Logosm.gif (1927 bytes)
navlinks.gif (4688 bytes)
Hruler04.gif (5511 bytes)

Back to Gary Imhoff’s main page

Just Vote No on the School Governance Charter Amendment
Gary Imhoff
June 2000




Dorothy Brizill
Bonnie Cain
Jim Dougherty
Gary Imhoff
Phil Mendelson
Mark David Richards
Sandra Seegars


DCWatch Archives
Council Period 12
Council Period 13
Council Period 14

Election 1998
Election 2000
Election 2002

Election 2004
Election 2006

Government and People
Anacostia Waterfront Corporation
Boards and Com
Campaign Finance
Chief Financial Officer
Chief Management Officer
City Council
Control Board
Corporation Counsel
DC Agenda
Elections and Ethics
Fire Department
FOI Officers
Inspector General
Housing and Community Dev.
Human Services
Mayor's Office
Mental Health
Motor Vehicles
Neighborhood Action
National Capital Revitalization Corp.
Planning and Econ. Dev.
Planning, Office of
Police Department
Property Management
Public Advocate
Public Libraries
Public Schools
Public Service Commission
Public Works
Regional Mobility Panel
Sports and Entertainment Com.
Taxi Commission
Telephone Directory
University of DC
Water and Sewer Administration
Youth Rehabilitation Services
Zoning Commission

Issues in DC Politics

Budget issues
DC Flag
DC General, PBC
Gun issues
Health issues
Housing initiatives
Mayor’s mansion
Public Benefit Corporation
Regional Mobility
Reservation 13
Tax Rev Comm
Term limits repeal
Voting rights, statehood
Williams’s Fundraising Scandals


Appleseed Center
Cardozo Shaw Neigh.Assoc.
Committee of 100
Fed of Citizens Assocs
League of Women Voters
Parents United
Shaw Coalition



What Is DCWatch?

themail archives

For more information on the  School Governance Charter Amendment, see its main page.
This piece originally appeared in the Northwest Current and Georgetown Current, June 14, 2000.

This piece originally appeared in the Northwest Current and Georgetown Current, June 14, 2000.

In January, Mayor Williams proposed eliminating the elected eleven-member School Board and replacing it with a five-member board that he would appoint. The City Council countered with a proposal to reduce the size of the elected board from eleven to nine, and passed legislation that would have given voters a choice among a nine-member elected board, a five-member Mayorally appointed board, or the current system. At that point, the Control Board intervened and prevailed upon the Mayor and the City Council to agree on one "compromise" proposal — the nine-member divided Board of Education (five members elected, four appointed by the Mayor) that will be the subject of the June 27 election.

Neither the Mayor nor the Councilmembers liked the "compromise" proposal, and they still have not invented any rationale for how or why it will improve our children’s education, but they are supporting it on the basis that the voters should accept a bad idea simply because politicians couldn’t agree on anything else and compromised on it.

In the history of American education, this kind of divided School Board is an untried and untested experiment, and none of its supporters has demonstrated any connection between it and improving the classrooms in DC schools. In fact, improving children’s education isn’t the major aim of the Amendment’s advocates; they are more concerned with bringing off a power grab and with putting a big part of the DC government budget more directly under the Mayor’s and Council’s control.

No one argues that the DC Board of Education has performed well throughout its nearly twenty-five year history. For many years, dating back to the 1970’s, members of the School Board have acted in embarrassing ways and fought each other, and the conditions of DC schools -- physically and educationally -- have deteriorated. The Emergency Board of Trustees that ran our schools for the past three years, a Board that was appointed by the Control Board, has been just as contentious and ineffective, though it was in the news less often because it operated in secret.

But the proposed Charter Amendment won’t make the School Board work together better; it will only make things worse. It will divide the Board into two factions, part appointed by the mayor and part elected, guaranteeing that the Board members will always be at odds with each other and unable to work together smoothly. It will eliminate ward membership on the Board, lessening the accountability of even the elected members to parents and to the voters.

And it will lessen accountability in another way. The Mayor argued that he could be held accountable for the actions of the five member appointed board that he wanted, but he certainly won’t accept accountability for the actions of a divided board of which he appoints a minority of the members. And the elected members won’t be accountable, because they can claim that the Mayor’s appointees block and frustrate their efforts. The Amendment structure is a built-in excuse system, not a plan for accountability.

The Amendment harms the schools in other ways. First, it eliminates the independence of the School Board and subordinates it to the City Council. The Home Rule Charter created the Board of Education as independent and elected — in fact, it was the first and only body elected by DC citizens for several years. That is why the composition of the Board can be changed only by a Charter Amendment. But if this Charter Amendment passes, the Board of Education will no longer be independent. In the future the City Council will be able to change it in any way it pleases by simple legislation, without submitting those changes to the voters. Second, the Charter Amendment reduces the responsibilities and powers of the Board of Education, and further blurs the lines of "accountability" by reassigning some important responsibilities and powers to a vaguely described and undefined "state education agency" that will be created by the City Council.

You don’t eliminate the faults of democracy by eliminating or limiting democracy, but by working harder to nominate and elect good people to office. Appointed boards aren’t better than elected boards, but a divided board is worse than either. The Mayor’s judgment isn’t better than the people’s. Certainly this Mayor’s fumbling of his appointments to the University of the District of Columbia Board of Trustees doesn’t inspire confidence in his commitment to education, and nobody can trust what any future Mayors may do, or know whom they might appoint.

We voters must vote down this Amendment, reaffirm the District’s commitment to democracy, and concentrate our efforts on finding good candidates and electing them to the Board of Education.

Back to top of page

Send mail with questions or comments to webmaster@dcwatch.com
Web site copyright ©DCWatch (ISSN 1546-4296)