Spammed and Scammed
Dear Spammers and Scammers:
If you sent a message to themail and it’s not in this issue, please
resend it. On Christmas day Comcast started blocking as spam all of my
own mail that was being forwarded to me from dcwatch.com addresses, so I
missed at least two-and-a-half days of E-mail. Everything is working
now, so please try me again.
When you do write, don’t feel that the only subject you can write
on is the ballpark boondoggle. Here in themail, we’re about all
aspects of living in Washington, not just about getting fleeced so
politicians can do favors for their rich friends. Those of us who are
being most badly fleeced, of course, are those who own property in the
area around the southeast stadium site. Today in the Washington Post,
David Nakamura and Thomas Heath report (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/27/AR2005122701221.html)
that the Williams administration plans to finance some stadium cost
overruns by selling development rights to property seized by the
Anacostia Waterfront Corporation from the citizens who own land in the
stadium footprint. After the horrendous Supreme Court decision in the Kelo
case, no one can tell for sure, but I can’t imagine that even the
justices who voted for that decision could believe that a government can
legitimately use eminent domain to seize property just so it can profit
by selling its development rights. I hope the property owners’ lawyers
are paying attention.
Tomorrow, Nakamura and Heath report that the administration plans to
raid a DC-controlled fund under the Metro budget to pay part of the
ballpark infrastructure cost of upgrading the Navy Yard Metro station (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/28/AR2005122801483.html).
This is the same fund that was supposed to be committed to build a
light-rail system in Anacostia. This is just the first of many budget
raids and funding redesignations that the city will use to disguise the
real, total cost of the ballpark and to hide taxpayer funding for it.
Keep watching in 2006; we’ll probably miss a lot of the
sleight-of-hand tricks that will be played, but we’ll catch some part
of them.
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
###############
New Metro Line Is Needed
Paul McKenzie, McKenzieDC at gmail dot com
Last week the Federal Government announced that they are interested
in reserving a part of Walter Reed Army Medical for federal offices.
This will have a big impact on roads and transportation around our area
if this comes to pass. Traffic capacity is becoming more and more
limited as DC roads are closed, or the numbers of lanes are actually
reduced. There are places today which struggle to accommodate present
car volume. We need to plan and think about the consequences of a new
federal office park and a new Metro line to accommodate this growth.
A couple of other issues that the Washington Post reported on
this week were the possible Metro extension to Dulles and the sad state
of our Metrobus system. These two issues suggest the need to expand the
Metro system to include a new line, which would alleviate our vehicle
congestion. In addition to Dulles airport and the Walter Reed campus
needing Metro stops, Georgetown would be well served, as would growing
areas just inside the beltway, i.e., Oxon Hill, Arlington, as well as
other District sites. This new underground rail line would be connected
hopefully to new light rail line going along M Street, SE, for example.
To some it would seem like a tall order but we need to be planning
ahead so our quality of life in this area can remain as high as we all
would like it to be. A new Metro line needs to be built to assist
emerging requirements as well as help locations that didn’t get a
Metro stop originally.
###############
Written Exam for Bus Drivers
Bryce A. Suderow, streetstories@juno.com
I’m told that the written exam for bus drivers consists of three
parts. Part 1 is high school level math, including some algebra,
geometry, and trig. Part 2 is reading comprehension. Part 3 is answering
questions on paper about a movie you’ve just seen. I think 2 and 3 are
multiple choice.
Two bus drivers told me the test results in their respective classes.
In one class, 65 people took the test. Twelve passed it. In the other
class, 90 people took the test and 23 passed.
What does this say about our area schools?
###############
Colin Powell, Fellow Citizen?
Larry Seftor, larry underscore seftor .the757 at
zoemail.net
I’m curious as to whether Colin Powell is a resident of DC. The
reason I ask is that he is publicly urging our DC council to commit
taxpayers to the stadium for baseball (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/27/AR2005122700091.html).
He goes on to say that his group includes many people with roots in the
DC community. Again, I don’t know if that means they live in DC or
just claim DC when convenient. If Powell is a resident of DC, then he
has as much right as the rest of us to argue the issue. If not, then,
like many speaking out, he doesn’t have the standing to make a case.
In a related incident, I found it amusing about a week ago when the
anchors on WTOP, who obviously don’t live in DC, expressed
exasperation about the fact that the council was not approving the
stadium. The person they were interviewing had to explain the obvious,
that the council is elected by citizens of DC who generally disapprove
the lease and not by those in the suburbs who want the team without
bearing any of the burden.
The council should continue to take note; their constituency are the
residents of DC. If they vote for the stadium in its present form then I
and many others will vote them out of office at the next opportunity.
###############
Latest SE Land Grab Makes RFK Site Even Better
Option
Ed Delaney, profeddel@yahoo.com
Http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/25/AR2005122500533.html:
“It’s known as the ‘Blue Castle’ in the neighborhood where it
has been a local landmark since the late 1800s. Now the building with
the purplish-blue paint and the turrets has been swept up in the
renaissance of redevelopment in Southeast Washington. Preferred Real
Estate Investments Inc. recently paid $20 million for 770 M Street SE.
Executives at the Conshohocken, Pa., developer said the location of the
100,000-square-foot building makes it ideal for retail stores such as a
Barnes & Noble bookstore and a Whole Foods grocery. The upscale
stores eventually would supplant three charter schools that now are in
the building. The Blue Castle, across from the Navy Yard, is barely a
block away from a huge new residential complex that is being built at
the former site of the Arthur Capper/Carrollsburg housing project. More
development is coming nearby the proposed baseball stadium; 2 million
square feet of office, residential and retail at the Southeast Federal
Center; and the headquarters for the Transportation Department, which is
under construction and expected to bring more than 5,000 office workers
to the area. ‘This is such a good corner, and there’s a real lack of
services here,’ said Michael G. O’Neill, chief executive of
Preferred Real Estate. ‘You see new glass office towers going up but
no retail, and it’s a prime spot for retail.’”
If you remove “the proposed baseball stadium” part of the
equation, it’s clear that its presence doesn’t really matter, as it
is only a small part of the list of driving forces prompting the
purchase and intended redevelopment of the property. Each of the
development plans listed above were already completed or underway before
the official announcement of the deal with MLB and the ballpark site in
late 2004, and would’ve occurred within the same time frame without
the ballpark’s presence. What a waste of a ballpark project, to put it
at a site where the ballpark’s transformative presence and economic
benefits will be underutilized, due to the area’s revitalization
having been spurred by massive projects completed or underway beforehand
and where even its proponents have admitted its presence will overburden
the roads, sparse parking areas, and underdeveloped single-line Metro
station with traffic and a flow of people “that officials acknowledge
might create a logjam on sold-out game days that could keep hundreds or
even thousands of fans milling about South Capitol Street and the
surrounding area” (Washington Business Journal, February 21,
2005).
"O’Neill said he found the Blue Castle building three years
ago while driving around Southeast. He was in the area after he bid on
another old building near the Anacostia River, but he lost it to a
developer who was willing to pay more. When he saw the Blue Castle, O’Neill
said, he saw an opportunity. One problem: It wasn’t for sale,
according to its owner, a nonprofit group that provides services to
mentally challenged people. ‘We kept badgering them,’ O’Neill
said. ‘We felt that if we buy it and be patient, we could do something
with it.’ They came to a deal in November.” Again, this guy from out
of this area was eyeing this property three years ago, back when the
current site was way down the list of potential sites as the Brigade was
still salivating over the two sites adjacent to Mount Vernon Square. In
fact, the Brigade was trying to hilariously tout the two Mount Vernon
Square sites as needing the presence of the ballpark to spur and speed
redevelopment in those areas, with dire economic consequences facing the
city should they not jam a ballpark there as soon as possible. Not
surprisingly, the doomsday scenario painted by the Brigade then -- the
same one they are painting now at the current site — was agenda-driven
and far from reality. The redevelopment ended up occurring so rapidly at
those two sites that rising prices and a reluctance for landowners to
wait for the ballpark forced their removal in 2003 for consideration as
ballpark sites.
Per the January 31, 2003 Post: “The mayor’s comments
[dropping Mount Vernon Square from the site possibilities] echoed the
sentiments of several DC Council members who have argued that Mount
Vernon Square, which is in Northwest Washington near the new convention
center that is scheduled to open in March, has enough stimulus to ensure
rapid development over the next several years. Cropp said the city
government’s investment in a stadium, which the mayor has said could
reach $300 million, would be better spent bringing economic development
to a more sluggish area.” We already have clear evidence, including
the story on December 25, that the current site is anything but sluggish
and appears to meet the criteria used by the mayor and the council three
years ago to drop the Mount Vernon Square sites from consideration.
If the city really wants to “bring economic development to a more
sluggish area” of the city and still meet the ballpark siting goals of
choosing a location with maximum access to public transportation, major
arteries, and parking to not only serve city residents but bring in a
maximum number of patrons (and the dollars they bring) from outside the
city with a minimum of negative impact to city residents, they still
have no better option than the RFK Stadium site. If we’re talking
solely about city priorities, it makes sense even more going into 2006
to put a stadium where the city’s traditional stadium locale has been,
where we understand from extensive testimony from residents living
nearby the site that a stadium would be welcomed. Having a site with
such unparalleled access and infrastructure resources for the city’s
stadium makes it the only logical place for the ballpark to go,
especially given the challenges on that front which are still
unaddressed at the current site. It would be an incredible misuse of
available city resources in the eastern part of the city to not
capitalize on the site’s suitability to house a stadium and maximize
the ballpark’s redevelopment potential there instead of shoehorning
the ballpark into the current site where the ballpark’s redevelopment
potential would be as underutilized as the city determined three years
ago it would have been at the MVS sites.
It must continue to be noted that the RFK Stadium site of course has
dozens of acres of land available for complimentary development that
would enable the city not only to have more entertainment options as
part of the ballpark experience but also have enough land left other for
more diverse and creative development options at a location deep into
northeast and southeast DC that could further succeed in its goal to
give residents enough options close to home to where they can spending
most of their retail dollars without crossing into Maryland or Virginia.
That in turn incentivizes residents to remain in the District and makes
neighborhoods from Kingman Park to Deanwood and Benning Heights direct
recipients of the ballpark’s benefits thanks to the diverse
redevelopment options it would spur that most certainly would not have
reached that part of the city on such a significant scale any other way,
which is certainly a noble goal. It doesn’t hurt that a site switch
would also enable a more affordable stadium project to be built with
much more certain costs associated with the project. The incompetence of
the Brigade vis-à-vis the out-of-control costs associated with the
current site that made the site over budget and unworkable, followed by
the ensuing infrastructure games at the site might actually lead to a
better solution if the council acts to switch the site and bring the
stadium’s benefits to the RFK Stadium site, where the benefits can do
the city the most good.
###############
I take very strong exception to your [Gary Imhoff’s]
characterization, in your November 30 column, of my role in the baseball
financing debate. I would never mislead the Council on this or any other
matter. In regard to the technical amendments passed by the Council on
November 15, we explained to several council members the nature of these
amendments and the need for enacting them. We could not issue the bonds
for a new baseball stadium without these changes that clarified the
December 2004 legislation and removed conflicting language.
I have been open and honest with the council members about the nature
of these amendments. I wish you had at least given me an opportunity to
talk with you before making such a slanderous attack on my professional
credibility.
[According to the statements of Councilmembers Kwame Brown, David
Catania, Jim Graham, and Carol Schwartz at the council hearing on
November 28, statements that Mr. Gandhi did not contradict or dispute,
Mr. Gandhi did not reveal to them the full effects of the “technical
amendments,” or disclose to them that the technical amendments would
lift the council-imposed cap on the cost of the baseball stadium. Is Mr.
Gandhi now claiming that these councilmembers lied at the hearing, or
did he explain “the nature of these amendments and the need for
enacting them” only to those councilmembers who supported the baseball
agreement? — Gary Imhoff]
###############
Carol Schwartz has alluded in passing to stadium-related development
slated for the DC WASA site in southeast. If true, this, if even
possible, would not only add millions to the cost of the stadium, but
involve some challenging engineering. It is certain to increase sewer
overflows into the Anacostia. The WASA site is the home of the Main
Sewer Pumping Station and its brother pumping station on O Street. Three
massive pipes feed the pump station. The pumps are in the midst of a
sorely needed and expensive upgrade. These pumps feed into three pipes
that go underneath the Anacostia and feed into the treatment plant. Some
fear that relocating this operation for the sake of development would be
a very expensive mistake and an engineering nightmare. Even now, WASA
struggles with containing overflows at the Pumping Station. Why would we
want to make this problem worse?
###############
Cooking the Numbers on the Stadium
Robert Marvin, insidedcbubble@yahoo.com
Instead of the $667 million oft repeated price tag for the baseball
stadium in Southeast, a more accurate estimate comes in about 20 percent
less at $557 million. Opponents of the stadium have unnecessarily added
$110 million to the price by incorrectly including financing costs, RFK
renovation fees, and other items outside of the footprint of the
stadium.
When looking at the revised $557 million figure, the debt on the
stadium can easily be covered by the four revenue sources planned for
the stadium. Borrowing $557 million at a rate of 4.5 percent would
create a mortgage payment of $3.5 million per month and $3.8 million per
month would be raised. For a more complete analysis go to http://dcbubble.blogspot.com/2005/12/you-gotta-comment-cooking-numbers-its_25.html.
###############
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every
Wednesday and Sunday. To subscribe, to change E-mail addresses, or to
switch between HTML and plain text versions of themail, use the
subscription form at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail/subscribe.htm.
To unsubscribe, send an E-mail message to themail@dcwatch.com
with “unsubscribe” in the subject line. Archives of past messages
are available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should also be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com,
and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of
Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to
be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief
paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can
be put into each mailing.