In the last issue of themail, Karl Jeremy asked, “Why David Alpert?” Jeremy, a longtime civic activist in DC, wondered why Alpert, the founder and editor of the Greater Greater Washington blog, should have been given prominent positions by city councilmembers and bureaucrats who are creating policy regulating cars and drivers. Alpert and his followers want to promote public transportation, walking, and bicycling, so they advocate making it more expensive and difficult for the city’s residents to own and drive cars. In their view, cars are a blight on society that should be cut back substantially if they cannot be completely eliminated. This coincides with the views of Councilmembers Wells and Cheh and Office of Planning Director Harriet Tregoning, and with the current fads and trendy anti-suburban prejudices in urban planning.
Jeremy’s message didn’t cause any stir among readers of themail, but it did elsewhere. David Alpert himself replied in “Gen Xers and Millennials Are Not Going Away,”http://tinyurl.com/8enasmc, and Will Sommer covered the exchange in the City Paper, “Millennials Will Suck DC Dry, Says Grumpy Old Man,” http://tinyurl.com/9rk5cby. Alpert not only acknowledged that he didn’t know who Jeremy was; he parlayed his lack of knowledge into the speculation that “Karl Jeremy” was probably a pseudonym. Alpert isn’t alone in being unfamiliar with and contemptuous of civic activists who aren’t in his circle; most of the Greater Greater Washington crowd share his attitude. Among the “smart growth” circles, the most common criticism of civic activists is that they are old and therefore out of it. This is an ironic payback for the liberals and radicals of the baby boomer generation that in the 1960’s invented the motto, “Don’t trust anyone over thirty.”
Youth is important to the Greater Greater Washington crowd. But many of the commentators on Alpert’s article are anxious to clarify that they’re not all twenty-somethings. They are in their forties and even fifties, they insist, but they are bicyclists and think young; they’re just younger in attitude than others in their generation. Yet other commentators to Alpert’s article take a smug satisfaction in the thought that their anti-car values will triumph eventually, since their opponents are old and will die off (unlike themselves, apparently).
The real argument is not between generations, but between those who want a city that will accommodate all generations at all states of their lives — people when they are young and in school and all their wants and needs can be satisfied with a tiny, cramped dorm room and a bicycle and nearby bars; people when they are young adults and starting families; and people when they are older — and those who want a city that is designed just for those who are in the first stage of their lives or who want to prolong that first stage for decades longer than usual. Our city’s urban planners are now encouraging the construction of “microunits,” tiny apartments as small as 330 square feet, without dedicated parking spaces,http://dcmud.blogspot.com/2012/10/micro-units-at-wharf-could-be-dcs-first.html. These units can be understood as dorm rooms for people in a prolonged adolescence, people not part of a couple and certainly not part of a family, who live their lives in coffee shops and bars and who retreat to their cells only to sleep. This is the logical conclusion of “smart growth”; cramped spaces in crowded neighborhoods for singles. This development reminds me of nothing so much as Malvina Reynolds’ contempt for the suburbs in her song “Little Boxes”: “Little boxes on the hillside/Little boxes made of ticky tacky/Little boxes on the hillside/Little boxes all the same./There’s a green one and a pink one/And a blue one and a yellow one,/And they’re all made out of ticky tacky/And they all look just the same.” What an irony — a generation raised on contempt for the ticky tacky little boxes in the suburb grows up to promote ticky tacky microunits in the city.
I’ll give the last word to one commentator on Alpert’s article, “Crin,” who writes: “The letter writer [Karl Jeremy] would have been on firmer ground if he/she had simply asked: why are elected officials and professional policy makers deferring to David Alpert as if he’s some sort of policy expert? He’s not. He’s a technology expert who started a blog. The blog is a helpful and productive forum, so kudos to Alpert for that, but his opinion is no more insightful, helpful, or analytical than one of the commenters on GGW. Elected officials see him as a political king-maker that they have to kowtow to. Politics should never be mistaken as expertise.”
Must reading: Alan Suderman, “The Catania Conundrum,”http://tinyurl.com/c5vjfzh, about Councilmember David Catania and his employer, M.C. Dean: “Should DC really have a system where councilmembers vote on bills that affect how their employers, their employers’ partners, and their employers’ competitors do business here?”
Does Photo Traffic Enforcement Save Lives,
Send mail with questions or comments to firstname.lastname@example.org
Web site copyright ©DCWatch (ISSN 1546-4296)