Competence
Dear Competent Correspondents:
I tell you, it’s delicious. On the first page of the Washington
Post today, Daniel LeDuc writes, “With Washington’s new ballpark
a little more than a month from its scheduled completion, the project
has failed to meet the majority of hiring goals meant to provide
construction jobs to city residents, and the District has not sanctioned
any contractor for falling short” (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/23/AR2008022301651.html).
Is the Post the only entity to be surprised by this? Everybody
else knew long ago that the promise of stadium jobs was as specious as
the cap on stadium costs, and everybody else knows that the same empty
promises, with no intention of ever fulfilling them, will be made about
the upcoming soccer stadium giveaway (Clark Construction, which has the
ballpark contract, has also been named as the Poplar Point developer),
and the football stadium giveaway, and the volleyball stadium giveaway,
and the curling stadium giveaway, and whatever other schemes sports
promoters can dream up. Jobs a-plenty; tax revenues a-plenty;
development opportunities a-plenty; and just a small, minimal, tiny
really, contribution from the city — that will be the story from the
mayor and the majority of the councilmembers, from the Post and
the Federal City Council and the Greater Washington Board of Trade, from
all the usual suspects.
On the front page of the Metro section of the Post, Marc
Fisher covers another Child and Family Services Agency horror story, one
that is the opposite of the Jacks family story (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/23/AR2008022301920.html).
Here, in the Caplan family case, instead of CFSA’s not following up a
tip, it overreacted and took two twin infants away from their parents
because one of the girls bumped her head. It continued to press child
abuse allegations against the Caplans even after the police
investigator, five examining physicians, and a DC Magistrate found no
evidence, no grounds, no basis for abuse allegations. Fisher quotes CFSA
Director Sharlynn Bobo as justifying CFSA’s continuing actions against
the Caplans because, “This family is privileged and able to marshal
significant resources to accomplish its goals and fight the allegations.”
He quotes Acting District Attorney Peter Nickles as admitting that, “It
may very well be that the weight of the evidence supports the Caplans’
position,” but nevertheless applauding CFSA’s decision to try to
deprive them of the custody of their children. The only person within
the city government who seems to understand what’s wrong with CFSA’s
actions in this case is CFSA’s Deputy Director Roque Gerard, who
wrote, “In our attempt to protect, we have also lost the ability of
balance for fear of retribution.” Gerard will undoubtedly suffer for
his honesty; honesty is something DC government does not tolerate
easily.
In Fisher’s account, the only person aside from Gerard who has a
balanced viewpoint on the case is the victimized father, Greg Caplan.
Fisher writes: “The Caplans reject the idea that the city is only
doing its job well by being on hair-trigger alert. ‘Do you believe
innocent families have to get caught up in this?’ Greg asks. ‘This
is a false choice. What has to happen is not overreaction, but
competence.’”
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
###############
Judge Tells District to Settle Benning Library
Case
Robin Diener, rdiener@savedclibraries.org
Last Friday, Superior Court Judge Judith E. Retchin ordered the
District government to “provide language for relief” in settlement
of the final count of the suit over the future of the Benning Library.
Judge Retchin’s order will, in effect, require the government to
address community concerns about the size and services of the new
library, the rumored sale of the library land for redevelopment, and the
apparent loss of an important collection of African-American literature.
The plaintiffs have also asked for assurance that there will be adequate
space for literacy programming, computer labs, and community meetings in
the new Benning library as recommended by the Blue Ribbon Task Force
Report on Libraries.
Plaintiffs are also seeking a response “in particularity” to
issues raised by the local Advisory Neighborhood Commission (ANC)
including a financial impact report on the razing and rebuilding of the
library versus renovation and expansion, consideration of adding a
second floor, and delineation of a citywide plan for community
involvement in the proposed transformation of the DC Public Library (DCPL)
system. Archie D. Williams, Intergovernmental Affairs Specialist for
DCPL, participated in the meeting where he said he believed DCPL would
develop a “model” process for community inclusion.
ANC 7D plans to sponsor a forum for DCPL and other officials to
address the public’s questions. This was the fourth hearing in the
Benning library matter. Judge Retchin retained jurisdiction, pending an
equitable settlement.
###############
Invitation to Councilmembers Alexander and
Brown to Debate the Noise Bill
Joseph Fengler, fengler6a02@yahoo.com
We are disappointed with Councilmembers Alexander’s and Brown’s
votes to table the Noise Control Protection Amendment Act of 2007. By
tabling the bill, Alexander and Brown voted to deny any discussion of
the bill. It is hard to understand why Alexander voted to table the
bill, given her publicly stated support at the January 5 Hillcrest
Community Civic Association meeting.. At that meeting, she told
approximately one hundred Ward 7 residents that she would support this
bill. More perplexing is Brown’s support of Evan’s motion to table,
as he was a cosponsor of the bill. Brown has participated in many
Capitol Hill community meetings over the last few months as part of his
reelection campaign. At no time did he indicate to the residents that he
was anything less than one hundred percent behind the bill.
Yesterday, Alexander and Brown failed to support the residents of
Ward 6 and Ward 7. After the vote, Alexander and Brown both mentioned
they still supported the bill, but that it needs to be “worked out”
before it comes to the council again. I am personally prepared to debate
the merits of this bill with Alexander and Brown in a public forum over
the next three weeks. I would welcome that opportunity. We have worked
over two years to develop this bill to balance the concerns of all
parties. Perhaps a public debate will provide the opportunity for
Alexander and Brown to highlight what changes are needed to garner their
support. Our goal is to get this bill back in front of the council in
early March in order to protect the residents from unrestricted levels
of noise in their homes. Every resident should have the right to peace
and quiet within the confines of their own home. By voting with Evans,
Alexander and Brown appear not have that same goal.
As a reference guide to understand how unrestricted, amplified speech
impacts a residential community, please see the comprehensive review
published in the Washington Post, “Sounding Out Solutions for
Noise Pollution,” http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/metro/interactives/noise/?hpid=moreheadlines.
###############
On Friday, February 15, Carol Schwartz’s Committee on Government
Operations held a public oversight roundtable to discuss “problems
that arose” during the District’s presidential primary on February
12. During the hearing, Alice Miller, the Executive Director of the
District’s Board of Elections and Ethics, gave testimony in which she
repeatedly praised the Board and its staff for what she called “a
successful election” in which “voters were never at a disadvantage
in the ability to vote.” However, during the hearing, there was
evidence presented that: 1) many polls ran out of paper ballots, some on
more than one occasion, and there was a delay in resupplying the
precincts; 2) the ballots were, as in recent election, poorly designed
so that the perforated tab at the top of the ballot, if not removed,
jammed the vote-counting machines; 3) the privacy sleeves or envelopes
were again too small for the ballots; 4) many voting machines, both the
optical scan and touch-screen machines, malfunctioned at several
precincts; 5) there was a shortage of poll workers; 6) three days after
the election the Board had still not counted all ballots that were cast
on election day (out of ten thousand special ballots that were cast on
February 12, only 618 had been counted by the hearing on February 15);
and 7) after the polls closed, the vote-counting cartridges from all
several precincts were not delivered in a timely fashion.
In the aftermath of the election, many individuals, both voters and
poll workers, have contacted the city council with accounts of problems
they witnessed during the presidential primary. Dan Seligson wrote a
detailed account of his experience as a poll worker in Mt. Pleasant in
the February 14 edition of Electionline Weekly, entitled “A
Ballot-less Nightmare in the District” (http://www.pewcenteronthestates.org/report_detail.aspx?id=35492).
He recounts how his “precinct descended into chaos.” The next week’s
issue of Electionline Weekly, on February 21 (http://www.pewcenteronthestates.org/report_detail.aspx?id=35662),
reported that the Board of Elections its appreciation for his bringing
these problems to its attention by telephoning Seligson on the same day
his article appeared, and telling him that in the future he could no
longer work as a poll worker in the District. Since pollworker positions
are paid, Mr. Seligson is covered by the District’s whistleblower law.
Last week, the Fenty administration nominated Errol Arthur to fill
the vacancy as the third member of the Board of Elections (http://www.dcwatch.com/council17/17-685.htm).
Mr. Arthur is a recent graduate of Howard University Law School and a
resident of Ward 4. He is a sole practitioner with offices in a
townhouse at 14th Street and Spring Road, NW. He first registered to
vote in the District in 2000, and first voted in 2002. Little is known
about why he was selected for this important position. His confirmation
hearing has been scheduled for March 14 at 9:30 a.m. His wife, Sherri M.
Beatty-Arthur, has been nominated to serve as a member of the board of
the Office of Employee Appeals.
###############
As one of the owners of the Corrupt Ones 2008 Blog with a readership
now of over 64,000 people daily in DC and over 200,000 in the Metro
region, we have recently learned about censorship by the Fenty
Administration. Some employees of the government of the District of
Columbia have informed us that they have received E-mail notices
forbidding them from reading our blog because our blog is perceived as
being negative in its nature and its coverage of elected officials, and
fails to allow the other side to tell their side of the story. As of
February 21, our blog will be blocked so employees of the government of
the District of Columbia cannot access or read what might be said. As
such, it appears that the DC Office of Technology is monitoring and
censoring all E-mails received by employees of the government of the
District of Columbia before they are relayed and allowed to be seen.
What does this say about Mayor Adrian Fenty? It would suggest that he
had crossed over into being a little Hitler who will not allow anyone to
disagree with him let alone allow that disagreement to reach the ears
and eyes of his servants. Does this sound like Fenty believes in
democracy? Every blog or message board has always allowed Fenty and his
henchmen to submit their position on the issues that they might be
criticized on, but they to my knowledge have never done so. What are
Fenty and his henchmen afraid of?
[As always, I’d welcome any confirmation or contradiction of this
charge. If you are a government employee, can you access Rees’ blog
from your government office computer? If you got the E-mail that Rees
describes, can you forward it to themail@dcwatch.com?
Thanks. — Gary Imhoff]
###############
A Mini-Survey
Ed T. Barron, edtb1@macdotcom
Since the fifth of January, this year, I’ve been on the road
thirty-one days, traveling on four different airlines and coming back to
two DC area airports. On each trip, I checked a rolling duffle bag and
on one trip a pair of skis as well. When I landed at Dulles, I waited an
average of forty-five minutes until the bags started coming onto the
luggage carousel. For the two trips ending at National Airport, the bags
were already coming onto the baggage carousel when I reached the baggage
area (about five minutes walking from the landing gate). My conclusion
from this mini-survey is that the baggage system, and or baggage
handlers, at National, are much better than those at Dulles.
###############
Fifteen Million for Lincoln’s Cottage;
Homeless Veterans Out in the Cold
Ralph Blessing, rblessin88@hotmail.com
[Re: Faye Pinkney, themail, February 20] Competing priorities aside,
I find it hard to believe that a relatively small house like the Lincoln
summer home would require such an enormous sum to restore. I wonder how
many new homes of comparable size could be built with $15 million.
###############
Tours of the DC Recorder of Deeds Building
Paul Williams, DCHouseHistory@aol.com
It’s really ironic that this year represents the eighth year
anniversary of tours of the DC Recorder of Deeds building at 515 D
Street, NW, highlighting the 1942 era murals inherent in the interior of
the building built the same year. I would like to offer my own virtual
tour of the critical third floor “square and lot” room to highlight
the horrible condition of the actual records the building was built to
hold. I’m sure it won’t be on the heritage tour again this year.
When I research there often amongst dozens of title insurance company
employees, we all laugh, joke, and seriously ponder how anyone buying
property in the District has a clear title to any parcel in the city of
Washington.
I would love to show the heritage tour participants the broken
electronic lektrievers (70’s era auto file cabinets) whose contents
have been spread over a two-room area in no apparent order for more than
six years now, the vacant check-in and security desk, priceless vintage
Sanborn maps strewn about, no personnel in sight for hours, deed
recordation only summarized on index cards (easily removed and
frequently stolen and missing), an average temperature year round of 90
degrees, open windows, and no fire protection. All the summaries held in
this building are the only ones known to exist. Individual property deed
summaries from the years 1925 to 1935 will be missing entirely . . .
they are across the hall in unmarked and unknown file cabinets obtained
from a private company. Fifteen years ago, in fact, I had alerted a Washington
Post reporter to follow me to the earlier records (pre-1875) kept on
the fourth floor, in a shamble and pile of open, handwritten ledger
books dating from the 1790’s on the floor, under open windows year
round, covered with snow in the winter. They are now gone, our bluff
being discovered before the story ran, sent off to an unknown dump.
Other researchers and I were led to believe that some “DC Archive
Task Force” was looking at this current situation and other reported
violations of critical citizen records, beginning years ago. It is now
very obvious that the task force members never actually use the records
they were tasked to investigate. Why is it that researchers and title
examiners can retrieve fully digitized deed records in Montgomery County
that reflect 100 years or more of land transactions (and in most of the
nation in fact), when DC residents are once again left with our records
literally left open to criminal and environmental elements?
###############
I too am a transplant, here but for twenty years. And I was fine with
the present zone system, and foisting off Congressional intervention in
local affairs. But here’s the thing. Judging by my own experience, I
bet just about every cab user has at least one (if not many) bad
experience arguing with a cabbie about a fare. Even one instance of that
is one too many. There is no question that a traditional taxi metering
system will eliminate all arguing and disputes. Maybe it won’t
eliminate grousing.
However, it’s true that the “zone meter” system would have
worked the same way. And that shows the real problem is the lack of
transparent metering, not necessarily a zone method of charging versus
charging by the time-and-distance method.
###############
Taxicab Gas Surcharge
Erik S. Gaull, esq25@columbia.edu
Here, here! I couldn’t agree more with Jim Champagne (themail,
February 20). An extra dollar? Per fare? Cabbies must be praying that
the gas prices never go down. Based on this gas surcharge concept,
perhaps my newspaper should cost an extra quarter because the newspaper
delivery guy faces a higher cost of gas, and the salad bar at the
luncheonette near my office should be an extra fifteen cents per pound
so the owners can offset the cost of gas as well. Come to think of it, I’m
marching into my boss as soon as I finish this E-mail and inform him
that I’ve added a gas surcharge of $5,000 per year to my salary to
compensate me for my higher commuting costs.
I sincerely hope that when we go over to the meter system that the
cost of doing business is figured into the metered cost.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS
Homefront: WWII in Washington, February 26
Jerry A. McCoy, sshistory@yahoo.com
The Washingtoniana Division of the DC Public Library presents a free
screening of the WETA broadcast of Homefront: WWII in Washington on
Tuesday, February 26, at 6:30 p.m. in the Washingtoniana Division, Room
307, Martin Luther King, Jr., Memorial Library, 901 G Street, NW.
Following the screening, WETA producers and directors will take
questions from the audience and share the ups and downs of making the
film, which was aired in December 2007 on Channel 26, WETA.
###############
US-Iran Policy Discussion, February 27
Julie Drizin, juliedrizin@starpower.net
What should the next President do about Iran? What do you need to
know about US-Iran policy? Join NPR host and Shepherd Park resident
Michel Martin for an in-depth discussion, Wednesday, February 27 at 7:15
p.m. at the Washington Ethical Society (7750 16th Street, NW). Hear from
progressive peace activist Carol Waser and conservative foreign policy
scholar Michael Ledeen and join the conversation.
$15/ $12 for students and seniors. Refreshments provided by Taste of
Jerusalem.
It’s Spark: The ThinkingOutLoudSpeaker Series at WES. Open your
mind before you make it up. Michel Martin is the host of NPR’s Tell Me
More, heard weekdays at 2 p.m. on WAMU. All are welcome. For more
information, go to http://www.ethicalsociety.org.
###############
Adjust Your Color: The Truth of Petey Greene,
February 27
Corey Jennings, press@urbanfilmseries.com
Landmark’s E Street Cinema will host an exclusive VIP premiere of
Adjust Your Color: The Truth of Petey Greene on February 27 at 7:00 p.m.
The documentary tells the real story of Petey Greene, America’s
original shock-jock. The perfect documentary companion to Talk To Me,
Adjust Your Color is narrated by Don Cheadle and contains rare archival
footage as well as exclusive interviews of Chuck Brown, James Brown, “Sugar
Ray” Leonard, Dewey Hughes, Marion Barry, and others that help tell
the real story of Petey Greene. Tickets for the screening are $15 for
general admission and $25 for VIP reserved seating. Tickets can be
purchased at Landmark’s E Street Cinema (11th and E Streets, NW) or at
http://www.UrbanFilmSeries.com.
Proceeds will benefit Next Generation Awareness Foundation’s upcoming
children’s film festival in the Washington, DC area.
###############
What Makes Great Streets, February 28
Jazmine Zick, jzick@nbm.org
Thursday, February 28, 6:30-8:00 p.m., DC Builds: What Makes Great
Streets? Panelists Petronella Muraya, professor of geography, Howard
University; Darrel Rippeteau, Rippeteau Architects PC; Emeka C. Moneme,
director, District Department of Transportation; and Joe Englert, DC
nightclub impresario, discuss the essential components necessary to
create vibrant, livable streets in Washington, DC. $12 members; $12
students; $20 public. Prepaid registration required. Walk-in
registration based on availability. At the National Building Museum, 401
F Street, NW, Judiciary Square stop, Metro Red Line. Register for events
at http://www.nbm.org.
###############
UDC Law Review Hosts Katrina Symposium,
February 29
Wayne Turner, actupdc@aol.com
On Friday, February 29, 9 a.m.-5 p.m., the University of the District
of Columbia’s David A. Clarke School of Law will host a symposium
titled Katrina’s Wake: Emergency Preparedness and Response from the
Bayou to the Beltway. The Symposium will feature leading scholars,
advocates, and public officials who will examine the parallel racial and
economic disparities in New Orleans and the District of Columbia. Topic
areas include the administration of justice, addressing the needs of
vulnerable populations, and accountability in disaster planning and
relief spending.
The symposium will be held in Building 38, Second Floor Windows
Lounge, University of the District of Columbia, David A. Clarke School
of Law, 4200 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Red Line Metro at Van Ness Station.
The event is open to the public and is wheelchair accessible. The full
schedule is available at http://www.law.udc.edu.
RSVP is recommended by contacting Wayne Turner, Symposium Editor,
UDC-DCSL Law Review, 274-7362 E-mail: lawreview@udc.edu
###############
Please join us on April 1 for our annual Joe Rauh Equal Justice Works
Chapter, Summer Public Interest Fellowship Auction! (And it’s not too
late to donate an item; just E-mail to jlibertelli@udc.edu
or contact auction chair Karen Hainer at kahainer@comcast.net.)
Proceeds support our students in summer public interest fellowships at a
wide variety of public interest, judicial and government placements.
Thus, your donations do quadruple duty. When you support the auction,
you help the School of Law provide $3,000 stipends to students for ten
weeks of service, broaden our student’s legal education and help
provide them with terrific career contacts, assist a wide variety of
public interest, governmental and judicial offices, and support the
clients and causes these entities exist to serve! The auction itself is
a fun-filled occasion attended by elected officials, School of Law and
University board members, faculty, students, alumni, and members of the
community. This year’s EJW Auction will take place at the UDC David A.
Clarke School of Law, 4200 Connecticut Avenue, NW, right atop the Red
Line Van Ness/UDC Station. Park under the campus off Van Ness Street.
Please consider helping us towards our goal by joining Busboys &
Poets, The Tabard Inn, Verizon, Amtrak, Wilmer Hale, Williams Connolly,
Steptoe & Johnson, and many other companies, firms, foundations and
friends that have established a tradition of support for the District of
Columbia’s public law school. We will publicize your organization or
company’s support on our web site, in our Advocate which is mailed to
more than six thousand leaders of the bench and bar in the District of
Columbia, and in other publications throughout the year. So far, our
fabulous items include meals at fine restaurants including Busboys and
Poets, the Tabard Inn and many more; fabulous Rehoboth beach house from
August 30 to September 6; two round trip speedy Acela train tickets from
DC to NYC and weekend stay in nice Upper East Side NYC apartment for
four adults; two seats at the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights May
14 dinner; long weekend at a lovely beach house; two symphony tickets;
dinner for eight cooked and served by Lane Green and Ed Bruske (you
choose the menu, purchase the food); lots of baseball tickets (at least
four different games); two seats at the Alliance for Justice luncheon in
the end of April; shadow LCCR’s Wade Henderson for a day; shadow king
of torts Jack Olender for a day; shadow “best job in the world”
holder, Dean Shelley Broderick, for a day; use, but don’t abuse, Prof.
Tom Mack’s cabin on the Shenandoah River in Luray, which sleeps six or
more; wine tasting dinner for six (with guest appearance by Dean
Broderick); and lunch with VA Association of Trial Lawyers officer.
###############
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every
Wednesday and Sunday. To change the E-mail address for your subscription
to themail, use the Update Profile/Email address link below in the
E-mail edition. To unsubscribe, use the Safe Unsubscribe link in the
E-mail edition. An archive of all past issues is available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com,
and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of
Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to
be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief
paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can
be put into each mailing.