Journalistic Ethics
Dear Ethical Advisors:
Correction: The Washington City Paper’s current Loose Lips,
Mike DeBonis, wrote to say that the administration had not stalled in
replying to his Freedom of Information Request for E-mails, as I wrote
in a comment in the last issue of themail. “Actually, there was no
stalling whatsoever; the mayor’s office delivered the E-mails within
the fifteen-business-day window set out in the FOI statute, and a fee
waiver was even granted.” For that information, I relied on Post
reporter David Nakamura, who told Dorothy that the FOIA had been filed
several months ago. Obviously, that was my error.
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
###############
In the Post’s relentless attack on true DC Public Schools,
they’ve gone to bat for our ill-performing and money-sucking charter
schools yet again. This time, the Post is whining, along with the
charter schools, about athletics. No one has ever said that charters can’t
join the DCIAA. The problem is the charters don’t want to. If they did
join the city’s public school athletic league, then they would be
unable to engage in practices that they like too much, like recruiting
athletes from other schools and allowing age- and grade-ineligible
players playing time. Look, rules are rules, and charters don’t like
having to follow any. They would much rather been seen as the poor
stepchild instead of the equity busting entities that they are. Fair
play doesn’t exist in charter schools. Rules are seen by charters as
just another “bureaucracy” that they don’t want.
In the article (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/03/AR2008030302844.html)
that preceded the editorial on Tuesday (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/10/AR2008031002665.html),
the director of the charter schools’ athletic league notes that he
charges the charter schools fees so he can secure practice and game
space, sometimes outside the city. He wants DCPS to let charters in on
the gym and field space that we have. It’s just not that simple when
he says, “When the Wilson boys aren’t playing, let us in.” Well,
when the Wilson boys aren’t using their basketball court, the Wilson
girls have games scheduled. And when they’re not playing other Wilson
teams are using the space. Every high school gym in the city is
seriously overused and over-scheduled. New high schools should probably
have two gyms to accommodate all the teams that need the practice space.
And if gym space were so important to the charters, why aren’t the
charters that are already in former DCPS schools, (Friendship’s four
campuses, Maya Angelou, Community Academy’s multiple campuses, to name
a few) being asked to cough up their space? Oh, that’s right, because
DCPS is the stepchild in this “system” and we’re the ones who are
expected to take the hit, time and time again.
###############
It has been a week since I was mugged at gunpoint on the escalator
entering the Columbia Heights Metro station at 5:00 in the afternoon.
Since that time, several people have asked me if I was now considering
leaving the city. (From friends living in DC, the question was mostly a
joke; from those outside the city, it was not.) My answer is a loud and
forceful “no.”
I loved my adopted neighborhood and city before the incident and I
love it now. The fact that I had one scary incident will not change
that. If anything, the support I and my family have received from
friends, listserv members, and the police has made me love Columbia
Heights even more. The police officers and detectives I have dealt with
have been exceptional in their commitment to catch the perpetrators and
to address all of our concerns.
My wife and I intentionally moved into the District from Northern
Virginia when it came time to buy a house because we wanted to find a
changing, vibrant, multiethnic community in which to start our family.
While I am a migrant, my sons are Columbia Heights natives and I am
proud of that. They ride their tricycles around the neighborhood and
know the faces at Columbia Heights Coffee. We spend many mornings in the
museums and galleries on the National Mall — and take the Metro to get
there. None of this will change. When we bought our house in 2002, some
of our non-city relations thought we were making a mistake. We knew we
were not, and we have never questioned our decision. We’re here to
stay, and one bad afternoon will not change that. Besides, we’re about
to get our own neighborhood Five Guys.
###############
Independents Should Vote in Party Primaries
Adam Clampitt, press@adamclampitt.com
Democracy in the District should not be a question. Sadly, it still
is. Though DC has been denied full and appropriate representation in the
federal government for 218 years, the District has enjoyed increasing
degrees of local democracy for thirty-five years. Yet, remnants of a
broken system remain denying 17 percent of District residents the right
to vote in primary elections. This is because DC law forbids
independents from participating in primary elections and forbids parties
from determining who can vote in their primary elections. This
unconstitutional measure must be overturned and that is why I applaud
the efforts of Councilmember Catania (At-Large) for his introduction of
the Open Primary Act of 2008.
Without question, it is the prerogative of the parties to determine
how their District residents will select their respective nominees, but
DC government must not make this choice for them. I believe open
primaries provide the best method for allowing all District residents to
select the competing candidates for the general election. Regardless of
one’s political affiliation, we can all agree that this year’s
presidential candidates are among the most impressive in years, and many
analysts agree that independents have been a key factor in producing
such an excellent selection.
###############
In his Washington Post blog today, Marc Fisher writes (http://blog.washingtonpost.com/rawfisher/2008/03/how_the_sausage_is_made_a_repo.html)
what appears to be the Post’s response to last week’s City
Paper article on Metro reporter David Nakamura and “The
Washington Post’s Cozy Year with the Fenty Administration” (http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=34681).
In his article, titled “Making Sausage: A Reporter’s E-mails,”
Fisher is dismissive of the concerns that Post readers have
raised about Nakamura’s tactics. He quotes Tom Kunkel, dean of the
journalism school at the University of Maryland, who equates the work of
a reporter with the making of sausage, and notes it “it is not always
pretty.” He goes on to praise Nakamura as an “aggressive and
competitive beat reporter doing his job” who did nothing unethical or
improper. In response to Fisher’s article, I posted the following
comment:
“Marc, I'm not buying your rationalization and approval of the
partnership between the Fenty administration and the Post, in
which the administration gets favorable coverage and the ability to
dictate how the Post will cover the story and whom it will
interview, in return for giving the Post advance notice of its
decisions and appointments. You may consider that a fair exchange, and
it may be for the newspaper and the administration, but it isn't for the
readers, because it deprives readers of fair, full, and critical
reporting on their government. If you were reporting on any corporation
other than the Post, you would call it insider trading, and you
would condemn it.
“As Quibillus Maximus and secuitat have pointed out in their
comments on your article, you're wrong when you say the Post
could come back the next day and give a fuller and more complete version
of an event, fairly quoting the administration's critics. It could
publish those follow-up stories, but it doesn't, because that would
jeopardize its cozy relationship with the administration. Your newspaper
has many good reporters in Metro who do maintain their independence and
their ties to communities, and who report on stories that would cast a
shadow over the glowing self-portrait of the Fenty administration that
we find in the Post. But they find their stories spiked by their
editors or, at best, buried on page B8.
“And, on a personal matter, I take offense that you share David
Nakamura's contempt for ‘regular citizens’ such as myself, when you
write about the ‘picky questions civic gadfly Dorothy Brizill poses at
mayoral news conferences.’ I ask picky questions like, ‘Isn't this
supposedly new initiative just a new name for the same initiative that
went into effect a few years ago?’ ‘How much is this going to cost?’
‘How are you going to pay for it, since it isn't in the budget?’ ‘This
seems to violate District code; why do you think it is legal?’ ‘What
qualifies the nominee for this position?’ Picky questions that,
because they may prove embarrassing for the administration, the Post
doesn't ask. In summary, getting a day's jump on your competitors isn't
worth the price of putting the paper in the tank for the administration.”
###############
I have sat by and listened to folk crying about the mass firings.
Have you ever had to deal with DC Public Schools at 825? I am confident
that if they fired 95 percent of the staff, they would not be making a
mistake. The government should not be a substitute for welfare or
education. As a parents and taxpayer, I deserve better. Luckily, I had
the skills over the years to fight them with lawsuits and win. Please,
no more bleeding heart liberal for incompetence. The cesspool at DCPS
downtown had to be eliminated.
###############
Brute Force and DCPS Firings
Rachel Thompson, rachelwtoo@aol.com
With regard to the DCPS firings, I want to comment only on the
specific way that they were conducted, with people being escorted from
the building immediately after being let go (per the Post
account). Unfortunately from what I’ve seen and read it’s absolutely
standard when companies do layoffs to handle it this way too — all at
the advice of the lawyers. I’ve been fortunate enough not to have it
happen to me, but it’s happened where I’ve been working. You get
called to a meeting and everyone in the room is fired. You sign the
piece of paper, you’re escorted from the room, someone stands there
while you empty your desk, you give them your keys and
everything/anything else, and they show you the door. No goodbyes, no
idea who else has gotten the same treatment unless you happen to see
them too stumbling out in shock. I think it’s horrible for the people
who have to do it as well, which may be why the police got stuck with
the job in this case. So much for respect in the workplace in general.
###############
If the goal of the police escorted mass firings was to clean up DCPS,
please explain what has been accomplished, besides possibly engendering
system-wide fear and humiliation? If the goal of the mass school
closings is to save District taxpayers twenty-three million dollars, why
must we first pay one hundred ten million dollars in order to be ready
to be receiving schools by September 2008? Let us recall what school
finance expert Mary Levy, director for Public Education Report Project
for the Washington Lawyers Committee, has repeatedly stated in print and
in various testimony before the city council: these mass school closings
“will not save us a lot of money, and it’s not going to allow us to
do exciting new enrichment programs. Levy put the savings at about $14
million, based on her own analysis. Because finance officials have
projected a deficit in the nearly $1 billion school budget, Levy said
any savings would probably first be put toward closing that gap. Unless
the council comes up with some other funding source, there’s not just
going to be the money there, for anything, Levy said. . . .”
Further, if the goal is to implement DCPS change, then this
Administration’s use of former Superintendent Janey’s school
modernization plan — a verbatim extraction — and the “extrapolation”
from the Charlotte-Mecklenburg handbook is not at all in keeping with
“change” or “progress,” other than providing a different
signature at the bottom of someone else’s page. But it is “in
keeping. . . .“ And shall we dismiss the lack of definitive line-item
educational strategies and academic specificity, which does not appear
to exist, let alone any new or innovative functioning within an old DCPS
structure? What is apparent is this Administration’s decision to
contribute to further academic decay by eliminating foreign languages.
The old DCPS main eliminated PE, arts, music, and librarians, so why
shouldn’t the “new change agents” continue and eliminate foreign
language? It’s a new decision, so presumably that qualifies as
progressive change.
Unfortunately, while many are chanting “change,” “progress,”
and “elimination of the dysfunctional status quo,” this
administration is right on course as it continues down an historically
broken, dysfunctional, and inept path. In spite of the vehement mantra,
there is absolutely no demonstratively new, innovative, or intelligently
thoughtful and well-plan strategy emanating from this administration for
DCPS and our children’s academic success — just extrapolations and
extractions for previous DCPS educators and locales — and of course
the promotion of untested charter schools and the financial benefactors
aligned with privatization. So, as discomforting as the facts are, and
while many wish to articulate wistful hope because there are new public
faces streaming vague new approaches, read and listen a bit more
intently and one will indeed acknowledge it’s the same old approaches
in a new, energetic package.
Chanting “change” and “progress” are stratospheres away from
meticulous line item strategic planning to implement academic success,
for which we taxpayers are paying. Justifying mass school closures under
the guise of saving twenty-three million dollars, and then requiring one
hundred ten million dollars (minimally) from taxpayers, is, well — let’s
agree the media duping, primarily from the Washington Post (http://washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=34681)
is successful. The facts speak for themselves, regardless of the media
propaganda and carefully crafted “change/progress” message. The only
progressive, innovative change we taxpayers are experiencing is emptying
more of our tax dollars into an ever growing smokescreen from which the
majority of District residents (and DCPS children) reap little benefit.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS
Michelle Rhee at Cleveland Park Library, March
13
George Idelson, g.idelson@verizon.net
Michelle Rhee, Chancellor, DC Public Schools, will be the featured
speaker at the meeting of the Cleveland Park Citizens Association on
Thursday, March 13, 6:30 p.m. at the Cleveland Park Library. Also, Jeff
Smith and Erika Landberg, executive director and program director,
respectively, of DC VOICE, will present their latest findings on school
readiness.
Because of the critical role education plays in the future of our
city, this meeting should be interest to all. It will be of particular
importance to parents and prospective parents of school age children.
All welcome. We urge you to arrive on time.
###############
Ward One Democrats Election of Officers, March
15
David Meadows, shad0421@aol.com
The Ward One Democrats will hold an election that is open to all
registered Democrats who reside in Ward 1 on Saturday, March 15, at the
DCPR Colombia Heights Recreation Center, 15th and Girard Streets, NW.
Voting will be from 10:00 a.m. until 1:00 p.m. Officers will be elected
for the following positions: chair, vice chair, treasurer, corresponding
secretary, and recording secretary.
###############
For the Greener Good, March 18
Jazmine Zick, jzick@nbm.org
Tuesday, March 18, 6:30-8:00 p.m. For the Greener Good: Whose Carbon
Is It Anyway? As the construction and maintenance of buildings creates
more than 40 percent of the carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere
every year, who is going to take the lead in finding solutions? $12
members; free students; $20 public. Prepaid registration required.
Walk-in registration based on availability. At the National Building
Museum, 401 F Street, NW, Judiciary Square stop, Metro Red Line.
Register for events at http://www.nbm.org.
###############
Education Town Hall Meeting, March 26
Candi Peterson, kepmclp@msn.com
The Coalition to Save Our Neighborhood Schools invites students,
parents, teachers, and the community to an educational town hall meeting
on Wednesday, March 26, 6:30-8:30 p.m., at Shaw Junior High School, 925
Rhode Island Avenue, NW, one block from the Shaw/Howard Metro station.
This teach-in will comprehensively education our community about issues
surrounding the school closure crisis and offer alternatives to the plan
that abruptly closes twenty-one schools and restructures twenty-seven
school programs. It will cover the history of DCPS school closures;
where your children will attend school in August 2008; what the impact
is on teachers, other employees, and students; what empty buildings will
do to your neighborhood; the DCPS budget analysis; the impact of
privatization on public schools; and options for school reform and
student progress.
Public schools belong to the people, and the people have the power.
For more details, go to http://www.saveourneighborhoodschools.org
or call 607-7632.
###############
Martin Luther, King, Jr., Parade, April 5
Dorinda White, dorindaw@gmail.com
Save the date! Please join us for the twenty-ninth annual Martin
Luther King, Jr., parade to honor the life and legacy of Dr. King, Jr.
The parade will kick off on Saturday, April 5, at 12:00 p.m., at Ballou
Senior High School, located at 3401 4th Street, SE, and end at the
corner of Good Hope Road and MLK, Jr., Avenue, SE. We hope to see you
there!
We are accepting groups/organizations to march in the parade! If your
group or organization wishes to march in the parade, please call
698-1666 for more information.
###############
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every
Wednesday and Sunday. To change the E-mail address for your subscription
to themail, use the Update Profile/Email address link below in the
E-mail edition. To unsubscribe, use the Safe Unsubscribe link in the
E-mail edition. An archive of all past issues is available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com,
and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of
Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to
be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief
paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can
be put into each mailing.