. But Jonetta means
the kind of diversity that really counts, intellectual and political
diversity. That’s not the grounds on which our elections are fought. We
fight over sex and race, not ideas. Anita Bonds’ first campaign pitch in
the current special election was made to women, to whom she argued that
she should be elected because she is a woman, in order to increase (or
maintain) the number of women on the city council. Now that Michael
Brown has dropped out of the race, her primary pitch is that she should
be elected because she is black, to maintain the number of blacks on the
council.
Everybody else’s campaign pitch has been that he or she should be
elected because he or she is a Democrat, not a Republican, and Repugs
are just fuggly and should never be elected to any office ever. One
exception to that rule is Perry Redd, the Statehood Green candidate, who
argues that Democrats are too conservative, and should all move further
left. The other exception is Pat Mara, the Republican candidate, who
argues that he’s just as liberal as any Democrat on most issues, so his
party shouldn’t be held against him.
I don’t know. I want a real troublemaker on the council, one who will
challenge the group think and that keeps the current councilmembers on
their toes. The current councilmembers don’t like one another and don’t
work together as a team, but they don’t challenge each other on
ideology, policy, or their idiotic special pet projects, either. I would
like someone on the council who has a backbone and is smart, and who
starts some arguments over the direction of this city’s government.
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
###############
You really must try harder to sort out the characteristics of groups
whom you find objectionable. A case in point: how have the
nature-adverse urbanists of Washington come to be so attached to a brief
season marked by such a risky dependence on undependable weather?
I am a pretty typical urbanist, and I can assure you that it is cars
we are averse to, not nature. What could be better than deciduous trees
in the city, providing shade when needed, oxygen all the time, and their
elegance to the landscape? [An attached] photo shows my urbanist home,
my urbanist Yoshino [cherry tree], my urbanist vehicle (the bike), and
an example of the kind of vehicle (behemoth hipster truck) whose numbers
on my urbanist street I would prefer to see reduced.
I know you find the increase in bicycle traffic in the city a bother,
but my mode of transport does not emit particulate matter that causes
asthma, heat, and greenhouse gases that contribute to the urban heat
island or global warming, make potholes, or create gridlock. You should
be happy that every cyclist you see — even the pesky ones — are pedaling
along the margins rather than crowding yet another motorized vehicle
onto the street.
###############
How Strongly Held Are Anti-Automobile
Positions of Some Younger DC Residents?
Tom Grahame,
tgrahame@mindspring.com
Gary, it seems to me that you might have spotted the strength of
anti-automobile people earlier than I did. Look at what Jason Mitchell
says in an exchange on Larry Janezich’s blog . . . regarding a new
proposed residential building near the Potomac Metro, where the
developer wants permission to build a smaller number of parking spaces
than required. Please look at the insensitivity of a person named Jason,
who essentially tells me that I should move if I don’t like being
inconvenienced as a elderly car owner, and then my reply to that.
For context, I wrote: "There is also the issue of precedent to
consider. If one developer gets to build more apartments with less
parking, then it will be hard to say no to the next developer, and the
next, and the next. The result will be that the people who need to on
street parking the most — those who no longer can do all they need to do
on foot or on bikes — will have an ever more difficult time finding
parking near their home. If you want to do something about automobile
traffic and emissions, keep on raising the downtown parking garage fees,
which will incentivize commuters — who drive many more miles a year than
most DC residents — to take Metro. Please don’t punish the people who
moved to DC long ago, drive very little, but still need their car, in a
crusade against automobiles."
Jason replied: "DC is an urban city for all that entails. Where does
it say that a city must provide parking for all? If you must own a car
(and I would argue that I find it hard to believe that if you’re elderly
that’s the best way to get around) then you should either own a home
with off-street parking or perhaps move to a cheaper location which
offers a car-centric lifestyle. Your argument about people who moved to
DC long ago holds no water, as their home values have skyrocketed and
thus they could afford to move. Don’t forget that we’re still below peak
population levels in DC. Oh whatever did all those people do with less
cars back then? They chose to live in a city, as do we all that live
here. There are positives as well as negatives which go along with that.
Better public transportation, greater density, and better zoning helps
alleviate the need to drive even for those with special needs."
I replied to him: "Jason, perhaps the reason you find it hard to
believe that a car is the best way for us to get around is that you
aren’t there yet, and don’t know our activities! I won’t take up space
here to detail it, but I can guarantee that I need a car on average four
days a week, never to get to work (I walk two miles to work, Metro home
most nights). If you want details, please reply. I agree that greater
density around Metro stations is a good idea. I just don’t agree that
the greater density should be without parking, or very low parking. As
for moving, most of our social community, our social lives, are wrapped
up in Capitol Hill. We do not want to move. We could afford to, but it
would impoverish our lives greatly, we would no longer be near our
friends. We moved here when cultural attitudes to parking and commuting
were different, we were the oddballs because we did want to live in a
city, and didn’t want to commute by car. Please don’t tell us that we
have to conform to the rules of a new generation in ways that will be
difficult for us to accommodate, or leave everything we have known as
adults."
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS
Origami Mural Project at Yards Park with
Artist Iona Rozeal Brown
Marybeth Brow, DC Commission on the Arts and Humanities,
marybeth.brown@dc.gov
Meet DC artist Iona Rozeal Brown and learn about the ancient art of
Origami making. The public is invited to contribute to the installation
of DC’s first ever Origami mural! Thousands of Origami figures will
unite to form a work of art along New Jersey Avenue, SE, in Navy Yards
Park.
Join us at the corner of M Street and New Jersey Avenue, SE, from
10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. on Saturday, April 13. All ages are welcome.
Special thanks to The Yards and the Capitol Riverfront BID.
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published
every Wednesday and Sunday. To change the E-mail address for your
subscription to themail, use the Update Profile/Email address link
below in the E-mail edition. To unsubscribe, use the Safe Unsubscribe
link in the E-mail edition. An archive of all past issues is available
at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com, and should
be about life, government, or politics in the District of Columbia in
one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to be
printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief
paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can
be put into each mailing.