Humor
Dear Humorists:
I never learn my lesson; I shouldn’t attempt humor. In the last
issue of themail, I quoted from Council Chairman Vincent Gray’s
introduction to the first of a series of council hearings on DCPS, as it
was printed in his office’s press release: “Today, I’m also
excited to announce that the Committee of the Whole will expand beyond
our traditional cadre of weekday budget hearings, and convene two
Saturday hearings specifically designed to illicit views from our young
people and their families on the proposed FY 2011 education budget.”
I thought it was funny. Oh, not as knee-slappingly funny, subtle, and
sophisticated as a Carrot Top routine, but mildly amusing nevertheless.
But some readers didn’t get the joke. Two informed me that I had
probably mistaken the word “illicit” for “elicit,” and a third
realized that the mistake was in the Chairman’s press release, but
scolded me for believing that the council was expressing scorn for the
views of students and parents.
No, I don’t believe that. Or, rather, I do believe that some
councilmembers are scornful of the views of students and parents —
those councilmembers who are blindly supportive of Mayor Fenty’s
takeover of the public schools and Chancellor Rhee’s mismanagement of
them — but not the council as a whole. There are two ways to respond
to the anger and resentment of the parents and children who are begging
the council to defend them against a hostile school administration and
city administration. One way is to listen to the people whom the public
schools are supposed to serve and to heed them, and we’ll see whether
the council chooses to do that. The other way is to attempt to manage
and control their opinions.
Michelle Rhee has already chosen the second path. She has hired Anita
Dunn as a public relations consultant. As Pat Taylor points out in her
message below, DCPS and the Fenty administration refuse to disclose what
private source is paying Dunn’s fee, and how much it is paying, so we
have no idea whose interests Dunn is serving. But from her recent
history in the Obama administration, we do have an idea how she will
serve those interests. As the Post noted in its article on Dunn’s
appointment, her biggest project in the Obama administration was its war
on Fox News, and its attempt to discredit a critical media outlet as not
being a legitimate news source. As the Post didn’t note, the
controversy that led to Dunn’s “resignation” was the disclosure of
a video of a speech she gave in which she discussed her political
strategy: “The third lesson and tip actually comes from two of my
favorite political philosophers: Mao Tse-tung and Mother Theresa — not
often coupled with each other, but the two people I turn to most to
basically deliver a simple point which is, ‘you’re going to make
choices; you’re going to challenge; you’re going to say why not; you’re
going to figure out how to do things that have never been done before.”
A public relations consultant who advises all-out war against critical
media outlets and who says that Mao Tse-tung is one of her two favorite
political philosophers — that sounds like a perfect match for Rhee,
but it doesn’t sound like someone who will do her any good.
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
###############
At the council’s Committee of the Whole meeting last week, Ward 4
Councilmember Muriel Bowser introduced the “Open Government Is Good
Government Act of 2010,” Bill 18-716. According to Bowser, the stated
purpose of the bill is to strengthen the District’s open meetings law.
Currently, DC Code 1-207l.42(a) provides that: “All meetings
(including hearings) of any department, agency, board or commission of
the District government, including meetings of the Council of the
District of Columbia, at which official action of any kind is taken,
shall be open to the public. No resolution, rule, act, regulation, or
other official action shall be effective unless taken, made or enacted
at such meeting.”
The problem with the District’s open meetings law arises because
the phrase, “at which official action of any kind is taken,” is not
defined, and is generally interpreted to refer only to meetings where
decisions are made and votes taken. The obvious fix would be to clarify
the term “at which official action of any kind is taken” by defining
it broadly and inclusively. Instead, the Bowser bill first argues that
the “formation of public policy and conduct of public business shall
not occur in secret.” It goes on to state that: “Members of the
public have a right to be present at all meetings of public bodies that
advise or determine how the public’s business will be carried out, and
to witness all phases of policy formation and decision-making, including
information-gathering, discussion, deliberations, and resolutions.”
But then the bill takes a step backward and details a laundry list of
exceptions and loopholes to the open meetings requirement that would
render it ineffective, meaningless, and possibly worse than the current
law. For example, it provides for meetings to be closed when a public
body is negotiating the terms of a contract; negotiating economic
development incentives; consulting with an attorney; planning,
discussing, or conducting collective bargaining negotiations;
considering disciplinary matters before the DC Board of Medicine;
discussing personnel matters; having a “discussion of any proprietary
or confidential information”; or meeting “solely for the public of
deliberating to make a decision in an adjudication action or proceeding
by a public body exercising quasi-judicial functions,” such as the
Alcoholic Beverage Regulation Administration, the Zoning Administration,
the Public Service Commission, the Office of Employee Appeals, the DC
Board of Elections and Ethics, etc.
Moreover, the bill’s open meetings requirement extends to any “public
body,” which is defined as “any council, task force, board or
commission of the District government established pursuant to statute,
regulation, or order.” The bill specifies that its provisions apply to
“the Council, the District of Columbia State Board of Education, the
District of Columbia Public Charter School Board; the District of
Columbia Water and Sewer Authority, the Washington Convention and Sports
Authority, and any other entity that is created by and exercises
authority delegated by the District of Columbia government.” However,
it also indicates that the term “public body” “shall not include
the District of Columbia courts, governing bodies of individual public
charter schools, the Mayor’s cabinet, and the professional or
administrative staff of public bodies when they meet outside the
presence of a quorum of those bodies.”
Bowser’s bill is virtually identical to Bill 16-747, the District
of Columbia Open Meetings Act of 2006, which former councilmembers Kathy
Patterson and Vincent Orange introduced. Following substantive
amendments to the original bill by the council’s Committee on
Government Operations, then chaired by Vincent Orange, the entire
council at the Committee of the Whole meeting on July 11, 2006, refused
to approve the bill and, instead, recommitted it back to the committee,
where it subsequently died.
###############
My name is Sheila H. Gill, a proud product of DC Public Schools. On
November 21, 2007, Ms. Pamela D. Graham, the Chief Financial Officer of
DC Public Schools, submitted a memorandum regarding the FY 2008
projected deficit to Michelle Rhee; Dr. Gandhi, Chief Financial Officer;
Lucille Dickinson, CFO Chief of Staff; Kaya Henderson, Deputy
Chancellor; Lisa Ruda, DCPS Chief of Staff; and Allison Allis, Budget
Director DCPS (http://www.dcpswatch.com/mayor/071121.htm).
At that time, Ms. Graham identified budget pressures that had
accelerated to the point where DCPS had a projected budget deficit in
the fiscal year 2008. The deficit was as high as $100 million and Ms.
Graham recommended measures that were required to stop the deficit
immediately, including a freeze of all new hiring in DCPS central
administration and schools and producing a deficit reduction plan by
December 7, 2007.
Also, in Ms. Graham’s report, she stated that, “The practice of
overriding process and procedure in hiring new employees must not
continue. No one should be made an offer of employment until the budget
certification process is completed.” Unfortunately, Ms. Graham’s
career at DCPS as a certified competent Chief Financial Officer ended
when she was forced to resign after she expressed in writing to the
Chancellor that the practice of over-hiring must cease immediately. Ms.
Graham was replaced by a new Chief Financial Officer of DCPS, who lacked
experience and who supported the Chancellor’s over-hiring practices.
The United States Government Accountability Office recognized in its
June 2009 report on DCPS (p.22) that “DCPS focused on a workforce
replacement strategy . . . but is unsure new staffs are an improvement.”
In other words, the Chancellor’s education reform is over-hiring and
firing, over-hiring and firing. The Chancellor’s Administration has
not stop recruiting, hiring, and training new employees on the job in
DCPS since she was named Chancellor in 2007. The total funding approved
for the FY 2009 budget was $764.6 Million and $779.6 million was
approved for the FY 2010 budget. On October 29, 2009, testimony of
Michelle Rhee reads that DCPS began the hiring process between April 15
and July 15, 2009 after establishing the need for up to 955 new
teachers. It is evident that the Chancellor created and manufactured a
reduction in force because she never stopped hiring. Why did the
Chancellor’s administration hire 1,698 new employees from March 1,
2009 to August 31 2009?
The Chancellor’s Administration continued hiring after
manufacturing the reduction-in-force, and hired an additional 513 new
employees between September 1, 2009 and January 15, 2010, including over
one hundred teachers for regular school-day jobs and over one hundred
new employees in the central offices. Numerous job opportunities are
listed on Craig’s List, DC Jobs, idealist.org, and the DCPS web site.
The Chancellor’s Administration never stopped hiring, not even after
the reduction-in-force. Why does the Chancellor have a blank check for
new hires any time? Why is DCPS still hiring?
The city council should not approve the Chancellor’s reprogramming
request that will probably be made prior to the Summer School program in
June 2010. Clearly, the Chancellor’s administration manufactured a
reduction-in-force as well as continued over hiring practices. Also, the
city council needs a forensic audit immediately for school years 2008-09
and 2009-10. Why were federal stimulus dollars used for new hires when
school positions were being cut at the local schools? The DCPS
Equalization process was never implemented by the Chancellor. However,
the Chancellor is responsible for mass teacher firings and violating
anti-deficiency laws, discrimination laws, labor laws, as well as DC
laws and regulations. The city council needs to have emergency
legislation in support of all wrongfully riffed DCPS employees to be
reinstated and made whole immediately without any break in service.
###############
Michelle Rhee now has a privately funded media adviser, Anita Dunn,
according to a March 20 Washington Post article (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/19/AR2010031904714_pf.html).
Do others think it strange that private donations, seemingly anonymous,
are funding this media advisor? Is this appropriate? Is it legal for DC
Public Schools to be using private donations to contract Squier Knapp
Dunn — a private communications firm — for Dunn’s services? Are
these anonymous donors some of the same private foundations and business
organizations which have put millions of dollars into School Chancellor
Rhee’s efforts to weaken DC’s traditional public schools by
supporting the expansion of (nonunion) charter schools?
###############
Rhee’s Extreme Makeover: Only a Dream!
Candi Peterson and Efavorite, saveourcounselors@gmail.com
In an article written this weekend in the Washington Post,
Bill Turque reports that Chancellor Michelle Rhee turns to Anita Dunn, a
media consultant and former White House Communication Director, to help
rebuild her despicable image. Anita Dunn is the wife of Bob Bauer, White
House legal counsel, and she is also the owner of the media firm Squier,
Knapp and Dunn. Rhee’s contract with Dunn’s firm is still being
negotiated and will be paid for with private funds, which have yet to be
disclosed. Among the objectives for Dunn’s firm will be how to
effectively handle the local and national media. Turque also reports
that Dunn’s firm is expected to assist with the upcoming announcement
of the Washington Teachers’ Union tentative agreement, which has been
three years in the making.
An E-mail from Efavorite suggests that the first meeting between Rhee
and Dunn may go something like this: “I had the strangest dream last
night. I was in a media training session with Michelle Rhee and her new
hotshot, privately funded media consultant, Anita Dunn. I looked around
nervously and thought, ‘No. This is all wrong. I don’t belong here!’
But then I realized that no one seemed to notice I was there, so I
decided to sit back and observe the session. First Dunn said, ‘OK,
Michelle, repeat after me: “I apologize for calling teachers child
molesters.’ Rhee: ‘Arrrhhhgg.’ Dunn: ‘Uh — good start. Don’t
worry, we have lots of time, lots of money, and this is very important
work we’re doing.’ Rhee: ‘For the children! For the children!’
Dunn: ‘Oops, sorry. I didn’t mean to lead you down that well-worn
path. No one pays any attention to that old line anymore. We’re
starting fresh. We want people to see the new, reinvented, sensitive
Michelle Rhee. So again, please, repeat after me: “I apologize for
calling teachers child molesters.”’ Rhee: ‘I — I — I — I
will not kowtow.’ Dunn: ‘Great progress! You’ve got the first word
right. Good girl. We’re getting there. Let’s keep practicing. Here
we go again: “I apologize for calling teachers child molesters.”’
Rhee: ‘I apol — I apol — ARRHGG — (gulp) I apologize for calling
teachers child molesters!’ That’s when I knew I was dreaming.”
###############
Richard Urban Launches
Campaign for City Council At-Large Seat
Kyungmi Nadia Ayad, Kayad@rufordc.com
On March 10, I attended while Richard Urban gave his campaign launch
speech in front of the John Wilson Building to announce his candidacy
for Washington DC City Council At-Large. Mr. Urban is an active
Washington DC resident of twenty-seven years. He founded a nonprofit
group called ULTRA Teen Choice, an organization that provides education
and peer counseling to promote abstinence from sex outside of wedlock,
as well as abstinence from drugs and alcohol. He is also the founder of
a small community based business — Urban Grocery LLC. Now, he is
stepping it up to better the Washington DC area through politics. His
campaign being RUforDC.
Throughout Mr. Urban’s speech, he made it quite clear that he is
unhappy with the role, actions, corruption, and influence within DC’s
government that is emanating out towards the community. He states, “I
am for a DC where public service comes before selfish conflicts of
interest.” Mr. Urban’s main concerns regard family breakdown, same
sex marriage, the spread of STDs, restoring the school board, tax codes,
and “bringing honesty to the government.”
Mr. Urban’s core is the need to build up strong and healthy
families. He believes that through strong families comes a strong
community. “Are you for the families of Washington, DC?” asked Mr.
Urban, “The very keystone of society is the family. It is not an
exaggeration to say that without peaceful families, there cannot be a
peaceful society. Family breakdown is at the very root of all major
social problems. This includes out of wedlock pregnancy, high rates of
juvenile crime and violence, high dropout rates and lagging school
achievement, and a lack of a clear vision for a happy future for our
youth.” Mr. Urban, obviously troubled by the lack of strong families
in the Washington, DC, area, continued to support his theory further by
pulling up facts; for example, the study showing that, “Ninety percent
of children living in an intact, two-parent family do not become
involved in delinquent behavior even in crime ridden neighborhoods.”
All throughout his speech, Mr. Urban pushes the importance of the
family.
Next, Mr. Urban’s opinion is without reserve when it comes to
same-sex unions. He declares, “I am for a DC where marriage is defined
as being only between a man and woman.” Mr. Urban is clearly against
the law that states marriage is between any two consenting adults. He
insists that through this teaching, our youth have gone into great
confusion, and what could be worse than the next generation being
utterly confused, when about to take over? Even though Mr. Urban is
completely against same-sex unions, he is still intent on bringing the
issue to the public so that the people may vote on what they would like
marriage to be defined as.
One topic that Mr. Urban finds himself especially close to is the
need for abstinence education. He constantly reminded the crowd that he
is “running to fight for every child to have the option of a program
that emphasizes sexual abstinence so that they can be free from the
burden and consequences of premature sexual activity.” Mr. Urban is a
firm believer in this, and also believes it will save the future of the
youth in the Washington, DC, society, as well as around the world. He
believes that the answer is simple: to prevent the rapid spread of STDs,
don’t have sex outside of marriage, and stay faithful to one partner.
As well as wanting to install programs or clubs he calls “Students
Teaching Abstinence and Responsibility” (STAR), Mr. Urban also has the
vision of “returning control of the DC public schools to an elected
school board and to remove Chancellor Michelle Rhee.” He also says,
“Nonprofit groups have been blocked from operating in public schools
because they don’t meet the political agenda of the current school
chancellor.” Furthermore, Richard Urban figures that the firing of
hundreds of teachers and the blocking of community groups that want to
work with public schools “is just plain wrong.”
Moreover, an issue of concern to all and Mr. Urban is taxes. One of
Mr. Urban’s goals is to “reduce the high increase in taxes for
longtime DC residents.” As of last year, a new property calculation
was voted in by the city council, and now affects thousands of DC
residents. Mr. Urban states that his property tax is now more than
double last year’s. He also promises to work on keeping small
businesses from being burdened by “excessive regulations and taxes.”
He too, is the small business owner of Urban Grocery LLC. “In short, I
am running to serve you, and to help each family to raise children that
will be successful, happy, and safe, which will make the entire city a
better place to live. I am running because the DC government has been
hijacked by those who represent the values that most DC citizens hold
dear.” So, there you have it, plain and simple, the words of the new
independent candidate Richard Urban.
###############
On March 16, the Advisory Neighborhood Commission of Mt. Pleasant
held a community meeting to discuss various neighborhoods issues. One of
these issues was a proposed mural to be placed at the side of 3125 Mt.
Pleasant Street. The muralist is DC’s and specifically Mt. Pleasant’s
Byron Peck, a renowned muralist with an international reputation. I have
been a resident in the neighborhood for almost twenty-four years now and
met Mr. Peck about a decade ago. About a year ago, Mr. Peck was
commissioned by DC Arts to do a mural. He thought of the Atonal building
at 3125 Mt. Pleasant Street, NW, and approached the residents there.
Since the city was funding the project and also because Mr. Peck wanted
it to be a true reflection of the diversity in his neighborhood, he
solicited community input. He had a succession of community input
meetings that had hundreds of resident turn out. He compiled a large
checklist of the various wants of the residents and came up with the
proposed mural that you can see at http://tinyurl.com/yztww5m.
From the onset, certain ANCs wanted more control over the design of
the mural. It got ludicrous at one point with one ANC in particular
demanding more input than his position allows. I attended about three of
these meetings and it was apparent who had an agenda. Mr. Peck went to
extraordinary means to please as many people as he could, including and
especially these ANCs. On Tuesday the 16th, the final discussion/vote on
the Mural occurred. What a bunch of self-interested crooks those
commissioners are. An overwhelming majority of the residents there were
in support of the mural with an additional three hundred signatures of
residents of the neighborhood attached to a petition that was given to
each Advisory Neighborhood Commissioners. Four ANC’s voted against the
mural and gave very different and questionable reasons why they did not
support it. Only two supported it, so the measure did not pass.
Jack McKay indicated that he was a longtime supporter of the mural
but changed his mind suddenly after he realized that there was
opposition to it. When he was asked to quantify this opposition, Mr.
McKay could not. He then proposed an alternative legislation that would
take away city funds from the project and require another lengthy
community input process. I guess the hundreds of people who currently
support the project aren’t convincing enough for him. Phil Lepanto is
simply a jerk. He actually looked like he was hung-over or something (at
7:45 p.m.). He talked about why he’s opposing it and then suddenly “lost
his train of thought” and couldn’t finish. It was pretty pathetic to
see. Greg Edwards — well, where to begin. He was dressed in a snappy
pinstripe suit; I swear I thought the guy was there for a job interview
or something. He began by claiming that he was an “Arts History Major”
in college and that he understands and appreciates fine art. He went on
to outline a grand plan on panels attached to the side of this barren
brick wall that could be used as a buffer for the paint against the
wall. He finally proved to me what a real idiot he truly is. And my God,
the ego on this guy; it seems to grow each time I meet him. Greg also
introduced an alternative proposal for the mural laced with his numerous
suggestions (all of which had already been voted down by the DC Arts
Commission). In his description of the need for his alternative, he was
forced to make a change to reflect the fact that he’s ignoring the
will of the vast majority of people who are supporting the mural. His
alternative was to have the phase say “all” residents of Mt.
Pleasant must approve of the mural instead of the majority of them. This
is an impossibility, and his alternative with quickly voted down.
Angelina Scott just was asleep. She was so zoned out that she actually
voted in favor of the mural, only to then recant by asking “where’s
my mind tonight?” All of the E-mails and phone calls I’ve made to
her prior to this was never responded to or returned. If she does not
care to be there, to do her job, then she should simply resign and let
someone more willing and capable take over.
Dave Glosserman was amazing, simply amazing. He asked his fellow ANCs
what they were thinking and what they were looking at. He even gave a
figure — 80 percent of the residents he’s spoken to about this
support the mural. The remaining 20 percent simply offered contradictory
reasoning as to why the mural cannot work. It was a pleasure seeing Dave
engage Greg and call him out for the obvious stupidity and egotistical
manner in which Greg handled himself.
The majority of the crowd was great and very supportive of the mural.
One gentleman who introduced himself as Juan Carlos Ruiz from a Latino
organization (I did not catch the name) was pissed that the mural did
not have his final approval. He said that he represented the Latino
voice in the neighborhood and that he should have been instrumental in
the design of the mural. The problem with this is that the muralist, Mr.
Peck, had almost ten separate community meetings during the past year to
get input from residents. Mr. Ruiz never attended any of them and, at
this final vote, he was there making a scene because he now wanted to be
heard.
A Latino woman was angry at the fact one of the globes included a
picture of two El Salvadorian men sitting at a bench. She thought that
it would be viewed as El Salvadorians are lazy. Two things about this.
First. the two gentlemen are business owners sitting in front of their
restaurant. Second, Mr. Peck had heard her concern and decided to remove
the globe from his final version of the mural. He had actually removed
it months before, but this woman had never bothered to even look at the
mural again. She actually tried to apologize later on during the meeting
when someone pointed out the changes, but the ANC would not allow it.
Put aside all of the racist remarks at the meeting, and you will see
that the concerns really aren’t who is or is not represented in this
mural, but rather what this mural represents. Mt. Pleasant is a diverse
neighborhood that embraces its diversity with pride. The process last
night only proved to me last night that the egos of a few can sometimes
derail the will of many. I have never been more ashamed of being a Mt.
Pleasant resident than I was last night.
###############
Size of the Council in themail
Michael Bindner, mikeybdc@yahoo.com
When I was in the Office of the City Administrator, I floated a few
proposals internally to expand the council. Tim Cooper has a proposal to
make it 128, which is a bit too big. The New Columbia Constitution has
forty members in single member districts, while the draft NC
constitution that was enacted by the council and, in the current text of
HR51, the statehood bill, must be adopted to achieve statehood, has a
twenty-five member council with either sixteen districts or two members
per District, with the remaining members serving at-large and the chair
elected directly (as currently) rather than by the membership.
My proposal was for sixteen districts with three members per
District, at least one of whom cannot be in the same party as the others
and three at-large members, one of whom will be elected chair by the
body so that they are really the legislative leader. This might create
three factions — one for each at-large member — of varying sizes. It
would bring in just enough instability to achieve real oversight and
real debate. I have been suggesting for a while that the council amend
the Charter to incorporate the New Columbia Constitution as enacted in
advance of statehood, enlarging the council and calling it the House of
Delegates and calling the mayor the governor instead. It could, of
course, also amend the draft constitution by legislation and it can even
save a future step by having it ratified as well. If people are
impatient at council inaction, they could even have a People’s
Constitutional Convention. More on this at http://mikeybdc.blogspot.com/2006/09/call-for-peoples-constitutional.html.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS
Lincoln Douglass Day Dinner, March 23
Paul Craney, info@dcgop.org
Please join the DC Republican Committee at our annual Lincoln
Douglass Day dinner on Tuesday (March 23) at the Washington Hebrew
Congregation located at 3935 Macomb Street NW. The event will start at
6:30 p.m., and the dinner will start at 7:30 p.m. The special guest
speaker is Senator John Thune (R-SD). The dinner will include a fun
silent auction with stays at vacation properties and private lunches.
To purchase a ticket, please go to http://www.dcgop.com,
E-mail us at: info@dcgop.com, or
call us at 289-8005.
###############
Environmental Health Group (EHG) Events, March
23-24
Allen Hengst, ahengst@rcn.com
World War I munitions, bottles filled with chemical warfare agents,
and contaminated soil have been found in and around the Spring Valley
neighborhood of northwest DC. The Environmental Health Group (EHG) seeks
to raise awareness of the issues and encourage a thorough investigation
and cleanup. Every Saturday at 1:00 p.m., please join EHG for an
informal discussion about Spring Valley issues in the cafe at the
Tenleytown Whole Foods Market, 4530 40th Street, NW (one block north of
Tenley Circle). For more information, visit EHG on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/pages/Washington-DC/Environmental-Health-Group/67807900019.
Tuesday, March 23, 4:00 p.m.: School of International Service senior
Michael Ginsberg will present his research on the chemical warfare
cleanup occurring on and around American University’s campus and
potential concerns for the community at the 13th annual Undergraduate
Research Symposium. Members of the community are invited to come and ask
questions regarding possible health concerns or the past, present, and
future of the cleanup. In American University’s Mary Graydon Center,
Room #200, 4400 Massachusetts Avenue, NW (METRO: Tenleytown/AU. Shuttle
bus service to AU) http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=110833818931269&ref=mf.
Wednesday, March 24, 7:00 p.m.: Produced by Georgetown University
students, Buried in History is a gripping eleven-minute documentary
about the Spring Valley cleanup that will compete with seven other short
student documentaries in the DC Environmental Film Festival. The program
will be introduced by Chris Palmer and Sandy Cannon-Brown, Professors,
American University. A panel discussion follows. At American University’s
Wechsler Theater, Mary Graydon Center, 4400 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
(METRO: Tenleytown/AU. Shuttle bus service to AU) http://www.dcenvironmentalfilmfest.org/films/show/514.
###############
Launch of Defeat Poverty DC, March 24
Ed Lazere, lazere@dcfpi.org
Please join us on the morning of March 24 for the launch of Defeat
Poverty DC, a public campaign to bring greater visibility to issues of
poverty in the District. The launch will include a panel discussion
moderated by NBC News4 reporter Tom Sherwood and release of a new report
on growing poverty in DC during the recession. The event will be from
9:00 to 10:30 a.m. at the True Reformer building, 1200 U Street, NW.
Breakfast will be served. RSVP to Tamanna Mansury at Tamanna@thehatchergroup.com
or 301-656-0348.
Defeat Poverty DC is a new coalition of organizations and residents
in the District of Columbia working to bring greater focus during the
2010 election season and beyond to the damaging effects of poverty on
our entire city. The District’s long-term economic vitality depends on
helping families obtain good jobs, affordable housing, and quality
health care and child care.
###############
Master Facilities Plan, March 24
Parisa Nourizi, parisa@empowerdc.org
Yeah, it may sound boring, but without this important tool
communities go unserved, human needs are not met, and the city has
another reason to give your public property to their developer friends.
Care about housing, health care, green space, gardens, seniors, the
homeless, etc.? Then you should care about this. Come find out more!
Vacant schools, community gardens, affordable housing, libraries,
recreation, senior services, and more — demand the plan.
Why DC doesn’t have a plan, and why now is the time, an information
and summit on the Master Facilities Plan, will be held on Wednesday,
March 24, 6:30-8:30 p.m., at Reeves Center, 14th and U Streets, NW.
Accessible location, light refreshments. The Master Facilities Plan has
been required by the Comprehensive Plan since 1986, yet has not been
created. The People’s Property Campaign won introduction of
legislation requiring the plan and Councilmember Mary Cheh pledged swift
action, but has since stalled. What will it take to get the Council to
act now? Find out how the absence of a facilities plan has assisted the
giveaway of public property and cost taxpayers hundreds of millions in
wasteful leases, how this plan could help under-served communities get
the resources they are demanding and deserve, and what DC residents can
do in the next sixty days to pass legislation requiring the plan, and
hold the city accountable to carrying it out. For more information,
contact Parisa at Empower DC, 234-9119, parisa@empowerdc.org.
###############
Ward One Democrats’ Meeting on Statehood,
March 25
Bill O’Field, wofield@gmail.com
The Ward One Democrats will hold a ward-wide meeting on Thursday,
March 25, at 7:00 p.m. The meeting will be held in the Edna Frazier
Cromwell Community Room located on the second floor of the Reeves
Municipal Center, 2000 Fourteenth Street, NW. The meeting’s agenda
includes a panel discussion on “Statehood for DC Residents.”
Come learn about why we need statehood, the historical efforts to
achieve it, and what’s happening now. The panel will be comprised of
City Council Chairman Vincent Gray, Senator Michael Brown, DC Statehood
Constitutional Convention President Charles Cassell, and Executive
Director of the National Capital Area ACLU Johnny Barnes. This is your
opportunity to learn how the District of Columbia would benefit from
being a state and have your questions answered by the experts.
For more information, feel free to contact Chairman Sedrick Muhammad
at sedrickmuhammad@yahoo.com
or 719-0281 or Treasurer Bill O’Field at wofield@gmail.com
or 365-6641.
###############
National Building Museum Events, March 27
Johanna Weber, jweber@nbm.org
March 27, 10:00 a.m.-5:30 p.m., National Cherry Blossom Festival
Family Day and Opening Ceremony Family Festival. Celebrate the opening
of Washington’s cherry blossom season with a family festival that
explores Japanese arts and design, Washington, DC, in the spring, and
the official opening ceremony of the 2010 National Cherry Blossom
Festival. Free drop-in program. All ages. At the National Building
Museum, 401 F Street, NW, Judiciary Square Metro station.
###############
Reforming DC Public Education, March 31
Cherita Whiting, cherita_whiting@yahoo.com
Reforming District of Columbia Public Education, a community forum on
performance, evaluation, parental and community involvement, and review
of District public school test scores, will be held on Wednesday, March
31, at the John A. Wilson Building, 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Room
412. The keynote speaker will be Dr. Katharine Tobin, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Performance Review, Office of Management, US Department of
Education. Opening remarks will be given by Council Chairman Vincent C.
Gray; closing remarks by Councilmember Harry Thomas, Jr. The panel will
include Mary Levy, DCPS expert; Lee Glaser, DCPS parent; Maria
James, DCPS parent; Nathan Saunders, WTU Vice-President; and Clifford B.
Janey, former DCPS Superintendent.
This event is sponsored by the DC Federation of Civic Associations,
DC Federation of Citizens Associations, Ward 4 Council on Education, and
the Ward 5 Council on Education.
###############
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every
Wednesday and Sunday. To change the E-mail address for your subscription
to themail, use the Update Profile/Email address link below in the
E-mail edition. To unsubscribe, use the Safe Unsubscribe link in the
E-mail edition. An archive of all past issues is available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com,
and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of
Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to
be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief
paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can
be put into each mailing.