Health and Safety
Dear Safety Scouts:
Over the past several issues of themail, we’ve been discussing both
health and safety issues -- both hospitals and security measures. This
week, both issues merged when the Inspector General’s Office of the US
Department of Health and Human Services released its audit of the DC
government’s spending of federal grant funds for the Bioterrorism
Hospital Preparedness Program, completed on June 28 (http://www.dcwatch.com/themail/issues/health050628.htm).
In many respects, the audit repeats the findings of the DHHS audit of
how DC dealt with the federal funds given to it under the Public Health
Preparedness and Response for Terrorism Program (http://www.dcwatch.com/themail/issues/health050621.htm),
which I wrote about in themail on July 13. While DC failed to spend 48
percent of the program funds given to it under the Public Health
Preparedness and Response for Terrorism Program, it did better with the
funds given to it for the Bioterrorism Hospital Preparedness Program —
it failed to spend only 46 percent of those funds.
The DC Appleseed Center’s report on the District’s HIV/AIDS
program released today, which Dorothy discusses below, exposes the same
problem — the failure of the District government to manage its health
and safety programs effectively, efficiently, or even professionally.
AIDS has killed more District residents than any terrorist attack is
ever likely to, and we have had decades to get our AIDS public health
programs working properly. If the District government can’t be
bothered to operate them well after all this time, what makes us think
that the threat of bioterrorism will set it straight?
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
###############
What Would Benefit Metro Riders Most?
Dennis Jaffe, DennisJaffeDC@aol.com
My impression is that many folks think the Metro system, overall, is
pretty good — but that overcrowding, delays, safety, and lack of clear
information are all real serious concerns. Riders may soon get an
influential voice that advocates on our behalf to Metro’s policy
makers and staff. The agency plans to create a volunteer Riders Advisory
Council (RAC), which will be staffed. Metro has asked the public for our
comments on their proposal by Tuesday, August 16.
There is a catch. Metro wants its CEO to appoint the staff who will
work for the RAC. If the RAC is to be effective, it will sometimes need
to challenge and disagree with Metro. For it to be credible, its staff
must serve riders loyally. So it’s crucial that the staff who carry
out the Council’s work be able to do so without jeopardizing their
jobs. That means not owing their jobs to Metro’s CEO. The RAC — not
Metro’s CEO — should lead a staff selection process to ensure that
the Council staff works loyally on behalf of riders.
To get Metro to listen to us, we need to speak up. Creating a strong
Riders Advisory Council presents an opportunity to empower riders to
influence those who are responsible for our safety and quality of
service. There’s a sample message online that you can send to Metro’s
board of directors as is, or even better, that you can put into your own
words to send them. There’s also more information about the proposal
at: http://www.sierraclub.org/dc/sprawl/action/p011.html.
###############
Today, the DC Appleseed Center released a report, HIV/AIDS in the
Nation’s Capital: Improving the District of Columbia’s Response to a
Public Health Crisis, which is available in PDF format on Appleseed’s
web site at http://www.dcappleseed.org/projects/publications/HIV.pdf.
Today’s Washington Post describes the situation tersely: “The
District’s rate of HIV/AIDS is probably the worst of any major US
city, yet the city’s response to the epidemic remains badly
understaffed, poorly coordinated and especially lacking for youths and
other at-risk groups. . . ” (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/09/AR2005080901343.html).
There’s a connection between the long-standing problems in the
District’s HIV/AIDS programs and the ongoing Washington Teachers Union
trial that hasn’t been noted in the press. Michael Martin, who has
pled guilty to participating in the WTU embezzlement scheme, and who is
the son-in-law of Gwendolyn Hemphill, who is currently on trial, was for
several years the Chief of Operations of the DC HIV/AIDs Administration,
and oversaw that office’s staff. In his trial testimony, he has
admitted that he lied on his resume to get the job — he claimed to
have a degree from Howard University when he has no college degree, and
he claimed to live in the District of Columbia at his mother-in-law’s
address though he actually lived in Prince Georges County. At the same
time that he held this position, he was also receiving $49,000 a year as
a salaried employee of the United Planning Organization (UPO). His third
job at the same time was to assist Barbara Bullock and Gwendolyn
Hemphill in their embezzlement. Along with Errol Alderman, a friend who
Martin hired at the HIV/AIDS Administration, he assisted in laundering
nearly a half million dollars in WTU money over three years through a
paper corporation they controlled, Expressions Unlimited. And he
testified that he spent a good deal of time chauffeuring Barbara
Bullock, shopping with her, planning her parties, and styling her hair;
and even more time assisting Gwendolyn Hemphill with the mayor’s 2002
reelection campaign. The administration has treated the DC HIV/AIDS
Administration as a political plum, a place to park political allies
rather than as an office that deals with one of the most serious health
problems in our city. Until that attitude changes and substantial
changes are made in the staffing of that office, nothing will change in
the city’s mismanagement of AIDS programs.
###############
Video Minutes from a Community Meeting
Phil Shapiro, pshapiro@his.com
Have you ever attended a community meeting and wished other community
members were there to hear and see what was being said? These days it’s
possible, without too much effort and almost no expense, to archive
community meetings on the web at the Internet Archive. Here are the
"video minutes" of a community meeting I recently attended (http://mytvstation.blogspot.com).
This meeting is the July 2005 meeting of the Robotics Special Interest
Group within the Capital PC User Group (CPCUG.) I have to admit, I don’t
have a strong interest in robotics, but I was fascinated by what I heard
at this meeting. The annual FIRST (For Inspiration and Recognition of
Science and Technology) robotics competition is opening doors of
learning and opportunity for tens of thousands of teens across the
country. The kind of project-based learning that goes on in these
competitions is exactly what our youth need. If you have an interest in
youth development, you might want to view the video minutes of this
meeting. Regardless, thanks for passing along the word about this to
others you know.
###############
Sanitation Workers
Paul Wilson, dcmcrider at gmail dot com
I once lived in a much bigger city than our cozy little commonwealth
of DC. In this sprawling lakeside city of the big shoulders, trash
collection fell under the authority of a city department called
“streets and sanitation.” This moniker seems to me to be a little
more accurate than the impressive-sounding “Dept. of Public Works,”
a name that evokes grand bridges, canals, parks, schools, and whatnot.
In any event, DPW might want to try on the “sanitation” label one of
these days. About three weeks ago, contractor crews dropped off bright
new recycling and trash “supercans” on our block. This block has no
alleys, so trash is picked up curbside. In their generosity, the
contractor even dropped them off at adjacent multiunit properties that
have private trash hauling. Our block is now lined with vibrant blue and
more somber dark green cans. We’re now faced with what to do with two
city-supplied cans from the last "upgrade."
Presumably, the considerable cost of city-supplied trash cans could
be justified in that uniform trash receptacles make trash collection
faster and easier, with less toil for city workers. I’m all for less
toil. Far from being an improvement, though, Mondays and Thursday
mornings have become a scene of unsightly, smelly clutter. The crews
appear to collect the trash in two waves. In the first wave men on foot
fling open the nifty new supercans and dump the bags — and
occasionally loose contents — into the parking lane, between parked
cars. At some point (perhaps hours later?) a second wave comes through,
collecting the stinking bags so carefully stowed in cans the night
before, and throwing them into the trucks. Woe to anyone leaving a
parking spot. If you’re not lucky, you need to do some personal trash
hauling of your own to move your car.
I’ve seen this all over Capitol Hill in the past month or so,
during my early morning exercise and inspection tours. It appears the
new improved trash collection system is just another wasteful debacle.
###############
Play Architect for the Ballpark
Almina Khorakiwala, Almina@walkermarchant.com
The DC Sports and Entertainment Commission (DCSEC) has added a new
section to its recently revised web site, http://www.WashDCSports.com.
“Your DC Ball Park” is an interactive section that has been added to
allow DC residents and baseball fans everywhere to have their say about
how the new baseball stadium in the nation’s capital should look and
what features it should have. Just click on the link from the http://www.WashDCSports.com
home page. The “Your DC Ballpark” section features information on
plans for the new stadium that will be updated from pre-development
through groundbreaking, construction and the home opener in March 2008.
The arrival of the Washington Nationals baseball team, together with
the excitement of DC United Soccer, brings more attention than ever to
the DC Sports and Entertainment Commission. The new web site not only
showcases the home of two of Washington’s great sports teams, but also
the DCSEC’s programs that encourage involvement by Washington, DC
residents in organized team sports, recreational activities, youth
athletics, and healthy lifestyles. The site is also a portal for all
things sports in the District of Columbia and is the first place to look
if you’re trying to find a sport or recreational activity, want health
information or a quick link to local school, college or professional
sports teams.
As the new web site grows, additional features and links will be
added. To submit a sports or entertainment related link or activity for
posting to the web site, please send information to Tony Robinson,
Director of Public Affairs, RFK Stadium, 2400 East Capital Street, SE,
Washington, DC 20003 or E-mail to Arobinson@dcsec.com.
###############
National Capital Medical Center
Eric Rosenthal, eric.rosenthal@mac.com
Washington has awful health statistics. Infant mortality, asthma,
diabetes and life expectancy, especially among black Washingtonians, are
terrible. What is most tragic is that we could do better. We know how to
prevent most infant mortality, most asthma and diabetes complications
and most premature death. In other places, people do not get sick and
die early at the rates we do in DC. Every Washingtonian should be
outraged that it happens here. That is why the discussion over the city’s
proposal to build the National Capital Medical Center is vital. The
proposal represents a once-in-a-generation opportunity to address our
health needs. It should be judged in terms of whether it would make
Washingtonians healthier, whether it would reduce our rates of disease
and death. In that light, the NCMC is the wrong approach and it should
be rejected.
Greg Rhett, writing in themail on behalf of the DC Federation of
Civic Associations [themail, August 7], is correct in saying most major
medical centers are west of North Capitol Street. However, that is not
proof that residents east of North Capitol Street lack emergency and
acute care or proof that Washington needs another hospital. We live in a
tiny city of 69 square miles, and our half a million people are served
by nine acute care hospitals, nine emergency rooms, and five Level I
trauma centers. Cars and ambulances cross North Capitol Street all the
time. Washingtonians already use twice the national average of emergency
and hospital care, and 25 percent of our hospital beds on average sit
empty each day. Can the proponents of the new hospital demonstrate
Washingtonians lack emergency and hospital care and the NCMC would
remedy that? They have yet to do so.
A recent JAMA study found that Washington is the only state in which
every resident lives within 45 minutes of a high-level trauma center.
Only 69.2 percent of people in the US live that close. As a caution for
those who think we need another, the JAMA article also reviewed the
downsides of too many trauma centers concentrated in a region:
inefficiency and decreased quality of patient care (probably due to too
few patients per center). The city’s consultant, Stroudwater
Associates, found that even with several hundred million city dollars in
startup subsidies, the NCMC’s finances would be shaky. Mr. Rhett is
correct that Stroudwater said one necessary condition for financial
viability would be for Howard to move its hospital and other medical
services away from Georgia Avenue to the new site. Howard has yet to say
if it plans to do that and the city suggests it would not, justifying
its proposal in terms of the need for additional hospital beds.
Stroudwater noted several other conditions necessary for the NCMC to
reach financial viability. These conditions include receiving federal
grants of more than $42 million each year, attracting a relatively
wealthy patient payer mix and limiting the amount of medical care it
provides to poor Washingtonians without health insurance. There is no
evidence any of this would happen. Finally, the city proposal makes a
number of unsupported and unrealistic assumptions in an attempt to
project the NCMC would require no additional operating subsidy. For
example, it projects an 80 percent hospital occupancy rate, a rate much
higher than Howard University’s and much higher than the average for
all DC hospitals.
Perhaps Stroudwater Associates is correct when it reaches the
following conclusion in a report to the city: “The needs of the
population may be better served with a focus on providing access to
ambulatory care and integration of the ambulatory care system with other
District hospitals to create a continuum of care. Such a system would
benefit the District as a payer by improving access to lower cost
alternatives and improving the programs to address the serious chronic
diseases in the District, thereby reducing unnecessary
hospitalizations.”
The results of these discussions are critical, especially for black
people in Washington. The advocates of any proposal must demonstrate it
would ease the health burdens that actually plague DC and it would be
the most effective way to accomplish that task. Those supporting the
NCMC have not done so. We must go forward only with a plan that would
yield significant health improvements. The stakes are too high to do
otherwise.
###############
National Capital Medical Center
Martha Ross, mross@brookings.edu
I am in complete agreement with Mr. Rhett (themail, August 7) that
the inequity in health status and access to high-quality medical care
among District residents is unacceptable. But I don’t think a new
hospital is the way to fix the problem. A lot of health problems in this
city are driven by chronic diseases — things like asthma, diabetes,
hypertension. In some areas east of the Anacostia River, almost half the
adult population has a chronic disease. With these conditions, you
shouldn’t need to go to a hospital, as long as you have regular access
to primary medical care. It’s like changing the oil in your car — if
you do this routine maintenance, you won’t burn out your engine and
you won’t spend a fortune at the car repair shop. Lest you think
something like, “Oh, diabetes, that’s not such a big deal. All you
have to do is watch your sugar,” here are some of the effects of
diabetes: blindness, kidney failure, and amputations. For example,
people with diabetes are at particular risk for foot-related problems.
But if they learn how to take care of their feet and go for treatment in
the early stages of a problem, they are much less likely to have a foot
amputated. Sounds like a good advertisement for primary care to me!
The same areas east of the Anacostia River with high chronic disease
rates also have high rates of avoidable hospitalizations — much higher
than other parts of the city. An avoidable hospitalization is a hospital
admission for a health condition that should only rarely require
hospitalization (like the chronic diseases mentioned above). Such
hospitalizations point to the failure of primary care either in terms of
accessibility or quality. People in Ward 3 have the lowest rates of
these types of hospitalizations. And they have plenty of hospitals
nearby. So it’s not because they don’t have access to a hospital
that they’re not going. They have lower rates of avoidable
hospitalizations because their asthma, diabetes, hypertension, etc.
rarely gets to a crisis point where they require hospitalization, which
means in turn that they’re getting the kind of primary care they need
to manage their chronic condition.
Mr. Rhett also correctly notes the east-west divide in hospital
services. But there’s also a divide in the location and number of
doctors’ offices. Nonprofit community health centers are located where
you expect them to be — in areas with moderate to high poverty so they
can serve people without insurance or who otherwise would have problems
getting medical care. They do heroic work, but there’s not that many
of them and some are pretty small. Take a look at the location of
doctors’ offices overall. They are overwhelmingly in Ward 3 and
downtown. According to tax data, there are a total of about 30 offices
of physicians in Wards 7 and 8 together, compared to 30 in Ward 1, 252
in Ward 2 (downtown), 126 in Ward 3, 59 in Ward 4, 131 in Ward 5, and 38
in Ward 6. (I can give the fine print on the data if folks are
interested, but it tends to make peoples’ eyes glaze over.) It’s
just not clear how a new hospital would help improve DC’s health
indicators. We do have lousy health indicators. Something is wrong with
the health care system here in DC. But our biggest health problems, the
ones that cause the most premature deaths and unnecessary suffering, are
things like chronic diseases and low birth-weight infants. A hospital,
old or new, is not the right place to address these problems.
###############
Mr. Cowan recently wrote [themail, August 7] discussing the need for
random searches on Metro. He stated Mr. Imhoff’s essential point was
“that there must be a reason to investigate, search, and detain. That
is the traditional way of law enforcement in the United States:
stopping, searching, arresting only for probable cause, usually after
the commission of a crime.” This is exactly correct; not only is it
the traditional way of law enforcement in the US, it is the only
constitutional way for law enforcement to function. Mr. Cowan wrote:
“The problem posed by terrorism is that we seek to prevent the crime
from happening lest it claim large numbers of victims.” This is more
or less the problem posed by most crime, the difference is the number of
victims.
“If a man wearing a bulky, buttoned coat approached a Metro subway
entrance on a hot August day, that would be reasonable grounds for a
Metro officer to stop that rider and ask him to open his coat.” That
is correct, it would be reasonable grounds to ask; however, barring any
additional circumstances, it is not enough to require it. “Or suppose
a young man is carrying an obviously heavy canvas bag or suitcase.”
What about an old man? Or a woman? “I see no harm in asking him to
open it.” Again, asking is not the problem, requiring it is.
Fortunately, the Founders did see the harm in this.
“In both these scenarios, there is a reason for the officer to
suspect criminal intent.” Is there really? The vast majority of people
with heavy bags are travelers, not terrorists. Thus far no one in this
country has blown up or attempted to blow up a subway train, therefore
it is unreasonable to assume that individuals are engaged in criminal
activity. “Gary Imhoff objects to purely random searches as
unwarranted invasions of privacy, and ineffective. They do, briefly,
invade privacy. . . . These are transient ills.” The recent terrorist
attacks in London killed more then fifty people. In 2004, 198 were
killed in the District. Therefore should we allow the police to briefly
invade the privacy of people on the street; it will only be a transient
ill.
“What will Mr. Imhoff say about combating terrorism when the first
suicide bomber blows himself up in a Washington subway station?” While
I would not think to speak for Mr. Imhoff, I will speak for myself. I
would say that no number of terrorist attacks can allow us to allow our
government to intrude on our natural rights. “Amendment IV. The right
of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and
effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be
violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place
to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
###############
Random Searches Are Effective and Necessary
Bryce Suderow, streetstories@juno.com
I agree with Ed Cowan [themail, August 7] about the usefulness of
searches. I think random searchers protect densely populated areas like
subways by diverting terrorists to softer targets.
###############
Personal Privacy Rights
Michael Bindner, mikeybdc at yahoo dot com
Just to clarify the debate, there is no right not to be photographed
when in public. Anywhere a cop can see you a camera can photograph you.
I would note that the use of cameras in London and the arrest of the
second round of bombers probably stopped a continuing bombing campaign,
so, yes, cameras do work. Cameras in public areas are not big brother.
Big brother is not associated with mere police surveillance but with
attempts to control thought — i.e., Orwell’s thought police. You
will find the thought police in totalitarian states such as Iran and
Saudi Arabia and among the denizens of Al Queda. We have nothing like
that here.
###############
Perhaps Bonilla was surprised by the backlash among DC residents
against his proposal to rename 16th Street, NW, after Ronald Reagan.
Last year during the late President’s funeral, liberals and Democrats
claimed to be nostalgic about President Reagan’s conservative yet
amiable presidency, which they contrasted with the current one, but in
retrospect they were just looking for another way to bash Bush.
The bill offers DC residents a chance to remind Congressman Bonilla
and others that although the Constitution gives the Congress
jurisdiction over the District, the District lacks voting representation
in the Congress. Maybe Bonilla could be persuaded to cosponsor
legislation for DC voting rights in the Congress.
###############
I agree with Gary Imhoff [themail, August 7] that we should lie back
and stop complaining about Henry Bonilla’s attention-seeking proposal
to rename 16th Street “Ronald Reagan Boulevard.” In fact, we should
embrace the idea. Mayor Williams, that nattering nabob of negativity,
complained that it would be costly to change the signage and so forth.
Think outside the box, Mayor. We could recruit Lt. Col. Oliver North to
help us finance the transition by selling some weapons to terrorists and
diverting the proceeds. What better way to honor dear President Reagan’s
legacy?
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS AND CLASSES
Arts Workshop Classes
Jonathan Darr, jonathan@chaw.org
The Capitol Hill Arts Workshop, a nonprofit community arts center
near Eastern Market, is announcing our thirty-third season of classes in
the visual and performing arts. The Arts Workshop features a ceramics
studio, dance and exercise studio, art studio, gallery, black box
theater and programs for early childhood, youth, and adults. If you are
interested in learning more about our Fall semester please visit http://www.chaw.org.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — HELP WANTED
DCFPI Is Looking for a Public Policy Analyst
Ann Pierre, pierre@dcfpi.org
The DC Fiscal Policy Institute is looking for a Public Policy
Analyst. The DC Fiscal Policy Institute conducts research and public
education on budget and tax issues in the District of Columbia, with a
particular emphasis on issues that affect low- and moderate-income
residents. Our current issue focus includes the DC Earned Income Tax
Credit, affordable housing, progressive tax reform, income and poverty
trends, welfare reform, and efforts to improve the transparency of the
District’s budget.
The posting for DCFPI’s policy analyst position can be found on our
web site at http://www.dcfpi.org/8-9-05dcfpi-analystjob.htm.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — DONATIONS
School Supplies Are Still Needed
Susie Cambria, scambria@dckids.org
DC Action for Children is collecting school supplies — and we
particularly need backpacks to put the supplies in. We hope to fill an
additional 150 backpacks with paper, pens, pencils, markers, rulers,
crayons, etc. We need your help to outfit DC students! And if you are
not able to make it to your local supply store, we will gladly accept
monetary donations in order to purchase the supplies needed. If you
would rather make a monetary donation, please make checks out to DC
Action for Children/School Supplies Drive.
Donations may be delivered to DC Action for Children, 1616 P Street,
NW, Suite 420, by Thursday, August 25. Let’s make sure that DC
children and youth have everything they need to be successful this
school year! Call Kim Bell at 234-9404 for more information.
###############
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every
Wednesday and Sunday. To subscribe, to change E-mail addresses, or to
switch between HTML and plain text versions of themail, use the
subscription form at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail/subscribe.htm.
To unsubscribe, send an E-mail message to themail@dcwatch.com
with “unsubscribe” in the subject line. Archives of past messages
are available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should also be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com,
and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of
Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to
be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief
paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can
be put into each mailing.