Boondoggle
Dear Doggled:
Why does the mayor favor the southeast site for a new ballpark? Why
did the mayor and the Chief Financial Officer exaggerate the difficulty
and inflate the cost estimates of building the stadium at the RFK site?
Because the ballpark is an integral part of the mayor’s plan for the
Anacostia Waterfront Initiative. The Anacostia Waterfront Corporation,
formed to carry out the government’s plan for this area, does have a
few legitimate public-interest purposes: to clean the Anacostia River,
to ensure public access to the riverfront, and to plan and develop
public parks and green space in the area. But these purposes are all
subordinate to its primary purpose, to act a central government planning
agency directing economic development in the area, dictating what can
and will be built and choosing who will be allowed to own, develop, and
profit from the land under its control. Our city government is run by
people who believe that central government planning of economic
development is superior to, and gives better results than, a free market
economy.
Are our politicians, then, a fifth column of communists, determined
to overthrow capitalism? No, because their preference for centralized
government planning of the economy is really a mask for much more
practical benefits for politicians. If politicians choose who can own,
develop, and profit from property, they have enormous power. They can
reward their rich and powerful developer friends with property --
whether that property was already owned by the public or is seized from
less powerful citizens -- and those developers will in turn reward them,
professionally and personally. Politicians can then direct massive
tax-funded subsidies to their friends’ development projects, further
enriching them and keeping their friendship circle intact. (Ministers
whose support for the ballpark was bought by the promise of TIF funding
for their community projects should note that all of the developers
chosen by the AWC have said they want those same TIF funds to subsidize
their projects.) And when a project is finally built, politicians won’t
be relegated to the sidelines, congratulating developers at the
groundbreaking or grand opening; they will be front-and-center taking
credit for all the "hard work" they did to bring the community
this new convenience store, or Starbucks, or big-box retailer. (In 2006,
we in Columbia Heights are sure to go through the fourth electoral cycle
in a row in which politicians will stand in an empty lot at 14th and
Irving Streets and proclaim that a Target store will open there in a few
months, and that they deserve the credit for it.) There’s no need,
therefore, to believe that our mayor and city council actively prefer
centralized government planning because they are committed to communism;
it is sufficient to believe that they are committed to corporate welfare
and corruption.
The Washington Post, in an editorial today that is so weakly
reasoned as to be irrational, says that the city council should vote for
the ballpark lease and commit taxpayers to pay the hundreds of millions
of dollars currently estimated, the hundreds of millions of dollars in
inevitable construction overruns, and the hundreds of millions of
dollars in upgrades that the baseball team will demand in coming years,
even though most of this money is unbudgeted and unfunded, and then hope
that the rest of the money turns up somewhere (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/17/AR2005121701006.html).
Perhaps, the Post suggests, the new team owners, having just paid
the extortionate price for the team demanded by Major League Baseball,
will want to donate a few hundred millions that they have no legal
obligation to pay. Sure, and maybe the city’s financial plan is to buy
some PowerBall tickets and hope it wins a big lottery. Administration
officials are desperately trying to convince undecided councilmembers to
ignore the bad deal, not to worry about the money, and, most of all, not
to worry that Allen, Brazil, and Chavous lost their reelection races
after being prominent supporters of the ballpark boondoggle. The
baseball supporters claim that the ballpark vote was irrelevant to last
year’s election outcomes, and they badmouth these three losing
councilmembers, their close friends and allies last year, as poor
politicians and weak candidates who would have lost anyway. Don’t
worry, they tell their disposable allies this year, vote to give us the
money; we’ll finance your campaigns in return, and the voters won’t
punish you for your fiscal irresponsibility. Famous last words.
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
###############
Buying and Selling Votes
Dorothy Brizill, dorothy@dcwatch.com
In an eleventh hour effort to garner council votes for the baseball
lease, Mayor Williams has resorted to ultimatums and outright threats.
At the mayor’s weekly press briefing last Wednesday, he made a barely
veiled threat when he indicated that he "will work tirelessly to
support" councilmembers who vote for the lease, and he "will
not forget" those who vote against it. Since then, the mayor and
his baseball team have been more direct and explicit in their threats to
punish councilmembers who vote against him. He has said he will campaign
actively against anyone running for elective office in 2006 who opposes
the lease, and his office is holding out a blank check for supporters
who have pet legislation or programs needing the mayor’s signature.
For example, the mayor is now promising to support and sign Kathy
Patterson’s school modernization legislation (with some
modifications); to raise money from the business community for Linda
Cropp’s mayoral campaign; and to give assurances to Kwame Brown that
local, small, and disadvantaged businesses will reap additional benefits
from the ballpark and the Anacostia Waterfront Initiative.
The question arises as to whether Williams’s threats are real or
hollow. As a lame-duck mayor in his last year in office, does he have
any political capital with District voters that could help or hurt
candidates in 2006? In this regard it should be noted that 75 percent of
those who attended Nationals games this year were from the suburbs and
are not DC voters; and that every poll indicates that a vast majority of
DC voters (in some polls as high as 70 percent) do not support the deal
Williams negotiated with Major League Baseball, are concerned about the
stadium’s cost, and prefer the RFK site. If Williams were perceived as
acting in a retaliatory way against the constituents of any
councilmember running for reelection or higher office, for example by
withholding city services, that retaliation could well create voter
antagonism to Williams and redound to the benefit of the targeted
councilmember.
There is one councilmember, however, who may have succumbed to
various threats and promises emanating from baseball backers, according
to Wilson Building sources. Ward Three Councilmember Kathy Patterson is
not running for reelection, but is a candidate for council chairman in
2006. Williams promised to support her school modernization bill. In
addition, however, according to those who are in a position to know,
Patterson met last week with lead baseball supporter Jack Evans. Evans,
who was polling poorly in his bid to run for council chairman and who
has multiple Office of Campaign Finance problems with his campaign
finance reporting and political action committee expenses, withdrew from
the council chairman’s race last Thursday -- according to him, to
spend more time with his family. However, he called on Patterson prior
to that withdrawal, and offered to withdraw from the race in exchange
for Patterson’s vote in support of the baseball lease.
###############
Anthony’s Folly
Larry Seftor, larry underscore seftor .the757 at
zoemail.net
The fact-based article in today’s Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/17/AR2005121701235.html,
makes a stronger argument than I ever could against the baseball deal.
It is clear that financial disaster is certain and that it will come
after Mayor Anthony Williams is no longer in office. The citizens of DC
will bear the burden of the Mayor’s mistakes and will only have naming
rights for the disaster in return. I suggest "Anthony’s
Folly."
[It’s a great idea, but the administration gave naming rights away
to Major League Baseball, along with the keys to the DC treasury. —
Gary Imhoff]
###############
A Picture Paints $1.2 Billion Words on the
Stadium Issue
Ed Delaney, profeddel@yahoo.com
From Adrienne Washington’s column in the Washington Times: “Anthony
Williams offers many an analogy. At a meeting with editors and reporters
at The Washington Times this week, he likened buying a baseball
stadium to buying an expensive painting. It’s a painting everyone in
the family wants, so they pool their money and offer an outrageous bid
at auction. The painting is soon theirs, even though they recognize that
‘it’s not the best circumstances.’ In other words, they know they
got jacked, but they have their family heirloom. But, as these things
go, when the family gets home and hangs the painting above the hearth,
one complains that they paid too much and wants to send it back. ‘Everybody
comes out of negotiations unsatisfied,’ Williams said. I don’t know
about the Williams family, but in the Terrell family, Grandma Bea would
have spoken up before the deal was struck and said, ‘Sorry, we can’t
afford a pretty painting when we have children to feed and educate
first.’” Read the whole thing at http://www.washingtontimes.com/metro/20051215-112827-8205r.htm.
###############
Individual Taxpayers Will Pay for the Stadium
Greg DuRoss, internetgreg@verizon.net
The Mayor and baseball supporters say that we individual taxpayers
are not paying for the stadium, so they don’t understand our
opposition. Well, their position is a bunch of crap. They are using a
utility tax to generate income. Why is it that no one seems to have
focused on the fact that all utility taxes get passed right through to
the users — that would be us taxpayers. If you don’t believe me,
just check out your bills for that new tax line they added when the city
started charging fees to use the public right of way for electric,
cable, phone lines etc.
###############
“Ward 10” (i.e., NARPAC) Weighs in on a
World-Class Baseball Stadium
Len Sullivan, lsnarpac@bellatlantic.net
The DC council is about to make a narrowly focused decision on a much
broader issue. If our national capital city is to get a baseball team,
appropriately called the Nationals, surely it needs a world-class
stadium that preserves the national image and serves DC’s financial
interests as well. The financial success of a new Nationals’ Stadium
depends not on local employment, ticket sales, and parking fees, but on
its ability to spawn full development of otherwise fallow nearby land.
The planned South Capitol Street stadium site sits amid about fifty
acres of utter squalor, unfit for any US city. Mostly commercially zoned
and unencumbered by neighborhood NIMBYism, those acres are surrounded by
major redevelopment projects already well underway or on the books.
The alternate site for a Nickel & Dime RFK-replacement Stadium
sits amid about fifty acres of federally-owned surface parking lots at
DC’s east end. It is probably permanently isolated from downtown by
hundreds of residential acres, settled by over 20,000 possessive,
middle-income, single family, homeowners. The nearby 43-acre DC General
Hospital site is to be redeveloped, but its revenue-potential appears
limited by its location, a school, and a questionable council plan to
saddle it with a nine-acre, “world-class hospital,” half funded by
the city. The council has smartly earmarked future tax revenues from ‘Reservation
13’ for the city’s abiding healthcare problems.
A downtown acre of high-density residential or commercial development
can now generate three million dollars in annual tax revenues, and cost
DC a tiny fraction of that in services. A moderate-density, mainly
residential development away from downtown might generate 25 percent as
much in per-acre revenues, but much higher city services for schools,
healthcare, and safety. NARPAC bets a first-class South Capital Street
stadium can stimulate tenfold the net city income from its surrounds as
an economy-class RFK stadium can from its surrounds. And the council can
just as easily declare a special tax zone earmarking proceeds for
capital infrastructure investments as for routine operating costs.
NARPAC asks the council to stop grandstanding, look at the bigger
picture, and act in the best interests of America’s capital. Stop
focusing on penny-pinching the costs, and start weighing the benefits in
long-term net revenues by expanding our world-class national capital
downtown.
###############
[An open letter to city councilmembers] The debate over the stadium
in southeast has focused almost exclusively on construction costs. How
much and who should pay? The debate has failed to fully recognize the
economic and tax revenue boost from the stadium. Each night fans will
spend hundreds of thousands of dollars which over the course of the
season will translate into hundreds of millions in additional tax
revenue. One NBA playoff game, for instance, generated $100,000 in sales
tax revenue, according to the Washington Examiner. Remember 82
home baseball games are played each year (plus playoffs, god willing).
Similarly, the additional real estate development — condos, retail,
offices — will contribute millions to the DC tax base. Developers say
over $100 million in tax revenue will be generated. The objection to the
use of public funds amounts to nothing more than political
grandstanding. The debt on the bonds will be serviced by patrons of the
stadium through ticket sales etc. While many of those patrons will be
from DC, most will be from the Maryland and Virginia suburbs. Additional
stadium tax revenues could be used to improve schools, fund other
benefit programs or lower taxes. Vote “yes” for the site in
Southeast along the Anacostia.
###############
An Open Letter to Councilmembers Schwartz,
Catania, Brown, Graham, Fenty, and Barry
Thomas Smith, tmfsmith@starpower.net
Yesterday’s public roundtable on the baseball lease agreement was a
disgrace. Because you used the roundtable to make repeated speeches on
the issue, many members of the public were denied an opportunity to
share their views — both pro and con — with you and other members of
the public. Because I have a business to run, I had to leave after
little more than three hours of speeches by council members — although
I am aware that my testimony will be included as part of the official
record.
But I was stunned by the lack of civility to the mayor and to others
who testified at the public roundtable, including a group of developers
— as well as, on occasion, a lack of civility to one another. There
are many issues that divide this city, but we all share a commitment and
responsibility for civil discourse. During the course of your speeches
yesterday, on occasion you made reference to the importance of fiscal
prudence. As I sat for more than three hours listening to you repeat
these speeches and try to subject witnesses to public ridicule, I could
not help but ask myself if this process in which you were engaged was an
effective use of my tax dollars as a thirty-year resident of the
District of Columbia and as a local political activist for twenty-five
of those years.
Frankly, the citizens of this city deserve better than the behavior
on display yesterday. I was one of those who planned to testify at the
roundtable in support of the baseball lease agreement. I made that
decision on my own without any prodding by anybody. Contrary to all the
nay-sayers, I believe this will be good for the future of the city. I
left after four hours because I had to work and because it was clear
that council members only wanted to hear themselves talk, not give all
the residents of the city an opportunity to have their voices heard.
###############
Major League Baseball’s Strategy
Ann Loikow, Cleveland Park, aloikow@verizon.net
As we reach the closing days of the debate on the lease for new
baseball stadium on South Capital Street, I would like to refresh folks’
memory of a very prescient editorial from The Washington Times,
entitled “Baseball Talk,” published on December 18, 2002, p. A-18.
The last half says (I added emphasis): "The interest of the 29
owners is clear: The more public money extorted to build the
ballpark, the more dollars baseball’s 29 current owners can extract
from the DC ownership group that wins the likely bidding process. In
February, MLB purchased the Expos for $120 million. For the 2002 and
2003 seasons, MLB will likely spend $60 million keeping the franchise
afloat.
“Make no mistake: The owners are salivating over the ‘capital
gain’ they expect to extort from the winning DC ownership group. They
know that the Cleveland Indians, which once was virtually bankrupt,
fetched an astonishing $320 million in 1999. And they know that in 1998
the Cleveland Browns, an expansion football team, commanded $530 million
in a bidding contest. Most important of all, the baseball owners know
why: The fact that both teams play in publicly financed stadiums caused
their franchise values to soar far beyond what they otherwise would have
been. For their two-year cumulative investment of roughly $180 million
in the Expos, baseball owners expect to receive as much as $350 million
[now $450 million] for the team - and perhaps more, depending upon the
intensity of the likely bidding.
“Of course, the various DC-area groups competing for the franchise
know that the value of their investment will largely depend upon the
extent to which they can convince elected officials to commit taxpayer
money for a revenue-gushing, state-of-the-art ballpark. Luxury
suites. Club seats. personal seat licenses. naming rights. parking fees.
Concessions revenue. Signage. Broadcast rights in a hugely upscale,
largely untapped market. [All of which MLB claims in the draft lease.]
If taxpayers were to bear much of the risk by financing a ballpark, the
largest physical investment expenditure a team will have, the sky would
be the limit for profits to be realized by already-wealthy, now publicly
subsidized, relatively risk-free owners.
“The DC Council should repudiate Mayor Anthony Williams’
ill-advised offer of $200 million [now $700 million and climbing] in
public subsidies. Necessary infrastructure improvements? Yes. Corporate
welfare? Never.” Amazing, isn’t it?
###############
Jack Evans and the Foolish Council
Ed Dixon, jedxn@yahoo.com
Jack Evans sat on the pre-control board council as he sits on the
post-control board council. He has frequently used this “experience”
to point out “I’ve been there” and “I know what needs to be
done.” However, the experience that he has may be the experience that
drove DC to the control board to begin with.
According to DC Code 3301.2, a person shall be prohibited from
offering, and a public official, or any member of a public official’s
household, shall be prohibited from receiving anything of value, based
on “any reasonable inference that the thing of value would influence
the public official’s discharge of duties.” On May 26 and 30, 2005,
DC Fund, formerly known as Jack Pac, reported receiving $1500 from
registered lobbyists John Ray and Tina Brown while conducting business
during the January to July session. John Ray and Tina Brown were
officially lobbying at the time for, among other interests, Major League
Baseball. The Washington Post has been reporting on the Evans’
campaign coffers and their fiscal mismanagement. The Office of Campaign
Finance is investigating the reimbursements issued by the DC Fund and
what was spent on a recently failed mayoral campaign. What folks need to
look at as well is the extent that contributions act as quid pro quo
for legislation. Certainly with the examples of Ray and Brown the lines
are getting very blurred.
Folks nationwide are surprised about the giveaway that DC is about to
make in regards to baseball. The fact that there is no cap on spending
overruns on the stadium deal (caps which Evans has badgered the city for
in regards to the schools) raises serious doubt as to whether or not
Evans understands from where all the money is going to come. As evidence
of the surprise nationwide, the Monterey Herald in California ran
Ray Rivera’s story in the Post on cost overruns (http://www.montereyherald.com/mld/montereyherald/sports/13436520.htm).
See the Council is not just setting the standard for how DC is going to
work with big business but it is setting the standard for how the
country is going to deal with big business. Once DC gives in, other
cities will have to follow, making the situation a lot worse for
everyone. Thanks, Jack!
###############
Untreated Ice, Endangered Pedestrians
Yoma Ullman, ullman724@aol.com
Snow and ice are never cleared from the sidewalk fronting Muhlenberg
Park between Everett and Ellicott Streets on Connecticut Avenue. The
result is a sheet of ice that endangers people who walk that way and
people who go to the bus stop on that block.
I know from past experience that exposure in themail can bring
results, not to mention allies. Any suggestions?
###############
A Community Videocast and Joy to the World
Phil Shapiro, pshapiro@his.com
I’ve been wondering recently what a community videocast would look
like and sound like. Something that would be inclusive and that would
bring together sights and sounds from across the city. Something
grassroots and authentic that celebrates the many strengths in our
community. (Continued at http://communityvideocast.blogspot.com)
In this season of peacefulness and tranquility, I thought it might be
nice to share a video of a raucous, no-holds-barred rock-and-roll
version of Joy to the World. (Continued on page 2 of my Protopage at http://protopage.com/pshapiro)
Foot stomping and spontaneous hollering allowed in this manger.
###############
Not All Failures
Ed T. Barron, edtb@aoldotcom
Gary has cited a failure of economic development in Brooklyn [themail,
December 14] as what is likely to happen here in DC. I’m very familiar
with the changes in downtown Brooklyn over the last ten years, having
spent several days each week up there doing consulting work (since 1995)
at a university a few blocks from the Brooklyn Bridge. There have been
dramatic positive changes to the landscape in downtown Brooklyn and much
of it due to the efforts of the developer, Bruce Ratner. He is now
bringing a new NBA arena to the middle of downtown Brooklyn, much like
the MCI Center here. It will be for the “New Jersey” Nets. MetroTech,
a collection of five or six major office buildings, has been built right
in the heart of downtown Brooklyn by Ratner. These buildings, some
thirty stories tall house major financial organizations and other major
companies. The successes of Ratner greatly outnumber the failures.
That’s not to say that the proposed development in the Anacostia
area in southeast DC will ever be a success. I personally doubt it. But
you can’t argue with what has happened, and what is happening, right
around the new Convention Center, and around the MCI Center. That area
is booming.
###############
The Press
Gabe Goldberg, gabe at gabegold dot com
Phil Shapiro began a recent post [themail, December 14] with,
“Almost as penance for publishing a full-length article about a junk
food board game. . . .” C’mon, how about praising Donna Britt —
Phil’s real point — without this silly and repeated slam at the Post
for printing this article? I don’t read — I’m not interested in
— everything in the Post or any other publication, but I just
skip what I don’t care about. I skimmed this story, it was mildly
interesting — silly game, people buy/play it, local “inventor” if
I remember correctly. It started on Page 1 — maybe it shouldn’t
have. Maybe it belonged in Style. But maybe others were interested in
it, maybe they were less interested in Donna Britt’s piece than Phil.
That’s life. Micromanaging and microcriticizing detracts from any real
point being made. Phil presented good news. It would have been better
news standing alone.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS
Please come to a rally at Freedom Plaza tomorrow (Monday) at noon, to
ask the city council to vote no on the proposed stadium lease, on
Tuesday. The Council should not approve this lease without setting a cap
on public spending, or demanding that baseball pay a fair share of the
costs, or the cost overruns. Stadium-at-any-price supporters have called
a rally at noon. The media need to see us there too. Freedom Plaza is at
13th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW (Metro Center, Federal Triangle
metro stations).
According to a letter to the council by Chief Financial Officer
Natwar Gandhi on November 22, the more we borrow for stadiums,
convention center hotels, and similar projects, the less we’ll be able
to borrow for the District’s human needs, such as schools, libraries
and affordable housing. Expected costs have already almost doubled, and
construction hasn’t even begun. If you can’t come to the rally, or
if you can, call councilmembers. They can be reached at 724-8000.
According to yesterday’s Post, the following councilmembers
are likely to vote yes on the lease: Evans, Patterson, Orange and
Ambrose. The following Councilmembers are likely to oppose the lease:
Catania, Graham, Fenty and Barry. The following Councilmembers are
considered keys to the outcome: Schwartz, Mendelson, Brown and Gray.
Here’s a story in today’s Post, on who normally pays cost
overruns (“Beyond Washington, Most Teams Cover Stadium Overruns:
District Agreed to Pay Costs Exceeding Ballpark Budget,” http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/17/AR2005121701235.html.
Here’s an analysis, “Rising Baseball Stadium Costs Create Problems
for the District,” published by the DC Fiscal Policy Institute on
Friday: http://www.dcfpi.org/12-16-05bud.htm.
###############
Blink
,
December 20
Debra Truhart, debra.truhart@dc.gov
Tuesday, December 20, 6:30 p.m., Southeast Neighborhood Library, 403
7th Street, SE. The Capitol Hill Book Club will discuss Blink by
Ted Dekker. Public contact: 698-3377.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — HELP WANTED
Large elementary after school program has an opening for a
kindergarten teacher and an assistant teacher for third grade beginning
in mid-January. Both positions are Monday through Friday, 3-6 p.m.,
during the DCPS school year. We have a large and supportive staff with
low turnover in a wonderful environment! We are located a short walk
from the Van Ness Metro (red line). Please E-mail a letter of
interest/resume to murchxday@starpower.net.
###############
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every
Wednesday and Sunday. To subscribe, to change E-mail addresses, or to
switch between HTML and plain text versions of themail, use the
subscription form at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail/subscribe.htm.
To unsubscribe, send an E-mail message to themail@dcwatch.com
with “unsubscribe” in the subject line. Archives of past messages
are available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should also be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com,
and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of
Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to
be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief
paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can
be put into each mailing.