Full Disclosure
Dear Washingtonians:
Happy Passover and happy Easter.
#####
The bywords of the reporting trade are “disclosure” and “the
public’s right to know.” That is, until it comes to the inner
workings of the newsroom and the “private,” “personal” lives of
the people who work there. See below.
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
###############
Professional Ethics, The Washington Post,
and Mike DeBonis, Part 2
Dorothy Brizill, dorothy@dcwatch.com
In Wednesday’s issue of themail, I wrote that Washington Post reporter
and blogger Mike DeBonis had for the past three years been dating Dena
Iverson. During that time, DeBonis worked as the Washington City
Paper’s Loose Lips columnist before moving to the Post in
May 2010 as a reporter and blogger on local District politics. Iverson,
meanwhile, worked as a senior press and communications person and a lead
spokesman in a variety of positions in Mayor Fenty’s administration
(as press secretary to Mayor Fenty, as spokesperson for DC Public
Schools Chancellor Michelle Rhee, and as communications director for the
DC Department of Health). She also worked in Mayor Fenty’s reelection
campaign in 2010, and most recently was the press and public relations
director for Sekou Biddle’s 2012 campaign for an at-large seat on the
city council.
Over the past few days, I’ve been asked whether this is just a
titillating piece of gossip, or whether it has more serious
implications. I’ve been asked whether I thought that DeBonis and/or
the Post and the City Paper should have disclosed his
dating relationship to their readers. For me, there are five central
issues: what did the Post know about their relationship? When?
What did it do to erect a fire wall to avoid a conflict of interest? Why
didn’t the Post and the City Paper inform their readers
about a conflict? And why did both publications allow DeBonis to cover
issues and write stories despite obvious conflicts?
In a telephone conversation I had with DeBonis on Thursday, he
maintained that who he dated was a personal matter that did not require
disclosure. Usually, who a reporter dates isn’t anybody else’s
business. Who a food critic dates doesn’t matter to me, unless the
critic dates a chef or restaurateur and then reviews his restaurant. The
chef’s competitors may also wonder how the food critic’s
relationship affects reviews of them. In this case, the paper should
have disclosed the relationship to its readers, so that they could judge
for themselves whether they thought the relationship affected the
reporter’s coverage. DeBonis and Iverson are both in the business of
politics, and the readers should have been told of their connection.
Erik Wemple, who writes below, was the editor of the City Paper when
DeBonis was its Loose Lips columnist, and he writes that public
disclosure wasn’t necessary because he was aware of the relationship
and managed DeBonis’ writing. Last week, when I wrote to DeBonis’
editor at the Post, he referred me to Eliezer Reyes, who
described himself in a telephone conversation with me as DeBonis’
supervising editor. Reyes told me that DeBonis did “come to us and
tell us” about his relationship with Iverson, and insisted that, “You
should know that he [DeBonis] did nothing wrong.” He would not
elaborate, but he repeatedly insisted that DeBonis did not write about
the 2012 at-large councilmember race at all, and said that during the
2010 mayoral race, “Nikita Stewart covered Gray and Tim Craig covered
Fenty,” and that “DeBonis did not cover Fenty at all.” Later that
day, the Post’s public relations/communications office,
informed of Reyes’ response, wrote that, “We have nothing further to
add.”
In covering the District, the Washington Post frequently
writes about ethics and conflicts of interest as they relate to public
officials and employees of the District government. In those instances,
neither Post nor City Paper reporters would accept such a
response. If a city councilmember voted to give city grants to a
girlfriend or boyfriend, and then said that the matter had been reviewed
internally in his council office and found to have been proper, and
therefore the dating relationship didn’t have to be disclosed to the
public, no reporter would buy that story. Why should we accept it from a
reporter?
###############
One of [Dorothy’s] questions was “What did the City Paper
know and when did it know it.” That’s a question that’s common in
delving into scandal. But to suppose that there is anything scandalous
about two young people with similar professional interests developing a
relationship beyond the boundaries of their jobs is unfair to Mike
DeBonis and Dena Iverson. Though I don’t know the details of the
relationship, it’s clear that they met through their respective jobs
relating to DC politics. Things apparently went from there. That’s a
dog-bites-man story. People with proximate interests date one another:
law students date law students; restaurant servers date chefs; reporters
date flacks and bureaucrats. Happens all the time.
Mike DeBonis told me about this issue once he was pretty certain that
it was something real. At a larger news organization, I, as editor,
could have transferred DeBonis to the Johannesburg bureau. At City
Paper, there was no choice. DeBonis is a beast of DC politics; he
was not changing beats. So we managed our way around the problem, such
as it was. When Mike had an inquiry to an agency where Dena worked, we
routed our requests through other officials. We dealt with it on a daily
basis, in other words.
It seems that you are committed to writing about this. That’s your
prerogative. However, I think that any piece on this very normal set of
circumstances needs to prove that this relationship somehow affected the
work that Mike DeBonis did for the Washington City Paper. What
stories were too kind to an agency for which Iverson worked? Or what
story leveraged the DeBonis-Iverson relationship to the detriment of the
city? Because talking about the relationship of these two people is fun
gossip and all, but unless you can show that the written record proves
something untoward, that’s all it is: Empty-calorie gossip. And if you
can’t cite repeated instances in which this relationship somehow
corrupted City Paper journalism, I wonder what the point of this
exercise is.
[Erik Wemple was the Loose Lips columnist for The Washington City
Paper.
Later, during the period when Mike DeBonis was Loose Lips, Wemple
edited The Washington City Paper. Then he was the editor
of the TBD web site (http://www.tbd.com).
Now he is a media critic for The Washington Post at “Erik
Wemple: A Reported Opinion Blog on News Media,” http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple,
and frequently writes on media ethics.] — Gary Imhoff]
###############
According to Ms. Brizill [themail, April 4], Mike DeBonis and his
colleagues must disclose every personal relationship, because if there
is no fire wall erected by DeBonis’s employer (The Washington Post)
his articles and those of his colleagues are, according to Brizill,
tainted. As a political reporter for some thirty years in which I
covered Congress, my late husband worked for a number of Congressman and
Senators, from Gary Hart to Tom Harkin, and as a couple we practiced our
own ethics. As a journalist, honestly I was frustrated, but my husband
for his and my protection (as well as the Senators who employed him)
made sure our professional relationships were never tainted even though
every time I broke a story I was routinely accused of obtaining help
from my husband. DeBonis is one of the few knowledgeable and talented
reporters covering the city. Brizill’s accusation is an attempt to
find corruption where none exists. Actually for the years I have read
Ms. Brizill, she has continually broad brushed all reporters as unclean
and their facts as illegally obtained from their friends. While I have
supported her efforts at uncovering corruption among public officials
and agencies, her attempt to go after Mr. DeBonis sounds like it was
just too quiet a day in DC and she needed to make deadline even if she
had to make something up. I don’t even personally know Mr. DeBonis and
I am not carrying water for the Washington Post, who I never have
written for in all these years.
[Diana Winthrop reported and produced for ABC News and was a
columnist on local affairs for The Common Denominator. — Gary
Imhoff]
###############
Gary, you write [themail, April 4] that you think that the electorate
supported the mayor’s endorsed candidates. I disagree. I think the
incumbents won for multiple reasons, chiefly due to the advantages of
incumbency. Early voting and name recognition favor incumbents. Of
course, incumbents have advantages in fund raising; all those money
orders help.
###############
Biddle vs. Orange — It’s Not Over Yet
Jack McKay, jack.mckay@verizon.net
As everyone knows, Vincent Orange leads Sekou Biddle for at-large
councilmember by just 543 votes. But provisional and absentee ballots
remain to be counted; could they change this outcome? The Board of
Elections and Ethics reports that 3,347 absentee ballots were sent to
Democrats before the primary election, and 1,553 had, at last count,
been returned. If we suppose that a total of 2000 ballots were received
by the deadline, this coming Friday the 13th, then, if 64 percent or
more of those absentee votes go to Biddle, he will have overcome Orange’s
lead and won the election.
How likely is that outcome? Scuttlebutt has it that most of these
absentee ballots will have come from Ward 3 type voters, of the
higher-income, west-of-the-Park sort. In Ward 3, Biddle won 71 percent
of the at-large vote, and in Ward 2, 62 percent. If those neighborhoods
are indeed the principal source of the absentee ballots, then it’s
just possible that Biddle could end up with a larger vote total. On the
other hand, Orange says that he’ll get absentee votes from senior
citizens, nursing homes, and — really! — the DC Jail.
My guess is that it’s going to be really, really close. And if
Vincent Orange prevails, it will be Peter Shapiro’s doing. His 5,616
votes — plus absentees — will surely have come mainly from Sekou
Biddle’s total. Shapiro was asked to withdraw, I am told, because
everyone knew that he didn’t have a chance, and his participation
could only swing the outcome to Orange. But he wouldn’t, and here we
are, wondering if the absentee ballots will change the election day
outcome to what would have been the result if he hadn’t played the “spoiler.”
###############
DDOT and Greener Storm Water Infrastructure,
Part III
David Jonas Bardin, davidbardin@aol.com
DDOT has begun to install green infrastructure to manage storm water.
In principle, it favors others doing the same. The District Department
of the Environment (DDOE) and DC Water also support green
infrastructure. But all three agencies regulate and may inhibit
installation of green infrastructure by one another or private
developers, as I explained at http://www.dcwatch.com.columns/bardin.htm.
DC has limited experience with green infrastructure in its public space
and has not yet adopted general policies to guide its regulators.
DDOT has lead responsibility for permitting installation of
facilities in DC’s public space — including green infrastructure
such as rain gardens in place of sidewalk. But DDOT may say no — or
put off a decision. DDOT faces legitimate, competing demands for use of
the public space, including transportation demands (think of MetroBus
shelters), public safety demands (think of security bollards), and
public utility demands (think of underground lines). Technical and
policy issues have to be thought through. DC has standards for concrete
sidewalks, governing installation, maintenance, and replacement by DDOT
and others. Not so for curbside rain gardens. Who would be responsible
for maintenance of a privately installed rain garden? How would DC
inspect and enforce compliance? If a utility has to access and replace
facilities under a rain garden, what level of restoration obligations
might it have afterwards? Where would it find competent contractors? To
what extent does DDOT want to leverage its own limited resources for
developing green infrastructure in the City-owned rights-of-way by
welcoming developer proposals pick up some of the challenge? DDOT
expects its Policy, Planning, and Sustainability Administration (PPSA)
to develop green infrastructure policies that will guide permit
decisions. Developers want PPSA to achieve clarity, leading to
predictable and timely permit decisions.
Until recently, agency staffers were expected to work it out
project-by-project in the absence of DC standards and policies for green
infrastructure. But three agency heads, Directors Terry Bellamy (of DDOT),
Christophe Tulou (of DDOE), and General Manager George Hawkins (of DC
Water) met on April 4 to begin to address green infrastructure
coordination issues. They reportedly resolved issues holding up two
projects “without setting a precedent” and committed to regular
meetings henceforth. Curbside rain gardens will be major tools for DC’s
realization of its green infrastructure potentials for handling storm
water flowing off streets and sidewalks. We may have to install
thousands of new rain gardens to achieve a Sustainable DC. That
challenges DC’s executive branch to achieve effective interagency
coordination and clear policies soon.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS
Waking Up in Eden,
April 9
Sue Hemberger, Friends of the Tenley Library, smithhemb@aol.com
Please join us on Monday, April 9, at 7:00 p.m., for this year’s
Henry Mitchell Memorial Lecture. Our lecturer will be Lucinda Fleeson,
author of Waking Up in Eden: In Pursuit of an Impassioned Life on an
Imperiled Island. It’s an event that should appeal not only to
people with an interest in gardening, but also to naturalists and fans
of memoirs. Here is Amazon’s description of the book: “Like so many
of us, Lucinda Fleeson wanted to escape what had become a routine life.
So, she quit her big-city job, sold her suburban house, and moved
halfway across the world to the Hawaiian island of Kauai to work at the
National Tropical Botanical Garden. Imagine a one-hundred-acre garden
estate nestled amid ocean cliffs, rain forests, and secluded coves.
Exotic and beautiful, yes, but as Fleeson awakens to this sensual world,
exploring the island’s food, beaches, and history, she encounters an
endangered paradise — the Hawaii we don’t see in the tourist
brochures.
Native plants are dying at an astonishing rate — Hawaii is called
the extinction capital of the world — and invasive species (plants,
animals, and humans) have imperiled this Garden of Eden. Fleeson
accompanies a plant hunter into the rain forest to find the last of a
dying species, descends into limestone caves with a paleontologist who
deconstructs island history through fossil life, and shadows a botanical
pioneer who propagates rare seeds, hoping to reclaim the landscape. Her
grown-up adventure is a reminder of the value of choosing passion over
security, individuality over convention, and the pressing need to
protect the earth. And as she witnesses the island’s plant renewal
efforts, she sees her own life blossom again.
After the lecture, Ms. Fleeson will sign her book, copies of which
will be available for purchase at the event (cash or check only). The
Tenley-Friendship Library is located on the SW corner of the Wisconsin
and Albemarle intersection, just across the street from the Tenleytown
Metrorail Station. Fleeson’s lecture will begin at 7:00 p.m., and will
take place in the large meeting room on the second floor.
###############
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every
Wednesday and Sunday. To change the E-mail address for your subscription
to themail, use the Update Profile/Email address link below in the
E-mail edition. To unsubscribe, use the Safe Unsubscribe link in the
E-mail edition. An archive of all past issues is available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com, and should
be about life, government, or politics in the District of Columbia in
one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to be printed,
and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief paragraphs
would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can be put into
each mailing.