themail.gif (3487 bytes)

September 2, 2009

Deborah Ann Brown

Dear Mourners:

Deborah Ann Brown was killed Saturday night, shot by a kid in her neighborhood (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/01/AR2009090103709.html). She was walking two blocks away from her job, just after her shift was over at Dunkin Donuts. She was in front of the Urban League headquarters on 14th Street, NW, where a group of kids were sitting on the steps, when the seventeen-year-old boy from the 1400 block of Girard Street, NW, who was riding by on his bicycle, pulled his gun and started shooting at them. He missed his targets; he hit Debbie.

We knew her, casually. She was a tenant in the rooming house next door to our house for several years, and we talked over the fence several times. When our house was burglarized while we were on vacation, she tried calling the police two or three times before she was able to flag down a passing patrol car and get the officers to investigate. She was a nice and friendly person who had what the news stories about her death called, vaguely, “personal problems” — when she drank too much she could become loud and argumentative. But she was recovering from her days of heavy drinking. In a way, Debbie represented Columbia Heights, both its past and its future. For years, she, like many longtime residents of Columbia Heights, struggled to live in a neighborhood plagued with unbridled drugs and violence, more than twenty-one acres of vacant lots owned by the city, and a long delayed promise of a subway line on 14th Street. In recent years, with the development and gentrification of Columbia Heights, Debbie’s rooming house was closed to be redeveloped. Like many others, she then struggled to find employment and affordable housing, so as to be able to stay in her neighborhood. Her death at the hands of a careless and thoughtless teen was unfair, but she had known a lot of unfairness and trouble in her life.

The Metropolitan Police Department solved Debbie’s murder quickly, but “solved” is a generous verb. Debbie’s many friends in the neighborhood volunteered all the information they had, and the killer was identified rather easily. Meanwhile, MPD’s response to the shooting was the same as its response to nearly every neighborhood drive-by; it flooded the area with additional patrol officers whose only job was to be a visible presence, not to investigate and really, not even to patrol. On Monday morning, Dorothy approached two officers (H. Luge, Badge No. 3704 and R. Jones, Badge No. 3291) who had parked their cars at 14th and Girard Streets, just across from the Dunkin Donuts where Debbie had worked. They spent most of their tour standing by their cars, talking only with each other. They never once crossed the street to go into the park at 14th and Girard, where a number of Debbie’s friends, who have an uncannily accurate intelligence network about the neighborhood, regularly congregate. When Dorothy approached the officers to discuss the stories about the shooting that were circulating in the neighborhood, they quickly let her know that they didn’t want to talk with her or to find out what she might know, and dismissed her with the statement, “We don’t know anything.” Calls to the Third District headquarters and to the PSA lieutenant for PSA 302 were similarly brief and dismissive. So much for reaching out to the community, for working together with the community, and for community policing.

Gary Imhoff and Dorothy Brizill
themail@dcwatch.com and dorothy@dcwatch.com

###############

Libertarian Party of DC
Peter J. Orvetti, peterjorvetti@gmail.com

The Libertarian Party of the District of Columbia is in the process of re-forming after a hiatus. You can find us at http://dclibertarians.blogspot.com/ and on Twitter at @DCLibertarians.

###############

Avoid the Jenifer Convertibles Store in Georgetown
Ted Knutson, dcreporter1@yahoo.com

DC government doesn’t have a monopoly on treated the public poorly. Customer service does not get any worse than at the Jennifer Convertibles store in Georgetown. A week ago Saturday, I ordered a love seat that was supposed to be delivered this Saturday. The middle of last week, the store calls to tell me that date is impossible and the next non-workday day that would be available would be September 26. That is over a month to get a piece of furniture from Landover. I could get a Radio Flyer and have it here in the fraction of the time.

I called the corporate headquarters and found that the only day that I could bring a Radio Flyer or a U-Haul over to the warehouse myself would be on a Thursday, when I and most other people are working. To add insult to injury, their computer records last week said I had agreed to a Thursday, September 10, delivery, which I never had. Today, according to corporate, their computer said I had agreed to pick up the love seat from the warehouse that day. So instead of correcting the mistake, they added to it. Note: that if you are not home when Jennifer tries to make a delivery, they hit you with an additional full delivery charge.

I finally got so sick of being treated like this, that I canceled the order. And guess what: they are hitting me with a 10 percent restocking fee, even though there is nothing to restock. In no instance would they have made the delivery by today and it was not a special order item. To make matters worse, Ogueji (I may have his name spelled wrong), who answered the phone at the store today and Saturday had the worst attitude I think I have ever encountered from a sales person. When I asked him to call the warehouse on Saturday to see if I could pick up the love seat at a convenient day and time, he refused. I don’t know if this was out of stupidity, incompetence, or callousness, but someone who treats a customer like that has no business being in retailing. When I asked him about possible delivery dates, he told me something and said “that is what was in the system.” When I said computers are wrong sometimes, he said “not Jennifer’s.” I am taking my business elsewhere. I hope you do, too. (I found out Tuesday morning that the store does not have a DC business license. Bad business is bad business.)

###############

Responsive Government
Phil Shapiro, pshapiro@his.com

At 6:00 a.m. on Wednesday, September 2, I posted on the web these ideas about public libraries diversifying the operating systems of the computers they make available to the public (see http://tinyurl.com/n67bmm). Two hours later I saw this article on the Washington Times web site about MLK library’s setting up twenty new Macs for teens to use (see http://tinyurl.com/nmmngh). I call that responsive government. I especially applaud the purchasing division of the library’s acting with such dispatch.

And next — the Linux public access computers. I’m prepared to wait an extra two hours for that.

###############

Time to Emulate the Cruise Ships
Ed T. Barron, edtb1@macdotcom

With the swine flu potentially invading our schools, there are things that can be done to help protect our school kids and minimize the spread of the disease. Cruise ships have learned how to protect their guests from the Noro Virus by using hand sanitizers all over their ships. There are hand sanitizers in the rest rooms, at the entrance to any dining facility, and even before you get on the ship at every stop. They also monitor guests to make sure that they use these sanitizers. The same could be done in our schools. Have sanitizers at the school entrances, at all of the rest rooms, and at the entrances of any school dining facilities.

###############

District Seeks Applicants for Aging Program Grants
Darlene Nowlin, darlene.nowlin@dc.gov

The District of Columbia Office on Aging has continued the search for nonprofit and for profit entities to apply for grant funds to operate Lead Agency and Senior Wellness Centers for residents aged sixty and older in the District. The process has begun again to give more the opportunity to apply for available funding. Lead Agencies are responsible for planning, developing, implementing and coordinating programs that provide advocacy, health, education, employment, and social services to District residents aged sixty and older so they can live longer and maintain independence, dignity, and choice. In total for fiscal year 2010 there is approximately $4,712,599.00 available for the Lead Agency Grants with $252,000.00 to $736,800.00 available for each of the eight wards of the city.

DC Senior Wellness Centers promote healthy lifestyles, sound nutrition, exercise, and general wellness among the aging population in the District. This grant seeks organizations to operate Senior Wellness Centers in Wards 4, 5, 7, and 8. For fiscal year 2010 there is a total of $1,354,780.00 contingently available for the Senior Wellness Center Grants, with approximately $300,000.00 available for each of the four Wards serviced.

The lead agency RFA and the Senior Wellness Center is available for review on the Office of Partnerships and Grant Services (http://www.opgs.dc.gov) and the DCOA web sites. The grant application deadlines are September 11 and September 8 respectively. For more information, contact Aurora Delespin-Jones, Program Analyst, or Eric Manuel, Programs and Grants Manager, at 724-8821 for the lead agency grant or Tiffanie Yates, Public Health Nutritionist, and Mr. Manuel for the wellness center grant.

###############

DPR Moving Rosedale Recreation Center to Old Gibbs Elementary School
John A. Stokes, john.astokes@dc.gov

The DC Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) has announced that the Rosedale Recreation Center and outdoor swimming pool, 1701 Gales Street, NE, has been closed to begin preparations for the construction of a new Rosedale Recreation Center.

Staff and programs from Rosedale Recreation Center are being relocated to the old Gibbs Elementary School, 500 19th Street, NE, which will reopen on Thursday, September 3. Access to the recreation center will be though the E Street entrance of the Gibbs Elementary School building. Hours of operation remain Monday through Friday, 9:00 a.m.-9:00 p.m.; and Saturday, 10:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. The phone number for the center is 213-5649.

###############

Continental Congress Update
Wenzell Taylor, plantation_america@verizon.net

Bailouts, layoffs, foreclosures, social decay, family destruction, and endless wars. Most don’t know it, but virtually every problem that America now suffers is the direct result of violations of the Constitution by our (servant) government. Finally there is hope. This November, publicly elected citizen-delegates representing the people of each state will convene at a national assembly known as “Continental Congress 2009.” The purpose of this historic event is to formally document the violations and develop strategies the people can employ to peacefully resist tyranny and restore constitutional order. It’s time to hold our servant government accountable and reclaim the light of liberty.

Continental Congress 2009 will take place on November 9-November 21 at Pheasant Run Conference Center, Saint Charles, Illinois (http://www.cc2009.us/about-cc2009/purpose-format-outcomes) Three Washingtonians have been nominated as delegates so far to represent DC. Go to the DC state page to see who they are. There is still time for you to nominate anyone whom you think would be a great representative for DC: https://givemeliberty.org/Delegates2009/SignIn.aspx.

Election day for the delegates will be on Saturday, October 10, 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. in each time zone. A voting center for elections to be held is still needed in DC. If you know of a place that might be willing to allow the voting to take place, please contact me as soon as possible. Volunteers are also needed. We the People organization home page and link to state pages is at http://www.givemeliberty.org/.

###############

Gay Marriage
Michael Bindner, mikeybdc@yahoo.com

I addressed this, as well as the merits of gay marriage in a religious context, in my DC Examiner piece at http://tinyurl.com/lkk74j.

###############

The Effort to Keep Homosexuals Unequal in DC
Philip E. Pannell, Philippannell@comcast.net

In 1983, when I was appointed to the DC Human Rights Commission, I became the first gay African American man to be appointed to a municipal human rights panel in the country. What humbled me most is that I took an oath to protect the rights of the then fifteen protected categories of residents in our city. The DC Human Rights Act is one of the most comprehensive and progressive in the nation and I am exceedingly proud to live in a city that protects minorities from the possible tyranny of the majority.

We live in a society where it is still acceptable to discriminate against lesbians and gays and advocate measures that will give rise to public expressions of prejudice. In my opinion, such is the case with the calls and efforts to have a referendum or initiative on same-sex marriage in our city. These are blatant efforts to dismantle the civil and human rights protections of LGBT residents in our city. I deeply feel it is a sophisticated form of hatemongering — homophobia wrapped in democratic rhetoric.

The preponderance of civil and human rights achievements for African Americans in the United States have been the results of legislative and judicial actions. If the rights of blacks had been subjected to popular votes years ago, many of the civil rights advances would have been delayed and denied. Only bigots feel comfortable in calling for popular votes that will affect unpopular minorities. My homosexuality is as innate to me as my eye color and race. To discriminate against people like me because of the way we were born is not only unfair and unjust, it is profoundly evil. I hope and pray that most people in the District of Columbia are not as hateful as those who are promoting a popular vote to ban marriage equality and that this campaign of bigotry will fail. People like me want the same rights and responsibilities as heterosexuals — nothing more and nothing less.

###############\

An Imposition? Please
Martin Andres Austermuhle, martin.austermuhle@gmail.com

I’ve again been surprised by Gary and his opposition to marriage equality. On August 30, he wrote: “Building a consensus in the United States for gay marriage as a legal option, which is far short of being a basic human right, will take many years and a good deal of work, and it can’t be done by the imposition of courts or legislatures.” Huh? I hate to be the one to remind Gary and other marriage equality opponents that legislatures across the country have many times played vital roles in the civil rights victories we now take for granted. The 1964 Civil Rights Act was passed by Congress under fierce opposition from many Southern states. Looking back on that key piece of legislation, is Gary arguing that Congress “imposed” civil rights on the US? And if it did, is that necessarily a bad thing? I don’t think so.

Changing people’s minds about marriage equality will take changes in cultural norms, but it will also take brave acts of legislation by our elected leaders. Vermont recently became the first state to allow same-sex marriage by legislation, and the District may well be the second. This isn’t an imposition, Gary — it’s democracy. Lest you forget, this is a representative democracy, and you have chosen representatives to make decisions on your behalf. If you’re that opposed to them, you can feel free and vote against them. But don’t pretend that anything is being “imposed” on you.

Finally, I think it’s telling that while marriage equality opponents claim to have the support of the “people,” the only actual protest we’ve seen occurred earlier this year in front of the Wilson Building and was attended by less than two hundred people — most of them not even District residents. And now that national organizations have decided to work against marriage equality in the District, it’s tough to argue that they’re not looking to impose their beliefs on the residents of the District.

[In themail on August 23, Martin seemed to argue that it was illegitimate to hold an initiative or referendum on the definition of marriage unless we held an initiative or referendum on every issue; now he seems to argue that in a representative democracy there should be no initiatives or referenda at all. I disagree. Not all states have a right to hold initiatives, but I think that the opportunity to propose initiatives and to get a public vote on them strengthens democracy and increases the legitimacy of laws. Interestingly, just today the state of Maine announced that a referendum on that state’s gay marriage law will be on the November 3 statewide ballot. If the law is upheld, it will increase its legitimacy; if Maine had blocked the citizens’ right to hold a referendum on the law, that would have placed a shadow of doubt over it, and created a presumption that it was a law imposed on the people without their consent. No doubt, national organizations will participate in the state campaigns in Maine, both for and against gay marriage, just as national organizations will participate on both sides of the debate in DC. Does Martin believe that the participation of national gay organizations on the side of same-sex marriage in DC invalidates the arguments made by local advocates? — Gary Imhoff]

###############

CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS

National Building Museum Events, September 10
Jazmine Zick, jzick@nbm.org

September 10, 12:30 p.m.-1:30 p.m., Building for the 21st Century: Deep-Energy Retrofits for Existing Homes. Betsy Pettit, AIA, president, building science consulting, provides results from several cold-climate retrofits that addressed windows, insulation, equipment, and more. Free; registration required. Walk-in registration based on availability.

September 10, 6:30 p.m.-8:00 p.m., Sustainable Communities: Greenovation. Discover cutting-edge sustainable technologies and learn how these innovations are conceived, developed, and ultimately brought to the market. Bill Sisson, director of sustainability at United Technologies, and others discuss moving green technologies from thought to reality. Members and students, $12; nonmembers, $20. Prepaid registration required. Walk-in registration based on availability.

###############

Outreach Information Exchange, September 10
Leah Gurowitz, leah.gurowitz@dcsc.gov

Knowledgeable persons will discuss the resources available to immigrants, non-English and less-than-proficient English speakers, and self-represented litigants at the DC courthouse. Thursday, September 10, 3:00-5:00 p.m., at the DC Court of Appeals, Historic Courthouse, 430 E Street, NW.

The DC Courts’ Standing Committee on Fairness and Access has reached out to immigrant communities, legal services providers, members of the bar, court interpreters, and others to gather recommendations on how to improve court access. One of the themes that emerged is that persons who provide services to immigrant communities, those who do not speak English or are less-than-proficient, and self-represented litigants are eager to learn more about the legal and other resources offered at the DC Courts. To address this, the committee will conduct an Outreach Information Exchange. Organizations and persons who provide services to these populations are invited to attend.

Presenters will discuss resources in the areas of family and domestic relations, landlord/tenant, small claims, domestic violence, wills and probate, tax sales, appealing to the DC Court of Appeals, court interpretation, the Courts’ web site, and access for persons with disabilities. Each presenter will describe briefly the scope of the services provided, the way the services are delivered, the location and hours of operation, and the resources available. For more information on the Standing Committee on Fairness and Access, go to http://www.dccourts.gov/dccourts/about/standing.jsp.

###############

themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every Wednesday and Sunday. To change the E-mail address for your subscription to themail, use the Update Profile/Email address link below in the E-mail edition. To unsubscribe, use the Safe Unsubscribe link in the E-mail edition. An archive of all past issues is available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.

All postings should be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com, and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can be put into each mailing.

 


Send mail with questions or comments to webmaster@dcwatch.com
Web site copyright ©DCWatch (ISSN 1546-4296)