Populism
Dear Populace:
I’m not a populist, at least in the sense that I’m not motivated
by envy and spite toward the wealthy. I don’t want to confiscate
anyone’s riches or put legal limits on salaries. But I become a
populist when rich people use their wealth, their power, and their
political connections to fleece the public. When the members of the
Washington Baseball Club and Major League Baseball use their political
power to impose taxes on others to subsidize their business expenses, I
turn into a flaming, raving, radical populist. Let me be clear, I don’t
believe that the influential wealthy, the members of the WBC and the MLB,
get their way through political corruption, in the sense of giving
politicians direct personal payoffs. Certainly, they will give
politicians thousands of dollars in campaign contributions in return for
receiving hundreds of millions of dollars in public funds, but that’s
legally and socially accepted corruption, and the politicians won’t
get personally rich from the exchange.
The wealthy don’t have to pay for favors; politicians vie to do
favors for them. A revealing photograph accompanies Roxanne Roberts’
flattering profile of Joe Robert in today’s Washington Post
Style section (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A10993-2004Dec18.html).
Unfortunately the photograph isn’t available online, so I’ll
describe it: Mayor Williams rears back in his chair at Robert’s Fight
Night charity event, tuxedoed and puffing on a huge cigar, immensely
self-satisfied and at ease as he never is when meeting with a group of
ordinary DC citizens. He has been made at home, on a complimentary
ticket to an expensive charity gala, among the power brokers, the movers
and shakers, the impossibly wealthy, an honored pal of Robert and Robert’s
best friend Jim Kimsey, both of them members of the Washington Baseball
Club. And he is one of them, too, a friend and an equal, for as long as
he remains in office and does their bidding. For some people, that’s
payoff enough. What do you have to give to Williams, or to the council
promoters of unlimited giveaways to WBC and MLB (Evans, Orange, Ambrose,
Brazil, Chavous, and Allen, lest we forget), that can compare? A plaque
from a neighborhood association?
More recommended reading from today’s papers: the Post and
the Times both have comprehensive and generally accurate reviews
of the council debate and its background: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A10839-2004Dec18.html
and http://www.washingtontimes.com/specialreport/20041219-121813-6607r.htm.
And from yesterday’s Post, Colbert King’s few hundred words (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A9248-2004Dec17.html)
is worth volumes to explain what is wrong about this deal. The column
ends with a rallying cry for Washingtonians, cited below by Rick
Rosendall: “WRC-TV news anchor Jim Vance spoke for many on Wednesday
evening when he heard that the owners had rejected the council’s
revised baseball stadium financing deal. Vance blurted out: ‘Great.
Let them go screw some other city.’”
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
###############
For several months a water main has been leaking at the intersection
of 51st and Jay Streets, NE. With the change of season, the water
leaking from the source has frozen over the last couple of days. I fear
that this may result in either a pedestrian injury or vehicular
accident. WASA crews have been out to the site although the water
continues to pour from the main. Is it possible, as a resident in the
block, to ascertain the repair status of the main?
###############
Thanks for Supporting Ross Elementary
Phil Carney, Philandscoop@yahoo.com
The eighth annual Christmas tree sale for Ross Elementary was a
cooperative volunteer effort by parents, teachers, and concerned
neighbors. PTCA Vice President Dawn Dickerson organized tree elves from
the Ross Parent Teacher Community Association and from Friends of Ross.
The two-weekend fundraiser was a great success with all wreaths, stands
and 300 trees sold.
Zipcar employees volunteered to provide free deliveries on the first
weekend, but were unable to help the second weekend. Where there is a
will, there is . . . we tied one tree to a skateboard and one man
carried his tree home on the back of his three wheeled scooter. The
money raised will go to individual teachers to make whatever
improvements deemed necessary. Teacher’s requests range from buying
dictionaries to repairing air conditioning. Previous tree fundraising
was used to renovate the front entrance, library, cafeteria and to buy a
flagpole and an American flag! Thanks to DCPS, all the funds raised over
the years have gone to cover basics that any self respecting
professional American public school system would pay for.
Ross Elementary School is located at 1730 R Street, NW. Thanks to
grants and fund raising, the school has new playground equipment. The
old playground mixed little children and cars — an idea that could
only happen in DC under DCPS. A separate car entrance with parking, new
fencing and landscaping will be added, hopefully soon.
###############
Anacostia Waterfront Corporation Again
Dorothy Brizill, dorothy@dcwatch.com
In the last issue of themail, December 15, I wrote about the quandary
facing the mayor and council over membership on the board of the
Anacostia Waterfront Corporation. The mayor had promised Joslyn Williams
that there would be a labor representative on the board, and then he had
filled the board without appointing one. How does a labor-friendly city
council resolve the problem? The council’s Committee on Economic
Development approved all of the mayor’s nominees, but on Tuesday
Committee Chairman Harold Brazil plans to introduce emergency
legislation to expand the Corporation board’s membership by two, one
to represent labor interests and the other to represent environmental
interests.
###############
Slaughter of a Babe in the Woods
Larry Seftor, larry underscore seftor .the757 at
zoemail.net
It is fascinating and appalling that a billion dollar baseball deal
was negotiated by someone with no apparent negotiation skills or
training. Many years ago, for work, I attended a Karrass negotiation
course. The city would have been well served if Anthony Williams had
attended such a course instead of taking one of his trips away from the
city. Williams’s negotiation with baseball would be a good case study
of what not to do. Here are some examples. 1) A true negotiation ends
with both sides satisfied, each fully understanding the deal, and each
having gained some advantage. If one side has to make unreasonable
concessions and leaves with bad feelings, the negotiation has failed. (I
believe the lawyers call this a contract of adhesion.) In such cases,
subsequent execution of the deal is generally fraught with trouble. 2)
Negotiations must be conducted both externally and internally. For
example, while I negotiate externally with another company I also have
to negotiate internally with my company’s management. Williams needed
to negotiate with the council as the deal was being struck, instead of
presenting a “fait accompli” to be rubber stamped. 3) To
negotiate one needs to know the market. Last week an economics professor
stated that Ms. Cropp’s proposal aligned well with the direction that
new stadium funding is taking. He also said that the DC market is an
attractive one to baseball, and that DC could have negotiated from a
position of strength. Williams obviously did no research and negotiated
from ignorance. In short, the council is doing their job. Too bad
Williams didn’t do his.
Postscript: late Saturday evening (actually early Sunday morning), I
read an online version of a story that appeared in Sunday’s Washington
Post about the baseball negotiation. I did a double take when an
important characterization was missing from the printed edition on
Sunday. Online the Post stated: “Major League Baseball is an
unregulated monopoly accustomed to bullying public officials, a
millionaires’ club that has spent the past year squeezing the District
for cash.” While the Post has the right to edit any way they
want, the deletion of this important truth provides a fascinating
insight into the workings of the media.
###############
Now that the DC Council has crossed its Rubicon and the baseball deal
will either be negotiated or die, it’s a good time to destroy two
shibboleths about big league stadiums. The first is that they must be in
a downtown or commercial setting; hence the Anacostia Waterfront plan.
But Washington has impossible traffic already and every game at that
site would mean disastrous gridlock for hours. The best alternative by
far is to build a new stadium adjacent to RFK Stadium and its abundant
parking, Metro, and adjacent freeway. The second shibboleth is that the
multipurpose stadium is dead. When a stadium for baseball or football
costs up to a half billion dollars, the taxpayers should call on their
leaders to mobilize the best in modern technology and architecture to
find an acceptable design for both, plus soccer, concerts, and even
conventions. Perhaps a multipurpose stadium could add a pavilion to
recreate some of the commercial setting baseball owners crave.
Should the Washington Nationals leave for Las Vegas or somewhere
else, it won’t be the end for DC baseball. Several other major league
teams have unlikely futures and are likely to move. The Florida Marlins
may already be in a race to beat the Nats to Las Vegas. The long term is
also important: a good guess is that the Redskins will be ready to
return to the city within twenty years as the gridlock in Landover
reaches impossible levels. Even without them, DC should have a stadium
big enough for events like college bowl games and World Cup Soccer. With
an innovative multipurpose stadium, perhaps with a retractable roof,
private financing is more likely and the city will be a sports
trendsetter instead of MLB’s lackey.
###############
Your article on baseball contained some misinformation. Linda Cropp
was at the table when the original deal was made and she admitted same
on the DC Politics Hour. I’m reading your mail less and less because
either you or Dorothy manage to slip in false information frequently.
[I’m afraid that you are misinformed. No councilmember, especially
Mrs. Cropp, was ever present at the negotiating table with Major League
Baseball, and among the councilmembers only Jack Evans was kept even
minimally informed of the progress of the negotiations and of the terms
of the agreement. The Williams administrations is now trying to
construct excuses and spread the blame in case the deal falls through;
don’t fall for it. — Gary Imhoff]
###############
In the December 15th issue of themail, Ralph Blessing asked, “who
will step up to the plate, so to speak, and offer to build a stadium,
then turn over ownership to the DC government?”
Answer: An advertiser.
###############
A Golden Opportunity
Ed T. Barron, edtb@aoldotcom
Some may feel that it will be a disaster if DC does not get a major
league baseball team. I look upon that event as a golden opportunity.
Mayor Williams, who got us into this mess by selling out the city and
getting a very onerous “deal,” will surely characterize not getting
the Nationals as a disaster and blame Linda Cropp. Linda Cropp, however,
has made the right recommendations and decisions for the right reasons
as she is watching out for the best interests of the taxpayers and those
who do business in Washington and should be lauded for her actions.
As for the golden opportunity: the District should form a team of
business and interested sports leaders to develop a plan to build a
first class minor league stadium in SW DC on the same site as proposed
for the major league stadium. Instead of a behemoth 60,000 seat stadium,
however, a 10,000 seat stadium should be built with ample parking for
4,000 or more cars. This will provide a venue that will likely cost only
about $100,000,000 and could surely be financed by business and private
funds. DC would only bear the costs for the land and infrastructure,
only a fraction of the more than $600 million that it was ready to
spend. The new stadium would provide the baseball that everyone wants in
the city but with ticket prices that will be affordable for families and
children. The benefits to the city will likely be tax revenues and
neighborhood improvements that would be almost as great as what would
have been realized from getting the major league team.
The only losers in this scenario will be Tony Williams, who won’t
be able to fill up his bloated ego and that creep from Baltimore, Peter
Angelos, who won’t get his tribute from the TV revenue and guaranteed
buyout for his woeful Orioles. This is a golden opportunity for DC.
###############
And I Thought It Was a Done Deal
Rick Rosendall, Dupont Circle, rrosendall@starpower.net
From the outset of the baseball flap, I figured that the usual
pattern of District officials getting stars in their eyes over a big
development project would overwhelm all objections. Was I ever wrong! I
had thought it might be nice to have baseball in the city, as long as
some ancillary issues were resolved, such as fair treatment of the
displaced businesses. But the awfulness of the Mayor’s giveaway deal
quickly became apparent. Kudos to Dorothy and Gary, the protesters,
Linda Cropp and the six dissenting councilmembers, particularly Fenty
and Catania.
I loved Jim Vance’s comment on WRC, which Colby King quoted in
Saturday’s column: “Let them go screw some other city.” Amen. The
sports writers can get so mad their heads explode for all I care. I am
particularly offended by the arrogance and dishonesty of Boswell at the Post.
And boy, you sure don’t have to scratch some folks much before the
racial insults come pouring out, along with idiotic slams against the
entire District because one ward elected Marion Barry as its
councilmember. A number of people on the Post forum Wednesday
morning wrote as if the stadium was to be built in Anacostia. Based on
the same reasoning, perhaps they think the Kennedy Center is in Potomac,
Maryland.
I am glad Linda pointed out that most of her angry callers were from
301 and 703 area codes. On Friday night at the Cafritz Awards reception,
someone mentioned that police had been stationed outside several
councilmembers’ homes to protect them. Oh dear Lord. If that’s the
sort of thug that baseball is going to attract to our city, good
riddance.
###############
Beware of mayors bearing gifts, specifically the Trojan horse used as
window dressing for full financing. Here in the ninth inning of the
baseball drama, here are nine critical things we’ve learned this week
(besides the fact that the mayor cannot be trusted when it comes to
baseball and that baseball cannot be trusted whatsoever):
1) Until their bluff is called, the barons of baseball plan to accept
nothing less than their original terms because they want to set a
precedent and believe this government can be cowed with enough "do
what we say and no one gets hurt" threats into delivering the keys
to the city coffers. (I wonder who ever gave them that idea, mayor?) 2)
The mayor has admitted he will do anything “within limits” (those
limits being only what he can get away with) to get this bad deal
through. 3) The baseball boosters from the mayor to the WBC will
threaten, intimidate, and attack directly or indirectly anyone they
perceive of as in the way until they get what they want. 4) Failing
that, the baseball boosters will wipe the snarls off their faces and
start sweet talking their opponents, telling them they’ve won and will
get what they want. They will promise the moon, the stars, whatever it
takes to get the deal done, all while deviously constructing the
required changes so that it gives MLB the ability to pass on the changes
and revert back to the original sweetheart giveaway of public funds. 5)
The promises and deceptions from the baseball boosters will only
escalate for every day they don’t get precisely what they want, which
they will insist is the only way to go. 6) If MLB is able to get its
poison pill passed by their personal deadline, the power of the DC
Council over this deal will officially end because MLB will have the
final power when push comes to shove to reject any and every part of the
deal that deviates from the original boondoggle. They won’t even have
to be civil about it, they’ll just do it, and they’ll have been
given that power by the DC Council’s actions. 7) The fiscally
responsible council members who have opposed and questioned the
completely giveaway have the baseball boosters right where they want
them and thus have no reason to let the baseball brigade dictate terms
and run out the clock like they’re trying to do to keep their
sweetheart giveaway alive. 8) If MLB is stood up to and not allowed to
get their poison pill in by the deadline, they’ll be forced because of
their own time constraints and desire to get the team sold and reap the
benefits of this market to come back to the negotiating table ASAP and
truly negotiate this time, putting more affordable options like private
financing and the RFK Stadium site back on the table. 9) While the
baseball boosters suggests that standing up to MLB and not accepting
their dictation of terms will send a negative signal to the world, being
suckered into accepting the worst stadium deal ever under the guise of
“sure, we’ll make private financing worth, but just in case it doesn’t
work out. . .” would send an even worse signal that will have all con
men looking to steam roll a boondoggle past the DC Council licking their
chops.
It is so amazing that the mayor dodged everyone for two full years on
this issue (except MLB of course, who he laid down in front of like a
subject and practically swore to do their bidding) and now will only
give them the time of day when he thinks he can use them politically and
then cast them aside after he gets what he wants. The fact is all
Williams is interested is delivering to MLB this bad deal they want, and
he will do or say or promise anything in the next few days to get it
done, but only if the poison pill signing the city’s coffers unimpeded
over to MLB — which he’ll pass off as a mere formality just to keep
MLB’s attention while everyone knows better (or should) — is
ultimately passed and then implemented without those pesky council
members able to do anything about it.
###############
I think I’m missing something. [December 16th’s] Post
shows that Jack Evans was one of the seven members voting with Mrs.
Cropp (six were against) even though he has supported baseball and is
the Mayor’ point person on the Council. Had he voted the other way her
proposal would have been defeated. What am I missing here? Can you
explain this?
[Mrs. Cropp’s most important amendment, requiring some private
financing for the stadium, passed by 10-3; and Mrs. Cropp voted with the
six solid supporters of the ballpark deal to pass the final legislation.
The supporters of the deal voted with Mrs. Cropp on all her amendments
because by then they had done the head count on the vote; they knew that
they had only six votes and that the six votes against the deal were
also firm. That made Mrs. Cropp the all-important swing vote, and she
made it clear that she would vote for the final bill only if her
amendments were included. If the deal’s supporters voted down her
amendments, they couldn’t get the deal at all. — Gary Imhoff]
###############
The Stadium Deal
Mary C. Williams, Southwest Waterfront/Near Southeast , Mslaw1121@aol.com
While Chairman Cropp did a commendable job at the eleventh hour to
save District residents from this ridiculously inequitable MLB deal, and
invariably she will take a lot of heat for it, it must be noted that she
could not have made that decision nor would she have had the opportunity
to act on it without the extraordinary legislative and debating skills
of Councilmember Fenty and Catania. As an overwhelmed and outgunned
Councilmember Evans later pointed out, his two opponents on this issue,
and the real people’s champions for good government, teamed up over
the past few months to focus on and highlight the unsavory substantive
contractual provisions that made this deal, by all accounts, unpalatable
at best, and unconscionable at its worse. Without their commitment,
courage, tenacity, and talents, I am afraid that this deal would have
soon become just another financial boondoggle that the administration
pushed through on the people. Fenty and Catania are the real heroes in
this fight. Councilmembers Graham, Schwartz, and Mendelson are also to
be commended for chiming in at appropriate times.
Needless to say, I am very disappointed that my own councilmember,
Sharon Ambrose, who ignored her constituents and proposed no amendments
that would protect Ward 6 residents from the well-documented adverse
impacts of the stadium, sat quietly throughout the December 14 debate
until the council proposed the RFK site as the backup. When Ambrose did
speak out, it was to contend that RFK could not be developed because of
federal constraints and, more importantly, neighbors didn’t want
baseball there. Really? So what about the thousands of residents in
southeast and adjacent southwest neighborhoods near the South Capitol
site who also don’t want baseball in their neighborhood? Don’t you
represent those residents, too? Or do you really put the interest of
developers and big businesses first? Southwest residents elected a
councilmember to speak on their behalf. If Ambrose wants to continue to
represent big corporations and developers, I suggest that she resign her
public service position and seek employment as a lobbyist. It pays
better and she may be better suited.
###############
As much as I think the mayor did a poor job at negotiating the
baseball deal, and as much as I think it is disgraceful how much time
and energy has been spent on building an essentially unnecessary stadium
at such an exorbitant cost, the events of the past week leave me with
sadness. The big picture is that with the stadium we would have a huge
increase in suburbanites visiting our city, which otherwise won’t
happen. The positive effects of this may be huge. Without the stadium,
suburbanites and others will write us off as dysfunctional and pathetic,
and the negative effects of this would also possibly be significant. I
realize that the logic that leads me to this conclusion is rather
twisted, but it is based in reality.
###############
Referendum on Baseball Deal?
Lars Hydle, larshydle@aol.com
It appears to me that according to the “Guide to the Initiative and
Referendum Process” published by the DC Board of Elections and Ethics
[http://www.dcwatch.com/election/initiati.htm],
the baseball deal would not be considered a proper subject for a
referendum. The Guide says: “Under the law, an Initiative or
Referendum may not appropriate funds, violate the Home Rule Charter,
negate a Budget Act, or violate the Human Rights Act. When the Board
makes its subject matter determination, it may consider only whether the
Measure meets these requirements.”
I would think that the District could conduct an advisory referendum
on the deal to find out what the public thinks, but it does appear that
a majority of DC voters are opposed to that deal, and that Chairman
Cropp and other Council opponents of the deal are responding to public
opinion. If Chairman Cropp’s goal was to bring baseball to DC under
more favorable terms, not to scuttle the deal, it seems that she has
erred. Major League Baseball cares only about maximizing the price at
which they sell the team, a price which would be greatly reduced by
uncertainty over financing the stadium. If the deal is unfair to the
District, it is because MLB is a monopoly that was offering one team to
up to six cities. The Supreme Court’s 1920 decision that baseball was
a sport, not a business, thus not subject to antitrust law -- an idiotic
decision that closely followed the Red Sox’ sale of Babe Ruth’s
contract to the New York Yankees and the “Black Sox” throwing of the
1919 World Series — ensured that MLB will always have the upper hand
in any negotiation with cities seeking to get or to keep a team.
Had we approved the deal, then worked with the new team owners to
obtain private financing and/or to reduce costs by building a new
stadium in the RFK location rather than at South Capitol Street, we may
have been more successful, because the new owners, unlike MLB, would
have an incentive to work with the District and to make the local fans
happy.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS AND CLASSES
Guy Mason Classes
Toni Ritzenberg, taritzdc@aol.com
Registration for winter 2005 classes at the Guy Mason Recreation
Center (3600 Calvert Street, NW) began on December 1 and will continue
through January 9, 2005 when classes begin. This is a District program
that “works.” If you have gone out recently, you will have noticed
that the cold weather has arrived and this means that it is time to come
up with alternatives to locking yourself, friends and family in the
house watching television or playing with a computer. There are classes
in Dancersize, Pilates, QiGong, Yoga and Ballroom Dancing. You can learn
Spanish and/or French.
You can be creative with art, pottery, china painting or copper
enameling. Adults and the very young (birth to four years) can
participate in Music Together, and those fifty and over can join in
Strength and Tone for Older Adults. And, as always there is bridge. The
Center is open Monday-Friday 9 a.m.-10 [/,/ and Saturday 9 a.m.-3 p.m.
Visit the Center, call Robert Haldeman/Caryl King at 282-2180, or check
the web site: http://www.guymasonstudioarts.com.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — FOR SALE
Three used motorcycle helmets, two with visors. Somewhat worn. $10
each, 3 for $25. 686-6712.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — PETS
Two Gorgeous Kittens — Ready for Brighten
Your New Year!
Pat Yates, Mt. Pleasant, PatEdCats@aol.com
Is your resolution for 2005 to share your home with loving cats? Then
please think about these two: Darla, six months, and Todd, five months,
survived the mean streets of Washington and are ready for a permanent,
loving home. Both were in the DC Animal Shelter for a couple of weeks,
and are now in my foster home, happily romping and playing. Darla is
loving and quiet (loves to be petted), and Todd is rambunctious and busy
(loves to play). They would make a great pair, or could possibly go
singly to homes with other cats or kittens. Both have been
"fixed" and tested, and have their shots up to date.
Call me on 265-2855 (or E-mail) if you would like to meet Darla and
Todd. See their pictures (and the pictures of other wonderful cats
available for adoption) on http://www.washhumane.org
— link to the foster page. And happy holidays.
###############
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every
Wednesday and Sunday. To subscribe, to change E-mail addresses, or to
switch between HTML and plain text versions of themail, use the
subscription form at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail/subscribe.htm.
To unsubscribe, send an E-mail message to themail@dcwatch.com
with “unsubscribe” in the subject line. Archives of past messages
are available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should also be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com,
and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of
Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to
be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief
paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can
be put into each mailing.