Late Voting
Dear Voters:
Oh yes, education again. The way that Mayor Fenty, Chancellor Rhee,
and their supporters present the issue, either you support their
autocratic methods unquestioningly, or you don’t care about good
schools, good teachers, and good education. There are other approaches
to improving schools that involve working in concert with teachers,
students, and parents, rather than working against them. Those
approaches are represented well on a new blog site sponsored by Teachers
and Parents for Real Education Reform, http://realeducationreformdc@blogspot.com,
which I heartily recommend. (I also recommend Bill Turque’s article (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/08/AR2008110802488.html)
on DCPS’ ineffective efforts to deal with violence at Hart Middle
School, efforts that center on Rhee’s faith that any school can be
improved by replacing current teachers and principals with young and
inexperienced ones.)
After the last issue of themail, Comcast public relations office
called me with a clarification. Comcast’s last rate raise notification
included a new two dollar monthly “convenience fee for payments made
through automated service.” I wrote that that meant that Comcast would
be charging extra for automatic monthly payments through banks or
through Comcast’s web site, but the company says that it won’t. It
says that it will be charging a “convenience fee” only for payments
made over the telephone, not for other automated bill payment services.
As Gilda Radner’s Emily Litella said, “Never mind”; but don’t
pay them over the telephone.
Virginia Spatz, below, accuses me of an “irresponsible bit of
speculating” because I said in the last issue of themail that the
oddest result in last week’s local elections was the outcome in Ward 7’s
Board of Education race, where a candidate who didn’t do any
campaigning, Dorothy Douglas, received more votes than her two opponents
combined, although they campaigned actively. I don’t know Ms. Douglas,
I didn’t have any stake in any candidate in the race, and I didn’t
follow the race, but I still think the election results are odd. Let me
break my own rule against bringing national events into themail, but
only for the purpose of drawing a parallel. Bob Barr and Ralph Nader are
both fine and honorable men who ran for president on interesting and
credible platforms. But wouldn’t it have been odd if either of them
had received more votes than John McCain and Barack Obama combined, and
won every state? Could that result have been adequately explained by
saying that voters were turned off by the sniping between Obama and
McCain, and among their supporters? Virginia misreads me, however, by
saying that I made an accusation of fraud. I didn’t, and I don’t. I’m
certainly not charging fraud by any of the three Ward 7 candidates. I’m
just saying that it’s curious, and I’d like to know more.
Here is how the issue was framed on the Ward 7 Yahoo list by
Christopher Jerry, chrisjerry@gmail.com:
“Granted, I live in Fairlawn and therefore most of the stuff I tend to
be on top of is on the western and southern end of Ward 7, so who is
Dorothy Douglas? With very little campaigning from her that I saw, at
least in my part of the ward, how did she win every precinct in Ward 7?
My precinct is 112, in the 1700 block of Minnesota, SE, and I’ve been
asking some folks who I know voted in my neighborhood in Ward 7, and not
only have I not talked to anyone who voted for her, I haven’t talked
to anyone who says they know her. To collect 13,000 votes in a race
where apparently close to 24,000 were cast for that seat and
councilmember Alexander got 26,000 in her race means that she was the
choice on almost half of every ballot that was cast. Had she been #1 on
the ballot, I could probably explain it, but she was #3, which means
someone had to search for [her] name to make that mark or selection.
There was no backing from any councilmembers that I know of, so it does
look a little strange than so many votes were pulled for someone who did
so little campaigning or [had no] political backing. I take it there are
some of you on the other side of East Capitol in Ward 7 who are very
familiar with her.”
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
###############
Which Votes Counted?
Dan Gamber, Ward 2, dan79@gamber.net
As of 8:00 p.m. on November 7, the Board of Elections and Ethics web
site says that there were 228,062 votes cast on election day, with no
absentee ballots and no provisional ballots. What happened to the
absentee and provisional? They obviously could not change the
presidential results, but they might change the at-large council race
and any of several ANC contests.
###############
Are You Sure Your Vote Counted?
Karen A. Szulgit, freedcnow@gmail.com
DC voters took part in the unfolding of history, as evidenced by an
Election Day turnout of over 53 percent. However, our civic duty did not
end when we exited the polls. All persons who cast an Absentee or
Provisional ballot should now verify that the DC Board of Elections and
Ethics counted their votes in this historic election. DC voters are able
to check the status of their own Absentee and Special ballots online at http://www.dcboee.org/voter_info/special_ballot/
— although the Web page is currently labeled “Search Special Ballot
Status for Presidential Preference Election — February 12, 2008” —
or by calling 1-866-DC VOTES (1-866-328-6837). If the Board did not
count your ballot, you have the right to appeal.
The Board will hold hearings from 9:00 a.m. to 4:45 p.m. on the
second Thursday and Friday after election day, in Room 270 North, 441
4th Street NW. If your ballot was rejected and you want to appeal, call
727-2194 to schedule a time to do so. Be prepared to show evidence that
your ballot should have been counted, and bring a lawyer or represent
yourself at the hearing. If you do not win your appeal, you have three
days to appeal the Board’s decision to DC Superior Court.
I must cast Absentee or Provisional ballots because I serve as a poll
worker in a voting precinct that is not my regular polling place. After
examining my own voting history, I discovered that the Board had listed
me as “E — Eligible (Voter did not vote in the election)” in
February’s presidential primary, and the primary and general elections
in September and November 2006, in which we elected a new mayor. I am
dismayed that I am no longer considered a “Super Voter,” and that my
voice was not heard in three highly contested elections. DC registered
voters, do not let this happen to you! Claim your deserved role in
making history by confirming that you have asserted your constitutional
right to vote. Our voting histories — whether we voted, not who we
voted for — are public record and it is a voter’s responsibility to
verify that his or her vote has indeed been counted in every DC
election.
###############
Around 6:45 a.m. on election day we got in the long line at the
Precinct 62 voting place. At 7:00 the line started moving at a fairly
steady pace, and by 8:00 or so we had made it to the doorway of the
school auditorium where the voting takes place. All of a sudden, the
doors were closed. We were told that once the voters already inside had
cast their ballots, the election officials were going to hold a strategy
session to address some problems they had encountered during the first
hour. It would take no more than a few minutes, we were told, but nearly
forty-five minutes later we were still waiting. When we were then
admitted, we went about our business with no further delays.
I related this incident to a coworker, who was astonished, claiming
that once voting has started it’s against the law to shut the doors
any time before the announced closing time. That makes sense, given the
possibility for ballot tampering that could occur behind closed doors.
Was my coworker correct?
###############
Absentee Ballot Didn’t Arrive
Laura Richards, lrichards@cftc.gov
There were no problems at Ward 7 precincts 108, 109, and 110
(Hillcrest, Dupont Park, Penn-Branch), but I mailed a timely request for
an absentee ballot for my mother and it never arrived. She was able to
use senior citizen curbside voting at her precinct (114, Anacostia),
which worked well.
###############
Folks were feeding their ballots face-up into both scanners at J.O.
Wilson Elementary, K Street, NE, when I was there around 7:50 a.m. I
wanted to feed mine in face down; why should the poll workers inspect my
selections on the way by? The poll worker supervising the machine for
which I’d waited my turn informed me “it wouldn’t work” if I
inserted the form face down. I inserted it face-down anyway. The machine
did not spit it back out. Did it count?
###############
Fenty’s Early Filing Offers a Valuable Opportunity
Mai Abdul Rahman, maiabdulrahman@comcast.net
Although the District of Columbia has yet to experience the same
steep economic hardships of home foreclosures and the predictable
decline in property taxes, nevertheless the economic crisis will impact
our city’s ability to meet our costly financial commitment to the
Fenty-Rhee school reform initiative. In the last month more than
twenty-three state legislators, including nearby Virginia and Maryland,
slashed their school budgets and froze future teachers’ and
administrators’ salaries. With the looming economic crisis we are
likely to face, Mayor Fenty’s early filing of his candidacy for a
second term offers our city, mayor, and legislators an opportunity to
reevaluate and reassess the mayor’s multi-billion-dollar school
initiative; the successes of his new school reforms in the classroom;
the effectiveness, role, and expense of his newly established Ombudsman
and Deputy Mayor for Education offices; how much the taxes allocated for
DCPS will have an impact on our limited city funds and services; and the
wisdom of the Chancellor’s contentious proposal to rely on fragile
nonprofit and private funding to augment the funds needed for her
proposed astronomical teachers’ salary increases, a contentious
proposal that has pitted teachers unsure of the reliability of these
funds against DCPS central office.
Mayor Fenty has argued that his mayoral control of our schools has
placed schools success and failure accountable to him, overlooking a
fundamental weakness of his school takeover. He still has to work with
councilmembers and negotiate the more than $1.4 billion needed for his
proposed reforms. With an emasculated Board of Education, school parents
have joined others in the city to push for more legislative oversight.
Meanwhile the council is fretting over its limited input on school
reforms and our rising school expenditures, while our schools have yet
to show any tangible successes in the classroom. As a result,
councilmembers are exercising their legislative prerogative by delaying
the approval of millions of dollars in school renovation funds and take
every opportunity to voice their discontent with Chancellor Rhee,
Facility Director Allen Lew, and Mayor Fenty in private and public
forums, openly challenging the Fenty administration.
Today’s economic climate and the mayor’s early declaration may
offer the mayor and his school Chancellor another chance to reach out to
the city council and school parents who have been alienated and
marginalized from much of the school debate. This is a chance to
reestablish and rebuild a more trusting relationship, and to diminish
the current political friction all have suffered and have openly
complained about. It may also present the mayor the prospect of
reassessing and justifying the cost effectiveness of his school plans to
DC citizens and legislators; to demonstrate how these reforms are
enhancing teaching and learning in the classroom; and to examine the
role, effectiveness, and cost of establishing multiple educational
agencies that have yet to produce concrete accomplishments.
###############
I was told by someone that principals, in public meetings with other
principals and parents, won’t ’fess up to not having resources
(including people resources) when the chancellor says “you have X, don’t
you?”, because they don’t believe that “telling truth to power”
is what’s sought by the question, and they fear for their jobs —
given the arbitrary and capricious decision making we seem to be
witnessing thus far. That seems like a sound course of action to me
(although I myself am not very good at denying the truth, but at least I
am not a DCPS principal).
It’s reasonable to suggest that one way to correct these problems
would be to weigh a good portion of the Chancellor’s salary on student
retention (not to mention teacher and principal retention). The DC
Schools Chancellor gets paid far more per capita than most school
superintendents in the US and in the region. Montgomery County, Fairfax,
and Prince Georges County schools all have about triple or more
enrollment compared to DC. DC’s school system is very small. Even
including the enrollment of the charter schools, it’s about half the
size of the larger school districts in the region. If you want to get
the school system committed to student retention vis-a-vis the charter
schools, I suggest weighing up to half of the chancellor’s salary on
student retention and enrollment increases/targets. Taking a page from
the NCLB (No Child Left Behind) metrics, weigh this in terms of overall
student enrollment, by elementary, middle-junior high, and senior high
school tranches, and by individual school. Similarly, principals should
have salary bonuses based on maintenance and increase of student
enrollments, but on a smaller portion of regular salary (say 25 percent)
compared to the Chancellor. So whether or not they are getting the right
resources, this would begin to focus the public school system on
competing with the charter schools for students.
Given the seven-thousand-student drop in attendance from last year to
this year, that means a hefty decrease in salary to my way of thinking.
(I know you have to guard against fudging the data, because that would
be the new incentive given the link to salary.) Right now, one of the
two major promises of charter schools, that their existence would
generate a competitive and marketing orientation on the part of the
traditional public schools, has never been realized (the other promise
is choice and better schooling options for children with otherwise
limited options). That’s because all the incentives right now favor
charter schools. And there are no real penalties to the DCPS other than
school closure which, granted, sucks for the people whose schools are
closed, but not for the people who manage to keep their jobs and schools
open.
We can argue about the two-tier salary system for teachers proposed
by Rhee. But I don’t think her proposal addresses what’s really
needed in the face of the fundamental lack of 1) quality curricular
systems; 2) quality teaching processes; 3) management and support
systems for principals; 4) professional development systems for teachers
and principals; 5) adequate support systems and provision of additional
resources as needed for students of special needs — be they physically
disabled or having other skill or resource deficits; 6) adequate support
and development systems for parents and families — something that many
school systems don’t need to do, but seem to be necessary in urban
school systems with either or both ESL students and families or a high
proportion of lower income students and families.)
This isn’t Wall Street, where poor performance gets big bonuses,
and stellar performance gets stellar bonuses. I would say a drop in
enrollment of more than ten percent merits a minimum 25 percent salary
decrease. I tell you if Chancellor Rhee’s income dropped that much
this year, she’d start changing how she does things, and really focus
on enrollment-based outcomes. Match that with student achievement
outcomes, and now you’re talking. So I’d do a base salary of maybe
$125,000, and then another $125,000 on achievement outcomes, and another
$125,000 on enrollment outcomes. I think that would have a lot more
impact than spending money paying middle school students, and it would
be cheaper too. (Although I do think there should be a cooperative
education option for high school students on an opt-in basis. Students
would go to school year round, maybe on 50 percent time, and spend the
other 50 percent in payroll-job-subject learning-career oriented
internships.) I’d be happy to sell this as a counter-plan to the
Washington Teachers Union, which doesn’t seem to have managed to come
up with a counter-plan yet.
###############
Am I the only one who seethes at having to go through a metal
detector and empty my pockets of keys, change, etc., and show an ID just
to get into my city hall? I can remember not having to do so for a long
time, and I am unpersuaded that enough has changed to warrant it now. I
see this extraordinary level of security as the first thing to cut in
every city building to make up the projected $131 million budget
shortfall.
Every time I have to subject myself to city hall security, I wonder
whether the city council feels a need for this level of security because
it fears it is as despised by the governed as Louis XVI and Marie
Antoinette, and it worries whether we perceive it as being held in
office by its fealty to special interests. City hall security smacks of
tyranny and royalism, not government in a free republic.
The Washington Express’ poll center shows 54 percent of
respondents object to WMATA’s new random bag check policy. But what
tool of democracy is afforded us to reverse it? Ward One Councilmember
Jim Graham sits on the WMATA Board, which has implemented this policy
without a public hearing, but since I live in Ward Five, I can’t
express my objection to this policy through the normal democratic means
of voting Jim Graham out. Is this tyranny or is it royalism?
###############
LEA and SEA Functions
Tonya M. Butler-Truesdale, attytmbt@aol.com
Dear Mr. Bobb and Mr. Greene, I thank you for your prompt response [themail,
November 5] to the contributions made by Ms. Goodall and I. Expeditious
agency responsiveness is impressive, while expedient misrepresentations
of questions and issues are not. It is critical that the comments and
questions of citizens regarding any ambiguities the public may perceive
regarding the division of responsibilities between the Office of the
State Superintendent ( the State Education Agency) and the District of
Columbia Public Schools (the Local Education Agency) not be
mischaracterized as being, “too quick to write off the significance of
the DC State Board of Education.” As taxpayers we do have a right to
ask questions. The thrust of the two contributions regarding the DC
State Board of Education which you are responding to narrowly focused on
the lack of clarity regarding the comparative responsibilities between
the LEA and the SEA as described by their web sites.
The defensive accusatorial tone of the response is almost
intimidating. While your E-mail lauds the alleged public participation
already achieved in the process of reform, a question regarding public
access to each agency’s responsibilities appears to be unwelcome,
given the overall tone of your response. I had to remind myself that you
are not the spokesperson for the LEA or the SEA. You are supposedly my
voice, my spokesperson, the voice of the community.
More troubling is the fact that your E-mail attempts to clarify the
responsibilities of the State Board of Education with the simple
explanation that, “We have policy authority and responsibilities
similar to those of education boards in every other state. Ours is the
‘big picture.’” That statement clarifies very little and leaves
out the most critical fact, which is that State Board of Education only
acts in an advisory capacity although it, “provides one of the few
public forums where District residents can share their views at hearings
and meetings with a responsive elected body that is focused solely on
education.” I thank you for your service and your commitment and I am
certain that the tone was less than intentional. And, I’d like to
remind the readers that this discourse started regarding a question of a
possible conflict of interest of a candidate for office to the State
Board and my response that the conflict of interest issue was tangled by
the fact that OSSE and DCPS are separate agencies with separate contract
and procurement offices.
###############
“First and most importantly, with the defeat of Carol Schwartz the
District of Columbia has probably elected the last Republican to a
partisan elected office for many years.” [Gary Imhoff, themail,
November 5]
Carol Schwartz lost the Republican primary because she opposes gay
marriage. Then, the loser, she said she wouldn’t do a write-in
campaign. Then the loser changed her mind. So it is Carol Schwartz’
fault that Patrick Mara was defeated for the council seat and Carol
Schwartz’ fault the Republican Party is disappearing.
Thanks Carol, you loser.
###############
Not a good prospect, surely, given the uncertainties of party
platforms, the improbabilities of local administration, Fenty’s wish
to imitate the most dubious of Bush’s claims to executive authority,
and the unholy alliance of the Post and the Fenty administration.
###############
Irresponsible Speculating
Virginia Spatz, vspatz@radix.net
I’m disturbed by what seems to be an accusation in Gary Imhoff’s
piece [themail, November 5] of fraud based entirely on the idea that
something seems unlikely. Is there any reason to believe there was fraud
in the election for Board of Education in Ward 7 other than the fact
that the person who didn’t campaign won? Given the sniping that was
going on, at least in the Ward 7 lists, between the two younger, male
candidates’ campaigns, it didn’t seem all that unlikely to me that
voters would ignore the both of them and turn instead to someone with a
teaching background and a long history of service to the community.
In any case, however, something being unlikely doesn’t make it a
crime, and what is copied below strikes me as a very irresponsible bit
of speculating. Were the reported misprinted ballots in Ward 7? Is there
any reason to suspect fraud in this particular case? If so, can someone
tell me some specifics?
If not, I hope citizens will think carefully before spreading charges
based on likelihood. Thank you for considering this
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS
National Building Museum Events, November 12, 16
Jazmine Zick, jzick@nbm.org
November 12, 12:30-1:30 p.m., Building for the 21st Century:
Innovation in Green Design: The AIA presents the 2008 top ten green
buildings. Lance Davis, AIA, LEED AP and Greg Mella, AIA, LEED AP, of
the American Institute of Architects Committee on the Environment,
present the committee’s top ten examples of sustainable architecture
and green design solutions that both protect and enhance the
environment.
November 16, 2:00-5:00 p.m. Family Program: It’s Easy Being Green!
Turn your trash into treasure during this fun workshop that uses
recyclable materials to explore some of the themes of the Museum’s
newest exhibition Green Community. Both events at the National Building
Museum, 401 F Street, NW, Judiciary Square stop, Metro Red Line.
Register for events at http://www.nbm.org.
###############
Investigating DC Elections
Dorothy Brizill, dorothy@dcwatch.com
On Thursday, November 13, the city council’s Board of Elections and
Ethics Investigation Special Committee will hold its second hearing on
the election process and practices in DC. The roundtable will be held at
10:00 a.m. In Room 412 at the Wilson Building. It will focus on “pollworker
training, recruitment and evaluation, absentee and early voting;
innovations in voting options; voter education and initiatives; vote
center; and other similar issues.” To testify, contact Aukima Benjamin
at 724-8062 or abenjamin@dccouncil.us.
###############
Department of Parks and Recreation Events, November 14
John Stokes, john.astokes@dc.gov
Friday, November 14, 6:30 p.m.-8:30 p.m., King-Greenleaf Recreation
Center, 201 N Street, SW. Fashion show: A fun-filled night of
choreography and dancing while introducing the latest crazes in fashion.
For more information, call Henry Moton, Site Manager, 645-4550.
Friday, November 14, 4:00 p.m.-9:00 p.m., Langdon Park Recreation
Center, 2901 20th Street, NE. Skate party: the staff at Langdon Park
Recreation Center will host a Skate Party for the community. Admission
is a canned good. All food collected will be donated to families in the
Langdon Park community. Ages 6-18. For more information, call T-Jai
Farmer, Site Manager, at 576-6595.
Friday, November 14, 7:00 p.m.-10:00 p.m., Joseph Cole Recreation
Center, 1200 Morse Street, NE. Teen pot luck dinner (all ages). The
teens of Joseph Cole will bring in dishes to sit down and share with
their fellow friends before the big feast.
###############
How to Make More and Better Sales Right Away, November 15
Barbara Conn, bconn@cpcug.org
At this interactive workshop led by Dick Davies, the president of
Sales Lab Incorporated, you will learn how to say what you want — the
way people want to hear it. In an hour and a half you will learn what to
say, how to say it, and when to say it to have your audience agreeing
they want to do just what you want them to do. No stranger to
technology, our speaker has had key roles in the adoption of cellular
phones, the Navy/Marine Corps intranet, and COBOL.
Gather your colleagues, friends, and spouses, and your questions, and
bring them to this Saturday, November 15, 1:00 p.m., event of the
Capital PC User Group (CPCUG) Entrepreneurs and Consultants Special
Interest Group (E&C SIG). These monthly gatherings are free and open
to all. This month’s event is at the Cleveland Park Branch Library
(first floor large meeting room) at 3310 Connecticut Avenue, NW (between
Macomb and Newark Streets), just over a block south of the Cleveland
Park Metrorail Station on the Red Line. For more information about the
event, the speaker, and CPCUG (a 501(c)(3) nonprofit educational
organization), visit http://entrepreneur.cpcug.org/1108meet.html.
To RSVP, send E-mail to bconn@cpcug.org.
###############
Historical Society of Washington, DC, November 16
Ed Bruske, euclidarms@yahoo.com
Sunday, November 16, 2:00 p.m.-4:00 p.m. Historical Society of
Washington, DC, 801 K Street, NW, at Mt. Vernon Square. Free admission.
HSW Author and Lecture Series: Black Men Built The Capitol:
Discovering African American History, In and Around Washington, DC. From
the Back Cover of Black Men Built the Capitol: “Millions of
people visit the National Mall, the White House, and the US Capitol each
year. If they only hear the standard story, a big question remains: “Where’s
the black history?” Packed with new information and archival photos,
Jesse Holland’s book, Black Men Built the Capitol, answers this
question. In this thoroughly researched yet completely accessible
volume, Washington insider and political-savvy Holland shines a light on
the region’s African-American achievements, recounting little-known
stories and verifying rumors, such as: enslaved black men built the
Capitol, White House, and other important Washington, DC, structures;
Philip Reid, a thirty-nine-year-old slave from South Carolina, cast and
helped save the model of the Statue of Freedom that sits atop the
Capitol Dome; the National Mall sits on the former site of the city’s
most bustling slave market; the grounds that are now Arlington National
Cemetery were, from 1863 to 1888, a self-sustaining village for former
slaves called the Freedman’s Village.
Included are hundreds of places in the District of Columbia,
Maryland, and Virginia that illuminate ‘the rest of the story’ for
Washington, DC, residents and visitors alike.” Jesse Holland is an
Associated Press reporter covering Congress and is extremely
well-connected among Washington’s powerful black elite — the
political, legal, academic, and media communities. He took a year’s
sabbatical from the AP to conduct never-before-done research into the
topics covered in this book. Holland lives on Capitol Hill with his wife
Carol and infant daughter Rita. See http://www.jessieholland.com.
RSVP@historydc.org
or 383-1828.
###############
State Board of Education Meeting Postponed, November 20
Sean Greene, sean.greene2@dc.gov
The District of Columbia State Board of Education (DCSBOE) has
postponed the public hearing scheduled for Wednesday, November 12, to
Thursday, November 20. The DCSBOE will receive input from the public on
the proposed Early Learning Standards. The meeting will begin at 6:00
p.m. on Thursday, November 20, at 441 4th Street, NW, in the District of
Columbia State Board of Education Chambers, located on the lobby level
of the building. The meeting will air live on DSTV Comcast Channel 99
and RCN Channel 18.
###############
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every
Wednesday and Sunday. To change the E-mail address for your subscription
to themail, use the Update Profile/Email address link below in the
E-mail edition. To unsubscribe, use the Safe Unsubscribe link in the
E-mail edition. An archive of all past issues is available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.