April Fools
Dear Washingtonians:
Faithful readers of themail are familiar with the work of stellar DC
Public Schools teacher Erich Martel. If you’re not, go to http://www.dcpswatch.com/martel
and review a few of the things he has written over the past ten years.
Now he has resigned, and the story of how DCPS forced that resignation
has been told by Jay Matthews in the Post, http://tinyurl.com/6q5dxvp.
DCPS is engaged in an anti-teacher project, begun under Chancellor
Michelle Rhee and Mayor Adrian Fenty, and continuing today. The old
military saying was that there are three ways to do things: the right
way, the wrong way, and the Navy way. That third way is just adherence
to rules, which are neither right nor wrong; they are just the rules.
The lesson DCPS teaches teachers is not to stick out, and definitely not
to stick up for doing things the right way. Martel got into trouble for
doing things the right way, and that is something DCPS — and the DC
government — punishes rather than rewards.
I wish this were an April Fools post, and that at the end I could
say, “Fooled you. You didn’t really believe such an outrageous hoax,
did you?” It’s not, and I can’t say that.
#####
Also not a hoax: there’s a primary election Tuesday.
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
###############
Tuesday’s Primary Election
Dorothy Brizill, dorothy@dcwatch.com
On Tuesday, April 3, DC voters will go to the polls to vote in party
primaries (Democratic, Republican, and Statehood Green) being held for a
host of local offices, including councilmembers (at-large, Wards 2, 4,
7, and 8), Shadow DC Representative and Senator, and Congressional
Delegate. Early indications suggest that there will be a low-water
turnout on election day, due in large measure to the fact that the date
for the primary, which previously was held in September after Labor Day,
is being held for the first time in April. Many District residents are
still unaware of Tuesday’s primary election. It should also be noted
that part District primaries that have been held when there wasn’t a
mayoral contest on the ballot have traditionally had low voter turnouts
(e.g., 42,570 votes cast by 12.84 percent of all registered
voters in 2008, as compared to 137,586 votes cast by 34.14 percent in
2010 when there was a spirited mayoral contest on the ballot). In
addition, it is still not known whether the early voting centers in each
ward will have made voting easier and will increase total voter
participation. Perhaps the biggest unknown factor centers around what
impact the ongoing scandals in the District government will have. In
many instances, there is widespread anger, creating apathy among voters
regarding the District’s elected leadership. On the other hand, many
are so disgusted that they simply want an opportunity to clear house and
throw all the bums out of elected office.
The current ongoing federal investigations of past political
campaigns (e.g., Council Chairman Kwame Brown and Mayor Vincent
Gray) and the political contributions of businessman Jeffrey Thompson
have had a chilling effect on all campaigns. Contributions, by and
large, are lower than in part years. Campaign contributions who would
normally donate are now leery about giving at all. In addition, the
campaign finance reports for all the primary candidates indicate that
there is less bundling of contributions and only infrequent use of money
orders and campaign checks. Because many candidates were severely
criticized at candidate forums for their acceptance of corporate
contributions, there also appears to have been a decline in such
largesse from the business community. In short, for this primary
election season, there hasn’t been the freewheeling spending of funds
that we have seen in past elections — no television ads as well as
fewer mailings, paid campaign workers, and posters.
Because we have changed our election calendar in the District by
moving the primary from September to April, it is possible that
candidates who lose the primary election on Tuesday could run again Fas
independents in the November 6 general election. No law forbids it. In
the past, the deadline to register as an independent in the general
election preceded the primary. This year, however, petitions to appear
on the November ballot as an independent will be available from the
Board of Elections starting on June 15, and they must be filed by August
8. That gives candidates who lose their primaries plenty of time to
regroup and register as independents in order to run in November.
[The last paragraph of Dorothy’s message in today’s issue of themail
was wrong. It read, “Because we have changed our election calendar in
the District by moving the primary from September to April, it is
possible that candidates who lose the primary election on Tuesday could
run again as independents in the November 6 general election. No law
forbids it. In the past, the deadline to register as an independent in
the general election preceded the primary. This year, however, petitions
to appear on the November ballot as an independent will be available
from the Board of Elections starting on June 15, and they must be filed
by August 8. That gives candidates who lose their primaries plenty of
time to regroup and register as independents in order to run in
November.”
[There is a separate free-standing provision of the DC Code that does
prevent candidates who lose a primary election from running in the
general election. It just hasn’t had any effect before now because the
primaries have always been close enough to the general elections to
disqualify candidates simply because of timing. The provision is D.C. Code
§1-1001.08(j)(2): “Nominations under this subsection for candidates
for election in a general election to any office referred to in
paragraph (1) of this subsection shall be of no force and effect with
respect to any person whose name has appeared on the ballot of a primary
election for that office held within 8 months before the date of such
general election.” The general election will be seven months after the
primary, so this section will apply.]
################
In the March 29 edition of themail, Dorothy Brizill reported, “Vincent
Orange had a luncheon on March 19 for more than one hundred twenty-five
seniors at the Eclipse Restaurant on Bladensburg Road, and after the
luncheon he transported them and five school buses and a
fifteen-passenger van to BOEE’s early voting center at Judiciary
Square to cast their ballots.” Isn’t this buying votes and what a
disgusting example of civic responsibility — seniors’ votes being
bought off for a free lunch. Vincent Orange is the councilmember who led
his black colleagues in a vote of support for the gas station magnate,
Joe Mamo. Their vote guarantees that gas prices will remain high at over
half the gas stations in the city, and Vincent Orange’s campaign
coffers will remain full.
The contrast between slimeballs like Vincent Orange and reputable
guys like Phil Mendelson used to be noticeable, but the difference is
narrowing. Mendelson’s council votes, like Vincent Orange’s, are
being bought. Residents once regarded Phil Mendelson as the “go to”
member of the DC council, but it appears Phil is no longer working on
behalf of DC residents. Politicians are expected to accept campaign
contributions, but the obvious quid pro quo is rarely as apparent
as Ann Loikow reported relative to the Betty Noel vote, “Councilmember
Mendelson received three thousand dollars in campaign contributions from
Pepco. This was more than the other members of the Committee.
Councilmember Bowser received $2,300, Alexander $1,900, Graham $1,800,
and Cheh nothing. . . . The DC Chamber of Commerce, one of the very,
very few entities beside Pepco to oppose Betty Noel’s nomination to
the Public Service Commission, gave Mendelson $5,000, Alexander $3,300,
Bowser $3,200, Graham $2,300 and nothing to Cheh. Donna Cooper, a Pepco
Vice President, is on the DC Chamber’s board of directors.”
In spite of the free lunches and bus rides, most DC voters are tired
of politics as usual and corrupt leaders. This might explain voter
apathy.
###############
Meeting on a Redskins’ Training Facility
Bryce A. Suderow, streetstories@juno.com
On the night of March 23, about four hundred citizens met with Mayor
Gray and City Councilmembers Evans, Alexander, and Michael Brown. They
were there to voice their opposition to the plan of the mayor and some
councilmembers to locate a Redskins training camp on Reservation 13, the
area along the Anacostia River that includes DC General and the DC jail.
Brown and the mayor made a major error when they appealed to the
citizens to support their plan because of their supposed love for the
Redskins. The problem was 85 percent of the attendees were white, and
many of them were newcomers who disliked the Redskins because they keep
losing games. The citizens rejected the appeal and remained opposed to
the facility.
Many citizens believe that a training facility is merely a first step
in a plan to bring the Redskins back to play in DC at RFK Stadium. At
the very least, this talk about the training facility serves — Gray
hopes — to divert attention from the investigation of corruption of
his administration. I believe that if Gray succeeded in bringing the
training facility to DC, many people would forget about his corruption
and vote him in for another term because they are so irrational about
their football team.
###############
DDOT and Greener Storm Water Infrastructure
(Part I)
David Jonas Bardin, davidbardin@aol.com
Many people connect livability of a city with tree canopy and
landscaping — both public and private. Many cities, including ours,
now strive for that kind of livability. Hard, impervious surfaces both
advance and obstruct livability. For example, we prefer walking or
riding on pavement rather than on mud or dust. But pavement competes
with flora and raises summer temperatures (the “heat island effect”)
and causes rainwater to run off quickly, rather than soaking into the
ground — and that runoff causes erosion, demand for storm sewers, and
federally-mandated costs to limit impacts on rivers and creeks, costs
which DC Water customers or DC taxpayers will have to bear.
Mayor Gray’s advocacy for a sustainable DC raises the issue of how
to balance pros and cons of impervious surfaces. One might think this is
mainly a matter of buildings with impervious roofs. Not so. All DC’s
private and public office buildings and residences combined account for
only 36 percent of our impervious area. In contrast, streets, roads,
sidewalks, and alleys account for 47 percent, citywide — and much more
in the most densely-developed parts of our city.
The District government itself, through its Department of
Transportation (DDOT), paves, owns, and manages almost all of these
streets, roads, sidewalks, and alleys. So DDOT feels challenged to
convert some of its surface holdings from impervious to porous. I
summarize that challenge and how DDOT has begun to address it in a paper
posted at http://www.dcwatch.com/columns/bardin.htm.
Costs of runoff from DDOT’s impervious surfaces are an “externality.”
Others have to pay for remedying perceived harm, as a subsequent posting
will explain, but DDOT does not. In the absence of price signals, Mayor
Gray and DDOT Director Bellamy must find other ways to measure and
address the costs of DDOT impervious surfaces to the people of DC so as
to set and achieve reasonable green infrastructure goals.
###############
Baruti Jahi for Ward Four Councilmember
Artee Milligan, Ward Four, ajmilligan@aol.com
I am endorsing Baruti Jahi for Ward Four councilmember. In addition
to his intelligence, leadership, and critical thinking skills, he is a
hard worker. He led the effort to repeal the tax on seniors levied by
Muriel Bowser. She voted to tax pension payments at the District of
Columbia’s highest tax rate of 8.95 percent. Jahi would never vote to
tax seniors, given their limited incomes and high bills; in particular,
in light of the proposed rate hike by Pepco.
Most recently, Ms. Bowser voted to defeat Betty Noel’s appointment
to the Public Service Commission (PSC). When Pepco and several council
members questioned whether her previous position as an advocate for the
District’s residents would impact her vote, an expert panel determined
that with Ms. Noel on the PSC it would be able to carry out its role to
oversee utility companies without a problem. Although Ms. Bowser was
aware of the expert panel’s findings, she still voted against her.
Betty Noel is a long time, valuable prominent resident of Ward Four. Ms.
Bowser voted against one of our own. Mr. Jahi would vote for Betty Noel
who is an expert in utility regulation, and has also spent her entire
career fighting for the interests of District residents. Pepco has
requested and received three rate increases over the last three years.
Pepco is a struggling utility company. The rates hikes they receive do
little more than put a band aid on operational issues in the company
that requires surgery. While most stocks are up for the year, Pepco (POM)
stock is down. It needs this rate hike to prop up its stock price. Betty
Noel’s appointment to the PSC would have guaranteed greater scrutiny
over Pepco rate hike increases.
When Fenty asked Bowser to vote for an outsider to run our school
system, she voted yes for Michelle Rhee. Ms. Rhee had two years of
experience in the classroom before she became Chancellor. She left DCPS
in a worst position than it was before she was hired.
Ms. Bowser repeatedly votes against Ward Four residents and for
business interests. She voted against Ward Four residents and in favor
of building two Wal-Mart stores. They are located at the very busy
intersection of Missouri and Georgia Avenues and Riggs Road and South
Dakota Avenue. Jahi is a founder of “Ward Four Thrives,” a community
group that opposes the construction of the Wal-Mart stores. Mr. Jahi
understands and appreciates the role of government and importance of
public service. He knows that a councilmember’s role is to serve the
public and not serve a puppet to business interests. He will fight for
ethics reform, education, reduced crime and safe streets. He will stop
the deficit spending and lower our taxes. Dr. Baruti Jahi has the
intelligence and the courage to always fight to make Ward Four number
one.
###############
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every
Wednesday and Sunday. To change the E-mail address for your subscription
to themail, use the Update Profile/Email address link below in the
E-mail edition. To unsubscribe, use the Safe Unsubscribe link in the
E-mail edition. An archive of all past issues is available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com, and should
be about life, government, or politics in the District of Columbia in
one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to be printed,
and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief paragraphs
would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can be put into
each mailing.