arcnav.gif (3459 bytes)

Back to School Governance Charter Amendment main page

Complaints about Illegal Campaign Activities by DC Agenda and the Mayor’s Office of Religious Affairs
DCWatch
June 19, 2000 and July 5, 2000

DC Watch Home

Council Period 12

Council Period 13

Council Period 14

Council Period 15

Election 1998

Election 2000

Election 2002

themail

Search DCWatch

Complaint on fundraising activities by DC Agenda Complaint on campaign activities by the Office of Religious Affairs
Affidavit by DC Agenda
Response by Office of Campaign Finance July 5, 2000, supplement to complaint of June 19, 2000

DCWatch
1327 Girard Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20009-4915
202-234-6982, fax 202-232-1215
http://www.dcwatch.com

June 19, 2000

Ms. Cecily Collier-Montgomery
Director
Office of Campaign Finance
2000 14th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20009

Dear Ms. Collier-Montgomery:

On June 16, 2000, John H. McKoy, president and Chief Executive Officer of DC Agenda, submitted an affidavit to the Office of Campaign Finance (attached) that admits that the organization had raised donations for "our efforts to support passage of the Proposed Charter Amendment III." This affidavit further notifies OCF that it had not expended any of the funds that it had raised for this purpose, and that it was returning all donations.

This letter is a formal request to the OCF to compel DC Agenda to file a statement of organization and a report of receipts and expenditures with the Office.

The relevant sections of the District of Columbia Municipal Regulations are in Title 3, "Elections and Ethics," Sections 3000.1, 3000.2, 3000.8, and 3009.1.

3000.1 Each political committee shall file a statement of organization, on a form prescribed by the Director of the Office of Campaign Finance (the Director), within ten (10) days of organization.

3000.2 Each political committee shall be deemed "organized" when any proposer, individual, committee (including a principal campaign committee), club, association, organization, or other group of individuals formally agree, orally or in writing, or decides to promote or oppose a political party, the nomination or election of an individual to office, or any initiative, referendum, or recall.

3000.8 For purposes for reporting and recordkeeping requirements, political committees shall include the following:

(d) Initiative, Referendum, Recall or Proposed Charter Amendment Committee — organized for the purpose of, or engaged in promoting or opposing initiative, referendum or recall measures or proposed Charter amendments, respectively. . . .

3009.1 Each committee supporting or opposing an initiative, referendum, recall, or proposed charter amendment shall file R&E Reports during the consideration of a measure for ballot placement, for any one election.

Under these sections of the regulations, DC Agenda had formed a political committee to support Charter Amendment #3, as shown by its actions in soliciting and raising money for that purpose. It was required by the regulations to file a statement of organization and a report of receipts and expenditures. It had been raising funds for more than ten days, and therefore had passed the deadline for filing a statement of organization. Even were it to disband prior to making any expenditures, it would still be required to file a statement of organization and a report of receipts and expenditures. There is no exception in the regulations that would exempt DC Agenda from this requirement simply because it disbanded the Committee.

In my supplemental filing of June 14, 2000, in MUR 00-01, I detailed the information I had as of that date regarding the establishment of this committee, dating back to the middle of May 2000. The DC Agenda committee did exist, and, having raised funds, was "organized" as defined by the DCMR. Therefore, I request that OCF require it to file a statement of organization and a report of receipts and expenditures immediately.

Sincerely yours,
Dorothy A. Brizill

cc: Mayor Anthony A. Williams
Councilmember Kathy Patterson, Chairman, Committee on Government Operations
Mr. Benjamin Wilson, Chair, Board of Elections and Ethics
Ms. Alice Miller, Executive Director, Board of Elections and Ethics
Mr. John McKoy, President, DC Agenda

Back to top of page


DCAGENDA
COLLABORATING FOR WASHINGTON'S FUTURE

DC AGENDA AFFIDAVIT

NOTIFICATION OF NON-EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS, RETURN OF DONATIONS AND WITHDRAWAL OF REQUEST FOR WRITTEN OPINION

TO: Cecily E. Collier-Montgomery
Director
Office of Campaign & Finance
2000 14th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20009

As a result of our review of relevant sections of DCMR regulations and the several telephone conversations with your staff since May 23rd, DC Agenda is concerned that we may be unable to comply fully with the requirements of the District of Columbia Campaign Finance Laws in the matter of our efforts to support passage of the Proposed Charter Amendment III.

We hereby notify you that we have not expended any funds and are returning all donations. In addition, we withdraw our June 8th request for a written opinion or confirmation of our reporting obligations.

John H. McKoy
President
6/16/00

Back to top of page


DCWatch
1327 Girard Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20009-4915
202-234-6982, fax 202-232-1215
http://www.dcwatch.com

June 19, 2000

Mr. Benjamin Wilson
Chair
Board of Elections and Ethics
411 4th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20004

Ms. Cecily Collier-Montgomery
Director
Office of Campaign Finance
2000 14th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20009

Dear Mr. Wilson and Ms. Collier-Montgomery:

Re: MUR 00-01

On June 16, 2000, the Office of Campaign Finance (OCF) issued an order in this case. That order said that, ". . . Mayor Williams is to immediately terminate all action involving the use of the resources of the District of Columbia Government to influence the outcome of the June 27, 2000 election on the matter of a Charter Amendment."

This order places upon the Mayor an affirmative obligation, not only to refrain from initiating new electioneering activities that involve the use of resources of the District of Columbia Government, but also to cease and desist from ongoing and already initiated activities using those resources that were designed to influence the outcome of the June 27, 2000, election. Mayor Williams has not ceased and desisted from such ongoing activities, and thus has violated the order.

In response to that order, Mayor Williams issued a press release (Attachment I) that stated that, "I respect the order of the District of Columbia’s Office of Campaign Finance regarding [the] School Governance Charter Amendment Act of 2000. My office has already acted in compliance with this order." Mayor Williams also said that, ". . . I intend to honor the letter and spirit of today’s order — we will not use government resources to advocate on this issue. . . ."

Prior to that date, in fact as early as June 9, 2000, Mayor Williams said in press and public appearances that he would no longer use government employees and resources to campaign for the School Governance Charter Amendment Act of 2000.

However, on June 18th, the attached flyer (Attachment II) was distributed by the Mayor’s Office in churches across the District. On June 13, 2000, Rev. Donald A. Robinson, Director of the Mayor’s Office of Religious Affairs, sent the attached letter (Attachment III) on the stationary of the Executive Office of the Government of the District of Columbia to ministers throughout the District of Columbia. In this letter, Rev. Robinson writes "on behalf of Mayor Anthony A. Williams," and requests ministers to circulate the attached campaign flyer, paid for by the New School Leadership Committee, which he refers to as "the Mayor’s ‘School Board Report Card’ flyer." The letter thus specifically identifies the political campaign committee’s flyer as "the Mayor’s." In his letter, Rev. Robinson also requests ministers to "circulate this flyer in your Sunday bulletins, display on your church bulletin boards and announce the significance of the ‘Education Referendum’ during your Sunday worship services." In addition, he gives a political argument for the Charter Amendment, and invites recipients of the letter to contact the Mayor’s Religious Affairs Office, "If you have questions, concerns or need additional information. . . ."

This letter was hand distributed to churches by government employees along with multiple copies of the New School Leadership Committee flyer that may or may not have been reproduced at government expense. It was distributed to a number of churches, among them St. Augustine Catholic Church, whose church bulletin of June 18, 2000, including the flyer, is attached (Attachment IV).

Writing and delivering this letter with the associated political flyer violated the Code and Regulations of the District of Columbia, as detailed in the OCF’s findings and order of June 16, 2000, and violated public pledges previously made by Mayor Williams. It also violated a US District Court Decision, District of Columbia Common Cause, et al., Plaintiffs v. The District of Columbia, and David E. Rivers, Defendants, C.A. No. 8-3528.

The writing and delivery of the letter did predate the OCF’s June 16, 2000, order. However, this letter was only the starting point of an ongoing activity. The letter requested ministers to circulate the flyer and to display and discuss it at their Sunday services on June 18, 2000. These actions took place after the OCF’s order had been issued and acknowledged by Mayor Williams. Between the issuance of the OCF’s order on Friday afternoon and church services the following Sunday, neither Mayor Williams, Rev. Robinson, nor any other governmental official took any action to withdraw the request to ministers or to inform ministers that the government’s approach to them violated District law and the OCF’s order.

Mayor Williams violated the OCF order both by his actions and, more directly, by his failure to act to prevent an ongoing violation of the OCF order. Mayor Williams knew that the distribution of this flyer would occur citywide in churches at the request of his Director of the Office of Religious Affairs on June 18, 2000. He knew that this distribution violated both the letter and the spirit of the OCF’s order, and yet he did nothing to prevent it. This deliberate inaction allowed Mayor Williams to profit from prohibited behavior after the issuance of the OCF order, and therefore violates the OCF’s order. I am requesting the OCF to reprimand Mayor Williams for violating its order and to determine and to take appropriate actions to prevent any further violations of its order.

Sincerely,
Dorothy A. Brizill

cc: Mayor Anthony A. Williams
Councilmember Kathy Patterson, Chairman, Committee on Government Operations
Ms. Alice Miller, Executive Director, Board of Elections and Ethics

Back to top of page


Office of Campaign Finance
District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics
Frank D. Reeves Municipal Building, Suite 420
2000 14th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20009
(202) 671-0550

June 20, 2000

Dorothy A. Brizill
Executive Director
DC Watch
1327 Girard Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20009-4915

Re: Preliminary Investigation 2000-101

Dear Ms. Brizill:

This is to acknowledge the receipt of your June 19, 2000 complaint received in the Office of Campaign Finance (OCF) regarding the possible violation of the District of Columbia Campaign Finance Reform and Conflict of Interest Act of 1974 (the Act), as amended, D.C. Code §1-1414(a) (1999 Repl. Vol.) and OCF regulations at 3DCMR §§1800.5, 3000.2, 3009.1 and 3009.3(a), by DC Agenda. Specifically, you allege that D.C. Agenda failed to file with this Office a statement of organization and a report of receipts and expenditures (R&E) while actively supporting Charter Amendment #3 the "School Governance Charter Amendment" (Amendment), which will be the subject of a special election on June 27, 2000.

D.C. Code §1-1414(a) states: "Each political committee shall file with the Director a statement of organization within 10 days after its organization."

At 3DCMR § 1800.5, it states: "Any political committee organized in support of, or in opposition to, a proposed Charter amendment shall file a verified statement of contributions with the Office of Campaign Finance."

At 3DCMR §3000.2, it states: "Each political committee shall be deemed `organized' when any proposer, individual, committee (including a principal campaign committee), club, association, organization, or other group of individuals formally agree, orally or in writing, or decides to promote or oppose a political party, the nomination or election of an individual to office, or any initiative, referendum or recall.

At 3DCMR §3009.1, it states: "Each committee supporting or opposing an initiative, referendum, recall, or proposed charter amendment shall file R&E Reports during the consideration of a measure for ballot placement, for any one election."

At 3DCMR §3009.3(a) it states that reports of receipts and expenditures shall be filed: "[o]n or before the commencement of the process for initiative, referendum, recall or proposed charter amendment."

Under 3 DCMR §3703, OCF is conducting a preliminary investigation to determine whether there is any merit to the allegations. A preliminary investigation is not an adversarial or adjudicatory process. However, we ask that you provide OCF with any further information you may have, memorialized in a written notarized document, with any necessary attachments, concerning this matter on or before June 30, 2000.

Please refer to the above referenced Preliminary Investigation number on all future correspondence. If you have any questions, contact Kathy S. Williams, General Counsel, on (202) 671-0554.

Sincerely,
Cecily E. Collier-Montgomery
Director

cc: Jean S. Diggs, Chief of Staff
Kathy S. Williams, General Counsel

Back to top of page


DCWatch
1327 Girard Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20009-4915
202-234-6982, fax 202-232-1215
http://www.dcwatch.com

July 5, 2000

Ms. Cecily E. Collier-Montgomery
Director
Office of Campaign Finance
2000 14th Street, NW, Suite 420
Washington, DC 20009

Re: Preliminary Investigation 2000-101

Dear Ms. Collier-Montgomery:

This is to supplement my June 19, 2000, complaint regarding the possible violation of the District of Columbia Campaign Finance Reform and Conflict of Interest Act of 1974 (the Act), as amended, D.C. Code §1-1414(a) (1999 Repl. Vol.) and OCF regulations at 3DCMR §§1800.5, 3000.2, 3009.1, and 3009.3(a), by DC Agenda.

Supplemental Filing of June 14, 2000

I am appending to my June 19, 2000, complaint the following information from my supplemental filing of June 14, 2000, with regard to MUR 00-01:

At a meeting during the latter part of May 2000 that was attended by Mayor Williams, Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton, Council Chair Linda Cropp, and several members of their staffs -- including Gregory McCarthy, Peggy Armstrong, and Mickey Seligman of the Mayor’s staff -- Mayor Williams discussed the need to raise $80,000 quickly for his campaign efforts. He indicated that he had in hand $45,000 that had been raised by Terry Golden, a member of the Control Board’s Education Advisory Committee, and by the Federal City Council. Mayor Williams also indicated that he was going to use a nonprofit organization, separate from the official campaign committee, through which he would funnel the bulk of the funds that he raised.

With this information, Gary Imhoff of DCWatch placed a telephone call to the office of Terry Golden on Monday, June 12, 2000, and spoke with Mr. Golden’s assistant, Ms. Tammy Butler (301-380-4780). He asked how to make a contribution to Mr. Golden’s fundraising efforts for the School Governance Charter Amendment. Ms. Butler called back within five minutes with the information that the check should be made payable to "D.C. Agenda," and sent to it at 1155 15th Street, NW, Suite 900, Washington, DC 20005, and to write on the memorandum line of the check, "Campaign for New School Leadership."

DC Agenda is a 501(c)(3) organization. It has not registered a campaign committee with the Office of Campaign Finance for the purpose of advocating for the June 27, 2000, special election, even though our information indicates that it has been accepting funds for this purpose for several weeks. It appears that this account has been established to circumvent disclosure of receipts and expenditures to the Office of Campaign Finance and to provide a tax-deductible shelter for contributions that would not be tax deductible were they given directly to the New School Leadership Committee.

Additional Call to DC Agenda

An additional telephone call was made to DC Agenda on Thursday, June 15, 2000. A staff member of DC Agenda informed the caller that contributions to support the School Governance Charter Amendment could be made by a check made payable to DC Agenda with a note attached saying "Attention Carrie Thornhill." Ms. Thornhill is the Vice President, Community Outreach, and the lead person for schools and education issues for DC Agenda.

DC Agenda Affidavit

Attachment A to the order issued by the Office of Campaign Finance on June 16, 2000, in MUR 00-01, is an affidavit from DC Agenda signed by its president, John McKoy. That affidavit is also attached to this letter. In that affidavit, Mr. McKoy acknowledges that DC Agenda had had conversations and consultations with the Office of Campaign Finance regarding its fundraising efforts since at least May 23, 2000. He further acknowledges that DC Agenda had been informed of the reporting requirements and that it had in fact raised donations in support of Proposed Charter Amendment #3. These acknowledgments by Mr. McKoy place DC Agenda squarely under the provisions of the DC Code and Regulations cited in the first paragraph of this letter.

Failure to Report

DC Agenda has failed to file the required statement of organization that was due on or before the commencement of its activities or within ten days of its organization as a campaign committee. It has failed to file the required reports of receipts and expenditures that were due at the same time as its statement of organization and on Monday, June 19, 2000. Based on the admission of Mr. McKoy that he had several conversations with the Office of Campaign Finance and was aware of the reporting requirements, it appears that the failure to file these required statements and reports was willful and deliberate, and neither inadvertent nor the result of ignorance of the legal requirements.

Thank you for the opportunity to provide this supplemental information. If you have any additional questions, or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,
Dorothy A. Brizill

Attachment

cc: Mr. Benjamin Wilson, Chairman, Board of Elections and Ethics
Ms. Alice Miller, Executive Director, Board of Elections and Ethics
Mr. John McKoy, President, DC Agenda

Back to top of page


Send mail with questions or comments to webmaster@dcwatch.com
Web site copyright ©DCWatch (ISSN 1546-4296)