Takeover
Dear Takeovers:
Patrick Jordan, below, says that last week’s national election will
have a great impact on the District of Columbia, and that,
“Washingtonians are much more likely to have their concerns addressed
by a Democratically controlled Congress since a vast majority of the
city is composed of registered Democrats.” Has anyone seen any real
evidence of that since the passage of the Home Rule Act, or is it merely
a declaration of faith? I don’t think the national Democratic party
cares about the District at all, or that the priorities of District
voters concern it, because of the fact that we are such loyal
Democratic voters. Democrats don’t have to do anything to earn our
votes; they know they have them whatever they do or don’t do for us.
What do you think? When national politics has a direct impact on us
living in DC, that’s when we discuss them in themail, and it’s time
to place our bets on whether a Democratic House and Senate will have any
real impact on us. The Democrats may well give Eleanor Holmes Norton a
floor vote in the House, since that increases their majority, but that’s
a purely partisan move. Will they do anything else that increases home
rule, increases DC’s congressional representation, or moves DC closer
to statehood? Will Congress abstain from interfering in local politics,
or will it bypass local voters to advance Adrian Fenty’s proposed
takeover of the school board?
On that matter, yesterday the Post editorialized that Adrian
Fenty, Robert Bobb, and Vincent Gray should all cooperate in fixing the
schools (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/10/AR2006111001474.html),
but it neglected to specify whose plan they thought the next mayor,
school board president, and city council chairman should cooperate in
implementing. Probably that’s because as yet neither Fenty, Bobb, nor
Gray has any school plan — except that Fenty wants to increase his
power and diminish everyone else’s, including the electorate’s. Ed
Barron, below, says that Bobb and, by implication, Gray, should support
Fenty. I don’t see any reason why, or why Bobb or Gray should be
blamed for supporting a democratically elected school board. Fenty is
the one attempting a power grab and picking this fight. As I’ve
written before, I haven’t been given any reason to trust either his or
Bobb’s motives in wanting to take control of the school budget,
buildings, property, assets, and construction fund and, incidentally,
the education of our children, so for now I’m just happy that they’re
fighting rather than cooperating to divide up the spoils.
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
##############
Unbridled Greed, Part II
Dorothy Brizill, dorothy@dcwatch.com
On Tuesday, the city council will hold one of the last few remaining
legislative meetings of this legislative session. It is likely to be a
lengthy meeting, since the agenda will be filled with emergency bills as
well as bills that can be enacted only if they get two readings before
January. Nearly one third of the councilmembers who will vote on Tuesday
are lame ducks: Cropp, Ambrose, Patterson, and Orange. In addition, of
course, Fenty will be mayor, and will not be returning to the council.
One bill that will be considered on an emergency basis, the
"Mayor and Chairman of the Council Transition Emergency Act of
2006," Bill 16-965, was proposed by Mayor Williams. In addition to
providing $250,000 in transition funds for the mayor-elect and $150,000
in transition funds for the council chairman-elect, the bill also raises
the annual salary of the mayor from $152,000 to $200,000. Under the DC
Charter, the council chairman’s salary is pegged at $10,000 less than
the mayor’s salary, so it automatically raises the chairman’s salary
from $142,000 to $190,000 a year. Ward One Councilmember Jim Graham is
gathering votes to amend the bill to give a salary increase to all other
councilmembers of $23,000 a year, increasing their pay from $92,000 to
$115,000 for part-time positions. (Salary increases take effect only at
the beginning of a term, so councilmembers who are halfway through their
terms wouldn’t receive the higher pay rate until and unless they are
elected to a new term in 2008.) An alternative bill that is being
drafted by outgoing Ward Five Councilmember Vincent Orange, the
“Councilmember Compensation Change Emergency Act of 2006," would
"maintain the current pay differential between the chair and
members of the Council,” Since that pay differential is $50,000, the
Orange bill would raise councilmemberS’ annual salary to $140,000 —
a $48,000 salary increase.
Citizens should be angry at the underhanded way in which
councilmembers will be rewarding themselves. The amendment to Bill
16-965 and the Orange emergency bill will be introduced, publicly
discussed, and voted on for the first time on Tuesday. There will be no
opportunity for the public to debate or discuss it, or to weigh in with
councilmembers on the issue, and the pay raise will be passed as an
“emergency,” even though no one believes there is any actual
emergency requirement for a pay raise. Councilmembers were elected on
November 7 fully knowing the position’s salary, and, with the
exception of the chairman, council positions are part time (under DC
law, only the chairman is precluded from holding outside employment).
And the introducers of these bills, Vincent Orange and Tony Williams,
are both lame duck officeholders who are immune to retaliation from the
voters.
###############
Motor/Voter Intrusion?
Kenneth Nellis, nellisks at verizon dot net
When I went down to 301 C Street, NW, last weekend to renew my driver’s
license, the nice woman behind the counter said she needed to know my
party affiliation before she could process my renewal. When I demurred
she apologized for having to ask, but said the computer wouldn’t let
her proceed with the renewal until she filled in that box. How is that
appropriate?
###############
Election Results
Lindsley Williams, LWilliams@his.com
In the spirit of the introduction to the November 8 “Election
Results” issue [of themail], have you heard or can you bring out any
comments on DC’s electronic ballots? Fears of problems across the
nation seem to have been either underreported or amounted to something
far less than some projected. I seek the local component of the story.
It may be the story is there is no story.
###############
Eminent Domain and Voting Rights in themail
Michael Bindner, mikeybdc at yahoo dot you know what
Gary suggests an initiative on eminent domain. While that may stop
council action for a few years, it is not a permanent solution because
citizens cannot amend the Charter by initiative. Until the voters of DC
gain that right, real reform in eminent domain, campaign finance, and
term limits will prove elusive. Since most council races are personality
contests rather than dealing with substantive issues, I am not holding
my breath.
Speaking of not holding our breath, Congress may consider the
Davis-Norton voting rights bill in the lame duck session. In his press
conference on November 8, President Bush indicated in response to a
reporter’s question that this was the first he had heard about it. As
you may know, this provision calls for a seat for DC in the House,
nothing in the Senate, and a matching seat in Utah. Stand Up for
Democracy in Washington, DC, is holding a Teach-In on the Davis Bill on
Saturday, November 18, 3:00-5:00 p.m., at the University of the District
of Columbia. At that teach-in, it will say why this is a bad deal for DC’s
long-term prospects. The fear is that the Davis Bill may foreclose
future action, particularly statehood. My personal opinion is that Nancy
Pelosi may have a few things to say about this arrangement, especially
given the events of this week. A competing bill, which does include
senatorial representation through Maryland, is offered by Dana
Rohrbacher. It may be more dangerous to the cause of statehood precisely
because it contains a senatorial solution, while the Davis Bill leaves
that injustice in place, leaving the door open to further action. Of
course, if statehood depends on a sixty-vote Democratic majority in the
Senate, it is unlikely to occur unless the District elects Carol
Schwartz or some other Republican as one of its two Senators — so
Rohrbacher may be the best deal for voting rights for the foreseeable
future.
###############
Big Mistake
Ed T. Barron, edtb1@macdotcom
The Post reports [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/08/AR2006110802311.html]
that Robert Bobb, the newly elected president of the DC school board,
intends to fight Mayor Fenty’s efforts to take over the school system.
That’s a huge mistake for Bobb. He should cooperate with the mayor in
putting together a good plan to reform the DCPS. In the long run Bobb
has nothing to fear, since he would wind up with a major role in making
that reform happen, regardless of his title.
###############
Motor Vehicle Thefts
Michael Andrews, mandrews@udc.edu
The Institute for Public Safety and Justice at the University of the
District of Columbia recently completed the first phase of a
comprehensive analysis of motor vehicle theft in the District of
Columbia. This is a pervasive crime, constituting a major quality of
life issue in our communities that is often overlooked amidst a
background of other more publicized offenses. Dr. Angelyn Flowers, a
professor of Criminal Justice in the Department of Urban Affairs, Social
Sciences, and Social Work at UDC and the author of the report, observes
that “the conditions contributing to the escalating incidents of
stolen cars when unchecked form the breeding ground for other more
serious crimes. Strengthening neighborhoods enables communities to
better resist crime and its effects.” Future reports will analyze
neighborhood asset and deficit mapping to facilitate an analysis of the
dynamics of particular neighborhoods to support intervention and
prevention strategies.
In an analysis of more than 48,000 motor vehicle thefts occurring in
the District of Columbia over a 79-month period, characteristics of
neighborhoods with high numbers of motor vehicle thefts as compared to
those neighborhoods with low numbers have been preliminarily identified.
Population: neighborhoods with high numbers of motor vehicle thefts were
more likely to have high percentages of juveniles, an adult population
lacking either a high school diploma or GED, low participation in the
workforce and high unemployment among those adults who are
participating. Households: neighborhoods with high numbers of motor
vehicle theft hold households that were primarily occupied by people
unrelated by blood or marriage, family households are more likely to be
single-parent households, household income is below the poverty level (a
family of four with an annual household income under $19,350 would be
considered to be living in poverty under the 2005 poverty guidelines
issued by the US Department of Health and Human Services). Housing
Stock: neighborhoods with high numbers of motor vehicle thefts were more
likely to have a housing stock that is: renter rather than owner
occupied, consists of large multiunit buildings, has a high vacancy
rate.
The Institute for Public Safety and Justice is the research,
training, and evaluation arm of the Administration of Justice Program at
the University of the District of Columbia. It is under the direction of
Dr. Flowers and Dr. Sylvia I.B. Hill, also a professor of Criminal
Justice. For further information, contact Dr. Angelyn Flowers, 274-5689,
or aflowers@udc.edu.
###############
“Libraries are an anachronism.” [Sean Bean, themail, November 8]
This is the most depressing and misguided thing I have ever read in the
history of themail. To answer Sean Bean’s question, I still use MLK
library for personal and professional interests, even though I’ve left
my native colony for Ward 9 (Silver Spring). Yes, it needs work. But if
libraries are an anachronism, so is democracy, which cannot exist
without an educated and informed public. Anyone who thinks MLK Library
is just a place to borrow the latest Kim Stanley Robinson novel (the one
about killer flooding in DC) is long overdue for a fact-finding visit.
###############
MLK Anachronism?
Malcolm L. Wiseman, mal@wiseman.ws
Sean Bean asks when anyone here last used the library. I can’t tell
if Mr. Bean’s post is asking for the elimination of his
"anachronism" or what, but I for one use my Petworth Branch
library regularly enough (a week ago to pickup Chomsky’s Hegemony
or Survival, recently recommended by Hugo Chavez during his visit to
the United Nations). Although I still buy a few books that may be
special, most of my reading-for-enjoyment sources come from my local
branch library. Like medicine, books are necessary and expensive. Since
I’m in the mode of lightening my load of personal belongings, I no
longer buy many books, but instead borrow them from DCPL. I often make
donations of books from my personal library, and sometimes I pick up one
or two of the donated books that someone else has left there.
Whenever it’s inconvenient to make a leisurely visit to the branch
library, I often order books from DCPL’s CityCat web site and pick
them up when they notify me via E-mail that they have arrived, usually
within days. This is an online catalog of all DC branch libraries, and
if you need your book fast, they’ll hold it for you so you can go to
the remote branch and get it, or you can wait for delivery to your
local. The system works well. Oh, I forgot to mention the friendly
library staff members, at Petworth Branch as well as other branches I’ve
visited. Their smiles and helpfulness enhance the whole experience of
going to the library and getting, seemingly for free, good medicine for
my mind. I often observe mothers bringing young children to the library
to get their first library card, and I never fail to recall a similar
trip that I made with my mother to the Northeast Branch library on
Maryland Avenue.
As long as people continue to record their ideas and fantasy onto
pages in books, those books should be presented to the public in a
quiet, neutral environment. Perhaps libraries and books will someday
become Mr. Bean’s anachronism, when writers stop writing and printers
and photographers no longer produce images on paper, when others will do
our thinking for us, and we won’t need to read economically. Until
then, we should publicly fund, promote, and properly maintain our
libraries.
###############
The Importance of National Elections for the
District
Patrick Jordan, patjordan1@gmail.com
In the last issue of themail [November 8], Gary characterized the
national elections as having no implications on the District of
Columbia. This common misperception ignores the fact that our city’s
laws, budget, court system, and entire governing structure are
completely at the behest of Congress. The national elections from this
past Tuesday will have a profound effect on our city, regardless of the
fact that we have no representation by voting members of Congress.
Washingtonians are much more likely to have their concerns addressed by
a Democratically controlled Congress since a vast majority of the city
is composed of registered Democrats. Beyond Congressional races, even
the gubernatorial election in Maryland effects the way the Metro is
financed and operated, the cleanliness of the Anacostia River (or lack
thereof), and a host of other issues that affect our city.
The District of Columbia has shown over the past several years that
it is fiscally responsible (much more so than our national government),
has improved city services, and is in a great position to start pushing
Congress to give us the rights that other Americans take for granted.
Whether in the form of statehood, strengthening of the Home Rule Act, or
by other means, we as District residents should be lobbying the new
legislature for voting representation in Congress, control of our laws,
budgetary autonomy, and the power to appoint or elect our own judges and
attorney general.
###############
Shelving or Amending the New Comprehensive
Plan
Len Sullivan, lsnarpac@bellatlantic.net
In Wednesday’s issue [themail, November 8] Sue Hemberger raised a
number of important issues sidestepped in the current Comprehensive Plan
"final draft." NARPAC has a different list, but with
significant overlap. Our solution is different however, and possibly
more realistic. As Linda Cropp has often repeated, the new plan can be
reopened for amendments the day after it has been adopted, and we think
this is the better alternative. Adopt the current plan as the Williams/Cropp
Edition, and then begin work on the Fenty/Gray Edition as soon as they
make time to focus on it. The current plan cannot be fixed with word and
phrase changes deep in the four-hundred-odd pages. In fact, most of
those pages are harmless. Let the hard working guys who put this massive
effort together put it to bed. Don’t try to settle these issues in
overtime. Start a new game with new rules and the new team.
What’s missing in the Comp Plan is a sense of policy direction on
the big picture items, and these can’t be resolved by more meetings of
neighborhood and single-issue activists. Top leadership attention must
be directed to the overarching goals for this, the national capital of
the United States of America. They need to mull over what’s really
required to make this the best city in the world, and to listen to a
different set of advisors. So far, there doesn’t seem to be any
transition interest in fleshing out that big picture. The risk is that
the new players may prematurely commit themselves to an inconsistent set
of ad hoc objectives based on stovepipe transition guidelines.
Time’s a’wasting!
###############
From http://www.georgetowner.com/PDF/Issue_11.01.06.pdf:
“The Redskins would once again be in DC where we could all attend
games without committing an entire day of our lives. Think about it.”
In the current Georgetowner, Jack Evans maps out a nightmarish trip to
FedEx Field to see the Skins. While his tale is indeed harrowing, it is
far less scary than the notion of the city’s embarking on yet another
stadium chase, this time to snag the Redskins under the guise of a
better commute to the stadium for Jack and his constituents. Jack might
have built a better case had the current stadium debacle helped even a
little. Thanks to the machinations of Evans and his ballpark
legislation-drafting buddy Herb Miller, the entire region is all but
certain to be tied to one of the most unworkable and overburdened
ballpark treks in the country, one that even with proper planning (which
Evans obviously didn‘t execute whatsoever in his dubiously-told FedEx
Field odyssey) will present challenges to almost all ballpark visitors.
Even though the Brigade managed to finagle $20 million out of federal
funds allocated to the District for Metro work after the boosters
conveniently moved the costs for the improvements to the ballpark Metro
stop out of the stadium budget (despite Evans‘ garbage assertion that
no such monies would be used towards the ballpark project), the
pre-Katrina estimate for Metro’s original barebones expansion plan was
$47 million. To save ever-dwindling ballpark funding dollars (except
when it comes to luxury items costing millions that the team should be
paying for but that the city is covering, from entire concourse levels
of seats and suites in individual toilets inside each luxury suite
contrary to the final ratified agreement), the plan was slashed to $20
million by eliminating the originally proposed new station entrance. A
key factor is that the platform at the Navy Yard cannot be widened (Post,
November 14, 2004). The Stadium-Armory platform is 2,400 SF wider than
the Navy Yard platform. Yet the Stadium-Armory platform gets jammed for
games at the old ballpark, and officials predict many more will attend
games at the shiny new place. This looks to be a real problem even to
city officials. “That plan, officials acknowledge, might create a
logjam on sold-out game days that could keep hundreds or even thousands
of fans milling about South Capitol Street and the surrounding area” (Washington
Business Journal, February 21, 2005). The significant bottleneck was
played off as a shopping opportunity by Steve Green: “We’re trying
to balance the desire to move people in and out with the idea that we
want people out on the street.” That’s great, but after having spent
a significant amount of time navigating the overburdened Metro stop plus
two to three hours for the game, many people, especially older fans and
those with children, can’t be killing even more time close to midnight
downtown, even if the moribund ballpark entertainment district ever gets
off the ground! On weeknights, this scenario is completely unworkable,
and on weekends, people who are casual fans and have heard about the
transportation issues, along with the cut-rate nature of the “Buick or
Ford” greenhouse, may very well decide to spend the extra travel time
going to Camden Yards to a park with all the bells, whistles, and
surrounding ambiance that DC‘s value-engineered gem lacks or had to
sacrifice to save costs at the current joke of a site. Not a great way
to start out.
A closer look at the options offered by the Brigade, of taking Metro
to the ballpark or walking from the potential parking locations, could
make Evans’ FedEx Field trek seem tame by comparison. Estimates for
Metro ridership to the ballpark remain a mystery, as an estimate of 40
percent of ballpark patrons taking the Metro was used in early 2005 when
the Metro expansion question was being resolved, and that estimate
jumped to 60 percent by the DCSEC’s count when parking woes became a
more pressing matter. The single-line Metro station is a Green Line
stop, which will mean a transfer for the vast majority of riders, given
that the current team fan base generally comes from the more affluent
parts of the city north and west of the area, as well as Montgomery
County and Northern Virginia. The Brigade’s facile suggestions of
utilizing other Metro stops were meant merely to distract from the
upcoming problems, as the closest stops all have physical barriers
involved (at South Capitol Street, the SE-SW Freeway, and the river).
These stops are located several blocks from the stadium, and involve
traveling through spots deep in SW or SE that are not locations targeted
by the area’s revitalization and are not likely to be braved by the
most physically capable and intrepid of stadium goers, let alone the
rest of us!
The parking options — or lack thereof — are, as of November 2006,
sketchy at best, with the only specifically planned parking consisting
of 1,225 spaces adjacent to the ballpark, about ten times fewer spots
than the RFK Stadium site offered. The remaining parking options
reported by the DCSEC range from four to twelve blocks from the stadium.
Given their spread-out nature and the limited monies for extra security
and police overtime associated with the ballpark project, make these
options far less appealing than at the RFK Stadium site. Also at issue
is getting the thousands of cars to those spaces spread out over this
extension of downtown DC in the middle of rush hour, with very few
traffic options for patrons coming from north and west of the city.
Worse, money to improve the infrastructure of the surrounding streets,
widen sidewalks, and add lighting had been within the stadium budget,
only to be moved out of it with promises that the mixed-use development
of the ballpark district would more than cover those costs by the time
the ballpark opens. As we all know, much of that is in limbo, while the
primarily office and residential development slated for the area will be
occurring in locations that don’t line up with the routes that fans
would be taking to get to potential satellite parking lots. At least the
RFK Stadium site had a dedicated extended exit off of I-395 as well as
one off of I-295 (which had been closed due to lack of use from patrons
east and south of the city in Maryland); the current site with its
spread-out parking could jam up scores of city streets. This could
happen even if the Brigade puts forth a major effort to resolve this
situation, in contrast to the threadbare attention to detail that the
Brigade has paid to this matter this late in the game.
This ballpark experience was sold to us as being to be vastly
superior to the suburban model that FedEx Field represents, a model that
the Brigade started comparing to a trip to RFK Stadium as identical.
Ironically, at the new ballpark, the Brigade are now forced as a result
of their insistence on the current horrible site to play up as a viable
and reasonable option for patrons to park or even take Metro to the RFK
Stadium site and then be shuttled to the new stadium. Of course, this
could mean more public money ends up being spent on the ballpark
project, as Metro provides shuttles for Washington Redskins games that
are paid for by the Redskins. People might be a little more willing to
do the shuttle thing for a Redskins game, which happens ten times less
frequently than a baseball game. But it will be hard to get fans to pay
top dollar (as a result of the city‘s passing on the cost of the
shuttle service) for the unappealing option of getting to the downtown
stadium on a shuttle from the much-maligned RFK Stadium lot. And the
shuttle option will consume a lot of the time that planners said people
would spend at ballpark stores and restaurants. This seems to suggest
that the thing should’ve been built at the RFK Stadium site to begin
with.
"In two years, we will be finished with RFK Stadium." Not
if the still-conceptual DC United mini-park plan -- one that‘s so
barebones it will likely not be appealing for any other uses, while at
least the fixed-up RFK Stadium can double as an adequate venue for other
sporting events and major outdoor concerts -- doesn’t get off the
drawing board. I’ve got a better idea: how about getting out of the
stadium building business (especially since the Brigade has shown they
can‘t handle it) and using the existing stadium with its tens of
millions of dollars in improvements for DC United and other events? Let’s
finally see some benefits out of all the baseball spending and utilize
the modernized RFK Stadium for a while longer.
“We could demolish this facility and lease the land for $1 per year
to Dan Snyder.” Wow, that’s a great idea! The same thing could’ve
been done with nearby land for the baseball stadium and saved several
hundreds of millions of dollars over the current site, especially when
the final land compensation and penalties due the previous landowners
are tallied. In fact, it almost happened in December 2005 until Evans,
Herb Miller, the outgoing mayor, and the rest of the Brigade
double-talked the council into believing the ballpark could be workable
and affordable at the current site under a set cost figure, two things
which are not the case. In fact, the comments from Evans and the others
at the time were that an environmental impact study of the site — one
that already had a full environmental impact study done on it, unlike
the current site with its 53 oil tanks (many of them leaking) and the
presence of asbestos, none of which yielded a single independent
environmental study — would uncover “heavy environmental problems
that would trigger [stadium construction] delays of up to three years”
(Washington Times, December 7, 2005) and “federal and
congressional approval, [including] approval from the Park Service, the
National Capital Planning Commission and the US Commission of Fine
Arts,” (Washington Post, December 2, 2005). What a difference a
year makes, especially when the Brigade isn’t trying to artificially
inflate costs and create delays at the RFK Stadium site because they
want to put something there and make the land suddenly viable again!
This point nails the hypocrisy of the Brigade and their information
machine, and shows why the DC council still needs to commission
independent studies of the stadium project and its costs rather than
continue to exceed the cost cap on the parking issue for the first of
many times.
“All I had were my Ward 2 City Council license plates, which did me
absolutely no good in Maryland.” Oh, Willow, weep for thee. . . . If
only the rest of us had the problem of straying outside of the
boundaries of our municipal playground and having our license plates,
which Evans implies are extremely useful even in non-governmental
activities, do us “absolutely no good”! But getting control of the
goodies and perks was what started the Brigade’s baseball pursuit, and
guaranteed parking spaces seem to be the major impetus for the Brigade’s
next stadium play. This pursuit of stadiums driven by perks to the city’s
elite needs to stop now. Hopefully, the election returns for the city
show that this sentiment is strong enough to stop this nonsense.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS
DC Public Library Events, November 13, 16
India Young, india.young@dc.gov
Monday, November 13, 6:30 p.m., Chevy Chase Neighborhood Library,
5625 Connecticut Avenue, NW. Dr. Jeffrey Ian Ross, coeditor of the
recently published book, Native Americans and the Criminal Justice
System, will discuss the plight of Native Americans in the US
criminal justice system. Adults. For more information, call 282-0021.
Thursday, November 16, 2:00 p.m., Chevy Chase Neighborhood Library,
5625 Connecticut Avenue, NW. A lecture on the life and works of Oscar
Wilde by University of Maryland professor William Cohen, author of Sex
Scandal: The Private Parts of Victorian Fiction.
###############
Green Building Act, November 14
Mary Vogel, maryvogel at yahoo dot com
The “District of Columbia Green Building Act of 2006” describes
its purpose as “to establish high-performance building standards that
require the planning, design, construction, operation and maintenance of
building projects which help to mitigate the environmental, economic,
and social impacts of built structures in the District; to update the
Construction Code to include green building practices; to establish a
Green Building Incentives Program that includes an Expedited
Construction Documents Review Program; to establish a Green Building
Fund; and to establish the Green Building Advisory Council.” The
Committee on Consumer and Regulatory Affairs, to which Bill 16-0515 was
referred, reported favorably on this bill and recommended that the
council vote in favor of this legislation on Thursday, November 9.
The bill would significantly reform the way buildings are built in
the District. Green, high-performance, or sustainable building is the
practice of creating healthier and more resource-efficient models of
construction, renovation, operation, maintenance, and demolition. Green
buildings enhance the quality of air, water, land, and climate; are
constructed from environmentally preferable materials; and are sited
within a well-planned infrastructure that serves the community, economy,
and ecosystems. They also maximize energy efficiency, the use of
rainwater and reuse of gray-water, prevent pollution from storm water
run-off, and are reused or recycled at the end of their useful life
cycle. Finally, they provide a healthy and productive indoor
environment.
I initiated the first version of this bill over two years ago. I am
happy to say that the version reported out of Committee retains the
requirement for the private sector, though that requirement is phased in
over the course of five years. The DC Buildings Industry Association and
the Affordable Housing community were involved in shaping the final
version. The full bill is on the council’s web site, http://www.dccouncil.washington.dc.us.
I understand that its first reading is Tuesday, November 14 at 10 a.m. I
hope readers will call their council members and tell them to pass the
bill recommended by the Task Force and the Committee intact.
###############
Greenovation, November 18
Lauren Searl, lsearl@nbm.org
Saturday, November 18, 10:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. Greenovation: An Expo for
the Home. With exhibitors like Amicus Green Building Center, the
American Society of Landscape Architects, and the US Department of
Energy, plus seminars on "Dream Green Kitchens," "Stylish
and Sustainable Residential Interiors," and "Saving Green by
Going Green," Greenovation will fully equip visitors to make their
home renovation projects environmentally friendly, stylish, and cost
effective. At more than thirty display booths visitors can interact with
experts, watch demonstrations, sample green products, and collect
information on green home renovation. Five 45-minute seminars led by
nationally-recognized experts like Dean Hill, ASLA, Jennifer Roberts,
LEED, Jim Sargent, GMB, CGG, Victoria Schomer, ASID, and Annette
Stelmack, ASID, will be offered on a drop-in basis. In addition, DC
secondary school students will unveil the innovative green structures
they created in the Museum’s Design Apprenticeship Program. Special
tours of the exhibition The Green House will also be available and the
Museum Shop will offer an array of books on green remodeling. Free. Drop
in program. At the National Building Museum, 401 F Street, NW, Judiciary
Square stop, Metro Red Line.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — FOR SALE
Help Wilson Crew by Purchasing a Wreath for
the Holidays
Allegra Penny, fexo_fenodine@yahoo.com
I am a member of Wilson Crew. We are the only DC public school that
has a crew team, and therefore, the DCPS gives us no funding. We raise
all the money ourselves, primarily through fundraising done by the
rowers. Each rower has a fundraising goal of $400. Some of you may be
familiar with the annual wreath sale, and this year I hope to do
especially well, as it is my last season. To help achieve these goals,
Wilson Crew is selling wreaths for the holidays. The wreaths are
24" in diameter, double-sided balsam fir, from Nova Scotia. Each
wreath comes with a red bow, and they sell for $20. Wreaths will be
delivered to your home on Saturday, December 2, and Sunday, December 3.
If you are interested in purchasing a wreath to support us, you can send
your order and cash or a check payable to Wilson Crew Boosters, to 3205
38th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20016. Orders should arrive by November
17. If you have any questions, please contact me at 244-2142.
###############
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every
Wednesday and Sunday. To subscribe, to change E-mail addresses, or to
switch between HTML and plain text versions of themail, use the
subscription form at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail/subscribe.htm.
To unsubscribe, send an E-mail message to themail@dcwatch.com
with “unsubscribe” in the subject line. Archives of past messages
are available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should also be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com,
and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of
Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to
be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief
paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can
be put into each mailing.