.
“I had hoped Willoughby’s report would be thorough and independent,
since that is what people in such jobs are supposed to be. This thin,
biased 14-page document fails egregiously on both counts.”
What the Inspector General’s report has exposed is not the cheating
in the school system, but the more widespread and systemic corruption in
the DC government as a whole. The Inspector General’s office was created
by the US Congress at the same time as the Control Board and the
independent Office of the Chief Financial Officer. These were the three
entities that were supposed to keep the DC government honest and on the
straight and narrow path. Now the IG’s office has exposed itself as part
of the problem, as not just unable to investigate and expose the
misdeeds in the school system, but as part of the cover-up.
To date, there has been no objection, much less any outrage, from any
elected official. It’s part of business as usual as it’s done in this
government, making sure that nobody has to take responsibility for doing
anything wrong.
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
###############
This is indeed terrible news. I hope some clever person can figure
out a solution. I know that it was recommended we collect 37,000
signatures, but had hoped that 30,000 would be enough. Keeping voter
addresses up to date is a challenge. My husband died in 2005, and
although I told the people at the voting desk that he was deceased on at
least three occasions, it was not until 2010 that he was removed. Oh,
and his death certificate was produced by the DC government.
I was also running for political office with the DC Statehood Green
Party and BOEE was giving us a hard time around the primary in April. I
wrote several posts about the BOEE situation in April and May at my
blog: gleeaikin.blogspot.com. If you would like to be notified about
future posts you can sign up for notification by E-mail in the upper
left hand corner of the blog.
################
InTowner
August Issue Content Uploaded
P.L. Wolff,
intowner@intowner.com
This month’s lead stories include the following: 1) “Possible
Abandonment of Corcoran Gallery’s Historic Museum Building and
Relocation to Suburbs Deplored”; 2) “Streetscape Project Completed;
Adams Morgan Celebrates the New Look”; 3) “Annual Adams Morgan Day
Festival Plans Complete; Set for September 9th.”
Our editorial this month addresses the issue of taming Pepco’s
arrogance and urges that the DC Public Service Commission get on the
ball (From the Publisher’s Desk). Your thoughts are welcome and can be
sent by clicking the comment link at the bottom of the web page or by
E-mail to letters@intowner.com. The next issue PDF will publish early in
the morning of September 14 (the second Friday of the month as usual).
For more information, either send an E-mail to newsroom@intowner.com or
call 234-1717.
The August issue content is now posted at
http://www.intowner.com,
including the issue PDF. There will be found the primary news stories
and certain features, including the popular Scenes from the Past (this
month, the author’s final submission, is titled “How the Calvert Street
Bridge Came to be Built”) — plus all photos & other images; other
features not included in the PDF, such as Recent Real Estate Sales,
Reservations Recommended and Food in the ‘Hood, can be linked directly
from the web site’s home page.
###############
The Community Engagement Meetings Are about the IFF Report
Erich Martel,
ehmartel@starpower.net
On July 31, 2012, I attended the Ward 5 Quality Schools Community
Engagement Meeting, one of five ward meetings. It was initiated by the
DME (Deputy Mayor of Education) to address the recommendations of the
IFF (Illinois Facilities Fund) report, which recommends the closure,
“turnaround” or “transfer to charter operators” of 37 DCPS schools,
including five in Ward 5.
Before and during the Ward 5 meeting, the DME, DME staff and Public
Agenda facilitator insisted that the meetings were not about the IFF
report, but only to solicit the public’s ideas about school quality. In
discussion group #3, efforts to include a statement opposing the IFF
report were opposed by the DME staffer and the Public Agenda
facilitator. Their response was to minimize the importance of the IFF
report and to assure us that our concerns would be best addressed by
describing the elements of “quality” that we want to see in our schools.
The other part of their strategy was to split the participants into
multiple groups, have them spend the entire time discussing, making long
lists, then putting colored stickies on our preferences, and, finally,
reports from each group to the whole group. No time was allotted for the
whole group to vote on the recommendations it
This two-part strategy (divide participants into small groups; focus
discussion on broad generalities, instead of the real issue) is designed
to isolate concerned parents and community members in small groups and
limit discussion to an agenda that avoids the most important issues.
The resulting lists of “qualities” will be attached to the DME’s
recommendations, in his report. He will write that every quality
criterion can be met by closure, turnaround, or transfer to charter
operators, the IFF report’s recommendations. In the meantime, while the
DME is diverting parents and residents’ concerns into make-believe
discussions about school quality, the Public Charter School Board has
initiated a speeded-up process for “experienced charter operators” to
open new charters in DC by August 2013 and the DCPS Chancellor is
seeking charter authority to cover up her and Rhee’s failed reform
policies. Both charter initiatives have the full support of Mayor Gray
and DME Wright. The evidence (with links) supporting this analysis is at
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published
every Wednesday and Sunday. To change the E-mail address for your
subscription to themail, use the Update Profile/Email address link
below in the E-mail edition. To unsubscribe, use the Safe Unsubscribe
link in the E-mail edition. An archive of all past issues is available
at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com, and should
be about life, government, or politics in the District of Columbia in
one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to be
printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief
paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can
be put into each mailing.