Dear Sequesterers:
Back in the September 25, 2002, issue of themail, I wrote,
"Bureaucracies know how to confront and confound budget cutters. My
favorite true story was that whenever the federal budget proposed a
funding cut for the National Park Service, the Park Service would
respond with its Old Faithful list of spending reductions. Reliably,
right at the top of the list, year after year, would be two things:
cutting the hours of service at the Washington Monument and closing
Yellowstone Park for a few weeks during the summer. Whenever the
bureaucracy gets to devise the plan, services to the public will be
slashed savagely before anybody in the bureaucracy loses a job, and the
most popular services will be the first to be cut."
So it makes sense that the introduction to this issue of themail has
been cut because of the sequester.
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
###############
I disagree with Gary’s opinion that opening party primaries to
members of other parties and to non party voters won’t solve anything [themail,
February 24]. First, there are many people here who are registered as
independents, and there is no such thing as an Independent party.
Accordingly, these persons really have no say as to who will be the
candidate for any office. If they vote at all independents have to vote
for whomever the other organized parties put up. Therefore, an open
primary may just bring more voter participation something sorely needed
in DC elections what with our dismal and frankly shameful voter
participation rate.
Second, to me an open primary will allow candidates — even those who
identify with the established parties — to appeal to the independents
who have a different view of the direction their party should take. For
instance, if a fiscally conservative Democrat were magically to appear
in the now open primary, the independents and others of that mind set
could possibly make that person the Democratic nominee. In that case,
even with the 75 percent Dem registration advantage, there could be a
change in the direction of the city’s fiscal policies. Now that would be
a welcome change. So I think an open primary may be an answer, if not
the answer, to our predicament, and contrary to Gary’ s position may
just solve something.
Perhaps others can think of other solutions, but we as a body politic
are simply going nowhere with the present one-party-rule situation. All
the candidates are cookie cutter copies of the incumbents, and during
the election season can only resort to calling each other names to
distinguish themselves from one another because all share the same
ideology and governing philosophy: tax and spend.
###############
Slanted Rules Indeed
Paul Basken,
paul@basken.com
It’s a strange myopia that leads one to travel the streets of this
city and this country to imagine the rules are slanted in the favor of
bicyclists rather than cars. Where does one begin? Are most roads’ width
designed primarily for cars or bicyclists? The spacing and timing of the
lights? The frequency at which they change? The number of bicycle-only
highways (please let me know when you find one)? The raw percentage of
pavement?
It is, of course, understandable on some level that folks who don’t
actually travel by bike on a regular basis have a badly misguided
impression of what it’s really like. Among many other things, as we see
in the comments from Mr. Howard and Mr. Jeremy [themail, February 24],
they tend to have a seriously unbalanced understanding of whether it’s
bicyclists who most need protections against poor driving decisions by
motorists, or vice-versa. Bicyclists who don’t understand things such as
the rate at which cars start and stop and accelerate, Mr. Howard, don’t
actually survive for very long. The notion that motorists somehow
understand these things better than bicyclists is a peculiar conceit of
motorists. Bicyclists have a very keen understanding of the penalty for
a failure of a moment’s attention. By comparison, the driver who is
surprised by a bicyclist is very often absorbed in multiple activities
beyond paying attention to driving.
Motorists are understandably upset by daily high volumes of traffic,
and picking on bicyclists is, for some, a cheap and easy way to vent. A
moment of reflection, however, might lead them to see that most of the
traffic around them consists of other cars, and that encouraging
bicyclists and making them feel safer could lead to a few more
bicyclists, and a little bit less car traffic. The analogy to the
devastation of the riots of last century, Mr. Jeremy, is an interesting
one. Among other things, the riots represented a call on people in a
position of majority power to think a little bit more about the ease
with which they accept the status quo. So yes, that kind of lesson might
be worth considering now, if we’d like to avoid leaving folks a
different kind of devastation in the coming century.
###############
Senior Transportation Grant
Darlene Nowlin,
darlene.nowlin@dc.gov
The Office on Aging (DCOA) is soliciting applications from qualified
entities to operate the Washington Elderly Handicapped Transportation
Service (WEHTS). The Request for Application (RFA) will seek an
organization to operate the WEHTS program, currently located at 2601
18th Street, NW. The deadline for submission is April 19 at 4:45 p.m.,
and no late applications will be accepted. A Pre-Application Conference
will be held on March 6 at 10:30 a.m., at 500 K Street, NE. The RFA is
available on the DCOA web site at
.
For more information, contact Aurora Delespin-Jones, Program Analyst, or
Brenda L. Turner, Program and Grants Manager, at 724-8821.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS
Save Our Schools Summit, March 14
Parisa Norouzi,
parisa@empowerdc.org
Join Empower DC for the Save Our Schools Summit, an information
session and rally building support for Empower DC’s lawsuit to stop the
planned closure of fifteen DC public schools impacting over 2,700
students of color. Thursday, March 14, 6:30-8:30 p.m., at Temple of
Praise, 700 Southern Avenue, SE. The session will include the
introduction of plaintiffs from impacted schools, introduction of legal
team, review of the legal strategy, expressions of support, and a call
to action.
For more information, to RSVP, or request transportation contact
Daniel del Pielago, Education Organizer, 234-9119 x104 or daniel@empowerdc.org.
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published
every Wednesday and Sunday. To change the E-mail address for your
subscription to themail, use the Update Profile/Email address link
below in the E-mail edition. To unsubscribe, use the Safe Unsubscribe
link in the E-mail edition. An archive of all past issues is available
at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com, and should
be about life, government, or politics in the District of Columbia in
one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to be
printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief
paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can
be put into each mailing.