What’s Not to Like
Roger Scott and Candi Peterson, below, point out the disgraceful
smear that Chancellor Michelle Rhee aimed at the 266 educators whom she
fired last year under the pretense of a budget-mandated reduction in
force. Here’s the back story on that smear. In August 2008, Jeff Chu
wrote a flattering profile of Rhee in Fast Company (http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/128/the-iron-chancellor.html).
In the February issue of Fast Company, Chu wrote a one-paragraph
update in which Rhee defended the firings (http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/142/update-dc-report-card.html).
Her complete quote: “I got rid of teachers who had hit children, who
had had sex with children, who had missed 78 days of school. Why wouldn’t
we take those things into consideration?”
Rhee’s sneering contempt for her teaching staff, her relentless
denigration of teachers, has brought her plenty of fans. On Saturday,
DCIst actually applauded Rhee’s slander: “It is altogether better
for schools to not employ teachers who hit children or have sex with
them. A schools czar absolutely must [take] into consideration whether a
teacher is breaking the law when considering teaching assignments.
Pruning out teachers who abuse students physically and sexually could
take place more than once a fiscal cycle — possibly even quarterly. .
. . First these teachers beat on the students, then they beat on Rhee. .
. . [F]ewer child molesters and child beaters. What’s not to like?” http://dcist.com/2010/01/the_saturday_morning_post_61.php.
The Federal City Council took a quarter-page ad in the Outlook section
of this morning’s Post, not available online, in which it named
Rhee as its Person of the Year; the ad showered her with praise. Now,
admittedly, the Federal City Council gave Rhee this award and prepared
this morning’s ad before Rhee’s latest smear, but reporter Bill
Turque pointed out that Rhee had made similar charges before, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/22/AR2010012204543.html.
Mayor Fenty evaded the question of whether he supports Rhee’s
slander of teachers with the same tired line he has used so often in the
past in the face of scandals. Through his spokeswoman, Mafara Hobson, he
said, “The mayor cannot comment on personnel matters” (http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dcschools/2010/01/rhee_mum_on_teacher_sex_flap.html#more).
It doesn’t matter whether Rhee has campaigned to ruin the reputation
of 266 teachers after she has already fired them; if Fenty were to
defend innocent teachers against Rhee’s defamation, it would be
speaking about a personnel matter, so he won’t say anything on their
But let’s take Rhee at her word, that she knew of multiple cases in
which teachers hit children and had sex with them. She didn’t report
those cases to the police. She knew about physical abuse and sexual
abuse of children in the school system. As the head of the school
system, she was ultimately responsible and had a legal responsibility to
ensure that these crimes were reported. If she was aware of them
herself, she had a legal duty to report them herself. She’s now
admitting that she personally committed several crimes by failing to
report the underlying crimes that she knew about. If her admission is
true, I look forward to her being charged for her dereliction of duty;
if it isn’t true — and a failure to indict her would constitute
proof that it isn’t — I look forward to her retraction and apology.
Rhee: Armed with a Microphone and Dangerous
Roger Scott, email@example.com
I call your attention to the article on WTOP highlighting comments
made by Michelle Rhee regarding the teacher lay-offs (http://www.wtop.com/?nid=25&sid=1871149).
The article quotes Rhee as stating, “I got rid of teachers who had hit
children, who had had sex with children, who had missed 78 days of
school.” The Washington Post also carried an article on the
verbal mishap, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/22/AR2010012204543.html.
The WTOP article goes on to state that Ms. Rhee fired 266 educators.
Now, looking at the statement is appears that all of these 266 educators
fell in to the bucket of either abusing children, committing a sexual
act with a student, or missing work. While Ms. Rhee’s words are
hapless and irresponsible, if not slanderous; I would hope and pray that
anyone hearing or reading these words would not think for a moment that
the majority, or even a minority, of the 266 people hired to educate the
children of DC would have committed these acts. Regardless, she said it
and some people will believe it and run with it.
Her words were totally irresponsible. I would hope that she issues a
retraction or an apology, but I’m not holding my breath. If you can’t
get even a little upset at this, think of it as if you were one of those
educators who were dismissed and trying to find work.
Is Chancellor Michelle Rhee Fit for Duty?
Candi Peterson, firstname.lastname@example.org
Mike DeBonis, who writes for the Washington City Paper, tipped
us off on Thursday in his ‘Loose Lips’ column [http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2010/01/21/reports-of-overspending-mount-loose-lips-daily]
about Chancellor Michelle Rhee’s quote regarding laid off teachers
which is scheduled to appear in Fast Company’s February
magazine. Thanks to Mike’s heads-up, the story about the ongoing
demonization of DC teachers by Rhee is making its rounds on nationwide
blogs, channel 4, 5, 7 and 9 TV news stations, as well as in print
media. Washington Post writer Bill Turque’s article titled; “Rhee
says laid-off teachers in DC abused kids,” appeared in the Saturday
Metro section. I must admit I am happy to have been one of the leaders
of the Washington Teachers’ Union (WTU) board to have been quoted as
recommending that Rhee needs a fitness for duty evaluation as her recent
rants are those of either a mad or very confused woman. Here’s to Bill
Turque for reporting our story and to Mike DeBonis for alerting us to
Rhee’s comments in his weekly column. We need more reporters like both
I don’t think I can articulate how I really feel about Rhee’s
statements any better than The Frustrated Teacher blogger did in San
Francisco, California, when he said: “This seems to me to be among the
most egregious abuses of power I have ever seen. Michelle Rhee is
claiming, with no support, that she fired teachers not for the reasons
given at the time, but because now, with no substantiation, she has
decided to say that these teachers did horrible things to kids — with
no proof (well, there is the one case of corporal punishment, but to
paint the entire group with this broad brush is wrong, and maybe
criminal)! And if it turns out there is proof of abuse of students by
teachers, why were they not fired for it, or at minimum placed on paid
administrative leave while it was investigated? Who has the
responsibility to see that every student has a safe learning
environment? Guess who . . . the Chancellor. . . . The little people,
like you and me, need to speak up and expose these abuses by the
powerful. We need to do it more, and with real, paper and envelope
letters. Blogs are great (especially Candi’s and the Frustrated
Teacher) but we can’t really do anything except preach to the choir. I
am in California but what happens in DC is illustrative of what is
Won’t you stand with me and others to demand that Chancellor Rhee
be held accountable for her actions? We must demand accountability by
insisting on an independent investigation of Rhee’s allegations, which
implicates all laid-off teachers, and require that she provide
substantive proof of her comments. After all, Rhee owes it to our
children, doesn’t she?
Evans’ Conflicts in the Washington
Peter Tucker, email@example.com
I wrote a letter to the Washington Post that raises the issue
of Councilman Jack Evans’ possible conflicts of interest, as well as
the Post’s lack of coverage of this critical point. The Post
has posted the article here: http://voices.washingtonpost.com/local-opinions/2010/01/two_hats_on_the_dc_council.html.
Please take a look and forward it around widely. And post a comment,
if you’re so inclined! It’s time — actually it’s way past time
— for a public discussion surrounding the practice of DC
councilmembers (who make at least $120,000) being allowed to earn
whatever they can in the private sector (By doing what? And for whom?).
The DC State Board of Education Elected 2010
Beverley Wheeler, firstname.lastname@example.org
At the inaugural meeting of the 2010 year, the DC State Board of
Education elected the new President and Vice President. Ted Trabue was
elected to the office of President. Laura Slover was elected to the
office of Vice President.
The Office of the State Superintendent of Education awarded the 2010
Teacher of the Year to Stephanie Day from Friendship Public Charter
School, Chamberlain Campus. The finalists were Aris Pangilinan from H.
D. Woodson Senior High School; Brigham Kiplinger and Nathan Franz, both
from E. L. Haynes Public Charter School; and Christopher Bergfalk from
John Eaton Elementary School. The State Board congratulates all of the
awardees. Each has demonstrated deep dedication to education and to
Response to “Changes in Agency Direction”
Jamison L. Weinbaum, email@example.com
I was alerted to your posting this morning that contained an article
(Harry Gates, “Changes in Agency Direction,” themail, January 20)
referencing the Office of Zoning. The article appears to suggest that I
have eliminated the Compliance Review Specialist position at the Office
of Zoning. That is simply incorrect.
Earlier this month, in an effort to streamline efficiencies and
restructure certain employee responsibilities, I appointed Ms. Tracey
Rose as the new Compliance Review Specialist in the Office of Zoning.
Ms. Rose is a longtime employee of this agency and is fully prepared to
assist in compliance matters. We treat compliance as a critical
component of our work on behalf of the public, and continue to provide
exemplary service in this area. I encourage you to visit our web site
for a thorough understanding of this program.
Going forward, I would ask that you simply contact me if you have any
questions or concerns about the direction of this agency. Specifically,
I’d much prefer that you direct questions to me before publishing
information that is inaccurate. I would further ask that you issue a new
posting noting this clarification regarding our compliance program.
Please let me know if you have any questions or further concerns.
Bag Tax — Get Over It
Clare Feinson, cfeinson at speakeasy dot net
I’m really tired of hearing people whine about the bag tax. Suck it
up and carry a bag, or pay the five freakin’ cents already. If you
shop every week day for a month, that’s about a dollar — I’ll bet
those people walking out of the store with groceries in their arms
mindlessly spend many extra dollars every week on things more useless to
them than a shopping bag.
And the store owners should follow the lead of Giant and give bags
away for a while — what a marketing bonanza! The bag tax is worth it
not to trip over shopping bags all over the place or to see trees
infested with them from top to bottom!
Thanks, I needed that.
King and the Vietnam War
Greg Rhett, firstname.lastname@example.org
Bryce Suderow wrote [themail, January 20]: “Don’t forget that
King also opposed the Vietnam War. On April 4, 1967, Martin Luther King
in a speech entitled ‘Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence’
declared his opposition to the Vietnam War, alienating millions of
Americans, both black and white, for the war was immensely popular.”
Frankly, Mr. Suderow’s post and the submission timing (coming on
the heals of America’s Day of Celebration for the great legacy of Dr.
King) was offensive. The post appears to have been an attempt to “rewrite/revise”
American History in order to purposefully malign and marginalize a Nobel
Prize winning American Hero. I truly hope this is not the case and that
this was not the gentleman’s intention. Why single out Dr. King’s
opposition to the Vietnam War?
Furthermore, I beg to differ with Mr. Suderow’s context portrayal
re Dr. King’s reference to Germany in his speech before religious
leaders gathered at the Riverside Church in NYC. When one simply reads
or listens to Dr. King’s speech, along with its numerous applauses (http://www.drmartinlutherkingjr.com/beyondvietnam.htm),
it is clear that Mr. Suderow perhaps misinterpreted Dr. King’s
intended perspective. I also challenge Mr. Suderow’s contention that
in 1967, “the war was immensely popular.” In fact, “by mid-1967,
more and more Americans began to oppose the costly American involvement
in Vietnam. By 1968, only slightly more than 25 percent of the
population approved of Johnson’s military decisions” (http://library.thinkquest.org/27942/war.htm).
CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS
Will Metro Vote This Week to Cut Service?,
Dennis Jaffe, DennisJaffe@Gmail.com
If you don’t want to face and complain about severe Metro service
cuts in five weeks, you have the power to prevent them from being
approved. Metro’s Board of Directors is holding a public hearing on
Wednesday, January 27, at 5:30 p.m. at Metro headquarters at 600 5th
Street, NW — but you can E-mail them in advance — on how they will
eliminate a $40 million gap in the budget year that ends June 30. Option
1 would make severe service cuts. Proposed train changes include:
running trains nightly every thirty minutes instead of twenty, reducing
capacity during an already overcrowded rush-hour, and starting daily
service later and ending it earlier by thirty to sixty minutes. Some bus
routes scheduled to run every fifteen minutes would run every
twenty-four minutes, others running every twenty minutes would run every
If these cuts are approved, ridership would decline, which in turn
would further reduce Metro’s revenue and make necessary even deeper
service cuts. Four options being considered are explained at: http://www.wmata.com/about_metro/news/PressReleaseDetail.cfm?ReleaseID=4248.
Options to prevent the severe service cuts include raising fares by
between five to ten cents and delaying by up to one year a $16 million
rehabilitation of rail yards. But it’s also critical, as riders are
asked to step up to the plate here, that we tell our representatives we
want the local governments that fund Metro to step up to the plate with
greater investment in the transit system on which our region’s economy
depends. Your voice is powerful because all of the directors and
alternate directors on Metro’s Board are elected officials or report
to elected officials who do take seriously what their constituents
The District of Columbia is represented on Metro’s Board of
Directors by both Councilmember Jim Graham, Jim@GrahamWOne.com,
and DC City Administrator Neil Albert, OCA.EOM@DC.gov.
Let them know what you think. If you wish to provide comment at
Wednesday’s public hearing, pre-register at email@example.com.
Department of Parks and Recreation Events,
John Stokes, firstname.lastname@example.org
January 29, 7:00 p.m., Turkey Thicket Community Center, 1100 Michigan
Avenue, NE. Youth Against Violence for ages twelve through eighteen.
Forum for teens to discuss youth violence. For more information, call
Jason Lewis at 576-9238.
January 29, 6:30 p.m.-9:00 p.m., Caesar Chavez Charter School
Auditorium, 3701 Hayes Street, NE. My Dream for the Future Awards
Ceremony for all ages. Participants in the My Dream for the Future
Writing competition will be honor with an award ceremony sponsored by
Kenilworth Recreation Center staff. For more information, call Janice
Wright at 704-9152.
Angel of Death Row Book
Talk, February 2
Joe Libertelli, email@example.com
The UDC David A. Clarke School of Law and Jamie Raskin, Professor of
Constitutional Law, American University, present Andrea D. Lyon (Antioch
School of Law, 1976), author of Angel of Death Row: My Life as a
Death Penalty Defense Lawyer. Andrea Lyon is Professor of Law,
DePaul University, and a nationally recognized death penalty expert.
Copies of her book will be available for purchase, and Ms. Lyon will
sign them. A wine reception will precede Ms. Lyon’s talk. This
trailblazing attorney pioneered unconventional ways to defend clients
against society’s ultimate punishment. Nineteen times, Ms. Lyon has
argued to save a convicted murderer’s life, and nineteen times she has
Angel of Death Row: My Life as a Death Penalty Defense Lawyer is
the harrowing memoir of the first woman in the United States to head a
death penalty defense team. Come to hear her answer to the perennial
question, “How can you defend these people?” Tuesday, February 2,
6:00 p.m., at the UDC David A. Clarke School of Law, 4200 Connecticut
Avenue, NW, Building 39, Room 201, at the Van Ness-UDC station on the
Red Line. This event is free and open to the public. RSVP on line at: http://www.law.udc.edu/event/Angel_of_Death_Row.
Sing a Song, February 6
Lionell Thomas, lionellt@artspg@org
Price George’s Art Council presents a black history month family
celebration, “Sing a Song,” with performances by CAFE, Positive
Vibrations Youth Steel Orchestra, Dance Makers, Inc., The Colours
Program, and Three Chords and the Truth. This is a free event. Saturday,
February 6, 3:00 p.m.-5:00 p.m., at the Justice Theater at Northeastern
High School, 7000 Adelphi Road, Hyattsville, MD. For more information
call 301-277-1402 or go to http://www.princegeorgesartscouncil.org.
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every
Wednesday and Sunday. To change the E-mail address for your subscription
to themail, use the Update Profile/Email address link below in the
E-mail edition. To unsubscribe, use the Safe Unsubscribe link in the
E-mail edition. An archive of all past issues is available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should be submitted to firstname.lastname@example.org,
and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of
Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to
be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief
paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can
be put into each mailing.