Washingtoniana
Dear Washingtonians:
Two items of breaking news that you may not have heard yet: The
Common Denominator reports on its web site today that Peggy Cooper
Cafritz, the president of the Board of Education, is not going to run
for a third term (http://www.thecommondenominator.com/012306_news2.html).
And WTOP reporter Mark Seagraves reports that the Department of
Public Works has been overcharging other DC government agencies for work
that it does for them (http://www.wtopnews.com/?nid=25&sid=679003).
“The records reveal a pattern of mismanagement, over-billing and poor
bookkeeping resulting in hundreds of thousands of dollars in
waste."”You know that waste, fraud, and mismanagement are out of
control when the government doesn’t just do it to citizens, but does
it to itself.
It’s a long issue, so I’ll be brief, but I must comment on the
defenses of Councilmember Kathy Patterson that are offered below. It’s
one thing to suggest, as I did, that Kathy changed her position to
support the ballpark stadium giveaway hoping that she would benefit
politically from it. That’s bad enough, but it only implies political
expedience and self-interest. Kathy’s defenders, below, suggest that
she analyzed the costs and benefits of the ballpark and came to the
conclusion that it would be a profitable deal and an economic benefit
for the city. Isn’t that even worse? If it were true that she believed
that, wouldn’t it imply poor judgment and incompetence? If she came to
that conclusion about a deal that stinks as badly as this one, what
would it say about her ability to do business for the city?
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
###############
Dealing in Our Future and in Our Past
Mark Meinke, issan@verizon.net
The DC government’s task force on the public libraries and its
carefully controlled public discussions continue to ignore the primacy
of the Washingtoniana Division in chronicling and preserving the
District’s history. The Martin Luther King, Jr., Public Library,
slated for development as a major real estate parcel, has been home to
the 101-year-old Washingtoniana Division for many years. The plans, as
released, mention Washingtoniana’s collections only in passing with
not a word about better housing and professional quality archival
facilities for these important collections. Perhaps that is an indicator
of the Task Force’s wish to write off and bury Washingtoniana, perhaps
it’s simply an oversight.
The Division’s collections, its professional staff, and
Washingtoniana’s hours have made it a Mecca for those researching DC
history and its ramifications. The loss of Washingtoniana would be a
major loss to the preservation of the city’s history and documents.
###############
[An open letter to members of the Committee on Government Operations)
I appreciate your attention to the important matter of determining the
best use for publicly owned property in the District. The system has
been failing DC residents. We have lost dozens of public building, such
as historic schools, to sale, transfers, or other types of disposition
which have, as an understatement, shortchanged the residents. Many of
our public buildings have been converted into high-priced condos.
Meanwhile, community needs such as recreation, senior centers, job
training, and affordable housing are still unmet.
Please vote “no” on the disposition of Bruce and Old Congress
Heights Schools, because 1) we need an inventory of public property –
we don’t know what we have, and because of this we are failing to
plan. DC Code states that the Office of Property Management is to be
compiling an inventory, the first stage of which is to be completed by
March. What is the status of this inventory? The Committee on Government
Operations is charged with oversight. 2) We need a new policy for
determining new uses for public property which ensures community input,
and which prioritizes community uses. The greatest barrier to providing
services to the community — whether it’s affordable housing,
recreation, whatever — is the cost of real estate. Residents are owed
the right to benefit from our own public assets. 3) Residents in
Congress Heights and in the area surrounding Bruce School do not feel
that their voices have been heard. According to testimony from Carol
Mitten at the December 19th hearing, because of Congressional
interference charter schools will have “first right” to schools that
are expected to be “downsized” by DCPS, but they have a weaker
“first preference” to those currently on the list. If this is true,
than we should be sure to utilize these properties as prioritized by the
community, as charters are set to get the largest public land grab in
recent history (I’ve heard as many as more than twenty schools).
Additionally, the District government has a responsibility to ensure
fiscal responsibility. We support the resolution authored by Ms.
Schwartz, which calls for a moratorium on the disposition of public
property until the inventory has been completed and a facilities audit
is conducted. We simply should not be spending millions of taxpayer
money on rent when the District can rehabilitate historic public
structures. I appreciate your action on this matter.
###############
[An open letter to members of the Committee on Government Operations]
I write on behalf of Save Our Schools and the People’s Property
Campaign to urge you to vote no on the disposition of Bruce and Old
Congress Heights School. Past declarations of "no further public
use" have generally ignored pressing community needs such as
recreation, senior centers, child care, job training centers, and
affordable housing, and instead been virtually given away to private
developers. Residents in Wards 1 and 8 have definite ideas and proposals
for public uses for these two buildings, but their input has been
stymied. Residents in Congress Heights and in the area surrounding Bruce
School do not feel that their voices have been heard by the city
council. As stated at the December 19 hearing, charter school lobbyists
and Congress have attempted to circumvent community input and have
succeeded in claiming first right to school properties to be excessed in
coming years. But according to testimony from Carol Mitten at that
hearing, charters only have the weaker “first preference” to schools
currently in the control of the Office of Property Management. Community
groups, Advisory Neighborhood Commissions, and civic associations in
Wards 1 and 8 have clearly stated that they do not believe these
valuable properties should be handed over to charter schools. Charter
schools, while supported with public dollars, are private, independently
owned and operated entities, and they are, by definition, not community
schools that neighborhood students may attend as a matter of right.
Before declaring these properties surplus and handing them over to
charter schools or other private landlords, please commit to enacting
the following reforms: 1) complete an inventory of public property so
that planning can be carried out rationally. DC Code states that the
Office of Property Management is to complete the first stage of such an
inventory by March of this year, and the Committee on Government
Operations is charged with oversight of this effort. 2) Develop and
implement a new, democratic process for determining new uses for public
property that will guarantee community input and prioritize community
uses. Public property belongs to the residents of the District of
Columbia and you, our elected officials are entrusted with protecting
and preserving our legacy to future generations. 3) Support the
resolution authored by Ms. Schwartz calling for a moratorium on the
disposition of public property until the inventory has been completed
and a facilities audit is conducted. We simply should not be spending
millions of taxpayer money on rent when the District can rehabilitate
historic public structures. I appreciate your action on this matter.
###############
To continue our fight for DC voting rights in Congress, we’re proud
to announce that we are launching a much bigger and bolder effort: the
District of Columbia Olympic Committee (DCOC). That’s right. We’ve
started the process of getting Olympic teams for the District of
Columbia. We figure if other territories that have a single, nonvoting
delegate in Congress like Puerto Rico, Guam, and the US Virgin Islands
can have their own Olympic teams, why not DC? If we can’t have
representation in Congress — then we should at least have
representation in the Olympics.
We’ve even put together a curling team -- it was the only sport
that fit our collective athletic prowess, plus nobody wanted to wear the
tight body suits for the luge. (We’re pretty sure you didn’t want to
see that either.) The DCOC even has an official sponsor, Labatt Beer. We’re
going to need your help in pleading our case to the International
Olympic Committee (IOC). Please join us and send a message to the IOC
today. Tell them to “Let DC Play!”
You can learn more about this effort at http://www.DCOlympicTeam.org.
Visit the site, join a team, and send a message to the International
Olympic Committee. You’ll be helping make the case for democracy in
DC.
###############
Investor Education Booklets from DISB
Michelle Phipps-Evans, michelle.phipps-evans@dc.gov
District of Columbia investors may now visit the web site of the
Department of Insurance, Securities, and Banking (DISB), to download for
free a series of publications on investor education. Publications cover
a variety of subjects on investing, including Five Keys to Investing
Success, A Primer for Investing in Bonds, Where to Invest Your College
Money, Getting Help With Your Investments, Mutual Funds: Maybe All You’ll
Ever Need, Maximize Your Retirement Investments and The Basics for
Investing in Stocks. These booklets tackle the basics of several key
investor topics and are designed for the beginning, intermediate and
long-term investor who has never learned the basics. Each booklet
includes a glossary of terms and information on the role of state
securities regulators and how to contact them.
The publications are produced by the editors of Kiplinger’s Personal
Finance magazine and the Investor Protection Trust (IPT), a
nonprofit dedicated to investor education and protection. DISB has made
these publications available to District residents as part of its
citywide consumer outreach program. The agency has been working in
conjunction with IPT and the American Library Association to bring free
investor-education seminars to the District’s public libraries.
Planning is underway for the initial launch in late March 2006.
For more information or to download any one of the booklets, visit http://www.disb.dc.gov
and follow the Consumers link to go to Brochures and Publications. Hard
copies of select booklets will be available at the agency at 810 First
Street, NE, Suite 701, by the end of March.
###############
There has been a lot of coverage in themail and other press about the
death of a NY Times reporter in northwest Washington, and the
seemingly poor response by the DC Emergency Medical Service. History
does unfortunately repeat itself when it comes to poor emergency
services. Back in 1999, I wrote several articles for The InTowner
about the death of a young woman at 16th and U Streets, NW, so close to
a fire station you could see it from where she collapsed and died.
Despite repeated calls and even an in-person request from a bystander
who ran over to the station, it took about fifteen minutes for the first
EMS squad to arrive, and that was from a station much further away. When
the EMS squad from the U Street station did finally respond, they headed
off in the wrong direction due to a dispatch misunderstanding. This and
other events subsequently contributed to a shakeup in the Fire
department leadership, but clearly after six years the systemic problems
remain, and then, like now, there does not appear to be much interest in
addressing those problems. Meanwhile, people die when they should not,
and the District is not held accountable because according to District
law they have no liability.
###############
BCC Rescue Squad
Ed Kane, Chevy Chase, DC, ermk@aol.com
I totally agree with Ed Barron’s words on the BCC Rescue Squad.
They are great, deserve our full support, and from our area always
should be called when an ambulance is needed.
My last experience with them was on Christmas Day, when, after taking
a bad fall which ruptured my quadriceps, I had to get to the Sibley
Hospital emergency room. Two young, motivated, and highly qualified
volunteer emergency medical technicians showed up at the house five
minutes after we called them, and promptly and cheerfully got me off to
the hospital. Good for you, BCC Rescue Squad.
###############
A Tragedy in a Tragedy
Ralph J. Chittams, Sr., chittams@sewkis.com
Why is it that it takes the death of a white person in DC to raise up
voices of righteous indignation “west of the river”? Ambulances have
been misdirected, gotten lost on the way to, and mistreated many black
residents of the District of Columbia. Where was the public outcry when
those persons did not receive proper treatment? Yes, I am sorry that Mr.
Rosenbaum did not receive timely care. Yes, I am appalled that he was
assaulted on the streets of my city. But no, his life is no more
important than my neighbor’s, who was senselessly shot on the steps of
his home. Mr. Rosenbaum’s death is no more tragic than that of any of
innocent victim of crime in this city. Since Mr. Rosenbaum’s death,
how many of you know how many other people have died in the District of
Columbia as a result of criminal activity? Most of you don’t know
because those victims have been black. And unfortunately, still, in
2006, the death of white people is more news worthy than the death of
black people. Why, oh why, is that?
###############
[Jonathan] Rees might want to brush-up on the recent history of
national and DC politics, based on his recent post [themail, January
18]. His contention is that the nation has now found the political
center after going from the left to the right.
When Rees compares the city council to Joseph Stalin, he needs to
review the history books. Stalin was not a “social engineer” but a
ruthless dictator who signed a treaty with Hitler, murdered millions of
his own countrymen and millions more that were not from Russia. The DC
city councilmembers do have their faults, but please try to be a little
kinder to people who serve the city.
I won’t address the rest of his comments on issues that face the
city, since he lists school construction and the stadiums as project
with equal value and detrimental consequences. I guess he would equate
the needs of baseball fans and our school kids equally, as well.
###############
Councilmember Patterson has Unquestionable
Integrity
Tom Heinemann, tom_heinemann@yahoo.com
From 2001 through 2003, when I served in the administration’s
Office of Policy and Legislative Affairs, I have had the pleasure of
working with Councilmember Patterson on Judiciary issues. In my
experience, Kathy Patterson has always acted with complete integrity.
The policy decisions she made while chair of the judiciary committee
were always grounded on painstaking research where all sides of a given
issue were fully analyzed. On judiciary issues, the administration was
never given a free pass. Any support of the Mayor’s public safety
initiatives only came after she and her staff independently reviewed and
researched the initiative to conclude that indeed the initiative was the
most appropriate approach. No proposal moved out of her committee as a
favor to the Mayor.
I’ll bet that if you looked through her record as chair of the
education committee, the judiciary committee and the government
operation’s committee, you will see the same pragmatic approach to the
issues. To suggest that she sold her vote to baseball is absurd. Could
it be that she used the same approach to baseball that she has for
everything else she has done? Could it be that she researched the issue
to death, weighed the pros and cons on every detail then concluded that
support of the stadium was the right thing to do? Do you have reason to
believe otherwise?
It’s easy to criticize. It’s easy to say “no” to everything.
It’s a lot harder to take a controversial risk on something like
baseball — unless you’ve concluded through soul searching and the
weighing of all the pros and cons that it’s the right thing to do.
###############
Councilmember Kathy Patterson
Keith Jarrell, kjarrell@rcn.com
Councilmember Kathy Patterson is one of our brightest and sincerest
councilmembers. She is not at all about selling her vote. Your comments
[themail, January 22] are really quiet remarkably, less thought out than
I would have expected from you. Councilmember Patterson is articulate
and thorough; she is informed and decisive. She knows the issues in this
city and is aware of the needs of the voters in this city as much as
anyone. For you to even consider that she sold her vote for the baseball
stadium deal is really inconsiderate and unthinkable.
If you read carefully what Patterson is quoted saying, Major League
Baseball’s return to Washington, DC, will help finance school
improvements and other badly needed improvements. She’s on record
saying this months ago. At this time her vote was still leaning toward
supporting baseball. She also is on record saying that she wanted to
support baseball and the stadium deal and was still looking at creative
ways to do so. For your article or paper to suggest that she sold her
vote to the mayor for a political fund raiser is less than creative and
far less than accurate. We’re facing the need for more than one
billion dollars in school renovations and repairs. I certainly would
much prefer that we spread our thought process collectively, thinking of
ideas to help in gaining this kind of money from activities in
legitimate earnings rather than foot the bill myself through higher
taxes. Baseball seems to be the key here. I don’t think baseball is
the answer to all our problems, perhaps a part of them but not all.
As for political fund raisers go, if you have ever attended any of
them in this city many of the people in attendance don’t even vote in
the District. They work for firms or organizations that do business here
and they spend their money as their part in shaping the politics as we
know it. The real voice in this and every city is indeed the voters.
Surely the voters in this city will support Kathy Patterson in her quest
to serve us as our council chair. Her record is clearly one of concern
and action for the citizens of our city. As for fund raisers, the one in
question is Mayor Williams attempt to put his efforts to help shape our
next city leaders. Keep in mind this fund raiser was put into motion
just after Evans announced that he would no longer seek the office of
chair, leaving the best candidate standing and that is indeed Kathy
Patterson. I hope in the future you won’t post thoughts about good
honest people without first researching and qualifying your thoughts. I
appreciate your efforts in our city’s political structure and know you
want to be fair. But to think that Councilmember Patterson would need to
sell her vote for political gain is ridiculous. Her record stands solid
on issues that affect the people of this city, not selling out to
anyone.
###############
Gary’s Got It Wrong
Ed T. Barron, edtb@aoldotcom
Following Gary’s suggestion, I read the Colbert King article in
Last Saturday’s Post. In that article King strongly implies
that Kathy Patterson has sold her vote on the Baseball Stadium issue to
get Mayor Williams’s support for her election run in the fall for city
council chairperson. I’m not so sure that having Tony Williams’
support is anything near a plus. What I am sure about, knowing and
supporting Kathy through thick and thin over the last ten or twelve
years, is that Kathy does not play politics. Kathy does more research on
the issues that affect all DC residents than any other council person.
Kathy has a good staff and makes excellent use of that staff. Her
support for the new baseball stadium is based on her own analysis of the
economic benefits of Major League Baseball in DC when compared with the
long term costs of the stadium and associated development. There are
times when Kathy Patterson and I disagree with her analysis. But she
does not play politics and did not sell her vote to get support from
Tony Williams.
I’ll do some of my own research to see just what Kathy has done in
the interests of all DC residents over the last several years.
###############
Proposed Residential Park Fee Increases
John Henry Wheeler, zippytrash@att.net
I mostly agree with Paul Wilson’s suggestions (themail, January 22)
for enforcing parking rules in residential areas with severe parking
problems, but I disagree with his objection to raising the cost of a
residential parking sticker. The increase is greatest for additional
cars. We have neighbors with more cars than drivers in the house, and
all cars are parked on the street. Maybe an increase in the cost of
additional residential parking stickers will cause them to part with the
dearly loved cars. Yes, the citizens must accept some of the
responsibility for the parking problems in residential neighborhoods.
My wife and I share a car. So far that has presented few conflicts.
When we both retire and may have more need for an additional car, we’ll
go with the Zip car. It makes economic sense, as well as being a good
citizen.
###############
In Support of the Mayor’s Parking Bill
Cheryl Cort, Washington Regional Network for Livable
Communities, ccort@washingtonregion.net
Curb space in the city isn’t unlimited. In many neighborhoods it’s
a valuable and scarce public resource that needs to be managed to make
it available in a fair way. The Mayor’s Parking Bill starts to do
this. The bill proposes to make modest increases in fees for additional
residential parking permits and caps it a three per household. This
proposal, coupled with other management tools recommended in the Mayor’s
Parking Task Force, can have an appreciable effect of making parking
more available to residents and address visitor parking. Where there’s
plenty of parking on a neighborhood street there is no need to change
the fees. On-street parking is actually good for the neighborhood
because parked cars serve as traffic calming devices. In high demand
areas, can we all agree that it’s downright unneighborly to be one
household parking four cars on the street? This is a shared, limited
public resource.
While many neighborhoods have historically low car ownership rates
(in my U Street area more than half of households did not own a car in
the 2000 Census), more households are getting residential parking
permits, and more visitors are parking on neighborhood streets. Since
enforcement does not operate at night, any car can be parked on the
street without an RPP sticker after 6:30 p.m. until the next morning.
Thus, we need to manage on-street parking for residents and visitors,
where demand outstrips supply of valuable public street space.
The Residential Parking Permit (RPP) program was originally designed
to keep commuters from “hide and rideö in neighborhoods near Metro
stations or good bus lines. The program needs to be retooled to meet the
new needs of residents. In neighborhoods where more residents have cars
and permits than there is public curb space (it’s three to one in
Adams Morgan), we need to use management tools like pricing residential
permits, along with simplified enforcement of visitor parking.
Multi-space meters could replace the current two-hour time limit system
now regulating visitor parking in RPP zones. The hours of enforcement
should be extended to run 24-hours a day. Pay and display enforcement is
much easier than time limits, and can even be monitored remotely via
wireless sensors. This eliminates all the much talked about problems of
residents who don’t register their cars in DC, or visitors who park
every night. Paying at the curb to park will help non-permit holders
consider if it’s still worth it to park, or if an alternative mode of
access might be more desirable. Multi-space meters can be set to charge
more during peak demand periods in order to ensure that 1-2 spaces per
block are always available, and can accommodate overnight guests — as
a resident might want to have that option for a guest on occasion. It
won’t be free, as it is now, but it will be worth it.
These reasonable measures to manage residential permits, in
combination with the parking management recommendations similar to the
Adams Morgan Transportation Plan, can make on-street parking more
available for residents. Dedicating new revenues to neighborhood
streetscape improvements will benefit everyone, whether you own a car or
not. This helps everyone recapture the value given away everyday at the
curb, especially the 37 percent of DC households who don’t have a car.
Using pricing to make on-street parking available for residents and some
visitors and giving back to the neighborhood where that value is created
can make everyone happy. The Columbia Heights Public Realm Plan is still
unfunded; this revenue source could be used to fund it. Local parking
revenues is the proposed funding source for the exciting streetscape
improvements for Adams Morgan. We could also use revenues to discount
fully transit fares for DC students and low income people, who tend not
to own cars.
The Adams Morgan Transportation Plan, http://www.18amstudy.com/assets/adamsmorgan/documents/36x72_parking_plan.pdf
and http://www.18amstudy.com/assets/adamsmorgan/documents/executive_summary1.pdf,
proposed a comprehensive fix for many of the deficiencies in the RPP
system by placing multi-space meters on RPP streets to manage spillover
visitor parking 24 hours a day (RPP holders do not pay meters). This
will greatly help RPP holders find parking. But pricing for meters needs
to be set to ensure visitors are encouraged to make their stays shorter,
or find alternative modes of transportation, or be willing to pay a
steep price for parking because it’s worth it. The revenues are
proposed to be returned to the neighborhood for public space
improvements. These recommendations could really benefit other high
demand neighborhoods that experience spillover demand from commercial
areas or have too many residential permits issues for too little
curbspace.
Some have said that unless RPP permits are market priced — probably
over $1000 a year (given that an off-street space rents for over $100
per month), a marginal fee increase won’t have enough impact. But the
increased fees send a signal that some will respond to; car owners who
could use their garages for their second and third cars might take those
cars off the street. Curb space in high demand neighborhoods isn’t
unlimited; it’s a very valuable and scarce public resource that needs
to be managed to make it available in a reasonable way. Pricing is the
best way to do this. Another way is to limit the issuance of new RPP
permits in neighborhoods where public curb space cannot supply enough
parking for all the RPP permits issued in the area. Visitor parking
would still need to be managed in this approach. I’d still suggest
market rate pricing of visitor parking via multi-space meters to enable
relatively easy enforcement 24-hours a day.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS
Heurich Mansion (Brewmaster’s Castle) in
Danger, January 28
Ann Loikow, Cleveland Park, aloikow@verizon.net
I would like to pass on the following message from “Friends of the
Castle” concerning the possible loss of the Heurich Mansion/Brewmaster’s
Castle. The Brewmaster’s Castle is located at 1307 New Hampshire
Avenue, NW (corner of 20th and New Hampshire, one block west of Dupont
Metro south) and was the former home of the Historical Society of
Washington, DC.:
“By now you are hopefully aware that The Brewmaster’s Castle (http://www.brewmasterscastle.com)
is in crisis and is in immediate danger of being put up for sale. The
Friends of The Castle are holding a meeting of concerned community
leaders and citizens this coming Saturday, 28 January, at 10:00 a.m. at
The Castle to discuss ways that people can help save this unique
historic site that is this year celebrating its 50th year in the public
domain. Any sale would mean that this Washington, DC, Landmark on the
National Register of Historic Places would no longer be open to the
public. And the real value to the public is precisely this, its
extraordinary intact interior and its status as the most intact
late-Victorian house museum in the country. We urge you to please join
us this Saturday so that we may get your ideas on how to build community
support to prevent loss of this rare local treasure. If you plan to
attend, please let us know by reply E-mail. For more information contact
Gary F. Heurich, 333-2313, ext. 11, 333-9198, GFHeurich@FoggyBottom.com.
“Interest expense has risen around $150,000 in the past two years
and has broken the foundation’s budget. The foundation is in default
on interest payments and must raise $250,000 by February 15 or The
Brewmaster’s Castle will either have to be sold or face foreclosure.
Visitation, usage, and program revenues more than doubled last year over
the previous year, and, not including interest payments, The Brewmaster’s
Castle is self-supporting. But the increase in interest rates means that
The Brewmaster’s Castle must raise an additional $1,750,000 by the end
of the year in order to reduce enough of its debt so that it will then
be completely self-supporting. Learn more at http://www.BrewmastersCastle.com.”
###############
National Building Museum Events, January 26,
28
Lauren Searl, lsearl@nbm.org
All events except Construction Watch Tours at the National Building
Museum, 401 F Street, NW, Judiciary Square stop, Metro Red Line.
Register for events at http://www.nbm.org.
Thursday, January 26, 6:30-8:00 p.m. Lecture: Rubble: Unearthing the
History of Demolition. From the straight boulevards that “demolition
artist” Haussmann smashed through rambling old Paris to the televised
implosion of Las Vegas casinos, demolition has played an ambiguous role
in our lives. Author Jeff Byles will present a history of the little
studied art and science of un-building and will discuss the nature of
destruction as a prelude to renewal. After the lecture, he will sign
copies of his book Rubble: Unearthing the History of Demolition
(Harmony Books). $10 Museum members and students; $15 nonmembers.
Registration required.
Saturday, January 28, 10:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m. Construction watch tour
of the GSA Federal Building. A major federal building designed by
architect Moshe Safdie is currently under construction in the NOMA
(North of Massachusetts Avenue) neighborhood of Washington. The agency
headquarters includes a six-story, crescent-shaped wing and two
rectilinear, eight-story wings connected by an atrium. Jean Hundley,
project manager with the General Services Administration, will lead a
tour of this 422,000-square-foot project. Open only to museum members,
$18. Space is limited. Prepaid registration required. To register, call
the Museum or visit www.nbm.org.
Saturday, January 28, 1:00-4:00 p.m. Magnificent metalwork for kids.
Learning about metalworking is fun for families with children of all
ages. First, explore selected ornamental metal objects during a special
tour of Cityscapes Revealed: Highlights from the Collection. Then
experience the metalworking process by creating your own pressed metal
magnet to take home. This is the first in a series of family programs in
2006 designed to complement the new long-term exhibition Cityscapes
Revealed: Highlights from the Collection. $5 per project. All ages.
Drop-in program.
###############
Solidarity Rally for Barry, February 8
Anise Jenkins, anisej@hotmail.com
In response to numerous media inquiries, Stand Up! for Democracy in
DC Coalition and DC Resist confirm that they remain committed to holding
the solidarity rally for former mayor and current Ward 8 DC
councilmember Marion Barry, on Wednesday, February 8, at 9:30 a.m. The
rally will be held during the scheduled sentencing hearing before
Magistrate Judge Deborah A. Robinson at the DC District Court, at 3rd
and Constitution Avenue, NW.
Let there be no doubt that this rally will go on as scheduled. We are
holding this rally for Mr. Barry because he is standing up for democracy
by fighting to include those who continue to be shut out of the
political and economic system. Stand Up! for Democracy in DC Coalition
recognizes that Mr. Barry is a high profile target for nonpayment of
taxes that the federal government doesn’t deserve to get from DC
residents. Right now, DC is a federal territory and we are being treated
worse than the residents of the other territories.
Stand Up! for Democracy in DC Coalition and DC Resist urge all DC
residents and others to make a strong turnout. The groups also recommend
that supporters mail positive letters on behalf of Mr. Barry to
Magistrate Judge Deborah A. Robinson, District of Columbia District
Court, 1225 E. Barrett Prettyman US Courthouse, 333 Constitution Avenue,
NW, Washington, DC 20001.
###############
Strange New World: Art and Design from
Tijuana, February 16
Barbara Ruesga Pelayo, bruesga@sre.gob.mx
The Cultural Institute of Mexico will host the great exhibition:
Strange New World: Art and Design from Tijuana, showcasing artwork from
thirty-one contemporary artists living in the Tijuana-San Diego region.
The opening of the first stage of a national tour of this extraordinary
contemporary art exhibit, featuring paintings, installations,
photography and video, will be on Thursday, February 16, at 7:00 p.m.,
at the Cultural Institute of Mexico, 2829 16th Street, NW. The
Ambassador of Mexico, Mr. Carlos de Icaza; Minister Alejandro Negrín,
Director of the Cultural Institute; Curator Rachel Teagle; and some of
the artists will attend. For more information contact Alfonso Nieto,
728-1628, or visit our web site, http://www.instituteofmexicodc.org.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — RECOMMENDATIONS
To Network or Not to Network
Gabe Goldberg, gabe at gabegold dot com
Paul Penniman inquired (themail, January 22): “This basement
computer sits right next to a TV which has an RCN cable connection, so
all we need to do is use a splitter and another modem and hook up the
computer. But RCN says they will charge us $30-40/month for using this
extra modem, even our own. Any suggestions beyond just asking the guy in
the basement to get his own DSL connection?”
Try a wireless repeater on the first floor, between the upstairs
wireless access point and the basement computer. Or try IP-over-powerline,
connecting using electrical wiring. Your ability to use the latter
likely depends on how the house is wired, whether basement and upstairs
are on separate circuits, etc. If you like, E-mail me privately; I’ll
point you to people who do networking.
###############
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every
Wednesday and Sunday. To subscribe, to change E-mail addresses, or to
switch between HTML and plain text versions of themail, use the
subscription form at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail/subscribe.htm.
To unsubscribe, send an E-mail message to themail@dcwatch.com
with “unsubscribe” in the subject line. Archives of past messages
are available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should also be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com,
and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of
Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to
be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief
paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can
be put into each mailing.