arcnav.gif (3459 bytes)

Back to legislation introduced in Council period 14

Community Participation Protection Act of 2001
Bill 14-371

DC Watch Home

Council Period 12

Council Period 13

Council Period 14

Council Period 15

Election 1998

Election 2000

Election 2002

themail

Search DCWatch

Councilmember Sharon Ambrose

A BILL IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Councilmember Sharon Ambrose introduced the following bill, which was referred to the Committee on

To provide immunity from lawsuits for actions in the exercise of person's right of free speech.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this act be cited as the "Community Participation Protection Act of 2001 ".

Sec. 2. Immunity from exercise of right of petition of free speech

(a) A person shall be immune from any cause of action arising from any act in good faith of that person in furtherance of the person's right of petition or free speech under the United States Constitution in connection with a public issue.

(b) If a motion to dismiss the complaint is filed within 60 days of the service of the complaint or, in the court's discretion, at any later time, all discovery proceedings in the action may be stayed. The stay of discovery shall remain in effect until notice of entry of the order ruling on the motion.

(c) If a defendant prevails on a motion to dismiss the complaint or otherwise successfully asserts the defense provided under subsection (a) of this section, the defendant shall recover his or her attorney's fees and costs. If the court finds that a motion to dismiss or a defense under subsection (a) of this section is frivolous or is solely intended to cause unnecessary delay, the court shall award costs and reasonable attorney's fees to a prevailing plaintiff.

(d) For the purposes of this section, an act in furtherance of a person' s right of petition or free speech under the United States Constitution in connection with a public issue shall include:

(1) A written or oral statement or writing made before a legislative, executive, or judicial proceeding, or any other official proceeding authorized by law;

(2) A written or oral statement made in connection with an issue under consideration or review by a legislative, executive, or judicial body, or any other official proceeding authorized by law;

(3) A written or oral statement made in a place open to the public or a public forum in connection with a public issue; or

(4) Any other conduct in furtherance of the exercise of the constitutional right of petition or the constitutional right of free speech in connection with a public issue.

(e) The immunity conferred by subsection (a) of this section shall not attach if the person communicates information which he or she:

(1) Knew to be false;

(2) Communicates in reckless disregard of its falsity; or

(3) If such information pertains to a person or entity other than a public figure, negligently failed to ascertain its falsity.

Sec. 3. Fiscal Impact Statement

The Council adopts the fiscal impact statement in the committee report as the fiscal impact statement required by section 603(c)(3) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 24, 1973 ( 87 Stat.; DC Official Code §206.02).

Sec. 4. Effective Date

This act shall take effect following approval by the Mayor (or in the event of veto by the Mayor, action by the Council to override the veto), a 30-day period of Congressional review as provided in section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 813; DC Official Code §206.02), and publication in the District of Columbia Register.

Back to top of page


Send mail with questions or comments to webmaster@dcwatch.com
Web site copyright ©DCWatch (ISSN 1546-4296)