themail.gif (3487 bytes)

February 6, 2011

Influence

Dear Influencers:

Len Sullivan and Richard Rothblum, below, are not satisfied with the Committee of 100’s report on DC’s projected streetcar system that I praised in the last issue of themail. They have good reason not to be happy with it, since both of them think that building an extensive streetcar system in DC is a bad idea. They phrase it differently, but both of them think the Committee of 100 is simply advising the government how it can carry out a bad idea a little less stupidly. They’re right, of course, but what is the Committee of 100 or any other critic of the streetcar plans to do? The streetcar system is an extremely expensive boondoggle, but the mayor and the city council are determined to waste vast sums of money on it. The system has very vocal supporters who think it’s just the neatest, coolest idea ever proposed, and the swellest, shiniest toy they will ever be able to play with. It doesn’t have organized, vocal opponents. So what should a responsible citizens group do? Go down swinging as a die-hard opponent, when the politicians are determined not to listen to opponents? Or try to improve the proposal as best it can, and mitigate its worst mistakes?

I mean that question seriously, by the way. Stanford Ledbetter facetiously suggests, below, that I would have enough influence over Harriet Tregoning to get her to oppose the Frank Gehry design for an Eisenhower memorial (http://tinyurl.com/6ggdbhp) in favor of preserving parking spaces. I have as much influence over Tregoning’s planning ideas — none — as citizens groups and neighborhood associations have over the city’s streetcar plans. How do citizens and neighborhoods get a voice in the projects that politicians and city planners promote?

#####

Everton Johnson sent “Is Vince Gray the Second Most Powerful Man in the District?” to themail, and I published it in last Wednesday’s issue. But the item actually was written by Martin Austermuhle, and it had been published earlier at DCIst.com. Everton sent this explanation: “When I cut and pasted it into the E-mail to you apparently the header with his information did not transfer and I did not catch it. He [Austermuhle] definitely should get credit for writing it.” Mr. Johnson and I apologize to Martin for the confusion.

Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com

###############

Missing Reports
Rob Fleming, rflemin@verizon.net

So, whatever happened to the Gray Transition Team report? Did it come out in stealth mode? Did it not come out at all? Was it a sop to annoying supporters/constituencies? Does it remain a hidden agenda? Was it just another campaign promise?

The French say that there are three kinds of plans: Imperative, Indicative, and Decorative. Looks like Mayor Gray has added a fourth: Evaporative.

[Neither Mayor Gray nor Council Chairman Brown has issued any report from his transition team. — Gary Imhoff]

###############

WTU Looks for Ways around Teacher Furloughs
Candi Peterson, thewashingtonteacher@gmail.com

Furloughs without pay are on the horizon for District government employees. Exempt from the furloughs are five independent District agencies, in addition to police officers and fire fighters, as their furloughs would impair public health and/or public safety. Vincent Gray, although exempt from the furlough days as the mayor has signed a waiver to join the rest of DC government employees on furlough in order to help save the city nineteen million dollars during fiscal year 2011. I applaud Mayor Gray’s willingness to endure the furlough days like other DC city workers. Included in the mix of those to be furloughed are District of Columbia teachers and school personnel. As a result of emergency legislation, known as the Balanced Budget Furlough Emergency Act of 2011, that was passed by the DC city council, DC government employees will be furloughed on four designated legal public holidays during Fiscal Year 2011. The emergency legislation specifically states: “The District of Columbia Public schools shall not furlough a classroom Teacher on a date when there is classroom instruction during an instructional period.”

WTU President Nathan Saunders commented on teacher furloughs in a recent press release. Saunders stated: “Furloughs are the repercussions that workers face when subjected to government budgets that they don’t control. City workers, including teachers, will now receive less pay as a result of poor budget decisions made by senior level DC government officials. At some point, the DC government must hold managers accountable for overspending the same way it holds workers accountable.” I contend that the Michelle Rhee/Kaya Henderson regime under the helm of former DC mayor, Adrian Fenty are responsible for DCPS’ share of the budget deficit problem. What concerns me is that we still aren’t making the necessary budget cuts where they need to be made. After all, furloughs aren’t a permanent solution for a budget deficit, and there is talk that even more furloughs will be proposed at a future date. I would like to suggest a number of ways to cut some of the public school bloat for the longer-term. Let’s start by reducing Interim Chancellor Henderson’s executive staff salaries and put a moratorium on bonus payouts, reduce administrative staff in the central office — inclusive of the thirteen new instructional superintendents who were recruited last May 2010 with salaries ranging from $120,000 to $150,000, eliminate Master Educators’ positions whose starting salaries begin at $90,000 a pop, and delegate teacher evaluations to principals, reduce nonessential testing of students, and put an end to DCPS contracts that aren’t justified. Has anyone considered tightening our belt by conserving energy in our schools ? What happened to the cost savings as a result of the DC government freeze?

During our February 5 WTU Executive Board meeting, elected teachers and school personnel talked about being tired of getting hammered at every turn due to DCPS overspending. Our board was in agreement that “alternatives to furloughs” need to be considered. As a result of this lively discussion, the WTU Executive Board passed a motion that gives the Washington Teachers’ Union authority to explore alternatives to furloughing teachers and school personnel before President’s Day, the first day of government furloughs. The WTU is interested in teachers’ ideas on how DC Public Schools can achieve real cost savings so that we can look for ways around teacher/school personnel furloughs. We will compile a list of ideas and provide these recommendations to Mayor Gray amongst other strategies. Got suggestions? We’re listening.

###############

Doing the Wrong Job Right at Any Cost?
Len Sullivan, lsnarpac@verizon.net

Unlike Gary [themail, February 2], I find the Committee of 100’s new ninety-page “Assessment of DC Streetcar Routes” to be a starkly inappropriate treatment of a very dubious plan. The committee advocates “safeguarding and advancing the historic distinction, natural beauty, and overall livability of our nation’s capital” through responsible planning and land use. But It has done little on transportation, and none of its “seven priorities” here address the utility, propriety, or benefit of adding streetcars to the DC’s vehicular traffic: each simply supports the Committee of 100’s urge to avoid overhead wires, even by its call to “do it right” (wirelessly) to “ensure a world-class system for a world-class city.”

The report tacitly endorses any costs to reintroduce trolleys by accepting as “given,” without question, that DC’s transit system should expand by adding both buses and streetcars “to accommodate rapidly growing demand”; streetcar investment will, per se, assure future stability in as-yet underdeveloped areas; and some riders won’t use buses. The report ignores any match between the proposed routes and the increasing demand ; any risks of fixed system degradation; any unique costs of adding another transit mode; or why those (few?) folk are bus-averse. Rather oddly, it suggests that one new trolley route should be sure “to mitigate the effects of gentrification”; one route map paints the entire downtown/mall area as an enterprise zone with over 20 percent poverty; and it urges replacing DDoT’s proposed small, lightweight, cheesy trolleys with newer, wider, longer, heavier units.

But these issues are secondary to others. Given the substantial costs to “do the job right,” why ignore the more basic precept to “do the right job”? Why not expand Metrorail along some of those routes? Or Metrobus? Or the far more versatile “Circulator” buses? Aren’t there negatives for adding fixed guide way systems to poorly developed secondary road systems? For usurping curb space? For accidents (particularly broadside) and breakdown recovery? For usurping space for maintenance, power supplies, “turnarounds,” etc.? Aren’t there tradeoffs between unit size and service frequency on low-density routes? Shouldn’t a world-class system have its own designated rights-of-way? Shouldn’t it connect better to regional transportation systems? Shouldn’t it support the remediation of urban squalor? Shouldn’t it encourage socioeconomic migration into and out of the city? Apparently, anything goes except overhead wires.

###############

Committee of 100 Streetcar System Report
Richard Stone Rothblum, richard@rothblum.org

Thanks very much for the cogent summary by Abby Lane of the assessment of the new streetcar system by the Committee of 100 [themail, February 2]. The analysis should prove to be very helpful to decision makers. It seems that one of the main points of contention is the overhead wiring system that is going to be unsightly at the least. Another issue is the proposed route plan, and a third, the disruption of existing businesses in an economically fragile area.

I have a suggestion that was partly examined in the report (“wireless” technology). Why not make the cars capable of generating their own electricity, rather than generating electricity from a central location and installing the infrastructure to transmit the power to individual vehicles? The same system that powers the Chevrolet Volt might be considered. The engine/generator that powers the electric motor could run on compressed natural gas (CNG) to virtually eliminate pollution, and CO2 production would be the least of all electric generating systems that rely on fossil fuels. Metro already has experience with CNG engines, and Arlington relies exclusively on CNG for its public transit. There may be a case to be made for eliminating the electric part of the drive system entirely for higher efficiency and lower costs.

To address the routing controversies, my second suggestion is to equip the streetcars with special steel wheels that would enable them to roll on normally paved streets. The steel wheels could be fitted with rubber covers for quiet and efficient operation. The covers could even be inflated to better cope with anomalies in the road surface. A steering system would allow for ad hoc changes in routes, rather than relying on studies to predict future demand. The infrastructure costs would be a fraction of the cost of the rail and wire system, and it would be more flexible. Disruption to existing businesses for installation of the system would be minimal. There is much more 1920’s technology that could be adapted to address DC’s transportation problems. There is no need to continue to focus on the 1800’s, although I, like many old DC residents, appreciate the nostalgia value. Maybe it’s time to recognize that this is the 20th century. Oh, wait. . . .

The assessment also examines the effect of the project to encourage business investment in an underdeveloped part of the city. This investment in infrastructure will benefit a significant part of the 20 percent of the DC population thought to live below the poverty line, or about one hundred thousand persons. At a cost of $1.5 billion, that comes to $15,000 per impoverished person, not counting the economic costs of disruption due to construction. My suggestion regarding costs is that we offer the purported beneficiaries of the hypothetically improved economic climate their choice: streetcar service, or $60,000 cash for a family of four. This wouldn’t necessarily be a one-time payment that would just evaporate. We could continue to pay the affected citizens the cost to the city of the operating deficit of many tens of millions per year. There could even be a final payment that would be equivalent to the cost of demolishing the system in twenty years or so, when the city rediscovers what it found out in the ’60’s — that streetcars are not a practical means of urban transportation.

###############

The Hypocrisy of Harriet Tregoning
Stanford Ledbetter, stan_ledbetter@hotmail.com

Frank Gehry was in DC last week. He is proposing a monument to President Eisenhower at 6th Street and Independence Avenue. You know, that barren square across from Air and Space Museum that beckons you to stay the hell away but invites the homeless to rest and relax. Gehry’s first work in DC would be a gathering place, drawing the mall south, and the southwest federal center north. A place for businesspeople to lunch and tourists to learn about our great country, and spend money. It would also be the first truly significant modern art in the District, and an opportunity for DC to reestablish itself as a national leader in public art. In short, it would transform a desolate void into a livable, walkable, prosperous urban space.

So, when Gehry was at NCPC to promote his progressive urbanist design last week, Harriet Tregoning must’ve been a cheerleader, right? Wrong! Tregoning lamented the loss of public parking spaces on the street. Well done Mr. Imhoff, you’ve clearly convinced Harriet that driving downtown and parking on a desolate, barren square is an important right to be protected — at least when it means screwing over the National Park Service — and denying the residents of the District a world class urban square paid for entirely by private donations, not a single dime of DC taxpayer monies involved.

Tregoning has proven here that she is the worst kind of ideologue — the fake kind.

###############

Grocery Bags
Mindy Moretti, mindymoretti@yahoo.com

Costco (at least the ones I’ve gone to) and other such wholesale places have been selling plastic grocery bags in bulk for years. Where do you think many of the street vendors and corner bodegas get their grocery bags? This is not new and has nothing to do with the bag tax.

[I asked Mindy where she’s seen plastic grocery bags at nearby Costco stores; she replied at White Marsh and Fair Oaks. The first one I’ve seen them at is Gaithersburg; so perhaps their availability is spreading. — Gary Imhoff]

###############

Google Grant to DC Nonprofit to Teach Robotics to Youth in Southeast DC
Phil Shapiro, pshapiro@his.com

Some happy news to share regarding the teaching of robotics to youth in Southeast DC this summer. (see http://tinyurl.com/4cxfp97 and http://www.leshellhatley.com/brief-bio/)

###############

CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS

Michelle Norris at MLK, February 9
George Williams; George.Williams2@dc.gov

On Wednesday, February 9, Michele Norris, host of NPR’s “All Things Considered,” will discuss how far America has progressed towards racial justice based on her book The Grace of Silence: A Memoir. The powerful work discusses the life of her family in segregated Birmingham, Alabama, before the onset of the Civil Rights Movement. Among the interesting revelations is that her deceased father was a Navy veteran who fought in World War II but encountered racial intolerance on the home front. The event will begin at noon at the Martin Luther King, Jr., Memorial Library located at 901 G Street, NW .

###############

Woman’s National Democratic Club Luncheon, February 10
Tonya Butler-Truesdale, gotonyago@gmail.com

“Washington Winter in Reviews.” Broadcast Journalists Sid Davis and Bill Sheehan have been leading a popular monthly political discussion session at the Cosmos Club for some ten years. Last July, they brought their special discussion format to the WNDC, 1526 Massachusetts Avenue, NW. The session was a hit, and they accepted our invitation to come back, just as the new Congress is getting underway. Thursday, February 10, bar opens at 11:30 a.m., lunch at 12:15 p.m., presentation and question and answer session at 1:00-2:00 p.m. Members $25, nonmembers $30, lecture only (no lunch) $10. Register at https://salsa.wiredforchange.com/o/5880/p/salsa/event/common/public/?event_KEY=21043

An evening event at the Women’s National Democratic Club, 1526 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, on Thursday, February 10, at 6:00 p.m.: “Pray the Devil Back to Hell,” a documentary account of brave and visionary women who demanded peace for Liberia, a nation whose social fabric was torn to shreds by a decades-old civil war. Sponsored by Democratic Empowerment through Active Leadership (DEAL) and WNDC Young Dems. The event is free; register at https://salsa.wiredforchange.com/o/5880/p/salsa/event/common/public/?event_KEY=21076

###############

For the Greener Good: Life After Plastic, February 17
Tara Miller, tmiller@nbm.org

As a petroleum based product, many believe that the cost of plastic building materials will rise as the price of oil rises. What is the future of alternate products for the construction industry? A discussion with Blaine Brownell, Assistant Professor, University of Minnesota School of Architecture; Jay Bolus, VP of Technical Operations, MBDC; and Robert Peoples, Ph.D., Director of the ACS Green Chemistry Institute. Moderated by Lance Hosey, President and CEO, GreenBlue. At the National Building Museum, 401 F Street, NW, Judiciary Square Metro station, on February 17 at 6:30-8:00 p.m. Register at http://www.nbm.org/programs-lectures/programs/2011-programs/february-2011/life-after-plastic.html

###############

CLASSIFIEDS — COMPETITION

National Youth Science Camp Applications, February 28
Mary Lord, mary.lord@dc.gov

District of Columbia students have an opportunity to attend the prestigious National Youth Science Camp, http://www.nysc.org/w/Welcome.html, in West Virginia this summer with peers from other states and Latin America, all expenses paid. Applications are due by the close of business on Friday, February 28.

Two graduating high school seniors from across the District of Columbia will join students from each state and peers from several Latin American and Caribbean nations at the National Youth Science Camp. All participants will get the opportunity to work alongside practicing scientists on research projects spanning various fields as well as present their own seminars. The three-week, life-changing experience is free for students, including travel to and from West Virginia. Applications will be reviewed by a committee formed by the DC State Board of Education, with two delegates and one alternate selected to attend the 2011 camp. Applications may be downloaded on the DC State Board of Education Web site at http://www.sboe.dc.gov.

For hard copies or further information, please contact Mrs. Jamikka Kendrick at the DC State Board of Education at 741-0888 or DC State Board of Education Member Mary Lord at 257-3226.

###############

themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every Wednesday and Sunday. To change the E-mail address for your subscription to themail, use the Update Profile/Email address link below in the E-mail edition. To unsubscribe, use the Safe Unsubscribe link in the E-mail edition. An archive of all past issues is available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.

All postings should be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com, and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can be put into each mailing.

 


Send mail with questions or comments to webmaster@dcwatch.com
Web site copyright ©DCWatch (ISSN 1546-4296)