Chaos Theory
Dear Observateurs:
The personal politics of the politicians on the city council played
themselves out this week in a way that no one could have been predicted.
Council Chairman Kwame Brown decided that he wanted to replace
Councilmember Tommy Wells as chairman of the Committee on Public Works
and Transportation, and he informed Wells of that on Monday evening, the
evening before Tuesday’s legislative session. As I wrote in themail on
June 29, Wells was ill-suited to head that committee because of his
ideological commitment to making automobile transportation — a key and
indispensable element of the city’s transportation policy —
difficult and expensive, and of encouraging such impracticable
strategies as streetcars and bicycling to replace cars.
Upon being told that he would lose the Transportation Committee,
Wells immediately informed the Greater Greater Washington group, and it
began spinning Wells’ story beyond recognition, as that of the “progressive,”
“good government,” councilmember who was being attacked by the
corrupt council chairman who wanted to punish his honesty. Wells had no
past identification with good government causes, but by Tuesday that was
the press narrative that had been set. The problem for the press was
that the real world wouldn’t follow the narrative. When the question
of whether to reshuffle committee chairmanships came before the council,
Wells was alone, not only with no ally to vote for his chairmanship, but
with no ally even to speak for him in the debate. In fact, there was no
debate, as there would have been if the issue really were just a
personal struggle between the chairman and a councilmember who had been
critical of him.
What this event revealed was that the council has become fragmented.
There are no caucuses, no alliances; there aren’t even any
friendships. It’s every councilmember for himself or herself, and with
so many councilmembers under suspicion and investigation, it will remain
that way for years to come. Wells and Greater Greater Washington had
tried to portray Wells as the head of a “progressive caucus” on the
council; if so, this event exposed the progressive caucus as a caucus of
one, like Bernie Sanders is the leader as well as the sole member of the
Socialist Party in Congress. It exposed the weakness and lack of
influence of the young, rich, white, urban gentrifiers who fantasized
themselves both as the only demographic sliver whose interests should be
served by the city government and as the natural leaders of government.
But it also exposed the weakness of every councilmember, none of whom
could count on the votes of any of the others. This is a council with no
leaders. Under these circumstances, each issue, each vote, will stand on
its own, with no better than ever-shifting and unpredictable temporary
alliances. Everything is in flux, and will remain in flux.
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
###############
The Atlanta Scandal: Teaching in “A Culture
of Fear, Intimidation, and Retaliation”
Erich Martel, ehmartel at starpower dot net
The eight-hundred-page Investigation Report on the Atlanta Public
Schools (APS) cheating scandal, involving 178 named school-based
principals, teachers and other staff links the collapse of institutional
integrity to “a culture of fear, intimidation, and retaliation.”
Although that culture can be found in many private and charter schools,
it is a major ingredient in the growing trend of top-down,
privately-funded, “turn-around” “reforms” in our public schools
that view teachers, tenure rights, and union protections as the causes
of educational malaise. Until reform truly engages teachers as part of
the solution, we can expect more Atlanta’s in our nation’s public
schools.
The Atlanta Investigation Report is an anthology of teacher
disempowerment, abuse and the consequences for both students and
teachers. It shows what happens when educational policy makers and
governance bodies delegate broad areas of authority to celebrity or
savior superintendents and then, self-satisfied with their “reform,”
abdicate their oversight responsibilities, so they can bask in the glow
of their creation.
[Links to the three volumes of the report and its exhibits, are at http://tinyurl.com/63vztjv.]
###############
WMATA Will Never Get It Together Now
Rose Robinson, ward411@yahoo.com
Not that Metro doesn’t already have enough problems on their hands.
But now Muriel Bowser has been added to their board. Oh, my God! You
will be taking the steps even more now, and please watch the tracks.
Kwame Brown: if a person cannot service the residents of her own ward
how in the Hell do you expect her to offer help to Metro?
###############
PEPCO Seeks $42.1 Million Rate Increase
Sandra Mattavous-Frye, info@opc-dc.gov
On Friday, July 8, PEPCO filed a rate request that may represent a
new low for a regulated utility nationwide. Just one day after a DC
council hearing on a bill aimed at addressing chronic reliability
problems, and sandwiched between news reports again highlighting its “worst
in the nation relationship” with customers, PEPCO requested another
massive rate increase. This request comes even as consumers and public
officials continue to express concerns about PEPCO’s performance.
PEPCO has received rate increases totaling over $47 million since
January 2008, with little improvement in PEPCO’s performance. This
case suggests that consumers should expect more of the same in the near
future. In this case the company has boldly called for a 34 percent
increase in distribution rates, resulting in a 38 percent increase in
the customer charge for summer months and a 39 percent in the customer
charge for winter months. Ratepayers are also expected to pay PEPCO for
the loss of use of their traditional electric meters because PEPCO has
already requested and won approval to proceed with the changeover to
digital smart meters.
Ironically, PEPCO also seeks $7.4 million for a Reliability
Investment Recovery Mechanism, or “RIM,” surcharge. This surcharge
would allow PEPCO to recover reliability related expenses outside the
context of a rate case. Ratepayers would pay a recurring fee for PEPCO’s
efforts to provide service, as one consumer described it, “above Third
World status.” Additionally, the company seeks $3.2 million for
initiatives it has undertaken to “enhance customer service.” Again,
these requests raise questions about what PEPCO has done with the monies
it received in the last two rate proceedings.
###############
Money, Media, and the Culture of Corruption
Leo Alexander, Ward 4, la@alexandersolutions.us
Last week, Colbert King wrote a column, “Do They
Deserve To Be on the DC Council?” [http://tinyurl.com/65curxy].
I immediately took exception with this utterly ridiculous
characterization, because the writer and his paper are directly
responsible for creating this culture of corruption that currently
exists at city hall. Of course the writer makes some valid points about
why incumbents frequently win reelection, but what he fails to do is
look in the mirror. King is one of the most respected members of the
local media and is also held in high esteem in the black community, but
he failed both by publishing a column that absolves The Washington
Post of any responsibility in this current climate of pay-to-play
politics.
In the summer of 2009, when I made the decision to run for mayor of
the District of Columbia, I knew I had two things going against me —
the lack of name recognition and money. But I also knew I had one thing
that neither the incumbent or any other career politician had – a
platform that would positively impact every community in the District.
So our strategy was very simple, announce a year out and stay alive
until we got to the mayoral debates by touching as many people as
possible through coffee chats, meet and greets, and neighborhood
canvassing. Our media strategy was to win the debates and then our
campaign and platform would garner free media coverage. We got some from
Fox 5, Mark Seagraves on Channel 50, Bruce Johnson on Channel 9, Deborah
Simmons at the Washington Times, City Paper, Jonetta Rose Barras’
radio show, Kojo’s radio show, and the Afro, but only one
mention in the Washington Post, from the Palisades/Foxhall
mayoral debate, held on June 3, 2010. That one article was important
because the writer, Tim Craig, said that, “Leo Alexander was the
surprise of the evening,” so much so that the concern among the
attendees was which campaign would my candidacy impact the most, Fenty
or Gray. After that article, however, it was a literal blackout from the
Post. No follow ups — no nothing. Even with its shrinking
readership and revenues, The Washington Post still remains the
eight-hundred-pound gorilla in this media market. Local TV and radio
news stations plan their daily coverage by what is in the Metro section
of The Post. So if a candidate doesn’t get coverage they don’t
exist, and if you don’t exist you cannot raise enough money to
compete.
This is why I was so thoroughly disgusted with Colbert King’s
column. Post reporters are told to cover candidates only with
money regardless of where that special interest dough came from; i.e.,
developers, unions, or the business community. Once these candidates get
into office there’s rarely any investigative follow up on how these
contributions affect legislation and/or contracting opportunities.
Instead, what is covered is all the obvious acts of petty materialism,
waste, and corruption like multiple Navigators, allegations of campaign
finance fraud, and hiring scandals. This happens because this paper
places more weight on money versus ideas. Money has corrupted the entire
process, and The Post promotes and then feeds off this culture of
corruption. That’s why DC continues to get the best politicians money
can buy and then The Post hides their money grubbing hands and
acts as if they weren’t complicit in steering voters to make poor
decisions to cast their ballot for these common hustlers in the first
place. Here is a suggestion; the next time there is a local political
race all of the debates should be broadcast live by District-owned
Channel 16. This way, local media cannot control the message and steer
future elections by picking candidates that best fit their agenda. I
support a free press that fosters an open democracy where all candidates
can be heard. This allows all of the voters to decide who has the best
ideas and vision for the people of the District of Columbia, not just
those who can afford to buy candidates.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS
National Business Museum Events, July 21, July
26
Stacy Adamson, sadamson@nbm.org
Thursday, July 21, 7:00-8:30 p.m. The National Building Museum
presents Kulapat Yantrasast, a founding principal of California-based
wHY Architecture, in the next Spotlight on Design presentation.
Yantrasast discusses his firm’s recent work, including the Grand
Rapids Art Museum and the Speed Art Museum expansion. The Grand Rapids
Art Museum is the first new art museum in the world to receive the LEED
certification Gold. His talk focuses on architecture that heals,
rejuvenates, and provides a new sense of clarity and strength to the
surroundings and the community. wHY Architecture is doing Art Bridge at
the Los Angeles River, to be built from trash salvaged from the LA River
it spans (currently awaiting groundbreaking), among other commissions.
Yantrasast serves on the Artists Committee of Americans for the Arts,
the nation’s leading nonprofit organization for advancing the arts in
America. He is also the first architect to receive the prestigious
Silpathorn Award from the Government of Thailand for outstanding
achievement and notable contributions to Thai contemporary arts and
culture. Prepaid registration required; walk-in registration based on
availability. To register visit http://www.nbm.org
or call 202.272.2448.
Tuesday, July 26, 6:30-8:00 p.m. The Public Memory of 9/11, a lecture
presented by the National Building Museum and the Smithsonian
Institution. The upcoming tenth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks offers
an opportunity to consider how the sites in New York, Washington, and
Pennsylvania are memorializing and interpreting this event. Leading
representatives — Alice Greenwald, National September 11 Memorial and
Museum; Jim Laychak, Pentagon Memorial Fund; and Jeff Reinbold, Flight
93 National Memorial — present the designs of the memorials and
discuss the challenges in commemorating recent history. Brent Glass,
director of the National Museum of American History, moderates this
program.
Both events at the National Building Museum, 401 F Street, NW,
Judiciary Square Metro, Red Line. $12 members; free students; $20
nonmembers. Free program; registration required; walk-in registration
based on availability. To register, visit http://www.nbm.org
or call 272-2448.
###############
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every
Wednesday and Sunday. To change the E-mail address for your subscription
to themail, use the Update Profile/Email address link below in the
E-mail edition. To unsubscribe, use the Safe Unsubscribe link in the
E-mail edition. An archive of all past issues is available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com, and should
be about life, government, or politics in the District of Columbia in
one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to be printed,
and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief paragraphs
would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can be put into
each mailing.