Money
Dear Funders:
Mayor Williams has sent a bill to the city council (the “Mayor and
Chairman of the Council Transition Emergency Act of 2006,” Bill
16-965) that seeks to give Adrian Fenty up to $250,000 in taxpayer money
to fund any transition expenses he may incur for staffers, consultants,
travel expenses, services, etc. (We assume that Mayor Williams doesn’t
expect these funds to go to Republican candidate David W. Kranich or
Statehood-Green candidate Chris Otten.) The transition staff is already
being provided free office space, utilities, and telephone services on
the top floor of the Reeves Building, in the space vacated by the Office
of Emergency Management. There are, however, serious questions about
whether the public should pick up the bill. The eight-day pre-election
campaign finance report that the Fenty campaign filed on Monday, October
30, shows that the campaign has $812,000 cash on hand. In total, it has
raised $3.5 million. The Fenty campaign has several fundraisers planned
for the remaining days before the election, to give the businesses,
developers, and law firms that didn’t support him in the primary one
last chance to jump on the bandwagon. Since it will have few expenses in
the remaining week, it is likely to have a million dollars left when the
campaign is over.
According to Fenty’s filing with the Office of Campaign Finance, he
intends to transfer any unexpended campaign funds to a constituent
services fund, in keeping with DC Code 1-1107.02(b). This will give him
a sizable kitty from which to reward political supporters and advance
his political causes. In addition, after the general election he will
immediately begin raising funds for his inauguration. There is no legal
requirement for the mayor or incoming mayor to report the contributions
or contributors to, or the expenses of, the inaugural events, and no law
governs the use of excess inaugural funds. In 1999, Mayor Williams
transferred his excess inaugural funds to a committee, Washington First,
controlled by his wife, Diane Williams; his lawyer and first Deputy
Mayor for Planning and Economic Development, Doug Patton; and his
inauguration chairman, Bob Jones.
Citizens should demand that the mayor’s bill to fund Fenty’s
transition be amended. Fenty has already been funding what his committee
calls “pre-transition” activities from his campaign funds. Campaign
funds have paid for the trips that he and his staff have made to New
York City, Chicago, and California. When the council considers the mayor’s
bill, it should amend it to change DC Code 1-1107.02, which governs how
surplus campaign funds be used, to explicitly allow and encourage a
successful candidate to use any excess campaign funds to fund their own
transitions. Transition activities are the culmination of a successful
political campaign, and using excess campaign funds for them seems to be
perfectly reasonable and valid. It certainly seems more reasonable than
hitting up taxpayers for a quarter million dollars just so Fenty doesn’t
have to touch his million-dollar campaign war chest.
The mayor’s transition bill would also provide the council
chairman-elect, Vincent Gray, $150,000 in transition funds. As a current
member of the council, whose staff expenses, office expenses, and costs
to move down the hall to a bigger office will be automatically covered,
why does Gray need any transition funds at all?
Gary Imhoff and Dorothy Brizill
themail@dcwatch.com and dorothy@dcwatch.com
###############
Since October 6, I have filed five letters with the DC Board of
Elections and Ethics detailing progressively serious problems with the
conduct of the primary elections of September 12 and the officially
certified results of those elections. My initial complaint concerned a
Ward 5 DC Statehood-Green party primary for the Ward 5 Council seat, a
contest I lost by 7 votes according to certified results; however, I had
discovered (by checking the poll books for 9 of the 18 precincts of the
ward line by line) that in many precincts the number of voters who
signed in to vote far exceeded the number of recorded votes. My second
complaint then documented the problem of more voters than votes for all
18 precincts in the ward: at least 50 votes were “lost,” far more
than either my rival or I received. My third complaint showed that the
“lost votes” situation was worse for the Republicans in Ward 5 than
for the Statehood-Green party: 40 percent of the Republican votes were
lost, but “only” 36 percent of the Statehood-Green votes.
My fourth complaint cited the regulations governing the “Ballot
Accounting” required for the legal certification of results; the
discrepancies I had already documented meant that Ballot Accounting
regulations could not have been followed, and that certification was
therefore not legally possible. My fifth complaint, filed Monday of this
week, reported the “lost votes” problem for the city as a whole, and
for each Ward. These data are truly appalling; in summary, using the
certified results posted on the BOEE web site and “voter history”
data from the BOEE’s own Access database, the following percentages of
votes were “lost.” (For example, if there were 100 voters but only
80 votes, the loss is 20 percent.) In each case, the first figure is for
the Statehood-Green Party, and the second is for the Republican Party.
Figures are rounded to the nearest whole percent. Entire City: 33
percent, 26 percent. Ward 1: 20 percent, 29 percent. Ward 2: 23 percent,
16 percent. Ward 3: 22 percent, 8 percent. Ward 4: 33 percent, 31
percent. Ward 5: 36 percent, 40 percent. Ward 6: 32 percent, 19 percent.
Ward 7: 49 percent, 43 percent. Ward 8: 59 percent, 4 percent.
I have received no reply to my complaints and requests for
investigation, other than an acknowledgment that my first complaint has
been received and confirmation that an investigation was being
initiated. On Tuesday, a monthly Board of Elections meeting scheduled
for Wednesday, November 1, was abruptly canceled; I have been told by a
BOEE official that it will not be rescheduled for a date before the
November 7 elections.
###############
Before the new mayor takes over the school board and tries to clean
up that mess, he should hone his reform skills on a much smaller agency
that has proved as difficult to reform — the Department of Consumer
and Regulatory Affairs. If he could do that, I would have much more
confidence in his ability to tackle the schools.
###############
The Forest for the Trees
Ralph Chittams, chittams@sewkis.com
Election Day is eight short days away. However, the votes cast on
November 7 will have a direct impact on Election Day 2008. It is almost
a lock that Adrian Fenty will be the next mayor of the District of
Columbia. That occurrence will result in a special election to fill his
Ward 4 seat for the remainder of his term, until 2008. Those elected to
the School Board in 2006 will only be serving two years, until 2008. In
2008 the school board reverts back to an all-elected board. This brings
us to the crux of the matter. How many of us really believe that Robert
Bobb’s political ambitions reach their apex with the presidency of the
school board? Let’s examine the record. Mr. Bobb was brought here to
do a job, City Administrator. He was initially house-hunting in Ward 8
(in fact he paid a deposit on a house) then purchased a house in Ward 4,
after it became clear that Fenty would win the Democratic primary for
mayor — after! Why the move from Ward 8 to Ward 4? It will be easier
for him to defeat a two-year fill-in Councilmember in Ward 4 than an
entrenched Marion Barry in Ward 8. Why should we elect someone to
represent our children who already has his eyes on another job? If I am
wrong, Mr. Bobb, issue a written, unambiguous statement that you will
not be running for any ward seat or for mayor in 2008. In my humble
opinion, Mr. Bobb has no real interest in the children of Washington,
DC. He is simply using them as tools to further his own selfish
power-seeking agenda, which is being financed by big business and
developers. We do not need someone who advocates the dismantling of
neighborhoods and selling of neighborhood schools, under the guise of
economic development, overseeing our Schools.
###############
A Golden Opportunity
Ed T. Barron, edtb1@mac.com
The new mayor and president of the school board have a real
opportunity to reform the DC Public Schools. It will take a lot of
courage to make the needed changes. First and foremost the Teachers’
Unions must go. Tenure must be eliminated. The current pay system is
deadly since it is rigid and favors old age instead of performance.
Replace that pay system with one that rewards performance and results.
Change the way teachers are hired. Look for persons with experience,
proven capabilities, and educational background in the subjects they are
hired to teach. Give hiring bonuses to real stars and periodically give
pay increases or bonuses as teachers meet their goals. Help good
teachers to relocate to DC from outside the area with relocation
benefits and even some assistance in housing. Get the majority of the
enormous school budget out of the administration (currently 49 percent)
to get 80 percent, or more, into the classrooms. Give power to the
principals to hire and fire and the budget to make things work in their
schools, including facility upgrades. If the mayor and school board make
these changes there is hope, yet, that our students can get a good
education in the DC public schools.
###############
In my last published post [themail, October 29], I said that Vincent
Gray, the Democratic nominee for chair of the DC city council, desires
to become mayor of the District of Columbia, and said that I believe
that he will not want to see Adrian Fenty succeed, if he becomes mayor
succeed. There is no denying that Vincent Gray is a shrewd
businessman-lawyer-politician. His desire to climb the ranks of our
political hierarchy quickly is manifested in his becoming councilmember
for Ward 7 and two years later our possible next chair of the council.
At 63, Vincent Gray would be 67 in 2010 and 71 in 2014. Considering
that Adrian Fenty is only 36 and would be 40 and 44 respectively,
Vincent Gray knows that a successful Adrian Fenty would kill off any
chance of his becoming mayor, and thus it is not in Vincent Gray’s
best political interest to do anything that would help Adrian Fenty be a
success and move on to a second or third term. Add to Vincent Gray’s
strong desire to be mayor, the covert dislike for Adrian Fenty by Kwame
Brown, Carol Schwartz, David Catania, and Jack Evans, and you have a
making of “Sharon Pratt-Kelly II” with all the needed players to
make it happen who would be enriched by Adrian Fenty failing and going
into political obscurity as Sharon Pratt-Kelly has!
If you know the real Vincent Gray, then none of this is far fetched.
It is a serious reality I think we will all see unfold, and unfold in a
very clever and not so obvious manner before Christmas 2008.
###############
You Let St. Louis Eat Your Lunch
Star Lawrence, jkellaw@aol.com
I see that Washington did not even make the top ten most dangerous
cities. St. Louis is number one, acing out Detroit!
Come on, people!
###############
Urban Design and the Comprehensive Plan
Richard Layman, rlaymandc@yahoo.com
One of the things that I have testified about is that urban design
needs to be considered the Comprehensive Plan’s primary element,
leading and guiding all subsequent decision-making within land use and
government agency and facilities planning. Urban design means respecting
the street, connecting to the city beyond the site, having appropriate
massing and setback, etc. In a city, which it shouldn’t have to be
pointed out that DC is, urban design is centered upon the pedestrian
experience. Often, DC government agencies make facilities planning
decisions in ways that are counter to urban design. Rather than
strengthening the fundamentally urban nature of the center city, they
diminish it.
As an example, here is a statement from the DC Library System
planning document "A Blueprint for Change," (page 19):
"Branch libraries must be designed in such a way that people
passing by in a car, in a bus, or on foot become aware of the building
and are attracted to enter and use the facility. The branch must present
an open, inviting, and attractive front with a clearly visible entrance.
It is recommended that, where possible, the branch library be a single
story building with a minimum of 20,000 square feet." First, this
statement is disingenuous. There are many branch or regional libraries
in other communities that are multiple stories. The libraries are funded
and managed in such a manner that there aren’t security and staffing
problems. It is the size of the facility that for the most part dictates
staffing, not the number of floors specifically. Second, neighborhoods
in DC are not well-served by sprawling car-oriented government
buildings. One only has to pay attention to how suburban Post Offices
have been disconnected from commercial districts and put out in more
driveable places to discern the negative impact from such a policy.
(Sadly, we have examples of suburbanized post offices in DC as well.)
One such example illustrating both these points is the just opened in
January 2006 five-story Bronx Library Center in New York City. Is NYC
terribly out of touch with library site planning, and DC at the
forefront of new trends? Not likely. (Note also that the new library in
Rockville is three stories.) For the most part (if only because of the
cost of land, and the typical density and scale of NYC neighborhoods),
the New York City government constructs buildings respecting the
fundamentally urban character of the city. By comparison, DC too often
aggressively suburbanizes with its government-funded and/or supported
projects.
Third, DC’s branch libraries should be placed in commercial
districts to help provide additional reasons to patronize the commercial
district, to be located in areas with rich transit assets, to minimize
car orientation, and to strengthen the built environment. Making urban
design the predominant element of the Comprehensive Plan would require
that facilities planning and management actions by all District
Government agencies would have to be done in concert with urban
design-compact development provisions, not some underformed
suburban-oriented policy preferences.
###############
East of the River Online Presents Board of
Education Candidates
Vernard R. Gray, vrg@eastriverdc.net
A few weeks ago we decided to offer each candidate for the 2006
Washington DC Board of Education election an opportunity to participate
in a virtual candidate’s forum. The candidates are competing for three
positions — president of the Board, District III member (Wards 5 and
6) and District IV (Wards 7 and 8). Most candidates — there are five
each vying for three positions -- have responded to these questions: 1)
why are you seeking election to the Washington DC School Board? 2) What
are your qualifications for the position you seek? 3) In your opinion
what are the five major issues facing the Washington DC School System?
4) Who or what is to blame? 5) What is your opinion of mayoral candidate
Adrian M. Fenty’s position that the elected Washington DC School Board
be converted to an appointed advisory panel? 6) Do you have a web site
for your candidacy?
The results are published at http://www.eastriverdc.net/vote2006.
###############
On Saturday, October 28, I had the honor to be a host at the
seventy-sixth annual DC Federation of Civic Associations awards
celebration. This is a can’t-miss event if your passion is grassroots
civic involvement. It was a literal who’s who on the local political
scene, attended by just about every current office holder and potential
candidate in the city. It was a splendid affair at the Washington Navy
Yard with more than 450 people representing all corners of the District
in attendance. Former US Attorney Eric Holder and Metropolitan
Washington Council AFL-CIO president Joslyn Williams were keynote
speakers, and local Fox news anchor Shawn Yancy was the mistress of
ceremonies. The purpose of the event was not only to recognize the civic
involvement of the Association’s members, but also to award
scholarships to some of our most deserving youth. Both keynote speakers
touched upon this year’s theme, Our Youth, with some hard truths on
the limited opportunities that exist for the children of DC’s working
class families.
This year’s event was also the swan song for outgoing Federation
president Gerri Adams-Simmons. During her tenure as president, it was
her task force which led a successful petition drive that lobbied
Councilmember Kwame Brown to introduce “The School Modernization
Financing Act of 2005,” an amendment to legislation that earmarked
funds to reopen Phelps Career High School. She was also responsible for
co-founding the Citizens for the National Capital Medical Center; a
grassroots political group of concerned citizens formed to gain access
to emergency health care in the eastern sector of the District. Under
her leadership, the Federation awarded $13,000 in scholarships in 2006
and sponsored a political forum with the DC Chamber of Commerce and the
Washington Metropolitan Council AFL-CIO. The significance of this event
was that this was the first time in the local political arena that
representatives from labor, business, and the community joined together
for civic engagement in its purest form.
I’ve found that most people who are involved in civic service do so
to better their communities but receive little recognition for their
hard work. The recipients of this year’s awards represent the true
spirit of one village — one family. The Federation’s officers should
be applauded for their dedication and commitment to public service.
However, rarely do you find a person who does so much, but shies away
from all the kudos that follow. For this Gerri is a true gem, unique in
every way. She dares to envision a future of infinite possibilities and
embraces the belief that we are only limited by our imagination. Gerri,
well done. Our Ward 4 community, our Federation, and our entire city are
better because of you.
###############
My Unbridled Enthusiasm Is for Analysis
Richard Layman, rlaymandc@yahoo.com
Pleasant Mann [themail, October 29] attributes to me unbridled
enthusiasm for mixed use when it comes to library planning and
development. I would aver that’s an overstatement. However, I do
believe, especially for neighborhood library buildings that are not
designated historic, that mixed use development can be a part of a
strategy to achieve multiple public policy and community development
objectives simultaneously. Good (or even better) government demands that
we possess vision, especially given the fact that resources, including
land, are not unlimited. One of the better examples of mixed use
development done in an exemplary fashion is in the Hollywood
neighborhood of Portland, Oregon. This article, from Metropolis
Magazine, is a good discussion of that project: http://www.metropolismag.com/html/content_1002/ob/ob06_1002.html.
The issue really is to maximize the manner in which public assets
contribute to community and neighborhood stabilization and improvement.
The issue is can we do something similar, in appropriate places, in DC.
It comes down to trust, and frankly, I don’t think that the DC
government has a very good track record when it comes to funding or
constructing quality buildings. We must demand more from our government
and from ourselves. I can think of fewer than five projects over the
past seven years. Most are value engineered boxes that end up being a
form of visual “blight”" and certain facilities, such as
recreation centers, can end up contributing to neighborhood disorder
rather than improvement. And the public participation processes,
especially for library planning, tend to be circumscribed in ways that
minimize substantive public involvement.
Mann gives an example of poorly managed facilities by the DC
Department of Parks and Recreation at Shaw Junior High School as a
reason to not co-locate public services and facilities. This is not a
good example. This is a problem of management and execution, which is a
typical problem of DC government agencies, and one that must continue to
be addressed by the next Mayor. Why is it that Arlington County has no
problem in managing mixed-agency facilities, such as the Thomas
Jefferson Junior High School and Community Center, which has a field
house, theater and resident theater company, wellness facilities used by
the public, art studios, and other facilities in addition to those of
the school? Why is it that Arlington is redeveloping one of its
libraries, Shirlington, to include a theater for the Signature Theater
Company? And in November Montgomery County is opening a new library in
Rockville with administrative space for the library system, as well as
additional space for other government facilities? (Maybe Arlington is
the area jurisdiction that should be calling itself a world class city,
and not DC!) One of the many problems in DC is that we as residents don’t
demand excellence from our government. I have a saying: “When you ask
for nothing, that’s what you get. When you ask for the world, you don’t
get it, but you get a lot more than nothing.” We must stop reacting as
if the crumbs we get are all we deserve and worthy of great thanks and
appreciation besides. And we can jump start this process with tough,
analytical, clear thinking about the issues that come before us.
###############
Thanks for themail on all the wonderful horror hosts from back in the
day [October 29]! I miss Count Gore deVol most of all. He was the
campiest of them all, but the one who I believe genuinely loved his job!
But more important than that, the movies he featured were classics to
me. Remember The Screaming Skull? How about The Mill of the Stone Women?
And the one that scared the jeepers out of me so bad, Dracula Has Arisen
from the Grave! After it went off, I turned on every light in my apt at
the time and the radio and kept them on all night long! I still laugh at
myself to this day for being so silly, but Christopher Lee was one scary
dude! Anyway, I’ve decided to do my civic duty and volunteered to work
the polls this coming November 7. Hopefully, Christopher Lee wont show
up to vote! But we want everyone else to.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS
Mayoral Debate Broadcast, November 2
Mark Segraves, msegraves@wtopnews.com
Washington Post radio, 1500 AM, 1077 FM, will air the only mayoral
debate before the general election between Fenty and Kranich. Live,
Thursday, November 2, 10:00 a.m., for one hour.
###############
DC Public Library Events, November 2, 7
India Young, india.young@dc.gov
Thursday, November 2, 2:30 p.m., Martin Luther King, Jr., Memorial
Library, 901 G Street, NW, Room 221. Let’s Talk About Books. Discuss
the book Reading Lolita in Tehran by Azar Nafisi. Next month:
“The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber” by Ernest Hemingway. For
more information, call 727-1281.
Tuesdays, November 7, 14, 21, 28, 7:00 p.m. Free English as a Second
Language Classes, Southeast Neighborhood Library, 403 7th Street, SE.
This program is designed to teach conversational English and fluency. It
includes a resume workshop. The instructor will work with all levels.
Registration is not required. All are welcome! For more information,
call 698-3375.
###############
National Building Museum Events, November 6, 8
Lauren Searl, lsearl@nbm.org
Monday, November 6, 6:30-8:00 p.m. Dr. Eugen Brühwiler of the Swiss
Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich will discuss the work of
Professor Christian Menn, examining projects such as the Bunkerhill
Bridge in Boston, the Washington Road Pedestrian Bridge in Princeton,
and the Peace Bridge in Buffalo. This lecture is presented in
collaboration with the Embassy of Switzerland and will be held at the
Embassy located at 2900 Cathedral Avenue, NW. $12 Museum members,
Friends of Switzerland, and students; $20 nonmembers. Prepaid
registration required. Walk-in registration based on availability.
Wednesday, November 8, 10: a.m.-5:00 p.m. Start your holiday shopping
early in the Museum Shop with an incredible array of Iittala products
— from the contemporary Alvar Aalto vase and Oiva Toikka’s whimsical
handcrafted glass birds, to the limited-edition petrol blue 70th
anniversary Aalto vase. Iittala representatives will be on hand to
answer questions throughout the day.
Wednesday, November 8, 7:00-9:00 p.m. “Something we use every day
should fit the human being in every sense.” These are the words of
Alvar Aalto, the leading voice of Scandinavian modernism. Markku Lahti,
director of the Alvar Aalto Museum and Foundation, will discuss Aalto’s
distinguished career, including his Finnish and American buildings and
the signature vase that bears his name. A reception will follow the
presentation and the Shop will be open — with a chance to win a unique
Iittala item! Enter the special raffle at the membership table. $12
Museum members and students; $20 nonmembers. Prepaid registration
required. Walk-in registration based on availability. All events at the
National Building Museum, 401 F Street, NW, Judiciary Square stop, Metro
Red Line. Register for events at http://www.nbm.org.
###############
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every
Wednesday and Sunday. To subscribe, to change E-mail addresses, or to
switch between HTML and plain text versions of themail, use the
subscription form at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail/subscribe.htm.
To unsubscribe, send an E-mail message to themail@dcwatch.com
with “unsubscribe” in the subject line. Archives of past messages
are available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should also be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com,
and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of
Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to
be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief
paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can
be put into each mailing.