Negative Campaigning
Dear Campaigners:
Negative campaigning works for politicians who are behind in
political races. That’s why politicians do it. The best kind of
negative political campaigning talks only about the opponent’s
political skills and positions on political issues; the worst kind
smears the opponent’s personal life and character. It’s risky to go
negative, however. The gamble for the politician who depends on
denigrating his opponent is that he can drive down the support for his
opponent faster than he loses support himself because of his ugly
tactics.
When Linda Cropp started running behind in the polls, her campaign
became almost exclusively a negative one, based more on personal than on
political attacks on Adrian Fenty. That campaign is almost certain to
reduce the public support for Fenty; that’s why she engages in it. The
question is whether she can increase support for herself by these
tactics. Negative campaigning is even riskier for Cropp than for most
politicians. Regardless of whether people supported Linda’s political
positions — or whether they could even figure out where she stood on
most issues — most people thought of her as a nice and friendly
person. She’s sacrificing that advantage and coming off in the
campaign as the queen of mean, while Fenty continues to act as the nice
guy, criticizing Cropp only by questioning her claims of
accomplishments.
Most of the political commentators and pundits have already had their
say on the past two weeks of the campaign and on the debate between
Cropp and Fenty. Now it’s your turn. Where do the mayoral candidates
stand in your opinion? Who do you trust? As always, if you work for,
volunteer for, or are associated with anybody’s campaign, please
reveal that in your message.
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
###############
Retaliation Against DCPS Whistleblower
Erich Martel, ehmartel at starpower dot net
An open letter to my former advanced placement US history students
and their parents: I am writing to ask your assistance. Since 1987, I
have taught Advanced Placement US History at Woodrow Wilson High School.
For nine years, most recently in June 2006, I have also been a College
Board reader of Advanced Placement US History essays, making me the most
broadly experienced AP US History teacher in DCPS. In July, Dr. Tarason
[principal of Wilson Senior High] ordered all three sections of the AP
US History that I was scheduled to teach transferred to a teacher who
has never taught AP US History before and who came to Wilson High School
last year as a substitute for a world history teacher who went on
maternity leave. (There is no implied question of the other teacher’s
general qualifications as a social studies teacher.) He never informed
me of the change or gave me an educational or administrative
explanation. He did not send me the August 11 announcement of school
opening activities and teaching schedule, which was sent to Wilson HS
faculty just before returning to school last week, thereby not giving me
advance notice of his unannounced change. He has refused requests from
me and my colleagues for the restoration of these AP sections to my
schedule of teaching assignments.
This is a retaliatory response to my reports that 193 (now adjusted
to 178) of the 420 students on the June 5 Wilson H.S. graduation day
program had not completed all mandatory DCPS graduation requirements.
The “official list” of June 5, 2006, graduates “as of June 14th”
submitted to the superintendent lists 311 graduates. Ninety of these
“official” graduates are among those who are ineligible. I have
requested an independent and objective audit of all Class of 2006
academic records.
Most outrageous of all is using students and specialized AP course
assignments as pawns for retaliation. If you agree that this decision is
not in our students’ and our school’s best interest and that the AP
US history sections should be restored to my teaching schedule, please
consider sending your views to DCPS Superintendent Dr. Clifford Janey,
to your or your parents’ Board member and city council member: clifford.janey@k12.dc.us
(Superintendent Clifford Janey), vreinoso@federalcitycouncil.org
(Board of Education member Victor Reinoso, Wards 3 and 4), kpatterson@dccouncil.us
(Councilmember Kathy Patterson, Ward 3).
###############
Professor Cheh Refuses to Debate One-on-One
Erik S. Gaull, candidate for DC council, Ward 3, eric@gaull2006.com
Today, Mary Cheh declined to debate me one-on-one about public safety
in Ward 3 and DC. I am disheartened that Professor Cheh, who has spoken
so openly, often, and widely about how she will improve public safety in
the District, refuses to give the voters of Ward 3 a substantive look at
how she intends to do that. In issuing my challenge to Professor Cheh, I
noted that there have been a number of debates with all nine Democratic
contenders, but that the sheer number of participants means that the
answers to questions must be kept short. I am concerned that the voters
are being denied an opportunity to hear in-depth about a critical issue
affecting Ward 3 and the city as a whole. I’ve knocked on thousands of
doors in Ward 3, and I know that people want to know what the next Ward
3 councilmember will do to improve emergency medical services and the
other vital public safety services in the District.
Professor Cheh is the only other candidate to make improving public
safety a central platform item. The voters in Ward 3 are entitled to
hear a dialogue that really fleshes out our differences on this issue.
Complex answers to difficult questions on how best to improve public
safety cannot and should not be squeezed into thirty-second sound-bytes.
I would like to reiterate my invitation to Professor Cheh to participate
in a real debate about a real issue that affects real people all across
this city. Let’s give the voters what they want -- information.
###############
Ward 3 Council Election and the Public Schools
Tom Smith, Tmfsmith@starpower.net
Wendy Sefsaf’s recent post concerning the role of education in the
election contest for Ward 3 DC council [themail, August 27] trivializes
the problems confronting the DC public school system. Ms. Sefsaf’s
solution to the problems plaguing the DC public school system is to
elect a parent -- but not just any parent, a parent with children of age
who are attending the public schools. I wonder if her choice for a
candidate would suddenly be unqualified if this election was sometime in
the future and her candidate’s children were no longer of age to
attend DC public schools. I also wonder if Ms. Sefsaf is demanding that
her candidate commit in advance and sign on the dotted line that the
candidate will not ever forego public education in favor of private
education at some point in the future. And does she suggest that a
candidate with no children at all is simply unqualified to sit on the DC
council?
Our children should not be used as pawns in a political debate on
education. Likewise, the issue of public education is no less important
to a voter who either has no children or none enrolled at this time in
the public schools. All of us have a “dog in the fight” for public
education reform in DC. But, the dog is not a candidate. Our interests
should be our children — and not just the children in Ward 3 who have
access to some of the best schools in the city — but for all children
across this city. When our tax dollars are allocated to the public
schools, nobody imposes a litmus test on those dollars by asking if the
tax money is coming from a parent with children currently enrolled in
the public schools. That’s because public education is a
responsibility for a civil society. It is not the domain of any one
individual or group of people.
I want a Ward 3 council member who will be tough on this issue, not
just to make parents feel good, but also to be assured our tax dollars
are spent wisely, that our schools are managed effectively and, most
importantly, to ensure that children in all parts of DC can take
advantage of the opportunities that are possible with a good basic
education. So it’s time for candidates and their campaign workers to
forego creating false litmus tests for voters on the issue of education.
Talk is easy. Instead, I want to hear candidates outline what they plan
to do and how they plan to do it, especially given the current city
organizational structure that limits the role of the DC council and the
mayor in dealing with education. The type of litmus test suggested by
Ms. Sefsaf is usually indicative of a candidate with few ideas and who
is motivated more by the desire to win than the commitment to solve
difficult problems.
###############
Wendy Sefsaf Has Hit the Nail on the Head
Jonathan R. Rees, jrrees2006@verizon.net
The true role of our DC city council as it concerns the DC public
schools is funding and nothing more. Its oversight is merely one of
funding what DCPS asks for in its budget request each year, but the real
people who can make things happen are the DCPS officials we elect and
otherwise, not the members of the DC city council. Until voters realize
that, we will still have the likes of candidates promising things they
cannot do. This is why Pat Bitondo suggested if people are really
concerned about our schools, then they should run for a spot there.
I do not know who woke up one morning and decided that our schools
would be the number one issue in this political season, but as a Ward 3
resident and candidate, I realize that only 7 percent of the voters in
my ward have children in school, and more than half the people I have
spoken too, which has been well over three thousand so far, put matters
of the pocketbook first, not our schools. The sad truth is when I came
to DC in 1979, our schools were in disarray then and after all these
years, we finally decide to do something about it! Have voters been out
to lunch these past 27 years? The fact is that all the ward 3 candidates
except Eric Goblet and myself have made schools the top campaign issue
and have ignored all else has robbed the voters of where they stand on
so many other issues of concern to voters.
Income taxes, property taxes, jobs, job security, housing, excessive
and costly regulations on businesses, healthcare, assisted living for
our seniors, traffic congestion, and so many other issues were brought
up in my talks with voters before the school issue was. Sadly, most of
the Ward 3 candidates have made this campaign season a single issue and
are cheating and/or keeping voters ignorant on where they stand on many
other important issues. I ran into this 72-year-old gent who said to me:
“Mr. Rees, I am 72 years old; I have no children, never had any, I
live on a fixed income of $1,700 a month, I live in a rent controlled
unit, I have health issues, and I am concerned about paying my rent,
putting food on my table, co-payments on the fourteen different
medications I take each day, so why would I give a damn about our
schools? Mr. Rees, probably half the voters in Ward 3 are just making
it, and they are just like me, more concerned about what I am. It is
painful watching greedy landlords, doctors, pharmaceutical companies,
and others squeeze the life out of what little most of us have. What are
you going to do to strengthen the backbone of what life people like I
have left?”
###############
Non-Parents Care About DC Schools, Too
Alan Kimber, alan@alankimber.org
I have one problem with Wendy Sefsaf’s comments from the last
edition of themail [August 27]. Let me start by saying that I live in
Ward 6, so I don’t have a specific interest in the Ward 3 race, and I
agree that all the talk from the various candidates for council in all
wards needs to be backed up by action on those issues that the council
can truly affect (as opposed to those areas under the control of the
school board).
My issue is Ms. Sefsaf’s contention that those of us without
children have no interest in DC’s public schools. All citizens should
be outraged that our public schools continue to handicap the children
growing up in DC by providing vastly substandard education, limited
vocational training, and facilities that are literally crumbling around
the students and dedicated teachers.
A neighbor on my block and longtime resident is the president of the
J.O. Wilson PTA (I think she still continues in this capacity). She has
no children — just a drive and desire to help the children in our
community get the best education they can, despite a deeply flawed
system. This past weekend, I participated in the school beautification
work project organized by DCPS and Marc Borbely, working for several
hours at Ludlow-Taylor to clean up all the trash, plant flowers, mulch
and water the trees, etc., in preparation for the children starting
school. Only one couple who participated had any children, and they had
a two-year-old at that. We were all there because we care deeply about
the education that the children in DC receive. So please don’t count
us out when it comes to education issues. We all have an interest in
bettering DCPS, and divisiveness won’t help the cause.
###############
An Humongous Water Bill: A Cautionary Addendum
Clare Feinson, cfeinson at erols dot com
Beware of WASA technicians who come out to check problems with your
water meter and want to take the nickel tour of your house. A few years
ago, I, too, had an humongous water bill that was probably due to an
outside leak or a malfunctioning meter [themail, August 27]. The tech
who came out to check it asked casually if I would let him take a look
around inside the house. We had done a substantial upgrade of the
bathrooms several years earlier, which I showed him with great pride.
A week later, I got a letter from WASA, in which they told me that
when people who have relatively new fixtures complain about an
outrageous bill, WASA automatically assumes that there was a leak in old
fixtures that were hastily replaced before calling WASA to claim that
the problem was the agency’s responsibility. Unless I could prove at a
hearing that internal fixtures were not the cause of the leak, they were
going to make me pay the whole thing. Fortunately, I am a pack rat who
saves every receipt, and I was able to show them conclusively that the
new fixtures were installed several years before the water bill took a
heart-stopping jump -- I even had the inspection certificate from their
agency. I had to submit what amounted to a legal brief, with all the
documentation attached, and I was going to have to take a day off work
to attend the hearing. Fortunately, the day before the hearing someone
with some common sense finally reviewed my submission and dismissed all
the excess bill charges without my having to come in. So when that WASA
tech asks to see the indoor plumbing, better think twice before letting
him in.
###############
Here’s how I’d improve on Adam Nagourney’s tour of DC [themail,
August 27]. Yes, it is true that Zaytinya does not take reservations and
(also) that it should not be missed, but use that hour wait for a table
to hop down the block and have a blackberry mojito at the bar at
Indebleu. Skip dessert at Zaytinya and walk a few blocks over to Andale
for the chocolate y churros. A yummy night indeed that allows you to see
more of what Chinatown has to offer. Other must sees/dos: The Holocaust
Museum — I think if you’ve only got time for one museum this is the
one you should see; U Street for jazz — walk down 14th street a little
to HR-57 and don’t forget to save room for a snack of crispy fried
chicken wings and vinegary greens washed down with a cold corona; and
Eastern Market on Saturday for lunch either in a restaurant or at the
lunch counter and for shopping.
On the way back from lunch, stop by Ticketplace, near Gallery Place,
to see what shows you can catch for half price that night. I’ve even
gone in and ended up with free tickets to theaters/shows for which they
were trying to increase support. If the 9:30 Club is sold out, check out
the Velvet Lounge a few blocks over. A little more low-key, but always
interesting (and cheaper). After the show, have a beer at The Saloon on
U Street. (By the way, do people really still consider the neighborhood
around 9:30 Club to be out of the way and sketchy?) Finally, if you
happen to be in DC on a third Thursday or a first Friday, I recommend
the art gallery tours at Gallery Place (Thursday) and Dupont Circle
(Friday). They are interesting and unpretentious. I look forward to
other readers’ answers!
###############
NY Times
Article on DC
Ralph Blessing, rblessin88@hotmail.com
I found the Times article not terribly creative, especially
considering that its stated intention was to highlight some lesser known
DC gems. If that’s the case, then why an afternoon strolling through
Georgetown? When I have visitors, I make sure they see the Awakening,
Eastern Market, and Rock Creek Park north of Broad Branch. Time
permitting, I throw in National Cathedral or the Catholic Shrine, the
Franciscan Monastery, and the Library of Congress. Maybe a drive along
Embassy Row, a visit to some of the marvelous downtown gardens (Bartholdi
Park, Haupt, Ripley) or the Botanic itself. Then there’s Congressional
Cemetery, Logan Circle, and Galludet University. For restaurants, I’d
focus on some of the more upscale ethnic places downtown, such as Cafe
Atlantico, Ceiba, Jaleo, or Zaytinya. Suffice it to say that the Times
reporter just scratched the surface.
###############
Entertaining Out-of-Town Guests
Mike Livingston, mlivingston@greens.org
I like to take people on the smartass tour: the Watergate, the spot
where Reagan was shot, the hotel formerly known as the Vista. But
seriously, 18th Street in Adams Morgan, ideally for Ethiopian food; for
breakfast, the Tabard Inn or Ellington’s on Eighth or Teaism. For
souvenir shopping, 18th Street again, or the last remnants of pre-Verizon
Chinatown; if people insist on something more touristy, there’s the
gift shops of the National Building Museum, Natural History Museum,
Freer/Sackler, and the National Cathedral. And the two things I tell
every guest about are Millennium Stage and the importance, to the city
and the nation, of DC Statehood.
###############
Evaluating the Mayor’s Performance
Ed T. Barron, edtb1@macdotcom
My single criterion for evaluating performance is leadership. Tony
Williams is not a leader. He is not even a good manager. He is reactive,
at best. A true leader creates a vision, surrounds himself with very
capable people, lets these people establish a mission statement with
clear, measurable goals to support the vision, and then develops a plan
to make things happen. We have had none of this in DC. Instead, our four
critical needs of the District: schools; police protection/crime
prevention; fire safety; and emergency medical services, have not
improved in the last eight years. We have an inept police chief and poor
morale in the police department and fire safety department.
We have a mayor who loves to travel. He’s been away from DC more
than any three mayors of large cities combined. More than 80 percent of
these trips are real boondoggles. He’s even out boondoggled most of
the members of Congress in his self-promotion trips. Scandals have
plagued this administration including the petition collecting for the
mayor’s reelection, and fundraising for boondoggles by key
administration officials.
The key question one must answer is, “Would you vote to elect this
person mayor of DC based on his past performance?” Sorry, Tony, you
get a D-minus in my evaluation.
###############
Top Ten Reasons Why I Really Like Tony
Williams
Bill Coe, bceedeec@aol.com
Reason Number 10: Tony got my street plowed, then he got it paved,
and then he put those lions back on Taft Bridge. (Beautiful!) Number 9:
he tamed one of our community’s greatest plagues -- DMV. Number 8:
thanks to Tony, a whole generation of Washingtonians knows the true
meaning of the word “niggardly.” Number 7: he took an interest in
restoring our city’s beloved trees. Number 6: Tony balanced our
budget, and then he handed us a surplus!
Number 5: unbeknownst to most of us, he promised to help O.J. find
the real killer if, in return, O.J. helped Tony find a house to buy in
DC. Number 4: for better or worse, he gave our public schools a good
hard kick in the pants by supporting the introduction of charter
schools. Number 3: Tony didn’t just complain; he put the complaint on
our flag -- Taxation Without Representation! Number 2: in his two terms
as mayor, he was not once filmed smoking crack; and. . . .
The Number 1 Reason why I really, really like Tony Williams (and wish
he wouldn’t go): after 35 years of no results from nobody, Tony did
the work, paid the price, and brought major league baseball back to
Washington, DC. Bravo, Tony Williams!
###############
Tony and the Council: The Final Days
Petra Weinakht, pweinakht@gmail.com
Without doubt, after the primary the lame duck government, with
several months time on its hands and no reason to feel accountable to
anyone, will spend a chunk of time giving themselves and Tony Williams
honors. It will be interesting to see what parts of the District the
council will christen with Williams memorials on his and their way out
the door. I would say the best bet is that the stadium will soon be the
number one TW memorial, runners-up are the Wilson Building or something
inside it. If Cropp loses, then we’ll probably see more of the same.
###############
Dorothy, you drive me nuts with your negative [themail, August 27].
While you have done a great deal of good, you always seem to take a
negative on just about everything. How about taking a minute to find
good in Williams, Miller, and Jamal?
[Wayne is president of the Ward 2 Democrats. Wayne, if you want to
see praise of Mayor Williams and his partnerships with developers Herb
Miller and Douglas Jamal in themail, why don’t you write it? — Gary
Imhoff]
###############
Smokefree DC Endorses Candidates for Mayor and
Council
Angela Bradbery, Smokefree DC, Angela@smokefreedc.org
Smokefree DC has endorsed candidates for mayor and council based on
their history of support for smokefree workplace legislation and their
answers to a candidate questionnaire. You can see our endorsements at http://www.smokefreedc.org/e2006/primary-endorsements.php
or www.SmokefreeDC.org and read
responses to the questionnaires at http://www.smokefreedc.org/e2006/candidates2006.php.
We endorsed Adrian Fenty (mayor), Kathy Patterson (council chair), Phil
Mendelson (at-large councilmember), Jim Graham (Ward 1), Sam Brooks
(Ward 3), Kathy Henderson (Ward 5), and Curtis Etherly (Ward 6).
Although the DC council earlier this year passed a smokefree workplace
law that applies to bars and restaurants, it won’t be fully
implemented until January, when a new mayor and council take office. The
mayor is responsible for implementing the law, and the council has the
power to change it. We encourage all voters to take this into
consideration when going to the polls on Sept. 12.
###############
Is Tom Davis a Genius or
What?
Samuel Jordan, Samunomas at msn dot com
It was encouraging to see Sam Schramski’s online article in The
Nation, DC Edges Closer to Representation (August 20, http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060911/dc_seeks_representation).
Almost any discussion of this issue that reaches an audience outside of
the District of Columbia is welcomed by those who advocate for
Congressional representation for the 570,000 US residents in the
District Nevertheless, the article treats the matter with a gloss and
does not even hint of deeper currents in the nation’s political
culture that has lead to the status quo for the District. Schramski
accurately notes that the proposed legislation, HR 5388, The District of
Columbia Fair and Equal House Voting Rights Act of 2006, introduced by
Rep. Thomas Davis, III (R-Va.) and Eleanor H. Norton, the District’s
nonvoting Congressional Delegate, would expand the House of
Representatives from 435 to 437 Members granting one voting seat in the
House to the District and another seat to Utah. Schramski does not
inquire why the District does not have voting representation in Congress
Nor does he ask why Utah should get an additional seat. Rare is the
discussion that underscores the historical precedents for the District’s
lack of representation or the traditional methods used to address this
deficiency.
HR 5388 proposes that the District’s new voting seat be
“balanced” with a seat for Utah, although there is no crisis of
democracy in Utah, one of the “reddest” and whitest states in the
nation. “Balancing” is also one of the two traditional tactics
employed to grant Congressional representation to a jurisdiction
featuring a nonwhite numerical majority in its population. The tandem
entry of Alaska and Hawaii in 1959 is the best example of this racial
balancing. While we have been lead to believe that the purpose of
balancing is the maintenance of partisan neutrality, the Congressional
Record contains language that reveals the truth of the technique’s
utility — nothing of value for non-whites without something of equal
or greater value for whites.
Lyndon Baines Johnson, the powerful Senate Majority Leader, led the
opposition to statehood for Hawaii. He feared that Hawaii would send a
delegation to Congress that would “oppose segregation.” Other
members of Congress were as direct in their concern that Hawaii’s
Asian/Native Hawaiian majority was not sufficiently “American” to
become a state. Even though Hawaii applied for statehood in 1903, it
experienced the second-longest delay between application and grant —
56 years. Alaska, with its white majority, was admitted ahead of
brown-skinned Hawaii — the only deal that Johnson would accept. Was
racial balancing more important than political balancing?
The longest wait for the grant of statehood is the record held by New
Mexico, 62 years. Is it merely coincidental that New Mexico, described
in the April 1, 1876, Harper’s Weekly as “. . . an ignorant,
foreign community under the influence of the Roman Church . . . nine
tenths Mexicans, Indians, ‘greasers’ and other non-English speaking
people. . . ,” did not become a state until the census of 1910
confirmed a white majority? This rejection of the nonwhite numerical
majority until its replacement with a white majority is the second of
the two traditional tactics used when a territory with a nonwhite
majority population has sought to increase its political power through
statehood. No other options have been available. This is the
time-honored “rights by race rule” or more specifically, the “two
tactics tradition.” Is it coincidental that all US territories with
white majorities are called “states” and all the current US
territories, including the District of Columbia, have nonwhite
majorities and no realistic prospects of achieving statehood?
Something else that Sam Schramski missed in his review of the issue:
Utah will have an additional vote in the Electoral College in the
presidential elections of 2008. The District will not gain additional
Electoral College strength. Does this still sound like bipartisan
neutrality and political “balancing?” Just when the Republicans are
becoming anxious about retention of control of Congress and the White
House, along comes a feel-good bill that will give the reddest state in
the union an additional Electoral College vote when it matters. Is Tom
Davis a genius or what? “After all,” Davis is depending on his
coterie to say, “one vote for the District is still a sign of progress
and is better than nothing.” He expects no repercussions whatsoever
when the bill’s supporters realize that the “balancing” they were
willing to accept, is part of a stratagem to impact the 2008
presidential elections. Perhaps that is why Davis has not mentioned the
electoral implications of the bill in his public promotion of the
legislation.
###############
This past Tuesday, I attended a candidate’s debate in Ward 4
sponsored by the DC Federation of Civic Associations, DC Chamber of
Commerce, and the Metropolitan Washington Council AFL-CIO. Damn, that
moderator was good. All kidding aside, I had a wonderful time. I want to
thank the president of the Federation, Gerri Adams-Simmons, for the
memorable opportunity. At the peak of the evening, there were more than
250 people milling around Peoples Congregation Baptist Church. For the
most part, the event drew a middle-aged black crowd with a conservative
sprinkling of white folks and a few Latinos. But before I get into the
meat of this piece, I have to single out the performance of our
panelists: James Adams of NBC4, Sam Ford of ABC7, and Deborah Simmons of
the Washington Times — they were absolutely stellar! Not only
did they ask probing questions, but they also insisted that these
questions be answered with real thought provoking responses and not the
usual canned campaign spiels.
The first hour of the debate showcased the races for DC council
chair, Vincent Gray and Kathy Patterson, and at-large councilman, A.
Scott Bolden and Phil Mendelson. All four candidates got their messages
across, but I was left with these observations; Phil Mendelson didn’t
look the part. He wore no jacket or tie, and had the sleeves of his
rumpled shirt rolled up . . . that didn’t go over well with this
crowd. Bolden took full advantage of the debate format by requesting his
right to rebut every response Mendelson gave, drawing a clear
distinction between his candidacy and the two-term incumbent. Gray
proudly spoke of his record in social service to the neediest citizens
of the District, and his plans for reintroducing convicted felons back
into the community. While Patterson stressed that although she has been
the Ward 3 representative on the council, her record shows she has
sponsored legislation that benefited the entire District. Right before
their closing remarks I asked the candidates, “If the vote were held
tonight for replacing the closed DC General Hospital with the proposed
National Capital Medical Center, how would you vote, Yes or No with no
explanation?” Bolden, yes; Mendelson, yes; Gray, yes; and Patterson,
no.
The last hour of the debate was split into two segments, the
front-runners in the mayor’s race and the candidates for president of
the school board. The first half hour was the Linda Cropp show because
Adrian Fenty refused the invitation sighting a scheduling conflict,
without ever offering an alternative date or telling the organizers what
was so important that he couldn’t make their date work. I get his
strategy. If you were continually told you’re comfortably ahead, why
would you debate a seasoned challenger in front of a well-informed
panel? Being that the debate was in his backyard, maybe he’s already
counting those votes as his. Ward 4 has the highest concentration of
registered Democrats in the District, and these voters deserved an
opportunity to see each candidate under fire. Panelist Sam Ford
immediately asked Cropp about her “negative” campaign tactic against
her challenger and she defended this strategy, “My record is out there
for everyone to see, why shouldn’t the voters know the record of my
opponent [Fenty]? If this is seen as being negative, then that speaks to
his record and he should be held accountable. I have not leveled one
charge that isn’t true, so if his record is negative, then it speaks
for itself.” That response brought resounding applause from the
audience. By the time the candidates for school board took the stage,
Cropp and the candidates for city council had either left the church or
were in the atrium politicking the audience who had left the sanctuary,
prompting candidate Timothy Jenkins to say, “Every one of the
candidates tonight talked about how important education is in this
election, but did you see how fast the room cleared out when the
candidates for president of the school board got up here? That should
make you think how serious they really are about our children.” Strong
statement.
A couple of weeks ago I posed the question on my web site, www.thealexandercenter.com,
asking the visitors about their choice for mayor, chair, and at-large
city council. I did this because the numbers the Post was putting
out there were inconsistent with Ward straw polls. The winners were
Fenty, Patterson, and Bolden. I won’t get into the actual numbers
because it was an uncontrolled and unscientific poll. The problem was
that once certain camps got word of the poll they essentially stuffed
the ballot box. Just as an experiment, I decided not to notify the camps
for the at-large race, and those results will more than likely hold
true, with Bolden winning in a nail biter. The polls did make me wonder,
when is the right time for the mayoral candidates to take an honest
assessment of their chances and endorse a candidate with a legitimate
chance of being elected mayor. One would think with the election less
than two weeks away, the time is now to choose a candidate whose
platform most resembles yours — because no one will remember who came
in second.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS
Rally at the Anacostia Public Library, August
31
Gerald Schwinn, gerald.allen.schwinn@verizon.net
Did you know that the Anacostia Library has been shuttered since
December 2004? Did you realize that the Mayor and the city council have
never found it a priority to make sure interim services are in place to
continue to serve the needs of this neighborhood? Does this make you
angry because you recognize the important role libraries can play in a
community? Two years is too long! Come on out to rally for the immediate
reopening of Anacostia Library and bring your friends and children.
Keynote speakers, children’s activities and reading time, open mic for
all -- step up to the podium and speak! Food and beverages will be
served.
Thursday, August 31, 5:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m., Anacostia Public
Library, 1800 Good Hope Road, SE (18th Street and Good Hope Road. The 92
bus stops directly in front of the library. For more information,
contact Joy Pinkney, 202-889-7581, joy@joynet1.com.
###############
DC Public Library Events, September 5-6
Debra Truhart, debra.truhart@dc.gov
Tuesday, September 5, 6:30-8:30 p.m., Washington Highlands, DC
Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs’ Office of Consumer
Protection Workshop at your library. Be a smart consumer. Protect and
enhance your buying power. Learn how not to be a fraud statistic. For
more information, visit the web site at http://www.dcra.dc.gov,
and click on Office of Consumer Protection, or call 442-4400.
September 6 and 20, 11:00 a.m.-1:00 p.m., Martin Luther King, Jr.,
Memorial Library, 901 G Street, NW-Computer Lab, Room 315. Computer
training classes for seniors. Are you computer savvy? Want to be? Learn
your way around a personal computer and to navigate the World Wide Web.
First Class: Senior PC Basics; Second Class: Senior Web. For more
information and to sign up, call Adaptive Library Services, 727-1335.
September 6-27, Martin Luther King, Jr., Memorial Library, 901 G
Street, NW. Let’s Communicate in American Sign Language. Beginning
level: Monday and Wednesday, 5:30 p.m., September 6-27; Thursday, 5:30
p.m.; Thursday, September 7, 14, 21, 28; Intermediate level: Monday and
Wednesday, 5:30 p.m., September 6-27; Tuesday, 5:30 p.m., September 5,
12, 19; Saturday, 10:00 a.m., September 2, 9, 16, 23; Conversational
level: Monday and Wednesday, 5:30 p.m., September 6-27. Please check
outer lobby bulletin board for class locations. American Sign Language
classes are provided by the Librarian for the Deaf Community, Adaptive
Services Division of the DC Public Library. School ages-Adults. Public
contact: 727-2145 (TTY and Voice).
Monday and Wednesday, September 6, 13, 20, 27, 7:00 p.m., Juanita E.
Thornton/Shepherd Park Neighborhood Library, 7420 Georgia Avenue, NW.
Local authors from the Shepherd Park community. September 6, How
Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation Norms Can Influence Jury Verdicts
in Murder Cases by Cynthia Lee; September 13, The Passion of My
Times: An Advocate’s Fifty-Year Journey in the Civil Rights Movement
by William Taylor; September 20, Baseball 2006: Pennants, Playoffs
and Personalities by Mark Pattison and Dave Raglin; September 27,
TBA.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — HELP WANTED
Computer Precinct Technicians for the Upcoming
Elections
Bill O’Field, wofield@dcboee.org
The District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics is recruiting
individuals with computer experience to serve as Precinct Technicians
for the upcoming elections. Precinct Technicians will work in the
District’s 142 voting precincts for the September 12 primary and
November 7 general elections. These individuals will be trained by the
Board to assist the Precinct Captains, among other duties, to operate
the electronic voting systems in each of the District’s polling
places. The Precinct Technicians’ hours are from 6:15 a.m. until about
9:30 p.m. on Election Day, and they will be paid a stipend of $140.00,
which includes the training session. For more information or to inquire
about the training sessions send an E-mail message to wofield@dcboee.org
or call 727-2511. Individuals with hearing impairments can call the
Board’s TDD at 639-8916.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — SERVICES
Ever wondered if those rumors are true about your house, who built
it, who designed it, and when it was built? We will research it for you,
plus a whole lot more, like what existed on the site before your house,
who lived there in the past where they worked, and we even sometimes
find living relatives of your original owner that have those rare
photographs that showed how your house was furnished! Reserve your house
history today for a unique holiday gift, or to use as a marketing tool
when selling. In addition, the facade easement legislation was recently
updated and signed by the president; have you considered a tax
deductible facade donation? For more information or a sample house
history, visit http://www.WashingtonHistory.com.
###############
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every
Wednesday and Sunday. To subscribe, to change E-mail addresses, or to
switch between HTML and plain text versions of themail, use the
subscription form at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail/subscribe.htm.
To unsubscribe, send an E-mail message to themail@dcwatch.com
with “unsubscribe” in the subject line. Archives of past messages
are available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should also be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com,
and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of
Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to
be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief
paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can
be put into each mailing.