Crunch Time
Dear Crunchers:
For the rest of this month, the city council will have to face a few
key issues that will demonstrate both whether it is fiscally responsible
or irresponsible and whether its primary loyalty is to the residents of
the District of Columbia or to special interests. Can the council pass a
bill to rehabilitate and modernize DC schools that doesn’t have as its
main effect enriching favored developers who want to get their hands on
the valuable land owned by the public schools? Can the council stand up
to the mayor and Major League Baseball, force real improvements in the
giveaway deal that they have struck, and reduce the burden on DC
taxpayers that they demand?
Or will the council continue to consider DC’s assets — its
property and its tax base — as ripe for raiding? Watch their votes,
and then write to themail and let us know what you think it means.
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
###############
Funding with
Accountability: Now Is the Time
Erich Martel, ehmartel at starpower dot net
I sent the following message earlier today to Kathy Patterson, Carol
Schwartz, Vincent Gray, Marion Barry and Phil Mendelson, members of the
Council Education and Libraries Committee: “As a high school history
teacher, WTU/SCAC member and LSRT member at Woodrow Wilson High School,
I support full funding, but only with mandatory council accountability,
i.e., funding with an accountability string attached. Historically,
parliaments have gained greater power over kings by using the
"power of the purse" as leverage. This is a unique moment to
exert that leverage. Except for the council and an occasional piece of
investigative journalism, DC Public Schools is run like a secret
medieval principality with the superintendent and his top officers only
rarely held accountable. Consider that US Cabinet Officers and Deputy
Under-Secretaries of this and that have to be confirmed by the Senate,
yet every DCPS official between the Superintendent and local school
principals is appointed by the Superintendent with no confirmation
oversight required. If the Board of Education won’t do that, then the
Council should.
“This is the opportunity to build in oversight and frequent
accountability mechanisms to insure that contracts are proper and the
repairs and renovations are high quality and professional. Bring it
under the Council’s oversight -- the board is perpetually asleep, and
the two or three members who have genuine concerns cannot overcome the
others’ dead weight. How do you know, that is, what guarantees are
there, that increased capital funding won’t be misspent? As much as I,
a Wilson H.S. teacher and taxpayer, want to see school facilities
improved, I am not willing to turn over large blocs of funding to
another DCPS pork feast. The recent Washington Post articles on
textbook delays is but a peek at the big picture. When I testified
before the council Education Committee on altered student records at
Wilson H.S. in November 2002, you pointed out that the council has
oversight, but prefers to defer to the Board. Well, on that and other
issues the Board has yet to act and the abuses continue. It’s time for
the council to act. Capital funding is a good place to start.
“The problems that need to be addressed, posed as questions: 1)
what protections are there to ensure that increased capital funding will
be used in the most effective manner in the process of
constructing/renovating buildings? What contracting process and
oversight checks will there be to ensure that these repairs,
renovations, etc. are done professionally (in the real meaning of the
term) and that materials will not be used that are shoddy, e.g. doors
that have aluminum hardware with low metal-fatigue levels that break
when pushed too hard? 2) What guarantees are there that the existing
(renovated and non-renovated) structures and any new ones will be
effectively maintained? Has any evaluation of DCPS maintenance
procedures been done? What are the maintenance staffing needs? I know
that Ackerman laid off many people. Is that the real problem? Has anyone
studied an effectively maintained system, i.e. a school system model
that DCPS can replicate?
“3) What warranty protections exist? Contracts must have reasonable
warranty periods. Are the warranty contracts with real suppliers or with
contract rainmakers (dummy fronts) who really can’t warranty anything?
4) Are there standards for custodians, for maintenance personnel, etc.
and supervision thereof? There must be school system models that can be
replicated. 5) Does DCPS have an efficient report and response system
for repairs and periodic maintenance? I have heard that the Chief
Business Officer, Mr. Brady, has been making progress. Does he have the
information system and trained personnel to support this? While you’re
at it, why not find out why the DCSTARS computer system isn’t working
efficiently (you do know that DCSTARS is the same eSYS from AAL in
Ontario, that has been on again, off again for the past four to six
years). 6) Has DCPS provided reports showing the causes of disrepair,
broken equipment, etc., i.e., a) the portion of maintenance, repairs,
renovation, etc. caused by internal student vandalism? (notice that the
Superintendent’s Master Education Plan makes no reference to a student
discipline and behavior plan -- in some schools, this is a major
problem); b) external vandalism; c) failure of building maintenance
staff to adhere to periodic maintenance requirements, e.g., lubricating
moving parts, checking that drainage systems aren’t clogged, clearing
leaves out of gutters; d) systems that haven’t been upgraded, e.g.,
electrical systems that can’t support A/C’s, iron pipes with
internal blockages. 7) The most important of all, the one area where
parent activists avert their eyes, internal accountability and
oversight. Parents and many community activists are delighted to join
with school and school system leadership to call upon the benighted
outside power (council, mayor, congress) to provide us with the funds we
need, but turn mute when the question of internal, inept management is
posed.
“8) Having said all of that, what do I propose? a) There must be
fully empowered, independent oversight by the council. The Board of
Education majority is incapable of acting in an objective, detached
oversight role. b) There should be mandatory audits (i.e., results
publicly released) of all areas of procurement, contracts, and
performance in the areas I mentioned above. c) Educate the public on
this issue.”
###############
Is There Hope?
Ed Dixon, Georgetown Reservoir, jedxn@yahoo.com
This morning, the Education Committee of the Council of the District
of Columbia will decide if repairing and modernizing the city’s public
schools is a worthwhile endeavor. There needn’t be any long winded
speeches on the existing conditions that shame this city. They are the
same conditions that are found in many other impoverished inner cities
in this country and abroad. They are the schools of neglect that our
leaders have abandoned. They are the schools that speak to our children
about our aspirations for their future. They are the schools we have
created collectively as a city. The shame lies on all of us.
Today, the question for Councilmembers Patterson, Gray, Mendelson,
Schwartz, and Barry addresses hope. How much hope do they plan to expend
on our children? The Council is consumed in a stadium deal that will
enrich a few men in the form of an owners group with millions of dollars
each. The school modernization bill spread out over a generation will
enrich each student by a few dollars. Yet the difference in the future
of this city with those few dollars spent on each child will effect
those children in a profoundly different way than a new stadium will.
Will the school modernization bill eradicate poverty? No. But neither
will a stadium. Will the school modernization bill, speak to the
children of this city about the value of education? Yes. The Fix Our
Schools web site (http://www.fixourschools.net/modernization/)
has provided a means for those concerned citizens of the District to
send E-mails to the councilmembers on the Education Committee to let
them know that there is hope for our school children.
###############
DC Trades for Crumbs
from Major League Baseball
Ed Delaney, profeddel@yahoo.com
The Washington Post reports (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/02/AR2005120202068.html):
“The District and MLB have reached a tentative agreement on a stadium
lease that includes an additional $20 million payment from baseball
officials and a compromise on another key provision, city government
sources said yesterday. Negotiators will continue discussions, but the
deal could be wrapped up and delivered to the DC Council early next
week, said Mark H. Tuohey, chairman of the DCSEC. City sources said
agreement has been reached on the District’s two key demands, the $20
million payment and a letter of credit from baseball. In return for the
payment, baseball will receive a concession from the city, government
sources familiar with the negotiations said. The nature of that
concession was not disclosed. ‘We have completed the negotiations,’
Tuohey said. ‘We are going to be doing some drafting over the weekend.
We have essentially resolved the issues.’” So it took you how many
months to work out a lease that was secured with more giveaways from the
city, giveaways that you don’t want to bring up too soon lest it
dampen the jolly picture you and MLB are trying to pick of hard-fought
success and closure on the stadium matter?
“Top MLB officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because the
deal has not been finalized, cautioned that some negotiations remained
on the lease. They declined to discuss specifics.” When has this crew
ever discussed specifics? The DC council had to trap an MLB official in
a room for the first time Thursday to verify that MLB had not ruled out
the RFK Stadium site!
“District negotiators have asked baseball for a $24 million letter
of credit to ensure the Nationals’ rent payment for four seasons in
the case of a terrorist attack or players’ strike and $20 million to
cover contingencies in case of cost overruns. Those guarantees are
needed to secure an investment-grade rating on stadium construction
bonds, DC CFO Natwar Gandhi has said. Baseball officials have agreed to
give the city a letter of credit for one or two seasons, with the
expectation that that will satisfy Wall Street, DC government sources
said. If that money is drawn down in the future, then baseball would
renew the credit line to build up the reserve fund, the sources said.
Although general terms have been reached, the deal is not finished in
part because city financial officials must obtain Wall Street’s
blessing on whether the terms are strong enough to gain investment-grade
status for the stadium project.” And for this, the lease has been in
limbo until weeks before the bonds need to be issued? These two parties
deserve each other. If the DC council settles for this trade as enough
to justify emptying the coffers for a cut-rate Buick, Ford, or Schwinn
greenhouse with precious little parking and barely any infrastructure or
Metro station funding, they’re truly impotent and are grossly
negligent of their oversight duties.
“Evans added that he expected the council to get the lease by
Friday, in time to schedule a public hearing the following week. The
council is scheduled to vote on the lease Dec. 20, assuming it is
completed.” Let’s let them hear it publicly, folks!
“Several council members told Reinsdorf that if baseball did not
agree to the city’s demands, they would push to move the project to a
site adjacent to RFK Stadium. That location could save the city more
than $100 million, some council members have said. But that option would
require a costly environmental cleanup of the site and federal and
congressional approval, a process that could mean long delays before
construction. The land is owned by the National Park Service and leased
to the District at no cost. The 50-year lease, which ends in 2038,
allows for only one stadium on the 200-acre site. Building a new complex
would require Congress to amend the 1957 law that authorized the
stadium, said John Parsons, associate director for the Park Service’s
National Capital Region. The project also would require an environmental
impact statement and approval from the Park Service, the National
Capital Planning Commission and the US Commission of Fine Arts, Parsons
said. He said the whole process could take two to three years. ‘That’s
quite a bit different than their existing circumstance because the other
proposal is not on federal land,’ he said. An environmental impact
study completed in 1993 found potentially harmful lead contamination in
the soil.” If anyone doubted if the Post were still an
agenda-driven rag and a prostrate water carrier for the Brigade, this
should wipe those doubts away. The Post hilariously fails to
print facts from the story they themselves published about legislation
proposed by the White House, lauded by the mayor, and is already moving
through Congress with strong bipartisan support to give 200 acres of
federal land to the city free of charge, land that includes the RFK
Stadium/Reservation 13 campus. Somehow, that fact didn’t come to
light, nor did any of the assets from cost superiority to infrastructure
assets vis-a-vis the current site, as it didn’t fit the obvious agenda
to create problems out of thin air to pin on the site the Brigade doesn’t
want and obscure the deal-killing issues at their preferred site.
Instead, the Post concocts this doomsday scenario (right in lock
step with the mayor and the DCSEC, who have been spouting off about
fantastic cost and time issues at the site that don’t exist) which
contradicts the Brigade’s own 2002 site evaluation study and the mayor’s
findings when he prepped the site for MLB in 2004 and touted it as being
fully fundable and deliverable.
First, if the lease demands only one stadium operate on the site,
then the city can do what was being done in Saint Louis where the old
Cardinals stadium was demolished at the end of this season and the new
stadium will come online by the start of next season. Second, an
environmental impact statement was already done — which is plenty more
study than has happened at the current site, and the costs of
remediation at the RFK Stadium site are already set — unlike at the
current site, where samples of properties still held by existing
residents and businesses won’t be analyzed for months. Third, all
those approvals mentioned will either be made moot by the land transfer
or would be a formality given DC’s control of the land and MLB’s
lobbying power combined with the influence that could be brought to bear
by the team’s new ownership group, which will reportedly be selected
in part for the local and congressional influence it brings. And fourth,
Parsons’ outlandish comments suggest he is either being played for a
patsy or has an agenda of his own regarding the site; either way, his
park ranger hat might be too tight.
Not only that, but if all this work needed to be done, then the DCSEC
can be proven to have been negligent in not preparing the site work
accordingly along with the current site since the RFK Stadium site was
specified as the cost-saving alternative should the current site not be
able to house the ballpark for cost reasons per the relevant amendment
to the stadium agreement. This is also the first time in the entire time
that the city has been pursuing MLB all the way back to the San Diego
Padres effort in 1974 that the RFK Stadium site has been characterized
in the media as obstacle-laden, and the timing is not a coincidence.
Before, when it suited the Brigade’s pursuit of MLB, never was heard a
discouraging word about the site, only positives as DC’s ultimate
fallback site that no one else could match. How times change when needs
change too.
###############
Green Bay on the Potomac
Gabe Fineman, gfineman@advsol.com
As the numbers for the baseball stadium keep rising, the proposal by
Ralph Nader in January (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A57857-2005Jan7.html)
that the city just buy the team and get the profits is looking more and
more sensible.
###############
The Washington Post today ran an article about a car hitting a
pedestrian very hard in a 25-mph zone (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/02/AR2005120201801.html).
Stressing the force of impact and noting that the driver not only got
away with it, but even received "reassurance" from a police
officer, we must infer that speeding is forgiven if you also bag a
pedestrian (outside a crosswalk). This is good news for everyone. First
of all, no one needs a handgun anymore. Secondly, all the correspondents
who rail against speeding tickets now know how to dodge one. Just hit a
pedestrian!
###############
Questionnaires about the Master Education Plan
Erich Martel, ehmartel at starpower dot net
I received the following from Bill Potapchuk of the Community
Building Institute, one of the consultants hired by DC Public Schools to
evaluate the superintendent’s Master Education Plan. This refers to
the questionnaires for principals, teachers and community
members/parents. “There are now three surveys available on Master
Education Plan web site, one for community members, one for principals,
and one for teachers. Shortly, one will be available for students. The
web site is at http://www.greatschools.k12.dc.us/.
Please circulate the availability of your surveys to as many people as
possible. Getting more feedback is critical to ensuring the Master
Education Plan reflects the aspirations and concerns of our
community.”
###############
Winter Holiday Trash and Recycling Collection
Schedule
Mary Myers, mary.myers@dc.gov
Following is the holiday schedule for DPW services through the
beginning of 2006. Please note that when a public holiday falls on a
Sunday, the holiday is observed by the government on the following
Monday. Therefore, Christmas Day will be officially observed on Monday,
December 26. District government offices will be closed and most
services suspended, including DPW trash and recyclables collection,
street cleaning, parking enforcement and towing. All services will
resume on Tuesday, December 27. Trash and recyclables collection will
slide one day for the remainder of the week in Supercan areas. In
twice-weekly collection areas, service will slide on Tuesday and
Wednesday, with normal collections on Thursday and Friday.
Likewise, New Year’s Day 2006 will be observed on Monday, January
2, 2006. District government offices will be closed and most services
suspended, including DPW trash and recyclables collection, street
cleaning, parking enforcement, and towing. All services will resume on
Tuesday, January 3. Trash and recyclables collection will slide one day
for the remainder of the week in Supercan areas. In twice-weekly
collection areas, service will slide on Tuesday and Wednesday, with
normal collections on Thursday and Friday. Additionally, residents
should mark their calendars for the annual Christmas tree collection and
the winter street sweeping hiatus.
Residents who receive DC trash collection service are encouraged to
put holiday trees -- without ornaments or tinsel -- in curbside tree
boxes by January 2, 2006. Trees will be picked up during a special
two-week collection from January 3-14. Residents who wish to keep their
trees longer should put them out at their normal point of trash
collection (curbside or alley) after January 14. DPW will then collect
the trees along with the regular trash, as truck space permits over the
following weeks.
Routine residential street cleaning is suspended from January 9 to
March 17, 2006. During this time, "No Parking/Street Cleaning"
restrictions will be lifted. Residents and visitors who park along
posted, alternate-side, daytime street sweeping routes will not be
required to move their cars on street-sweeping days during the sweeper
hiatus. Residential street cleaning resumes Monday, March 20, 2006.
###############
It’s Not Rocket Science
Ed T. Barron, edtb@aol;.com
The problems in the DC Office of Procurement can be traced to a lack
of intelligent oversight. There are all kinds of rules and regulations
for every level of procurement contract. There are authorizations for
each level of procurement awards. To get things right, all the folks in
that office have to do is follow the rules and regulations. Knowing the
frailties of people who are in positions to dispense the city’s funds,
all you need is an honest cop who reviews each procurement to see that
the rules have been followed. This can be accomplished by a checklist
that must be completed by the person awarding the procurement contract.
When you find folks who fill out the checklist improperly (meaning they
are not following the rules to the letter) then relieve them of the
authority to issue procurement awards. It’s not rocket science.
###############
What Can We Rely on the Press to Tell Us?
Phil Shapiro, pshapiro@his.com
We can rely on the press to tell us about a DC-area couple who
created a board game about junk food. Http://tinyurl.com/cfm6u
###############
Affirmative Action
Kenneth Lyons, President AFGE Local 3721, kendu256@aol.com
It appears that DCRA is not the only agency that has adopted a policy
with a questionable intent. The DC Fire and Emergency Medical Services
Department has a similar policy that has had a detrimental impact not
only on minorities but in our communities.
Within FEMS there are two groups, the Uniform Firefighters and the
Civilian Emergency Medical Services providers, each group represented by
a different bargaining unit. Recently the Chief, a firefighter himself,
executed a hiring policy that only civilian emergency medical technician
applicants, regardless of their qualifications, would have to be
bilingual, while applicants applying to the position of firefighter with
the same or lesser qualifications would, could, and have been hired.
Many of those individuals applying to the civilian emergency medical
technician positions were District residents and minorities and had
acquired the training paid out of their own pockets; while many of the
firefighters hired were not minorities, not District residents, and to
this day many remain commuters with no incentive to become District
residents
Historically the civilian Emergency Medical Services Bureau took
great pride in providing employment to District residents and could
boast at a time that over seventy percent of those hired were District
residents. EMSB could boast that many of those hired were given a chance
when all others denied them the opportunity to learn a profession that
would enable them to give back to their communities, how times have
changed. Under the law as written in Executive Orders and interpreted by
the courts, anyone benefiting from affirmative action must have a valid
job or educational qualifications. This should not be to the exclusion
of applicants that would otherwise be qualified for the job, or policies
specific to one group while ignoring another.
Discrimination can come in many forms. In this instance, policies
draped in the silent endorsement of our elected officials and executed
under the guise of progress makes it no less discriminatory or
demeaning. How times have changed, or have they?
###############
DCRA Bilingual Requirements
Elliot Teel, eteel@yahoo.com
In further response to the question of DCRA’s search for Spanish
speaking employees, I think it has a lot to do with the realities of the
population in DC. There are a lot of people who speak primarily Spanish
who have to deal with DCRA, so if they want to be able to interact with
them DCRA needs to have people who can speak Spanish. I know from
personal experience they often don’t have translators, which are
required by law in certain instances, and so things get delayed or
rescheduled until they can find one.
###############
Affirmative Action for Bilinguals
Nora Bawa, botanica@isp.com
With regard to affirmative action for Latinos in DC hiring, a) could
it be that being bilingual is a job requirement or preference? b) What’s
wrong with affirmative action being extended to other underserved
groups? I’m not sure I understand the objection.
###############
I want to respond to “Spiraling Down,” submitted by Eric
Rosenthal (themail, November 30]. I am a native Washingtonian who has
asked the same question, Mr. Rosenthal. Is there any way to fix the
numerous problems (especially the foster care system, HIV/AIDS,
neighborhood crime, mental health and retardation, and our schools? I
have come up with one answer. Come election time, we the citizens of
this city must vote in a candidate who is qualified and compassionate to
take on these challenges. It’s not an easy job, but we have so many
candidates. Each elected official promises to fix it, but putting a dent
in some of the problems would be appreciated. Mr. Rosenthal, I agree
with your submission, and I hope my answer is reasonable.
###############
A Recipe for Newspaper Survival in the
Internet Age
Gabriel Goldberg, gabe at gabegold dot com
Regarding Phil Shapiro’s long-ago post (pun intended) about the
death of newspapers, here’s an interesting article by Robin Miller on
Slashdot: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/27/1645214.
It starts: “I’ve spent seven years working as a writer and editor
for Slashdot’s parent company. During this time I’ve been to at
least a dozen mainstream journalists’ and editors’ conferences where
the most-asked question was, ‘How do we adapt to the Internet?’ You’d
think, with all the smart people working for newspapers, that by now
most of them would have figured out how to use the Internet effectively
enough that it would produce a significant percentage of their profits.
But they haven’t. In this essay I will tell you why they’ve failed
to adapt, and what they must do if they want to survive in a world where
the Internet dominates the news business.”
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS AND CLASSES
Holiday Building Ornaments, December 10
Brie Hensold, bhensold@nbm.org
Saturday, December 10, 1:00-4:00 p.m. Holiday Building Ornaments:
whether houses, offices, or monuments, buildings shape Washington’s
identity as a city and the nation’s capital. Decorate your own wooden
ornaments in the shapes of various Washington buildings with an
assortment of craft materials. Presented in conjunction with the Museum’s
long-term exhibition, Washington: Symbol and City. $3 per project. All
ages. Drop-in program. At the National Building Museum, 401 F Street,
NW, Judiciary Square stop, Metro Red Line.
###############
Thursday, December 8, 10:00 a.m., and Friday, December 9, 10:00 a.m.,
Martin Luther King, Jr., Memorial Library, 901 G Street, NW, Room A-5.
Sixth Annual Young People’s Poetry Marathon in Spanish. Join over one
hundred children as they read their poems in Spanish at a lively
literary marathon! Sponsored by Teatro de la Luna. Elementary school
ages on Thursday; middle and high school ages on Friday. Public contact:
727-1183.
December 10-23, Martin Luther King, Jr., Memorial Library, 901 G
Street, NW, Main Lobby. Books Plus, The Library Store, is having its
Annual Holiday Sale for great deals on gifts during the busy holiday
shopping season. Stop by to see the new limited edition silver ornament
that celebrate the DC Public Library! Public contact: 727-6834.
###############
Lone Star Toastmasters, December 20
Lavonda Broadnax, lbor@loc.gov
Roses are red
Violets are blue
I’m improving my speaking skills
And so could you!
The Lone Star Toastmasters club is sponsoring a special workshop
featuring holiday poems and good cheer. Tuesday, December 20, at 7:00
p.m., at Young Chow Restaurant, 312 Pennsylvania Avenue, SE. Join us and
improve you public speaking skills and listening skills. Free of charge.
###############
Guy Mason Winter Classes
Toni Ritzenberg, taritzdc@aol.com
Registration for winter 2006 classes at the Guy Mason Center (3600
Calvert Street, NW) begins on Monday, December 5, with classes starting
the week of January 9, 2006. The majority of classes consist of eight
sessions. To encourage one’s creative skills there is art (studio with
critique) at three levels, china painting, copper enameling, and
pottery. Here is your opportunity to give hand made items as holiday
gifts. To prepare for the coming snow, there is ski and snow board
conditioning. For general exercise, there are classes in Dancercize,
Pilates, Qi Gong, yoga, and strength and tone (senior momentum for ages
50+).
French and Spanish classes are being offered, as are ballroom dancing
and bridge (duplicate), twice a week year round. Even though Guy Mason
is one of the few adult centers in the city, children are not forgotten.
There is music together (parent or adult with child class) for young
people from birth to four years of age.
There is not a better bargain offered by the District of Columbia.
For specific program start dates, visit the Center’s web site at http://www.guymasonsstudioarts.com.
To register online, visit http://www.dpr.dc.gov
and click on Activities Program Registration and follow the
instructions. For further information and/or to register in person,
visit the Guy Mason Center at 3600 Calvert Street, NW, Monday-Friday
9:00 a.m.-10 p.m. and Saturdays 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m., or call Robert
Haldeman/Caryl King at 282-2180.
###############
Historic Preservation Review Board 2006
Schedule
Bruce Yarnall, bruce.yarnall@dc.gov
The District of Columbia Historic Preservation Review Board will meet
on the fourth Thursday of each month, except in November and December,
when the meeting will be held on the third Thursday of the month, and in
August, to which only the usual late July hearing has been scheduled
because of a conflict. For most months, a second has been scheduled the
following Thursday as well, in order to accommodate extraordinarily
large case loads. Such meetings will only be held when necessary, and
the agendas will be produced at the same time as those for the regular
(first) hearing.
HPRB meeting dates: January 26 and February 2; application filing
deadline, December 22, 2005; public notice date, January 11. HPRB
meeting dates: February 23 and March 2; filing deadline, January 26;
public notice date, February 8. HPRB meeting dates: March 23 and March
30; filing deadline, February 23; public notice date, March 8. HPRB
meeting dates: April 27 and May 4; filing deadline, March 23; public
notice date, April 12. HPRB meeting dates: May 25 and June 1; filing
deadline, April 27; public notice date, May 10. HPRB meeting dates: June
22 and June 29; filing deadline, May 25; public notice date, June 7.
HPRB meeting date: August 3; filing deadline, June 29; public notice
date: July 19. HPRB meeting dates: September 28 and October 5; filing
deadline, August 24; public notice date, September 13. HPRB meeting
date: October 26; filing deadline, September 28; public notice date,
October 11. HPRB meeting date: November 16; filing deadline, October 26;
public notice date, November 1. HPRB meeting date: December 21; filing
deadline, November 16; public notice date, December 6.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — RECOMMENDATIONS
DC-Based Kids Books
Ann Carper, rochester54 at verizon dot net
For some local flavor in your holiday gift giving, check out the new
Spy Mice series by Heather Vogel Frederick (Simon & Shuster Books
for Young Readers, 2005, $9.95). Against the backdrop of the
International Spy Museum and other local landmarks, including the
Library of Congress, Dumbarton Oaks, and Thomas Sweet ice cream parlor,
fifth-graders Oz Levinson and Delilah Bean team up with private eye
Glory Mouse to outsmart sixth-grade bullies and Roquefort Dupont, king
of the rat underworld. The Black Paw and For Your Paws Only
(which takes place mostly in NYC during the Thanksgiving Day Parade)
have been described by the Christian Science Monitor as “Think
Stuart Little Meets 007.” Geared for ages 8-11, both are available at
the Spy Museum and local bookstores. For more info, visit http://www.heathervogelfrederick.com.
(Full disclosure: I’m related to Heather, who also wrote two highly
regarded children’s books about the daughter of a Nantucket whaling
captain.)
###############
I am seeking a provider of professional gift wrap services in the
District for a holiday gift list. Any suggestions?
###############
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every
Wednesday and Sunday. To subscribe, to change E-mail addresses, or to
switch between HTML and plain text versions of themail, use the
subscription form at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail/subscribe.htm.
To unsubscribe, send an E-mail message to themail@dcwatch.com
with “unsubscribe” in the subject line. Archives of past messages
are available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should also be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com,
and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of
Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to
be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief
paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can
be put into each mailing.