Logosm.gif (1927 bytes)
navlinks.gif (4688 bytes)
Hruler04.gif (5511 bytes)

E. Barrett Prettyman, Jr., Inspector General
December 30, 1997




Dorothy Brizill
Bonnie Cain
Jim Dougherty
Gary Imhoff
Phil Mendelson
Mark David Richards
Sandra Seegars


DCWatch Archives
Council Period 12
Council Period 13
Council Period 14

Election 1998
Election 2000
Election 2002

Election 2004
Election 2006

Government and People
Anacostia Waterfront Corporation
Boards and Com
Campaign Finance
Chief Financial Officer
Chief Management Officer
City Council
Control Board
Corporation Counsel
DC Agenda
Elections and Ethics
Fire Department
FOI Officers
Inspector General
Housing and Community Dev.
Human Services
Mayor's Office
Mental Health
Motor Vehicles
Neighborhood Action
National Capital Revitalization Corp.
Planning and Econ. Dev.
Planning, Office of
Police Department
Property Management
Public Advocate
Public Libraries
Public Schools
Public Service Commission
Public Works
Regional Mobility Panel
Sports and Entertainment Com.
Taxi Commission
Telephone Directory
University of DC
Water and Sewer Administration
Youth Rehabilitation Services
Zoning Commission

Issues in DC Politics

Budget issues
DC Flag
DC General, PBC
Gun issues
Health issues
Housing initiatives
Mayor’s mansion
Public Benefit Corporation
Regional Mobility
Reservation 13
Tax Rev Comm
Term limits repeal
Voting rights, statehood
Williams’s Fundraising Scandals


Appleseed Center
Cardozo Shaw Neigh.Assoc.
Committee of 100
Fed of Citizens Assocs
League of Women Voters
Parents United
Shaw Coalition



What Is DCWatch?

themail archives

Statement of Stephen Harlan, Vice-Chair, Control Board; Chair, MOU Partners
Statement of Mayor Marion Barry, Jr.
Résumé of E. Barrett Prettyman, Jr.

The Control Board fired two previous Inspectors General for not having either auditing experience (Robert Thomas) or investigative experience (Angela Avant). Now, the secretive MOU Partners have selected E. Barrett Prettyman, who has neither investigative nor auditing experience, as the new Inspector General of the District of Columbia.

Prettyman has indicated that he will take the position on January 15, 1998. He has agreed to be Inspector General for only six months. He will accept no pay, since he will continue to pursue his current legal practice at Hogan and Hartson while he acts as Inspector General. As Inspector General, he will focus most of his attention on the Metropolitan Police Department. With the concurrence and approval of the MOU Partners and the Control Board, he will hire a senior deputy in the Inspector General's office who will be responsible for investigating waste and mismanagement throughout the rest of the District government.

During his press conference on December 30, 1997, Prettyman indicated that he secured his position through his long-time friendship with the current Corporation Counsel, John Ferren, who was also a senior partner at Hogan and Hartson. Prettyman indicated that he had no knowledge of or experience with the MPD other than what he had read in the newspapers, but he said that he believed the general public might feel a "lack of confidence" in the police department. Although he had no idea of the budget for or staffing of the Inspector General's office, he indicated that he intended to hire additional personal staff. Andrew Brimmer, chairman of the DC Financial Responsibility and Management Assistance Authority, said that the staff and budget of the Inspector General's office "will be expanded to meet Mr. Prettyman's needs."


Staff Office: One Thomas Circle, N.W., Suite 900
Washington, DC 20005 (202) 504-3400

December 30, 1997
CONTACT: Jim Davison


Good morning. The Memorandum of Understanding Partners called this press conference today to identify, and to recommend a candidate, for the position of Inspector General for the District of Columbia. Before I talk about our candidate, and his experience and qualifications for the position, let me that the MOU partners have followed, and what we expect from our nominee.

As many of you know, the MOU Partnership is comprised of Mayor Barry; the Chief of Police, acting Chief Sonya Proctor; the Authority, represented in the MOU by Constance Newman and myself; the Council of the District of Columbia, represented by the Chair of the Council Linda Cropp; and the Chair of the Judiciary Committee, Jack Evans; the U.S. Attorney, represented by Mary Lou Leary and Ramsey Johnson; the Corporation Counsel, represented by John Ferren and the Chief Judge of the Superior Court, Judge Eugene Hamilton.

Public Law 104-8 provides that the Mayor shall nominate an individual as Inspector General, and "the nomination shall be effective after a seven day review period of the City Council, and subject to approval by a majority vote of the Authority." For the purpose of this nomination, the Mayor, in consensus agreement with the MOU partners, has been actively involved m searching for, recommending for interview, interviewing, and selecting a candidate for Inspector General. It is through the MOU Partners that this recommendation is being made. We expect the Mayor, the Council, and the Authority, all represented through membership in the MOU, to concur with our recommendation.

We also expect that once approved, and in office, the Inspector General will make an investigation for mismanagement and potential corruption in the Metropolitan Police Department a priority. To make this point perfectly clear, we expect such an investigation to review fiscal operations, management functions, personnel policies, audit systems and controls, command relationships, and other activities of the MPD, all bearing on the efficiency, integrity, and statutory responsibility of that Department. The MOU partners also expect that special efforts shall be focused on the proper treatment of whistle blowers, eliminating retaliatory personnel practices (including unfair use of promotions and demotions), preventing abuses of leave and overtime policies, reviewing and improving personnel disciplinary policies and practices (including procedures for termination), reviewing and improving procedures for handling citizen complaints, and ending wrongdoing that is egregious but does not rise to the level of criminality.

Because the position of Inspector General is presently vacant and the fact that the Office has not reviewed the operation of the MPD, the MOU partners have felt it imperative that this position be filled immediately by a person of unquestioned ability, integrity, and zeal to carry out the full range of the Inspector General's statutory powers.

The words unquestioned ability, integrity, and zeal, define the man we recommend for the job of Inspector General. Mr. E. Barrett Prettyman, Jr., a D. C. resident of long standing, has a distinguished history of involvement and community service in the District of Columbia. He was the first President of the District of Columbia Bar, to which all lawyers admitted to practice in the District belong. He is a member of the American College of Trial Lawyers. He has been a partner in the law firm of Hogan and Hartson since 1964, clerked for three Supreme Court Justices, was a Special Assistant to the Attorney General and to the White House and was the special outside counsel to three Congressional Committees, including the House Ethics Committee investigation of the ABSCAM cases. Mr. Prettyman is one of the most respected attorneys in our city.

In addition, Mr. Prettyman is committed to Washington. He is underscoring this commitment by accepting this challenging position without compensation.

We believe Mr. Prettyman will be an independent, effective and active Inspector General, and we look forward to a close working relationship with him.

Back to top of page


Press Conference Announcing Nomination of Inspector General
December 30, 1997

I am pleased to be here today to make this most important announcement. Public safety in this city is the number one issue facing all of the stakeholders in the District of Columbia -- the elected leaders, the appointed leaders, the Congress and all of our citizens. People ought to be able to feel safe in their homes and cars, or walking on our streets.

Because public safety has taken on such a high priority, I joined with the Financial Authority, the U.S. Attorney, the Chief of Police, the Corporation Counsel, Judge Hamilton and the Council's Judiciary Committee earlier this year to form the Memo of Understanding, which I wrote to make sure that the District does a better job in ensuring public safety. The Memorandum of Understanding was accepted and adopted by all other partners, and it ought to serve as a model for the nation's cities.

The Memo of Understanding effort has worked. Crime is down in our city. Homicides are down this year-- more than 23 percent lower than last year. There are more police officers on patrol on D.C. streets. I think the MOU has had a very positive effect in our city.

However, some people have recently called into question the credibility and integrity of the Metropolitan Police Department. While I don't believe that there is massive or systemic corruption among the police, some people do believe this to be true.

All of the MOU partners felt the need to look at this to see if there was endemic corruption, or if recent revelations about the department were isolated incidents. We all had different thoughts about how to accomplish this.

Initially, I thought we needed an independent commission. However, this effort would have been fraught with problems. It could have taken three to four months to accomplish and this would not have been an expeditious way to conduct an investigation. The other MOU partners had other ideas and we finally settled upon a 3-pronged approach.

"The U.S. Attorney will investigate criminal activities; a special, investigative committee of the Council of the District of Columbia will investigate allegations of misconduct and mismanagement at the Department and the Inspector General will investigate and review the fiscal operations, management functions, personnel policies and other operations of the police department. Special efforts will be focused on proper treatment of whistle blowers, eliminating retaliatory personnel practices, preventing abuses of leave and overtime policies, reviewing and improving procedures for handling citizen complaints and ending wrongdoing that is egregious but does not rise to the level of criminality.

"The selection of a new Inspector General was done in a cooperative way. In my press conference on December 10, I indicated that I wanted input from the MOU partners as to who the Inspector General would be.

In the past, the Board and myself have had different points of view as it related to appointments. However, on this appointment all parties have agreed that Mr. Prettyman had the right qualifications and experience. We had a list of from 12 to 15 candidates and all narrowed down the choice to 3, and then chose Mr. Prettyman.

"The person whose name I intend to send over to the Council and the Authority is E. Barrett Prettyman, a man of integrity and vast experience in government and investigations work. Mr. Prettyman has served as a Special Assistant to Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy and to the White House. He has also served as special or outside counsel to three Congressional Committees. Mr. Prettyman is currently a partner with Hogan & Hartson. He has agreed to take this job without compensation.

"The city is fortunate to have a man of Mr. Prettyman's caliber available to them," concluded Mayor Barry.

A copy of Mr. Prettyman's resume is attached.

Back to top of page


1945- 1949: Yale University (B.A., 1949)

1949-1950: Reporter, Providence Journal (Rhode Island)

1950-1953: University of Virginia Law School (LL.B., 1953). Decisions Editor, Virginia Law Review; Winner, 1953 Moot Court competition; Winner, prize for best Note in Vol. 38, Virginia Law Review.

1953-1955: Law Clerk, successively, to Hon. Robert H. Jackson, 1953 Term, Hon. Felix Frankfurter and Hon. John M. Harlan, 1954 Term, Supreme Court of the United States

1955: Co-editor, Justice Jackson's posthumous book, "The Supreme Court in the American System of Government".

1955- 1963: Associate, Hogan & Hartson, Washington, D. C.

April 1963-July 1963: Special Assistant to the Attorney General of the United States.

July 1963-April 1964: Special Assistant to the White House and the President's representative on the Interagency Committee on Transport Mergers.

July 1, 1964-Present: Partner, Hogan & Hartson

Special Counsel to Committee on Standards of Official Conduct of the United States House of Representatives, "ABSCAM" investigation (1980 - 1981).

Outside Counsel to Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the House Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, in United States v. AT&T (1976- 1977).

Special Consultant to Subcommittee to Investigate Problems Connected with Refugees and Escapees, Senate Judiciary Committee; fact-finding trip to Vietnam (1967-1968)


Fellow, American College of Trial Lawyers
First President, District of Columbia (Unified) Bar (1972-73)
Past President, American Academy of Appellate Lawyers
Past President, D.C. Bar Foundation
Past President, PEN/Faulkner Foundation
Past President, the Lawyers Club of Washington
Past President, Washington Children's Fund
Commissioner (appointed by the Chief Justice), Judicial Fellows
Chairman (1965-67), Board of Governors, St. Albans School Washington, D. C.
Trustee Emeritus, American University, Washington, D. C.
Former member, International Advisory Group, Toshiba Corporation
Vice President, Supreme Court Historical Society
Member, Judicial Conference of the District of Columbia (since 1958)
Member, District of Columbia and Supreme Court Bars. Also admitted to practice in the United States Courts of Appeals for the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 11th and District of Columbia Circuits
Member, Committee on Appellate Practice, Appellate Judges Conference

Author, "Death and the Supreme Court" (Harcourt, Brace & World 1961) (winner, Edgar Allen Poe Award); "Petitioning the United States Supreme Court -- A Primer For Hopeful Neophytes", 51 Va.L.Rev. 582 (1965); "Opposing Certiorari in the United States Supreme Court", 61 Va.L.Rev. 197 (1975); "Supreme Court Advocacy:: Random Thoughts in a Day of Time Restrictions", 4 Litigation Magazine (no. 2, 1978) 16; "Differences of Opinion", The American Lawyer (May 1995) at 75; and other articles.

Argued: 19 cases in U.S. Supreme Court and cases in most Circuits.

Back to top of page

Send mail with questions or comments to webmaster@dcwatch.com
Web site copyright ©DCWatch (ISSN 1546-4296)