Proven Planning Ideas
Dear Planners:
Sam Shipley, sas821@hotmail.com, responded to my piece on the Rolling
Stones and Peter Pan (themail, December 2) to the Ward 5 listserv: "It’s
quite refreshing to see that Gary Imhoff’s ideas and thoughts aren’t
stupid ones from a smart man, but instead stupid ones from an
unintelligent and highly uninformed person. Always nice (and lucky?) to
have that as your opponent when policy changes are being proposed and
debated."
It’s nice to be appreciated.
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
###############
Two more candidates have announced for the April 23 special election
to elect an at-large councilmember to fill Phil Mendelson’s vacated
seat: Matthew Frumin and Jon Gann. That makes a total of seventeen
potential candidates so far: Sekou Biddle, Anita Bonds, Michael Brown,
Kwame Brown, John Capozzi, A.J. Cooper, Matthew Frumin, Jon Gann,
Patrick Mara, Ron Moten, Kathy Patterson, Carol Schwartz, Peter Shapiro,
Doug Sloan, Leon Swain, Ted Trabue, and Brian Weaver.
###############
Proven Planning Policies, Not Smart Growth
Karl Jeremy,
mayandkarl@gmail.com
Recent issues of themail have focused on lifestyle changes, either
implemented or proposed, by agencies of the DC government. Both the
Office of Planning (OP) and the District Department of Transportation (DDOT)
are on board with plans to alter the way residents live and move about
and the city operates. As Gary Imhoff noted In his November 25 column (
http://www.dcwatch.com/themail/2012/12-11-25.htm),
DC residents aren’t supposed to move outside their immediate
neighborhood much less their ward; and commuters should expect driving
in the city to become even more difficult.
There was a time when most decision making occurred at the local
level in DC. Change bubbled up to decision makers. The ability of the
public to affect decisions began to diminish when Adrian Fenty became
mayor and determined to run the city "his way." He brought Smart Growth
advocate Harriet Tregoning from Baltimore to head the Office of
Planning. In the time she has been at the helm, Tregoning has created a
strong power base, which allows the agency to impose changes with little
public input. It’s unclear whether Tregoning, who is not a planner, even
takes direction from her immediate boss, Victor Hoskins, Deputy Mayor
for Planning and Economic Development, or if the mayor has granted her
total autonomy. The public sees that Tregoning has strong empirical
knowledge and wields incredible power in the city, They see the outcome
of the campaign she has mounted to change the city very quickly. Even
the Zoning Commission comes to full attention when OP speaks and is
predisposed to approve whatever the agency proposes.
One of Tregoning’s well known handmaids, David Alpert, blamed "our
society as a whole" for building communities that aren’t safe to walk in
No doubt he was talking about a section of Wisconsin Avenue that has
recently been redesigned to ensure greater pedestrian safety and promote
walkability in Glover Park. While there aren’t hoards of people
currently walking on this section of the avenue, pedestrians shouldn’t
throw caution to the wind when they venture out there. DDOT has created
obvious vehicular/pedestrian conflicts on Wisconsin Avenue, and is
planning to implement a similar stupid design on other arterials.
Arterial choke points make moving folks around the city impossible in
emergencies. A quote from the October 17 issue of themail noted, "In
their view, cars are a blight on society that should be cut back
substantially if they cannot be completely eliminated. This coincides
with the views of Councilmembers Wells and Cheh and Office of Planning
Director Harriet Tregoning, and with the current fads and trendy
anti-suburban prejudices in urban planning,"
http://www.dcwatch.com/themail/2012/12-10-17.htm.
One current fad is the affordable housing coming to Ward 8. Hundreds
of minimalist housing units are planned for construction. The new normal
in DC housing will immediately feel like home to recent college
graduates, since the units are the approximate size of dorm rooms. Then,
when these kids are ready to move on to a larger affordable unit with
neighborhood appeal, OP proposes the conversion of unused garages into
two-story accessory apartments on residential lots. It seems strange
that homeowners, who feel a great sense of relief when their own kids
have left the nest, would convert their garages into mini-frat houses.
The Office of Planning will present the new zoning regulations at a
series of public meetings in each ward over the next two months. The
public has an opportunity to let OP and the Zoning Commission know that
it favors proven planning policies rather than the trendy anti-suburban
prejudices found in smart growth initiatives.
###############
Thank you so much for your piece "Rolling Stones and Peter Pan" [themail,
December 2]. I could not agree with you more! A couple of months ago I
had the opportunity to sit down and speak with David Alpert and he used
a similarly arrogant and short sighted argument with me. The only
difference was that in this case he was talking to a young person who
was not buying one bit of his propaganda. Rest assured, he does not
speak for the majority of young people in this city and most of us find
his attitude a bit off putting. After all the American dream that we
were sold in high school includes a house with a picket fence and a car!
My major issue with Alpert is that he seems to forget that there are
single parents out there who have to shop for families and cannot fit
those groceries on a bike or lug them across town on a bus. While David
Alpert may never have had to figure out how to get three kids under the
age of twelve to school during the winter months, thousands of
Washingtonians do. For them the best solution is a car. Why should they
have to make their elementary school aged children brave the public
transportation system when the elite of this city have their children
driven to school? His response is that cars cause pollution and traffic.
My response was that the bulk of the traffic in DC does not come from DC
drivers in the first place, it comes from Maryland and Virginia. I then
asked Mr. Alpert if he could choose to either have zero cars in DC or
cars with zero emissions, which one would he choose. He said zero
emissions. After hearing that, I informed him that perhaps he should
focus on lowering the emissions on cars rather than making them
inaccessible to all a but the wealthiest people in our city.
The basic fact is that Mr. Alpert does not know what it means to be
poor, have a family, or be a senior. That by itself is fine. The fact
that he has no compassion or willingness to take those people’s lives
and well being into account however is unacceptable. I am all for saving
the environment but not on the backs of our most vulnerable populations.
This is by no means a generational issue. It is an issue of those who
live in a bubble attempting to force other people to live by their
unproven and uncaring philosophies. Thank you so much for standing up
for residents who do not have the time or energy to argue with people
like Alpert. He seeks to divide and marginalize people. That is no way
to grow a city. I cannot tell you how encouraging it is to know that
there are people like you at there who will not let them get away with
it.
###############
The Guise of Caring
Barbara Patterson, Ward 4,
thebpatterson@rcn.com
I agree with you [themail, December 2] regarding DDOT’s summit: that
the plan is a "done deal" and that a public forum is simply formality to
give the public the guise of the city really caring what it thinks about
plans that city administrators and legislators will move forward. As for
David Alpert, it was disheartening to hear A.J. Cooper at a at-large
candidates forum where he echo an eerily similar sentiment that
dismissed older residents. Unfortunately, this city will not flourish
without the wisdom and institutional knowledge of older residents,
despite the haughtiness it’s showing thanks to gentrification by younger
transplants to the city. Shame on Alpert and A.J. Cooper.
I will try to attend DDOT’s meeting tomorrow, but if not, I won’t
feel that my input would’ve been valued by this administration. It never
has and likely never will until a Statehood Green Party member has a
strong voice in government leadership.
Also, I will write my councilmember, Muriel Bowser, and urge her to
vote no on the "Board of Elections Petition Circulation Requirement
Emergency Amendment Act of 2012" that would eliminate the requirement
that petition circulators for candidates be registered DC voters.
###############
Thank you for sharing Alpert’s concerns and yours [themail, December
2]. I watched the council committee meeting where he testified and was
infuriated by his disdain for anyone who not only drives, but needs to
drive — I am one of these persons so I dutifully wrote to the committee
members about my concerns that a large part of our community are being
ignored and that we, too, have needs.
###############
Peter Pan and Rolling Stones
Kent Slowinski,
wksla@aol.com
Re: Peter Pan, the Rolling Stones and the Supreme Court Justices [themail,
December 2]: Thank you. LOL
###############
Ward 5 Heartbeat
Winter Issue Now Online
Abigail Padou, Editor,
editor@ward5heartbeat.org
Hard copies of the newspaper will be delivered more than twenty
thousand Ward 5 households in the next several days. Ward 5 Heartbeat
is also online at
http://www.ward5heartbeat.org.
Ward 5 Heartbeat is a nonprofit community newspaper.
###############
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published
every Wednesday and Sunday. To change the E-mail address for your
subscription to themail, use the Update Profile/Email address link
below in the E-mail edition. To unsubscribe, use the Safe Unsubscribe
link in the E-mail edition. An archive of all past issues is available
at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com, and should
be about life, government, or politics in the District of Columbia in
one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to be
printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief
paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can
be put into each mailing.