Shane
Dear Pardners:
Watching the eight-hour city council session yesterday on public
financing for the baseball stadium was like watching Shane again. The
casting of several roles was almost perfect. Jack Evans was obviously
Jack Palance, all sneering condescension and dirty tricks as the
gunslinger who is contemptuous of the homesteaders and town folk as he
fights against them on behalf of the nefarious plans of the wealthy
ranch barons of Major League Baseball. Vincent Orange and Harold Brazil
fit well their roles as the minor supporting villains; bumbling and
inept and almost comical, but dangerous nonetheless. David Catania and
Adrian Fenty were Alan Ladd and Van Heflin, though I’m not yet sure
which was which; rivals in many ways, but teamed up to defend the less
powerful homesteaders against the theft of their property by the greedy
and powerful. Classic Americana.
I’m still unsure whether Council Chairman Linda Cropp is playing
Jean Arthur as the heroine of the story or not, but time will tell. The
untold story of the six for (Evans, Ambrose, Orange, Brazil, Chavous,
Allen) to four against (Catania, Fenty, Schwartz, Graham) to three
abstaining (Cropp, Patterson, Mendelson) council vote is that it was
Cropp who gave MLB its victory, and who saved the day for Mayor
Williams, even after the disgraceful way in which the mayor and his
supporters had treated her in the past month. All three abstainers,
Patterson and Mendelson and even Cropp, were ready to vote against the
financing bill; it was through Cropp’s persuasion that they agreed to
abstain and allow the bill to pass on first reading. Cropp allowed the
bill to pass because the proponents of public financing for the stadium
agreed to her three amendments. Cropp’s first amendment holds out the
hope of locating private financing to build the stadium; Cropp may
actually believe that this will work, but since she fought against any
effort to make it enforceable, all it really requires the administration
to do is to go through a charade of pretending to consider private
financing proposals before rejecting them all. Cropp’s second
amendment supposedly sets a “trigger figure” at which the government
will have to consider sites for the ballpark other than the M Street
site, but what it effectively does is raise the council-approved
estimate of the cost of the ballpark to $631 million. (By the way, in
the debate over this provision, Evans revealed what the administration’s
supporters will do to hide the actual cost of the ballpark. They will
admit all the direct construction cost of the stadium, but refuse to
consider any other costs of preparing the land, environmental
remediation, the attendant parking, or the street and Metro
improvements. They will pretend that the city would have done all that
work whether or not the ballpark would have been built, and claim that
the costs can’t be attributed to the stadium.) Her third amendment cut
thirty million dollars that would have come from the general fund to
“jump start” the so-called “constituent services fund,” but,
contrary to press reports, did not cut the constituent services fund
itself or the payoffs to Councilmembers Ambrose, Chavous, and Allen that
secured their votes.
If, by some miracle, Cropp succeeds in her long-shot gamble, she will
secure private financing to build the stadium, against the certain
efforts of the administration to sabotage it. If she does, she will
emerge as the heroine of the tale, having gotten a baseball stadium for
DC without sticking the public with the cost. If she fails, she will
just end up as just another ally of the MLB ranchers, the one ultimately
responsible for fleecing the poor homesteaders of DC. In the meantime,
Major League Baseball will soon begin its publicity campaign to woo the
residents of DC. It will offer some small-change giveaways to Little
League teams, and then it will spend twice what it actually gives away
to advertise its generosity. As the fattest hog feeding at the public
trough, the biggest recipient of public charity in DC, MLB can afford to
let a few crumbs fall from its greedy maw.
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
###############
Beijing is not in Barney Circle. First things first — I know Mrs.
Ambrose is ill. I wish her well. I wanted to get that out of the way
because during every discussion on Mrs. Ambrose’s performance, we end
up focusing on her health. We must get beyond the health issue. My
problems with Mrs. Ambrose are not focused on her person. My problems
with Mrs. Ambrose are focused on her performance because we have the
relationship of boss/employee. I am her boss (as a citizen of Ward 6),
and she is my employee (as my Ward 6 representative). As her boss, I
want to fire her. Not only doesn’t she show up for work most of the
time, when she does show up, she is ineffective. My employer evaluation
includes the following: 1) not present at DC City Council Baseball
Stadium hearing, 2) not holding her own baseball hearings in the
community, 3) not attending the major Southwest community meeting on the
baseball issue, 4) not talking to the community in advance of making her
back door land giveaway deal on St. Coletta, 5) not hearing the
community on our desire to have a public/private development partnership
at Reservation 13, but insisting on trying to get the federal government
to give DC the land for free, which is impossible under current federal
law, 6) not present at a single Middle Anacostia Community (MAC) Traffic
Study meeting where the DC DOT is talking about making major changes to
local and metropolitan exchanges, 7) not present at community/police
discussions regarding the wheelchair bandits (paralyzed citizens selling
drugs from wheelchairs) who are running amok, 8) not present at
community/police/DC Department of Health discussions regarding the
Department of Health’s centralization of its methadone facilities at
Reservation 13, but 9) present to visit China with the mayor and her
city council colleagues.
There have been times when her performance was outstanding. However,
as her boss, I am entitled to a work product that benefits the company
over the long term. We need current victories, not past glories. For
those in other Wards, you probably want to know what all the fuss is
about. Mrs. Ambrose only has two more years left in office. Give her the
two years and call it a day. As her boss, I can confirm that due to the
absence of this crucial employee, and even when present, due to the poor
work product of this employee, this company is failing. Therefore, we
don’t have another two years to give. Deals have been done at
Southeast Federal Center, deals are being finalized for the baseball
stadium, deals are being finalized for the new Waterfront Commission.
Where is Mrs. Ambrose during these negotiations; when will Mrs. Ambrose
come to her constituents to get our feedback; what are Mrs. Ambrose’s
thoughts on any and all of these developments?
As her boss, I am having a hard time understanding how my employee,
who can’t show up for Council/community meetings, can make time to go
all the way to China (the Country, not Chinatown). It takes 15+ hours to
get to China. It would take no more than twenty minutes to get to an
Advisory Neighborhood Commission (ANC) meeting. The baseball meeting
held near the Waterfront would have maybe taken half an hour during rush
hour. As her boss, I hired her under the impression that she was an
expert on Ward 6. Therefore, I expect my employee to know where
important meetings are being held and to be there. I do not accept as an
excuse that “I didn’t know about the meeting.” Mrs. Ambrose is an
expert in Ward 6 affairs; she knows where every community meeting is
being held and when it’s being held. And if she doesn’t, then I need
to hire someone who does. Finally, as her boss, I feel that if she can
make it to Beijing, she can make it to Barney Circle.
###############
I am a trifle puzzled at the mixed messages that reach me on the
topic of the proposed baseball stadium and its associated costs. The
real cost of the whole thing seems to be still a matter of argument, and
this matters because the golden ball/lead balloon will be with us for a
long time — at least one, and possibly two generations of taxpayers
and beneficiaries. I don’t naturally know whether the forecasters of
doom or the predictors of a heaven-on-earth are correct, although the
doomsters have an impressive array of evidence — from economists and
business analysts, from what is said to be a two-thirds majority of
voters, from the government offices which find the mere cost of the land
to be acquired (by eminent domain’s use) to be largely underestimated
by those who argue for use of public monies to get the land on the
Anacostia under the Mayor’s proposal, and from other sources of
opinion and judgment.
I merely find unimpressive the allegation that a private purpose
should be even partially financed by public funds and properties. I
suppose that it is even-money that the US Supreme Court will rule on
this very question in the spring of ‘05, and would mildly suggest that
this might constitute a reason for the council to hold off any action on
the stadium until the matter has gone through this particular wringer.
As I understand the legal issue (begun in Connecticut) is whether a
private property may be taken by government primarily to make a transfer
of the land in question to another private party simply because the
(property) tax on the land would increase: at first glance this appears
to contradict the historical purposes of the power of eminent domain,
which permit its exercise only for public and governmental purposes that
are unavoidably and directly involved.
Naturally, this last has nothing to do with the absolute merits of
whatever case might be made for baseball in DC, except as yet another
mark of prudence, and looking before one leaps. However, with land cost
a large part of the decision, anything that has prospects of raising
costs has to be a part of anything proposed. It should, in other words,
be recognized by the councilmembers that these issues are presently
highly divisive: they have the same impact as Solomon’s dilemma over
babies, a zero-sum game, in which you win a whole thing, but lose the
confidence of the opposition. I suppose that what is going on in the
Ukraine has the same flavor.
###############
“When something starts off bad, it just gets worse,” so goes an
old adage. This baseball idea and “runaway” acquisition has turned
into a fiasco. With our District so financially strapped, why are the
city council and mayor rushing this project? This baseball project idea
is getting worse! As a native-born third generation Washingtonian, I
recently bought my first home in the District -- proof of my loyalty and
belief in DC. Moreover, I have a deep belief in our city, and I have
stayed with and in Washington, DC, throughout its ups and downs and,
now, ups. This rush to judgment saddens me. There has been little to no
input and acknowledgment from the citizenry. Yes, there were a few hours
of citizen testimony, where the “pros” appear to have been given
earlier slots — was this time strategy an attempt to wear down the
ordinary opposing voices? We citizens are yelling, crying, screaming,
begging, writing, and E-mailing for better schools, good working
condition educational equipment, better roads, better qualified/paid
policemen, better trained government workers, after hours recreational
and education centers, and more inclusive health care.
Yet, what is the response to our voices — purchasing a baseball
team and building a new stadium? This fiasco is being jammed down our
throats by a mayor whom I believe still is not a homeowner and a recent
transplant (deputy mayor) whom I believe has less than two-three years
vested in our city. This bad idea is being jammed down our throats by a
city council with two election-losing members from the wards that are
most affected. This fiasco is being jammed down our throats by a city
council and mayor that ignores the fact that there is already a
"preexisting" structure and infrastructure (existing public
transportation accessibility). Use business taxes to improve our
educational, health, employment, and housing needs.
I am single, a college professor, a Ward 7 resident, and a graduate
from our public schools (Eastern High School), who is willing to pay
higher taxes for quality public education. Our schools are in worse
condition than many underdeveloped countries’ schools. I attend a
public clinic and sit on its board because I believe in public health
and want inclusive health care for DC residents. I believed so very
strongly, along with other Ward 7 residents, that I voted to remove
Councilperson Chavous who became blinded to his constituents’ needs
and concerns. And, now as a defeated Ward 7 representative, he is
allowed to cast his vote on this issue that will have years of lasting
financial effect. What kind of sense and logic does this make? There is
no regard for what this “democracy” calls citizens; it appears this
government is not for its people. This government via the city council
enters into deals and projects and then tells the citizens what will be.
There was no in-depth long-term planning, only short-term desires. It is
like the “runaway jury.” The last election and voting has shown our
ward and at-large representatives that we are tired of being ignored,
mistreated, neglected, and abused. There are future elections, where
this democracy’s citizens will also speak again, especially to voting
councilpersons ignoring our voices, concerns, and needs. Many thanks to
the city councilpersons who understand that this is something that
started off bad and has gotten worse. Many thanks to the city
councilpersons that are and have been listening to your
citizens-constituents and thanks for representing us and not big
business.
###############
A Part of How I Feel
Wenzell Taylor, Ward 8, Wink12@juno.com
Deep down inside of all of us, we all know and recognize as much as
we will not admit it in public that this country’s and city’s
governments are corrupt. They border on racketeering. How much plainer
can the public be that their wish is not to have MLB bought to this city
in exchange for their public money. Why is it so imperative Washington,
DC, have a baseball team? Is there anyone out there who is going to die
if baseball does not come to DC? Several people have died already, and
it’s a certainty that a whole lot more people are going to die because
this city does not have a public hospital. Are apartments included in
this stadium deal for the homeless? How many classrooms will be made
available for students? Do any of the scumbag owners of MLB pay taxes
here? Do they pay taxes at all? You would be surprised. DC MPD already
leaves a lot to be desired. They sure don’t need a stadium to be built
in southeast.
When elected to public office, one is expected to perform in the best
interest of their constituents. Right now in DC we have a handful of
lame duck elected representatives bargaining in the open with public
revenue for their personal insignificant legacies. They are accomplices
in what amounts to unarmed robbery. This arrogant Mayor we have knows
the majority of the citizens don’t want him here and that he will not
be reelected. So is he trying to arrange as much kickback money as
possible for himself before the end? Or is he trying to position himself
for another office somewhere else? Damn you and your crony puppets.
Unfortunate Wards Seven and Eight have made an attempt to change
direction; Ward Six is expected to, and probably will, follow. Which
leaves you Jack Evans in the cross hairs. There is still enough time to
recall you. And good riddance. You act as though you are married to MLB.
Mr. Graham, the citizens know this is a bad deal, and you know this is a
bad deal; why were you bargaining? The damage done by this stadium deal
if it goes through far exceeds the cost of the funding needed in The
Libraries Fund.
There really isn’t that much interest in baseball in DC anyway. I’ll
bet that most of the ten thousand tickets sold to date were sold in
blocks to companies and organizations that will give them away as
rewards and incentives and to charities. Sure, give me a free ticket and
I’ll go. A lot of individual ticket buyers we don’t have. This
baseball stadium deal must be stopped. It is time to put an end to the
illegal, you kiss my ass and I’ll kiss yours bargaining and practices
going on by flunky city officials to get legislation passed and to elect
people who will conduct our city business according to our needs. These
officials have forgotten whom they work for. And now think they are our
dictators. They are probably thinking, “If we pass this stadium deal,
they’ll get over it and go along.”
###############
A few points in the previous E-mail prompts me to make these,
somewhat politically incorrect remarks. I preface by saying that now
that I’ve moved to the country and the stadium in Baltimore is closer
than either DC site, I really have become agnostic over this issue —
despite being a lifetime baseball fan. There are some items for which a
true economic analysis is unsuited and this is one. A cost benefit
analysis of baseball will never be decisive since the bulk of the
benefits are not monetary and will have to be assigned a value and
whoever assigns said value will predetermine the analysis. Similarly you
just cannot use the argument that the money would be better spent
elsewhere because it just wouldn’t be there.
This is similar to arguments that should have been made, but weren’t
really, when the construction of Metro was under question. I can hear
all those groans - comparing baseball with our wonderful Metro system --
but wait. We are now starting to hear complaints that the system is
falling apart, is potentially unsafe, needs to be rebuilt, doesn’t
meet all our needs, etc. OK, it’s expensive, but we couldn’t do
without it — could we?
Well back in the early 70’s the system was approved based on a two
billion dollar cost estimate which everyone knew was way low . . . most
thought by a factor of two or three, but it actually ended up off by a
factor of five. So should it have been built? What would our roads be
like without it? Don’t jump to answer. Metro did not effect the
regional modal split significantly. It did not attract enough riders to
change our work trip. Yeah, it did bring more people to public
transportation, but Metro in and of itself generated much more traffic
than the number of cars it removed from the roads. One can argue, not
definitively though, that our roads may well have been better off
without Metro. What I can argue definitively is that funding Metro at
the time we did was, in the long run, very bad for the region. Look. In
the latter stages of the twentieth century we built a transportation
system for our nation’s capitol in the twenty-first century using
technology from the nineteenth century! Yeah, one hundred years after NY
started doing its thing we were copying them! How anyone can think this
would be best in the long run amazes me.
So what were the alternates? There were other technologically
advanced options that were never seriously looked at. Did you know that
prior to the Civil War NYC had a pneumatically powered train running?
Wasn’t a reasonable option then, but did anyone consider it? What
about various other people mover systems that are feasible but untried?
They never even looked at the options. Well, you say, this was the only
tried and true technology and heck, the feds were paying. Yes, but by
building Metro at the time we essentially precluded our getting any
significant federal funding for public transportation for a good fifty
to seventy-five years. Metro — love it or leave it — it’s all we
have and all we can hope for in our lifetimes. On that basis it was a
bad, bad move.
And the cost — to put it in perspective you could have given every
person — infants, too — a brand new car for less money than the
system cost to build. While I wouldn’t have wanted that, you’d think
for that money other alternates would be considered. What about
dedicated busways with electric buses? Maybe not a permanent solution,
but one that could have served as a first phase while we decided on a
truly twenty-first century system. Metro doesn’t even address
transportation beyond the commute to downtown DC, and that is why our
roads are such a mess. We created an inflexible dinosaur that cannot
hope to help us deal with our roadway traffic today. And we created a
system that we knew would have to start eating big money to maintain. We
knew that but didn’t plan on it because we were in such a rush to fund
it and build it.
One more thing — not sure if any of you remember the five-station
system that was opened in 1976, since the city wanted to have something
for the bicentennial. That cost us some thirty million. Chicken feed you
say, the feds funded stage 1 fully. Well, if you wait till you have a
significant system — maybe eighteen more months — you could have had
a real stage 1, that would have some meaning transportation wise and
would have cost about 100 million and which the feds would have funded
fully as phase 1. The local areas would have benefited significantly if
we had waited instead of wanting a showpiece for ‘76.
But all that said — if you had a simple popularity poll today,
Metro would win easily. Why, most of you are probably anxious to start
throwing rocks at me. So maybe, bad technology that it was and terrible
economics that it represented, just maybe it was the right thing to do
at the time. You might look back at baseball in the same way thirty
years from now.
###############
DC Cabs and Traffic Stuff
Joan Eisenstodt, jeisen@aol.com
I read the article in the Washingtonian about DC cabs and, like so
many, I concur. The sad part is the really good drivers/cabs are really
good and those that aren’t . . . aren’t. Today, I was grateful that
a cab picked me up on the Hill . . . with Congress out, cabs are not
always plentiful on bad weather mornings. He did OK, didn’t always
signal but at least had a clean cab and was pleasant.
On the way back to the Hill, was in an OK cab, but the driver (an
older American one) used his cell phone without a headset. At the corner
of Independence and 3rd Streets, SW, by the Department of Health and
Human Services, around 11:10 a.m., another cab crossed three lanes of
traffic (in front of cars) to pick someone up and then did a U turn to
go toward downtown — no signal, and crossed again in front of cars. It
was Your Way cab #100, in case anyone from the Commission is reading
this.
On other traffic and safety notes: Phil Mendelson’s office (thank
you again!) worked to ensure that we got stop signs and a crosswalk
painted at the corner of 5th and Seward Streets, SE, and crosswalks at
5th and Independence Avenue, SE. At the former, people seem to believe
that STOP doesn’t mean stop even when there are people in the
crosswalk. I could make a bundle of money collecting! At the corner of
Independence, there are more accidents than I can tell you -- and more
almost-accidents. Traffic speeds down Independence and those coming out
of 5th Street can’t see around the cars. I am begging the District for
a stop light — even though there is one at 4th, we need it. Will it
take, on either corner, someone being killed ( a strong possibility)
before we get help?
###############
Mount Pleasant Heritage Trail
Neil Richardson, ananda001@aol.com
The Mount Pleasant Heritage Trail working group is proud to announce
that our neighborhood has successfully completed its application and has
been approved for a historic trail by Cultural Tourism DC. We join many
of the storied neighborhoods in the District including U Street,
Downtown, Capital Hill, and Dupont Circle in telling our community story
with approximately sixteen signs placed throughout the neighborhood.
Over the next year we will finalize our historic trail that creates a
narrative for who and what Mount Pleasant is. Our hope is that our
research tells the story of how our community evolved and how our
diversity is our strength.
Did you know that the Ingleside estate that is now Stoddard Baptist
nursing home was built for one of George Washington’s friends and
later Hiram Walbridge purchased the property? In the Civil War, Mount
Pleasant "founder" S.P. Brown’s home at the Triangle Park
and Park Road was used as a hospital and the Mount Pleasant hospital was
on the site of Tivoli theater in Columbia Heights. How about the
Rosemount Center in its original incarnation as a House of Mercy as a
“refuge and reformatory for outcast and fallen women”? The first
Latino business in the neighborhood was DiLone’s and opened on Mount
Pleasant Street in 1962, originally serving many of the nearby
embassies. In 1963 Canaan Baptist moved to 16th Street and Newton
becoming the first African American congregation on 16th Street. Did you
know that nonwhite people could not move into the neighborhood until
1951? What happened to the Burger King? What do you know about our
neighborhood?
Our research is not complete. In the next year we will finalize our
research, find old photos and select locations for our signs. Do you
have a story or artifact about Mount Pleasant? What about old photos or
former neighbors who know part of our story? A special thanks goes out
to Historic Mount Pleasant, Jack McKay, Dominic Sales and Will Grant,
the Mount Pleasant Neighborhood Alliance, and the hundreds of people who
have expressed interest and shared their ideas and memories with us. We
encourage you to visit the Heritage Trail in other neighborhoods; we are
a community connected to many others near and far. To learn more about
our project contact Neil Richardson at ananda001@aol.com
or at 518-9574. Cultural Tourism DC can be contacted at http://www.CulturalTourismDC.org.
###############
Children and Youth in the City Budget
Susie Cambria, scambria@dckids.org
DC ACT’s eleventh annual edition of What’s in It for Kids? will
be available this week. The main findings of the report are consistent:
Few gains have been achieved for children, youth, and their families in
the FY 2005 budget. Level and reduced funding means that many young
people and their families will once again go without basic services such
as mental health and shelter. For other families, services that support
work — such as subsidized child care and job training — are scarce.
To get a copy of this valuable analysis, contact DC Action for Children
at 234-9404 or dcaction@dckids.org.
The book is free, but as a nonprofit, we always encourage donations!
###############
Street Sweeping Hiatus
Mary Myers, mary.myers@dc.gov
As it does every year, DPW will temporarily suspend daytime street
cleaning from January 3 to March 18, 2005. During this time, "No
Parking/Street Cleaning" restrictions will also be lifted in these
residential areas. Residents and visitors who park along posted,
alternate-side, daytime street sweeping routes will not be required to
move their cars on street-sweeping days during the sweeper hiatus.
Residential street cleaning resumes Monday, March 21, 2005.
However, overnight contract sweeping scheduled for major arterials
(such as Pennsylvania, Georgia, Constitution, Independence Avenues and
others) will take place as usual all winter, with the attendant parking
ban during sweeping hours. Contract sweeping is part of the street
maintenance program administered by the Department of Transportation (DDOT)
to keep DC’s largest and most heavily used thoroughfares clean.
Motorists are asked not to park in these areas during the posted
overnight hours. Enforcement is handled by MPD along these major routes.
###############
Cell Phone Directory Legend
Ron Leve, TheRon@comcast.net
Erich Martel passes on [themail, November 28] what is a semi-urban
legend about a soon-to-be-published cell phone directory. From the
website, http://www.snopes.com, here
is a statement about this topic: http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/cell411.asp.
###############
I’m glad Ed Barron, following his trip to Normandy, altered
drastically his negative impressions of the French [themail, November
28]. There are many more impressions Americans have of others that would
also be drastically altered for the better if only they would read or
travel more, rather than rely on their pandering, ratings-centered media
outlets.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS
Democra-Palooza!, December 4
Sarah Pokempner, azepo@aol.com
Don’t miss this DC voting rights fun fest for kids (ages 4 and up)
and their families. Stickers, crafts, door prizes, learning, and making
a difference. All in one fun family outing! Come to the West End
Library, 24th and L Streets, NW (Foggy Bottom Metro) this Saturday,
December 4, 10 a.m.-noon. There will be presentations by the Sewall
Belmont House Museum and DC Vote about the women’s struggle for voting
rights and the DC struggle for democracy. The kids will enjoy hands-on
activities -- materials will be provided to create posters, songs and
chants for our spring voting rights rally and to write postcards to
friends and family in other places to tell them about our problem and
how they can help. RSVP to Kim Bassett, DC Vote, 462-6000, ext. 14, or jane@youngsuffragists.org.
Please indicate number of adults and children attending.
###############
From Victim to Creator: Transforming Trauma
Through Myth and Writing, December 4
Juliet Bruce, Juliet@arts-for-life.org
Dr. Juliet Bruce will be giving a free experiential talk for trauma
survivors, the professionals who serve them, and artists in all media.
December 4, 3:00 to 4:30 p.m., at the Cleveland Park Library, 3310
Connecticut Avenue, NW, at Macomb Street. Learn how to use the classic
"hero’s journey" myth as a paradigm for healing from any
kind of trauma. Experience first hand the transformative power of
creative community. No previous arts experience is required. We all have
imagination and we can use it to recreate our lives. This is the second
in a series of presentations on art as medicine sponsored by the
Institute for Transformation Through the Arts. To learn more, call
667-3766 or see http://www.arts-for-life.org.
###############
Sierra Club Holiday Party, December 7
Jason Broehm, jason_broehm@hotmail.com
The Sierra Club Washington, DC, Chapter invites you to attend its
annual holiday party on Tuesday, December 7 from 6:30 to 9:00 p.m. at
Pizzeria Uno at Union Station (Metrorail Red Line). Socialize with other
environmentalists over pizza and beer. Suggested donation of $10 to help
cover the cost of food. Cash bar. Please RSVP by Monday, December 6, to
Chris Craig, ccraig@zzapp.org, or
Jason Broehm, jason_broehm@hotmail.com.
###############
Light Up the Night, December 11
Maude Bauchard, mbauchard@usaction.org
Come celebrate Hanukah with a good old-fashioned house party:
dancing, frosty beverages, and klezmer music! What to bring: friends,
coworkers, neighbors, or any family visiting you for the holidays.
Saturday, December 11, 9:00 p.m., at Mackenzie’s house, 1302 Fairmont
Street, NW, 213-6476. Hosted By: Carrie, Erin, Joelle, Lenny, Mackenzie
and Maude. View the Evite: http://www.evite.com/pages/invite/viewInvite.jsp?inviteId=FOREECREGIKBOYYZAPVL&li=iq&src=email.
This is a fundraiser for an awesome local social justice
organization, Jews United for Justice. A $5 donation will be requested
at the door with all proceeds going to JUFJ. Check out http://www.jufj.org
for more on JUFJ and why we care about the work they do enough to ask
for a little gelt this Hanukah. Directions: The house is right at the
corner of 13th and Fairmont. By Metro, take the Green line to Columbia
Heights. Walk four blocks south on 14th street (downhill), then take a
left on Fairmont Street. 1302 will be on the right side of the street
near corner with 13th. By bus: We’re on several bus lines, including
the H4 (from Tenleytown/Cleveland Park), the H1 and 42 (from Dupont
Circle), and the 54 (runs up and down 14th Street). Check out http://www.wmata.com
and try the nifty Ride Guide, if you’re not sure the best route for
you. For help, E-mail Mackenzie at mbaris@dclabor.org.
###############
Accordion Concert, December 12
Mara Cherkasky, mcherkasky@thompson.com
The Washington Metropolitan Accordion Society will present a holiday
concert Sunday, December 12, at 4 p.m., at Sleepy Hollow United
Methodist Church, 3435 Sleepy Hollow Road, Falls Church, VA 22044.
Donation $7; kids free. A potluck supper will follow the concert. For
more information, visit http://www.washingtonaccordions.org
or call 703-671-5395.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — FOR SALE
Fresh Canadian Holiday Balsam Wreaths
Lavinia Wohlfarth, BrooklandCDC@aol.com
The Brookland Community Development Corporation offers to you
beautiful fresh Canadian holiday balsam wreaths (24") for the
holiday season at $20. This is a fundraiser for various community
programs including our annual Celebration of Lights Trolley Tour of
Brookland, which will be held from 6-9 p.m. on Sunday December 12. (Don’t
miss it — our neighborhood is known for elaborate holiday lighting
every December.)
Our elves will gladly deliver and install your wreath. Call 526-4848
to order. And please tell your friends! Brookland CDC promotes the arts
and works to protect and capitalize on the cultural resources of the
Greater Brookland neighborhood, and is the parent of Historic Brookland
Main Street.
###############
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every
Wednesday and Sunday. To subscribe, to change E-mail addresses, or to
switch between HTML and plain text versions of themail, use the
subscription form at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail/subscribe.htm.
To unsubscribe, send an E-mail message to themail@dcwatch.com
with “unsubscribe” in the subject line. Archives of past messages
are available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should also be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com,
and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of
Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to
be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief
paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can
be put into each mailing.