themail.gif (3487 bytes)

January 21, 2009

Don’t Turn Your Head

Dear Head Turners:

There are a few complaints about complaining in this issue of themail. I’ve started a reply, and I’ve demoted it to the end of this issue. Therefore, all I’ll do here is call your attention to an article by New York City’s school chancellor Joel Klein and Al Sharpton that urges President Obama to support Chancellor Michelle Rhee. “Come on up for the Rising,” is in the current issue of The New Republic, http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=7a99bd1c-903a-4f47-a2ee-9e4838975b05

Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com

###############

Tenley-Friendship Library Held Hostage
Anne C. Sullivan, acsullivan@starpower.net

Neil Albert, the Deputy Mayor for Planning and Economic Development, responded to a letter that Councilmembers Kwame Brown and Mary Cheh sent to him on October 29, asking him to terminate negotiations with LCOR for the Tenley-Friendship Library/Janney Elementary School site. Albert’s response arrived two and a half months later, on January 12. It refused to honor the Councilmember’s request to end negotiations for a project that has been uniformly opposed by neighborhood groups and the previous neighborhood ANC. Albert’s letter can be found at http://www.dcwatch.com/issues/westend090112.htm.

The members of the former ANC 3E Special Committee have sent a letter to Councilmembers Brown and Cheh in an effort to point out the misrepresentations and false claims in Deputy Mayor Albert’s letter (http://www.dcwatch.com/issues/westend090116.htm). The committee attached a PDF including images of LCOR’s site plans for the project as they were presented to the community in October, November and December (http://www.dcwatch.com/issues/westend090116.pdf). You will see that the images bear out the claim that very little substantive revision — and no attempt at problem-solving — has taken place over the course of the past four months.

###############

Impending UDC Tuition Increase
Kevin M. McCarron, alanbreckstewart@yahoo.com

The story I have heard, through a source whom I have always found credible, is that a tuition increase under consideration at the University of the District of Columbia would raise tuition from $105 per credit hour for DC residents to $292 per credit hour. This proposed increase of $187, to be implemented within the next semester, represents an increase of 173.33 percent. One effect is to immediately set up the game so that a smaller increase (let’s say, to split the baby, 86.67 percent) would then look reasonable. Obviously, it wouldn’t be. And reenter Charlene Drew Jarvis, she who had such a big role in saddling DC’s residents with that white elephant of the new convention center. (And, we are supposed to believe, the new white elephant that just coincidentally happened to benefit Terry Golden and the Marriott corporation for which he fronts. How nice.) As president of Southeastern University, Jarvis is said to be key in orchestrating a proposed “merger” of Southeastern, heavily laden with debt, into the public university. Once again, Jarvis schemes to have the public pick up her pet, private projects.

Who will get hurt? I could regale you with stories of students, with whom I have sat in class as a part-time student for several years, who struggle to stay awake and focused as they try to maintain a full-time job while they take a full-time course load. These kids, and some older adults, aren’t simply students who work; they’re workers who are trying to obtain a higher education. But I’m sure this is common knowledge. What isn’t common so commonly expressed is that once again the most vulnerable people in the District are to fall victim to the local political establishment. Longtime District residents, I’m sure, can tell you how rarely our councilmembers speak of the public university. All I can ever recall our councilmembers and mayors talking about is about Howard University. Howard certainly deserves the praise, but that is not our elected leaders’ charge; the University of the District of Columbia is. And the elected leaders in the District, with notable exceptions such as Charles and Hilda Mason — the two were a unit after all (and Mr. Mason was in fact a Howard alumnus) — have continuously shown their contempt for the public university in the paucity of the budgetary allotment: It’s a disgrace.

Added to this disgrace is the crime of our Congressional Delegate’s selling the university downriver with her complicity in helping Congress craft and pass the Tuition Assistance Grant, so that children of wealthier families in the District can send their kids “out-of-state” for the respective states’ instate tuition. But asking Democratic elected officials in this town to stand up to Eleanor Holmes Norton is like asking people to accept that corporate campaign contributions, even on the local scene, are in fact bribes: They ain’t gonna do it. So we “little people” must. But I should not only point any fingers at the new convention center; there’s also the new baseball stadium, funding for which was guaranteed by the District. I have heard there’s to be a new stadium for soccer, funded similarly. And then there’s the sweetheart land deal for Abe Pollin, who doesn’t have to pay a dime in property taxes for the Verizon Center. Why don’t low-income homeowners subsisting on low wages ever get such a sweet deal?

Folks, this tuition increase is not simply about improving the only public university in the District, as Jarvis would spin it. If that were indeed the case, then included in the proposal would be a plan to add and strengthen graduate programs where students (and the graduate faculties) would have to prove that they’re on the cutting edge of their fields by writing theses and dissertations — the sine qua non of a university. And that is what President Sessoms should be telling the District’s government: As public officials, they must at long last accept tangible responsibility for the public university, fund it properly, stand up to the Congressional Delegate, and keep it affordable for students. Please help us thwart this tuition increase in its entirety.

###############

Why Obama Visited a Closed Rec Center
David J. Mallof, mallof@verizon.net

On Martin Luther King Day my thoughts were in part on economic inequity and injustice related to granting abusive public subsidies and direct cash gifts via taxation schemes to those least in need. All local papers reported — including the Washington Post again proudly last Sunday on Metro page C1 -- on the historic visit by then President-Elect on Sunday, January 11, to play hoops in DC at the closed Marie Reed Recreation Center in Adams Morgan. Closed? That’s right. All recreation centers are shuttered DC-wide on Sundays. Shockingly, Marie Reed is closed on Saturdays too, while most others close early at about 4:00 p.m.! Weekday hours are anemic for most working people, both early and late. (Go to http://www.dpr.dc.gov for an eye opener.) DC has unacceptably high incidents of diabetes and hypertension per capita. Kids roam the streets at night. It seems we spend money for police cordons rather than to keep rec centers open. Cops should meet kids there, not at street barricades.

Unfortunately while rec centers persistently go begging for adequate operating funds, the DC council did gift, via a special scheme using its precious excise taxation powers, $50 million to the already wildly popular private Verizon Center just a little over one year ago. Leaders said the special outright subsidy scheme would be paid mostly by Marylanders and Virginians buying tickets at Verizon, so DC residents would be unaffected. Unfortunately too, DC now frantically seeks relatively small increments in new revenue to support flagging social programs. For example, it recently raised parking meter fees by $7 million. Yet the DC council, in the Verizon case, wastefully gifted $50 million in precious excise tax revenue to those least needing it. (During its 2007 deliberations, the DC council also concurrently sought and accepted a second skybox, on top of another skybox DC’s leaders already controlled, for the council’s exclusive use. This was a blatantly corrupt quid pro quo.)

And to this day the DC government, after repeated Freedom of Information requests during 2007-08, refuses to disclose the plan, required by a DC law that the Mayor approved, of just how the public’s $50 million is being spent on “capital improvements” to increase the value of the private property. Meanwhile Marie Reed and all other DC recreation centers go vastly underutilized. Our president should not return to any DC recreation center until they are all open to the public widely. He emphasized in his inaugural address: “. . . those of us who manage the public’s dollars will be held to account — to spend wisely, reform bad habits, and do our business in the light of day — because only then can we restore the vital trust between a people and their government.”

Mayor Fenty should pick up the phone this week and ask Verizon Center’s owners in good conscience to rebate back the shameful $50 million excise tax gift in order to increase public access to essential public health and recreation centers. And the DC council should return the keys to their second skybox post haste.

###############

Charter Buses’ Idling
Annie McCormick, mamccredz@msn.com

I understand that the District has an anti-idling law. Apparently no one told the charter bus drivers who parked on 14th Street between Thomas Circle and N Streets. On Monday, January 18, the buses parked there idled for much of the day. Also there was a yellow construction vehicle parked near the middle of the block on east side of 14th Street for weeks. The buses had to park around it. It was suddenly and quietly moved sometime before midnight on Tuesday night, too late to have freed up the space for the charter bus parking on Monday and Tuesday.

###############

Phew — DC Residents are Inauguration No-Shows
Joan Eisenstodt, jeisen@aol.com

Thanks to Dorothy’s observations and those of others about DC residents not attending the inauguration activities. We thought it was “just us” and felt we’d miss the energy of all those from out of town. DC has made some dumb mistakes around all this — one of which was not making tickets for even the parade readily available to those of us who put up with all of this. More, the Taxicab Commission’s absurd decision not to have flat fares so that drivers could pick up people along the way makes it painfully difficult for many to get around. We’ve gone to two related but not connected events so far; we’ll watch Tuesday’s events on TV and wait for the District to settle down a bit before heading out again. Maybe we’ll get a glimpse of the First Family in the next four years.

###############

Get a Grip
John Talbott, jttalbott@hotmail.com

As many as two to four million people are expected at the inaugural, and somehow or other you find a way to bash the DC government for its inefficiency. Get a good strong grip on yourself. Some things actually happen with absolutely no DC government cause, good or bad, behind them.

###############

Don’t Complain
Harry Jaffe, hjaffe@washingtonian.com

Gary, why not go down to the Mall or out in the city and try to participate and enjoy yourself? The fresh air might clear out all those negative thoughts. All around Washington today, people were celebrating MLK and Obama. I attended a wonderful and hopeful performance at Sousa Middle School. Students from Alice Deal played jazz; students from Sousa danced. I volunteered there as well, taking energy efficient packages of light bulbs and such around the neighborhood. All is free. The public is invited. Get out in the world and enjoy the benefits of living in the nation’s capital. No one is telling you to stay at home and complain.

###############

Needless Sour Grapes Make Unpalatable Whines
Len Sullivan, lsnarpac@bellatlantic.net

C’mon whinos, complaining about tight security and not being wanted downtown, or stomping futilely for statehood, is totally inconsistent with hosting a landmark American presidential inauguration. Those ‘themail’ readers who want to live in a state should move to any one of the fifty that surround us, and are represented here. Those who want to be part of our nation’s capital city, should make sure all those short-time visitors from our fifty states (and beyond) find a proud, welcoming, world-class city populated by residents who understand their unique role in this unique place. Get your hair done and go downtown next week. And then find some positive way to make Washington, DC a better symbol of our national goals.

###############

Inauguration with the Cranks
M.H. Rudolph, m_rudolph@hotmail.com

Gary and Dorothy, thank you for the encore presentation of Inauguration with the Kranks. You’ve both been around long enough to know that, as DC residents, you get to host great events whether or not you are in the mood for it. Think Millennium Celebration, Million Man March, World Bank meetings.

Watching from two thousand miles away, I am a bit sad that I am not there today, notwithstanding the hassle of getting around and dealing with the crowds. Your most recent rant reminds me of the reaction to that snowstorm in 1996 when the weather shut everything down and lawyers everywhere were incensed that they could not get in to work. For the rest of us, the soft silence of snow packed streets for a couple of days was a joy.

Just chill for once, and enjoy the fact that we have a new president, that so many people came to witness this and show their support for him. Be grateful for once, and humble, and ditch the cynicism. Just this once, take a break from the whining.

###############

Turning Heads
Gary Imhoff, themail@dcwatch.com

In the next issue of themail, I’ll address why Dorothy and I were critical of the DC government’s handling of the security for the inauguration. For now, I just want to point out that we were right. First, the good news. There wasn’t a single arrest at the swearing-in ceremony or inauguration parade. This is testimony not only to a well-behaved crowd, but also to unusual restraint by the many law-enforcement agencies that overlooked numerous small, harmless infractions. Now the bad news: all our predictions about the ill effects of giving security agencies a free hand to run the event came true.

We said that — unless DC government officials stood up for this city’s residents and our visitors and insisted on changes — overweening security restrictions would result not only in gridlock but also in keeping people away from inaugural events. This proved especially true at the parade, which was one of the most sparsely attended inaugural parades in recent memory. One of our friends reported having gone through three checkpoints in a block and a half to get to the Wilson Building, on the parade route. This deliberate blocking of attendees resulted in a parade route that even at the beginning had blocks of empty sidewalks guarded by solid lines of police officers. Most blocks never got more crowded than 7th Street in Chinatown on a Friday night, with spectators only three or four deep at most.

The level and extent of security restrictions was unprecedented. As The New York Times reported, “Though intelligence agencies have detected no credible threat to any inaugural event or to Mr. Obama, law enforcement agencies, operating from a network of centers, will command ground, air and waterborne forces numbering in excess of 20,000 police officers, National Guard troops and plainclothes agents from more than 50 agencies, according to security planners. The security measures, enhanced by a White House announcement of emergency financing for public safety, are by far the most extensive and stringent for the swearing-in of a president. . . . While the federal security officials have not projected their total cost for the inauguration, officials in the District of Columbia have said the city might spend nearly $50 million. State officials in Maryland and Virginia have estimated they might spend $12 million and $16 million respectively, and officials in each of the three jurisdictions have said they hope the federal government will help pay for their expenses,” http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/15/us/politics/15security.html. The problem arises not just from the massive growth in the size and cost of security for this inauguration, but from the imposition of new and uncalled-for restrictions on the freedoms of Washingtonians and others who attended the inauguration. “With hundreds of rooftop marksmen and thousands of police and guardsmen deployed throughout Washington, inaugural parade participants have been told not to make any sudden moves or turn their heads to look at Obama as they pass his reviewing stand.” http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20090119/LIVING/701199970. Luckily, the majority of parade participants had the good sense to ignore this ignoble command; in this democracy, peasants are still able to gaze upon the faces of their rulers.

These restrictions succeeded only in making people’s lives difficult, not in increasing real security, but security agents and government officials have been unapologetically proud of having gone well over the top in closing down the city. For the record, some personal accounts of the problems resulting from overzealous security officers issuing ever-changing orders are detailed in the comments to a post on DCIst, http://dcist.com/2009/01/swearing-in_ticketholders_also_deal.php. Terry Lynch, quoted on City Desk, gave his personal thumbs down to security problems, “‘I waited at the 7th & D checkpoint entrance amidst a crowd of thousands; Secret Service had only a few metal detectors in place, so over a couple hours only 250 folks maybe got through, leaving tens of thousands to leave or left out. A disgraceful performance by the Secret Service.’ Further, Lynch is also not pleased by City Administrator Dan Tangherlini who, he says, ‘has failed to allow many folks to witness the parade or leave with some orderly semblance after the Inauguration.’ To sum up: ‘A very disappointing showing; security has trumped access; and there was a vacuum of crowd control afterwards. DC’s residents and its many visitors deserved better,’” http://tinyurl.com/9pb2ct. Jason Cherkis gave an account of needless obstacles placed in the way of those trying to leave the Mall, http://tinyurl.com/9cvbz7Post articles about the gridlock problems include http://tinyurl.com/7s63vd, http://tinyurl.com/czmu6x, and even http://tinyurl.com/84crod, which details how some of Obama’s relatives who came from Kenya to attend the swearing-in event weren’t able to get in.

###############

CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS

Summer Camp Early Registration, January 21-31
John A. Stokes, dcdocs@dc.gov

The DC Department Parks and Recreation (DPR) has begun an early registration period for District residents for DPR’s 2009 summer camps. From January 21-31, District residents are able to register for any of DPR’s 2009 Summer Camp sessions by visiting one of DPR’s centers during regular hours of operation. This summer DPR will offer five two-week sessions from June 15-August 21, Monday to Friday, 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. Camping fees are $100 per session for District residents for most camps. DPR will also offer eight one-week camping sessions at Camp Riverview, DPR’s coed residential (overnight) camping facility located in Scotland, Maryland. The campground is nestled among 217 wooded acres along the Potomac River near the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay. Complete information on all of DPR’s summer camps is available at the web site, http://summercamps.dc.gov.

Early registration must be done in person at a DPR center and proof of District residency is required. All camping fees must be paid at the time of registration; acceptable forms of payment are Visa, MasterCard, and Discover, or money orders made payable to DC Treasurer. Checks or cash will not be accepted. DPR offers a scholarship rate for District residents to ensure that summer camps are available to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay. Children of eligible families attend camps at a flat rate of $25 per child, per camp session. To determine eligibility or to apply, families must complete a 2009 Summer Camp Scholarship Rate Application. Applications are available for download at http://summercamps.dc.gov or by request by contacting the DPR Camp Central office at 671-0295.

For more information about DPR’s 2009 Summer Camps contact the DPR Camp Central office at (202) 671-0295, by E-mail at DPRcamps@dc.gov, or visit http://summercamps.dc.gov. General registration for DPR’s 2009 Summer Camps will begin on February 2, 2009.

###############

DC Public Library Martin Luther King, Jr., Events, January 23-26
George Williams, george.williams2@dc.gov

Friday, January 23, 10:30 a.m., Washington Highlands Neighborhood Library, 115 Atlantic Street, SW. Dr. King Story Time. Enjoy stories, films and reading activities about the life of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Ages 1-5. Contact 645-5881.

Saturday, January 24, 1:00 p.m., Capitol View Neighborhood Library, 5001 Central Avenue, SE. Slavery and Civil Rights. Discuss the Atlantic slave trade, the Jim Crow Era, the Civil Rights Movement and the backlash, and the modern Civil Rights Movement. Adults. Contact 645-0218.

Monday, January 26, 10:30 a.m., Washington Highlands Neighborhood Library, 115 Atlantic Street, NW. Dr. King Story Time. Enjoy stories, films and reading activities about the life of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Ages 1-5. Contact 645-5881.

###############

DC Public Library Events, January 24-26
George Williams, george.williams2@dc.gov

Saturday, January 24, 3:00 p.m., Petworth Neighborhood Library, 4200 Kansas Avenue, NW. Petworth Quilters. For more information, contact 541-6300.

Monday, January 26, 7:00 p.m., Watha T. Daniel/Shaw Neighborhood Library, 945 Rhode Island Avenue, NW. History Book Club. Discuss biographies of famous American leaders who struggled for freedom and equality. For more information, contact 671-0267.

###############

National Building Museum Events, January 25-27
Jazmine Zick, jzick@nbm.org

January 25, 10:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. Girl Scout Day. Calling all Girl Scouts! Come discover, investigate, and design environmentally-friendly communities. Scouts will construct a model green community, design gardens, and much more during this fun-filled, interactive event. $12 per Scout. Open to Brownie, Junior, and Cadette Girl Scouts. Prepaid registration required. Walk-in registration based on availability.

January 26, 12:30-1:30 p.m., Building for the 21st Century. Sustainable Communities: Connecting Infrastructures and People to Protect the Environment. Dr. Woodrow Clark discusses his work developing “agile” energy systems, which generate energy for a cluster of buildings, such as a college campus, from local or on-site power while also tying to the central grid. Free; registration not required.

January 27, 6:30-8:00 p.m. For the Greener Good: Sustainability Roundtable. Join the Editor-in-chief for Architectural Record and Executive Editor from National Geographic as they discuss the future of green. What does climate change mean for the built environment, natural world, and politics? $12 Member; free for student; $20 nonmember. Prepaid registration required. Walk-in registration based on availability. All events at the National Building Museum, 401 F Street, NW, Judiciary Square stop, Metro Red Line. Register for events at http://www.nbm.org.

###############

Vanishing Local News, January 27
Anne Renshaw, milrddc@aol.com

The Citizens Federation probes print media’s vanishing local news coverage, and asks why, on Tuesday, January 27, 6:45 p.m.-9:00 p.m., at The Charles Sumner School, 1201 Seventeenth Street, NW (at M Street). We will explore what appears to be the fading prominence of city and neighborhood news by DC’s major daily publications.

Guest speaker David Jones, Managing Editor of The Washington Times, will discuss the workings of today’s newspaper industry in general and his publication in particular. Mr. Jones will address whether budget pressures, downsizing, competition from electronic and Internet media, as well as the plethora of national and international incidents, have squeezed out local news. Is local news now considered unimportant or will coverage improve, both in quantity and quality?

If newspapers are to be relevant, they need to expand local news, according to the Citizens Federation. Neighborhood organizations and community leaders rely on the media to investigate and report local news (beyond broken water mains, possible panda birth, budget cuts, and shootings), as well as monitor the performance of District officials and agencies. The Federation hopes to forge a partnership with Washington’s newspapers to strengthen their community outreach. For further information, contact: Anne Renshaw, Federation President, 363-6880.

###############

Seal Woman at Kensington Row Bookshop, February 5
Beth Meyer, kensington.books@verizon.net

Solveig Eggerz, author of Seal Woman, will speak at Kensington Row Bookshop, 3786 Howard Avenue, Kensington, Maryland, on Thursday February 5, at 7:30 p.m. She will describe how her award-winning, debut novel, Seal Woman, is informed by the ancient tale of the seal torn between two worlds. Charlotte, a German artist, escapes the devastation of postwar Berlin by following an advertisement placed by Icelandic farmers calling for “strong women who can cook and do farm work.”

Drawing on the historical event of the migration of 314 Germans to primitive Icelandic farms in the late 1940s, Solveig describes the healing powers of Iceland’s rugged landscape and of the plants and herbs of the tundra landscape. The novel is set in Iceland, Germany, and Poland in 1928-1959.

A native of Iceland, Solveig spent summers as a teenager working on Icelandic farms. She has lived in the Washington, DC, area since 1974 and worked as a journalist and a teacher of English and Icelandic. As a storyteller in elementary schools and in Washington, DC, women’s shelters, she tells the story of the seal woman. Seal Woman was published by Ghost Road Press in May 2008

###############

themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every Wednesday and Sunday. To change the E-mail address for your subscription to themail, use the Update Profile/Email address link below in the E-mail edition. To unsubscribe, use the Safe Unsubscribe link in the E-mail edition. An archive of all past issues is available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.

All postings should be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com, and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can be put into each mailing.

 


Send mail with questions or comments to webmaster@dcwatch.com
Web site copyright ©DCWatch (ISSN 1546-4296)