themail.gif (3487 bytes)

November 7, 2004

Who’s on First

Dear Players:

Here’s what to watch for in this Tuesday’s legislative session of the city council. As everyone knows by now, Friday at 12:30 Council Chairman Linda Cropp held a press conference at which she announced her decision to offer a substitute ballpark financing bill under which the city would publicly finance and build a new stadium for Major League Baseball on the grounds of Robert F. Kennedy Stadium, rather than at Mayor Williams’s preferred site at the base of South Capitol Street (http://www.dcwatch.com/govern/sports041105.htm). Then Mayor Williams held a press conference at which he claimed the sky would fall if Linda’s bill were passed (http://www.dcwatch.com/mayor/041105.htm). Both Cropp’s and Williams’s bills are hugely expensive giveaways of public funds for corporate welfare, but Cropp’s plan would be between one and three hundred million dollars less expensive.

The bill submitted by the mayor (http://www.dcwatch.com/council15/15-1028b.htm), which reflects the agreement the mayor and the Sports and Entertainment Commission reached with MLB, designates the site of the ballpark as “the site bounded by N Street, SE, Potomac Avenue, SE, South Capitol Street, SE, and 1st Street, SE, or any designated alternative site in the District of Columbia if this primary site shall be unavailable. . . .” The site criteria specified by the Office of Planning (http://www.dcwatch.com/govern/sports041025ppt) — availability of land at the site, access to transportation, economically viable for MLB, ability for the ballpark to have a broader neighborhood impact, and fit with District planning and economic development goals — fit the RFK site as well as, or better than, the South Capitol Street site. But the mayor and his allies have now gone ballistic, insisting that the vastly more expensive South Capitol site is the only possible place a ballpark could be built. The mayor’s threat, not a very credible one, is that if the council doesn’t pass the mayor’s bill without alteration MLB will leave DC, will find some other city that’s as big a sucker as DC that will completely finance a half-billion-dollar baseball stadium and give it to baseball’s multimillionaire owners, and will get that deal done in time for the opening of the next baseball season in April 2005.

On Tuesday at 10:00 a.m., after one of their regular illegal closed-door breakfast meetings, the council’s Committee of the Whole will meet in the council chamber. Jack Evans and Harold Brazil, chairs of the Finance Committee and the Committee on Economic Development, will submit the mayor’s revised bill that was passed in their committees on November 3, and will seek the Committee of the Whole’s approval to have the bill placed on the agenda for the Council’s legislative session. There will not be any debate on the merits of the bill in the Committee of the Whole. Immediately following the Committee of the Whole meeting, the council will reconvene for its legislative session. Evans and Brazil will introduce the mayor’s bill. Following their opening statements, Mrs. Cropp will move her bill as an “amendment in the form of a substitute bill.” Evans and Brazil won’t accept the Cropp bill as a “friendly amendment,” so the council will have to vote on whether to accept the Cropp substitute. If Mrs. Cropp has seven votes for her substitute, the mayor’s bill will be defeated, and all further debate will be on her bill. Whichever bill survives, it is very likely that a series of amendments will be offered by Councilmembers David Catania, Adrian Fenty, Jim Graham, Carol Schwartz, and perhaps others, and at least some those amendments will have a much better chance of being passed in the entire council than they did in the Finance and Economic Development Committees, which were dominated by advocates of the mayor’s ballpark plan. After amendments are offered and voted on, the amended bill will be voted on by the entire council. Assuming that there are seven votes for that version of the bill, the council will have a second reading and vote on the bill on December 7, and there will be frantic activity by all sides to amend the bill further in the weeks between Tuesday and December 7.

Gary Imhoff, themail@dcwatch.com
Dorothy Brizill, dorothy@dcwatch.com

###############

The Amendment Puzzle
Tom Matthes, tommatthes@earthlink.net

I’d like to share a bit of post election news about the bill, sponsored by Congressman Tom Davis, to provide DC a voting seat in the US House of Representatives. I recently met one of the House Republican leaders (I won’t quote him by name because I didn’t say I might report the conversation) and told him I oppose the Davis bill because such an action requires a constitutional amendment. His reply was that he opposed the bill on principle and was confident that the GOP House leadership would not permit it to reach the floor for a vote. With President Bush reelected, and with the GOP apparently in control of Congress for the foreseeable future, legislation on DC voting rights appears to be dead.

This provokes a question. DC voting rights advocates have refused for over two decades to ask for a constitutional amendment after the states wouldn’t ratify one that included two Senate votes. Since all of the unconstitutional means (the statehood bill; the House Committee of the Whole vote that could never affect the outcome of a bill; the lawsuits seeking statehood or votes in Congress by court order; and the attempt to get congressional votes by a straight House or Senate vote) have failed, and victory seems far off, why not try the real solution and ask for a constitutional amendment providing DC a single voting member in the US House? This would bypass all the critics, including this one, who insist an amendment is required and so would reduce the issue to a simple appeal to the democratic sentiments of Americans. If it succeeds, there’s always the option of seeking seats in the Senate or statehood later. Opting for an amendment for a House vote won’t disqualify arguments for statehood anymore than the 23rd Amendment, which awards DC the three votes in the Electoral College it would be entitled to “if it were a State.”

To be blunt, the refusal of DC voting rights advocates to seek such an amendment makes me suspect that some of them prefer to undermine our written Constitution rather than win a legitimate and permanent victory. A constitutional amendment is unlikely to be repealed, while a congressional majority vote, or even a court ruling, could be overturned. It’s time for candor: are DC voting rights advocates seeking constitutional reform or left-wing agitprop?

###############

I Got Your Per Capita
Ed Dixon, Georgetown Reservoir, jedxn@erols.com

The Bureau of Economic Statistics branch of the Department of Commerce puts DC’s per capita disposable income ahead of the 50 states with $41,143 in 2003 (http://www.bea.doc.gov/bea/regional/spi/). According to the BEA, disposable income is current personal income minus current personal taxes. Midyear population figures are used to derive the per capita rate. These are the demographic figures that current DC developers are drooling over. And with 40,000 DC kids and their parents living in poverty in this city, that leaves the per capita of the haves just a little bit higher and a little more disposable. Of course those thousands of homeless in the city don’t even pay property taxes, so that does put a burden on us home dwellers. But then if Caesar doesn’t want his due, I guess we better just be on our way and ignore the municipal passing of the plate, even though others are suffering.

###############

Where Have All the Acorns Gone?
Ed T. Barron, edtb@aol.com

In past years it was a real challenge to walk on the sidewalks of northwest D.C. with the leaves and all the acorns — a real ankle turning nightmare. This year I have seen but a handful of acorns. Perhaps the seven-year locusts ate all the budding acorns last summer. In any event, it looks like a harsh winter for the squirrel population.

###############

Metro eAlert System
Matt Forman, Matthew.Forman2@verizon.net

Wouldn’t it be great if metro had a system to send you an e-mail whenever there was a delay on the subway, so that you could make alternate plans to get to work or back home? Well, they do, although most people probably don’t know about it, due to Metro’s failure to publicize it! To sign up, go to http://www.wmata.com and click on alerts and advisories. Unfortunately, the alerts are still a little defective. The morning after the Woodley Park collision (don’t get me started), the alert said the line was clear, when obviously it wasn’t – the crashed trains were still in the station, and they were single tracking. Hardly what I’d call cleared. And just a week or so ago when the rail split on the Red Line, the alert said that the Red Line was experiencing delays between a couple stations. Please! If trains can’t make it through Judiciary Square because the track has just splintered in half, how is the delay only between the two stations? Obviously the entire line would be delayed. This is a persistent problem with the alert system, which continues to purport that delays exist only between certain stations.

Meanwhile, after learning about the Woodley crash, I decided to take the Orange/Blue Line (and then the pitiful bus system) as an alternate route to get home. I took special note of the LED alert screen at the station entrance. Any indication of the delay? Nope — just some elevator outages, as usual.

###############

Volunteer Traffic Cop in Georgetown
Amy Hubbard, ahubbarddc@yahoo.com

I had been so pleased to see that the city finally put a police officer at the intersection of M Street and Wisconsin Avenue. to direct traffic during rush hour. Other cities have done this for years. I couldn’t understand why it took DC so long to figure it out. But I just read in the District section this morning that this young man directs traffic on his own time as a volunteer!

Is this why the city started putting officers at other intersections — because they were shamed by a volunteer? (Dear readers, please enlighten me if you know the full story.) Maybe I’ll give him a gift card or something next time I see him. I’d like to give him roses but he couldn’t hold those and direct traffic at the same time. What is up with this place?

###############

Congress Moved In — There Goes the Neighborhood
Susan Ousley, westminster nine-thirty-five att ay ohh ell dott comm

Whether forced by Congress’s sneaky actions or otherwise, when a public school is closed, sold, or leased 99 years, more is lost than just classrooms. School facilities in DC were laid out with playgrounds — and sometimes with gyms and pools — for neighborhood use. They were intended to be lively centers of community life, in addition to being local children’s playgrounds.

When a school gets disappeared, there is no requirement to save or replace its play space. It’s just gone.

###############

No ANC Coverage in the WP?
Kristen Barden, Ward 4, Kristen@afj.org

I’m really disappointed with the Washington Post. There was not even a single mention of the Advisory Neighborhood Commissioner races in either yesterday’s paper nor today’s. There wasn’t even a mention in the District section today [Thursday] — which would have been a perfect place for it! So much for the WP being a "home-town" newspaper. Seems like the WP can only cover races where the candidates are paid. I’m angry. ANC Commissioners are elected, volunteers, nonpartisan, and serve a really important function providing voice and vote to DC residents who have so little voice and vote in local and federal government. So I guess I’ll have to go to BOEE’s web site to find the ANC election results … grrrrrrrr.

###############

Batter Up
Richard Rogers, rogerdewolfe@yahoo.com

Refurbish RFK. Demolish old DC General. Build a new baseball stadium on the hospital site, and build a new hospital on the old RFK site. Now, what is wrong with that?

[This message was sent to themail on November 4, before Chairman Cropp revealed that she would propose building the stadium on the RFK site. — Gary Imhoff]

###############

Baseball in DC: Feh!
Joan Eisenstodt, jeisen@aol.com

I moderate a listserv in the meetings/hospitality industry. There has been only moderate interest expressed in a baseball team for DC as an attraction for people who bring meetings to the District/area. More, there is a great fear among many of us that there will be a tax increase on hotel rooms and other meetings-related services to fund this effort. DC has high taxes for meetings; higher taxes (and still no hotel right at the new convention center) will be a disincentive to bringing meetings here. I say feh to the idea of a new stadium. If RFK were refurbished, maybe. If it means more taxes, then I fear it will not do us any good.

[This message was also sent on November 4, before Mrs. Cropp’s announcement. — Gary Imhoff]

###############

Brand New Stadium Not Necessary
Jeff Norman, jeffrey.norman@att.net

Linda Cropp’s proposal to put a new stadium near RFK is less costly than and thus an improvement over the Mayor’s proposal; but it is still way too expensive considering the city’s other needs. We should support Adrian Fenty’s reasonable compromise proposal to do a major overhaul of RFK instead, which should be much cheaper than building a brand new stadium at any location in D.C.. RFK was built in 1961 and is forty-three years old. Here are some other MLB stadiums which are much older than RFK and doing very well: Fenway Park, Boston, 1912 (92 years old); Wrigley Field, Chicago, 1914 (90 years old); and Yankee Stadium, New York, 1923 (81 years old). Why can’t we refurbish a forty-three-year-old stadium and make it just as good as those much older stadiums in Boston, Chicago, and New York?

###############

Mayor: I Will Win
Ed Delaney, profeddel@yahoo.com

Mayor: “I will win” (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A30918-2004Nov6.html). “‘Yes, I do believe I will win,’ Williams (D) said in a telephone interview.” Because a personal victory is really what this is about, right? This quote says it all about the issue, as everything the mayor has done and now said indicates that this deal is not being forwarded by him and the Baseball Brigade because of its merits or benefits to the city and its citizens, but is all about his personal pride and vindication (which would be fine if it didn‘t require half a billion dollars and rising of public dollars to achieve that). That alone shows why Cropp is on the right track and why the Brigade must be stopped Tuesday (or thereafter, because you have to know the Brigade isn‘t going to stop there), since their sweetheart deal is all about their own personal interests and no one else‘s. There is no “I” in team, but there are most definitely two “I”s in Williams.

“But Williams acknowledged that he is frustrated by the private meetings because, he said, council members make promises to support him that are broken in public. Williams had assumed for weeks that Cropp supported his baseball plan. ‘I’m tired of getting a commitment on one level and having it changed,’ he said. ‘We should televise [the meetings] or open them to the public.’” Are you kidding me? You’re the one who perfected backdoor meetings and subversion of the public process because you correctly gathered that your machinations and giveaways would never survive the least amount of outside scrutiny, but now you’re frustrated by someone else daring to have private meetings? How hypocritical can you get? “’He doesn’t have the votes,’ Cropp said of Williams. ‘For those who want baseball here, we had to figure out how to keep baseball. I went to him last week and said, “Mr. Mayor, let’s do this together.” . . . I could have let it go until Tuesday and let it fall apart. I met with him three or four times to get his attention. I’ve got his attention now.’” You sure do.

“Graham said yesterday that he will support the mayor if Williams can implement a spending cap of about $500 million on the project and ensure that additional money is given to libraries. If not, Graham said, ‘the other plan looks very attractive to me.’” Since not a single land deal has been negotiated and since some landowners have promised not to sell but to sue should the city try to take their land, the mayor cannot implement a spending cap of $500 million, which needs to be made clear to all involved.

###############

Ducking the Issue
Charlie Wellander, B07A11 [@] yahoo.com

Now that we have a couple of competing proposals for a stadium for Washington baseball, perhaps it’s time to talk about the team name again. “Mighty Ducks” is a name used for a team in a movie — http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0104868/ and for two actual ice hockey teams (Ohio and California) — http://www.cincinnatimightyducks.com/ and http://www.mightyducks.com — but it does not seem to be in use for any baseball team.

If the three current DC Councilmembers who lost their races for reelection are responsible for pushing through the Williams stadium giveaway over the Cropp alternative, I suggest that the Washington baseball team be named, in their honor, the Mighty Lame Ducks.

###############

Baseball
Sczerina Perot, Sczerina@legalclinic.org

Jack Evans’s initial position was that you cannot negotiate a good deal with a monopoly unless you are willing to walk away from the table. Remember his stance? “I won’t begin to negotiate until MLB commits to coming here?” So they came back with an offer? So what? We have looked at it, decided that this is a bad deal, and we should walk away. Look, don’t you think it says something when the Cato Institute, The Brookings Institute, and the DC Fiscal Policy Institute agree? It says that baseball stadiums are not good economic development, and you and the Council should not be fooled.

Even if we are not talking about alternate uses of the money, and only focusing on the financing of this deal, it is still a bad deal, and will not reap real economic development or more money in the general revenue for meeting other city needs. I wish Jack would walk away, and I wish people like you would encourage him to hold to his original strong negotiating position. Let us just say no to baseball. Let us use public financing for better economic development projects, like ensuring that parents can work and earn enough to support their family.

I work with low-income moms, many of whom are employed. I see DC from the perspective of the mom who works but can’t make ends meet. She probably can’t access subsidized day care because of long wait lists for slots and she probably can’t find affordable housing, and definitely not in range of a decent public school. In DC working does not pay, and the ladder out of poverty is missing the bottom rungs. Until we fix that fundamental problem through social supports, we won’t be doing the real economic development that needs to happen here.

###############

Reply from DDOT on Ordway Sidewalk Construction
Leila Afzal, Leila.Afzal@noaa.gov

Mr. Khalid of DDOT has responded to my missive [themail, November 3] regarding the missed opportunity in coordinating with WASA to replace lead lines during our road reconstruction. In short, he admits to the general premise of my note, but states that the contractor will bear the cost of repairing any sidewalk damaged by lead water line replacement. It remains to be seen what the patch job will look like. “Ms. Afzal, All the lead service work in public space is done by DDOT contractor (the same contractor who is doing the roadway work including sidewalk). The testpit will be done in the tree space, not where the sidewalks are placed. If a section of the sidewalk is damaged during this operation, the contractor will replace it at no additional cost to the District. Once the test holes are made, a visual inspection will done by WASA inspector to determine lead pipes. Thank you. Sincerely, Muhammed Khalid, Program Manager District Department of Transportation”

It seems to me the order of work could have been such not to pore a new sidewalk and then "replace" it if it gets damaged by lead water line replacement. My sidewalk was new as of a few years ago, ripped up two weeks ago due to this project, replaced, and will be possibly damaged and replaced again once the lead lines are dealt with. There must be a better way.

###############

Personal Interests
Jeff Coudriet, jeffcoud@yahoo.com

I have no personal interest in what Jack Evans does or does not do. As you rightly noted [themail, November 3], I no longer work there, but obviously you must think I’m some sort of chattel or indentured servant of the Councilmember. Thank you for treating me as less than having my own opinion. I won’t be bothering to write to themail again.

Secondly, Ward 2 historically has a lower turnout than high turnout Ward 4. It’s just a fact, go look it up.

###############

Thumbing Their Noses in Ward 2
Ed Dixon, jedxn@erols.com

Other spin aside, of the three 2004 general election ward councilmember races, Ward 2 Councilmember Jack Evans got the least support in his own ward. Not only did Evans get the least support, but Ward 2 had the most voters who decided to show up at the polls and comment on the Evans record. Over 5000 voters showed up at the polls in Ward 2 to vote against Evans or just thumb their noses at the race by choosing not to choose. Meanwhile, both Marion Barry and Adrian Fenty reached near consensus in their respective wards’ final tally. On top of all else, the turnout in Ward 2 was the worst turnout for the ward since at least 1996.

###############

It’s Not Just the Money
Jonetta Rose Barras, jrbarras@aol.com

Ed Dixon misses my point [themail, November 3] when I speak about the money the superintendent and other administrators are being paid. First, this superintendent comes with less experience dealing with a large urban school system than the last one, Paul Vance, and the interim that followed, Elfreda Massie, but he is being paid 100 percent more that either of them, including benefits. Second, instead of reducing the administrative, overhead cost of operating the system by streamlining the bureaucracy, Superintendent Clifford B. Janey’s first action is to increase it, adding two new positions. Parents and other education advocates have yet to hear any specific plan for improving the management of the bureaucracy -- other than outsourcing the work that the people he hired should be doing — or for enhancing student test scores. Janey is interested in reducing the number of people who report directly to him, not the money they are paid. Meanwhile, as Ed Dixon accurately points out, others — janitors, teachers and special instructors — go wanting for decent salaries, or at least timely paychecks.

###############

CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS

Benjamin Banneker Celebration
Peggy Seats, Seatspc@aol.com

On Tuesday, November 9, at 1:00 p.m., members of the Benjamin Banneker chapter of Blacks in Government (BIG), and the Washington Interdependence Council, the nonprofit organization authorized by Congress to establishment a memorial to Banneker, will co-host a special luncheon time celebration paying homage to America’s First Black Man of Science. The theme will be: A Man of Many Firsts.

In a collaborative celebration designed to showcase the many contributions of perhaps America’s most unsung hero, the two organizations will offer largely unknown facts about the many contributions of Banneker as a genius in the areas of math, science, astronomy, engineering, and the secret sciences. GSA Administrator, Mr. Stephen Perry, will address the audience, along with Mr. Don Smith, BIG’s Banneker Chapter President. Ms. Peggy Seats, Founder/CEO of the Washington Interdependence Council, will serve as Keynote Speaker; and Dr. Patrick Wilson will talk about the new Benjamin Banneker Institute of Math and Science. The special event is free and open to the public, and will take place at the General Services Administration headquarters located at 18th and F Streets, NW, in the main auditorium.

This event offers an opportunity to learn more about a man for whom hundreds of professional organizations, parks, buildings, schools, etc., are named. There will be exhibits, refreshments and a host of wonderful Banneker enthusiasts on hand to share their thoughts. For further information call 387-3380.

###############

History of the Treasury Building at Dumbarton House, November 16
Marsha Raj, marsharaj@dumbartonhouse.org

Please join us for “Joseph Nourse and the Melodrama of the Treasury Office: Religion, Politics and Arson,” a lecture by Pamela Scott, architectural historian and author of numerous books on historic buildings. Pamela Scott will focus on the history and construction of the Treasury Building and the role of Joseph Nourse, first Register of the Treasury, in the development of the Department. Joseph Nourse, who served in the Treasury Department for fifty-one years under six presidents and nine Treasury secretaries, resided at Dumbarton House from 1804 until 1813.Thursday, November 16, 7:00 p.m.-9:00 p.m. Admission free. Reservations recommended at 337-2288x450. Sponsored by The National Society of The Colonial Dames of America in the District of Columbia.

Dumbarton House is located in Georgetown at 2715 Q Street, NW. Limited parking is available on site. Dumbarton House is Metro accessible at the Dupont Circle Station on the Red Line or on the D2 and D4 buses. For more information please call 337-2288 x230 or visit http://www.dumbartonhouse.org.

###############

UDC Law Library Dedication, November 16
Joe Libertelli, jlibertelli@udc.edu

Please join with us in celebrating the dedication of the newly renovated UDC David A. Clarke School of Law Library in honor of our great benefactors, Charles N. and Hilda H.M. Mason! In addition to honoring the Masons, we urge friends of the School of Law to attend to show their support to the American Bar Association site evaluation team. The Team will be present and will be evaluating community support, which we hope will help serve as the basis for a positive recommendation for full accreditation! Tuesday, November 16, 6:30-8:30 p.m. University of the District of Columbia, Mason Law Library, David A. Clarke School of Law, Building 39, Connecticut Avenue Level, 4200 Connecticut Avenue, NW. Parking off Van Ness Street, Metro Red Line: UDC/Van Ness station. Live music, food and drink served. No charge. RSVP to 274-7349 or Djackson@udc.edu.

###############

2004 Elections: Lessons for the Left, November 17
Bill Mosley, billmosley@comcast.net

Join DC/MD/NOVA Democratic Socialists of America for "The 2004 Elections: Lessons for the Left." A discussion with Harold Meyerson, Editor-at-large, The American Prospect; Washington Post columnist; and National Vice-Chair, Democratic Socialists of America. Wednesday, November 17, 7:00 p.m., Stewart Mott House, 122 Maryland Avenue, NE (Metrorail: Union Station/Capitol South; Metrobus: X6/X8). Suggested donation $5 ($2 student/low income). Contact Bill Mosley, 232-2500, ext. 2, or billmosley@comcast.net for more information.

###############

Spotlight on Design Lecture, November 18
Brie Hensold, brie.helsold@nbm.org

The buildings of Mexico City’s TEN Arquitectos exemplify the range of cosmopolitan influences in architecture. Principal Enrique Norten will present the firm’s projects, which include the Chopo Museum of Contemporary Art and Brooklyn’s Library for the Visual and Performing Arts. Thursday, November 18, 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. Tickets: $12 members; $17 nonmembers; $10 students. Prepaid registration required. At the National Building Museum, 401 F Street, NW, Judiciary Square Metro, Red Line.

###############

CLASSIFIEDS — FOR SALE

Keyboard, Telephone, Kneeling Chair
Laurie A. Ferreri, lferreri@starpower.net

Macintosh USB keyboard - $10. AT&T cordless integrated phone system (three phones), 2.4 megahertz with base station and two handsets - $40. Halogen wire mount low voltage overhead light system (five lights) - $20. Balans original kneeling chair, black wood with black fabric upholstery - $20. G.E. 900 megahertz cordless phone, like new, free with any other item. Please call Laurie or Jim at 686-3436.

###############

Wooden File Cabinet
Don Squires, dsquires(at)erols(dot)com

1940’s (probably government issue) wooden file cabinet (four letter-sized drawers) in fair to good condition. One of the drawers needs some mechanical fixing and the top could use refinishing. It was meant to be side-by-side with other file cabinets so the sides do not have raised panels. But it may have contained some interesting top secret documents at one time! We’re asking $150 or best offer over $100. I can E-mail you a couple of pictures if you’re interested.

###############

Computers
Bryce Suderow, streetstories@juno.com

I need to get rid of two computers that are taking up space in my efficiency apartment. One is an IBM clone, a Pentium 2, with a 3 gig hard drive. It has a 14-inch color monitor. The other is a Mac, an ultraplex, with a 14-inch color monitor. I am selling these really cheap. Make me an offer.

###############

CLASSIFIEDS — PETS

Mr. Boots and Matthew
Tedd Appel, geoffrey@mrgeoffreys.com 

Two adult cats seek permanent home with nice person or family. Mr. Boots and Matthew were homeless as a result of their owner’s difficulties with the US Marshall. The cats are now living in a foster home but seek a home with a wonderful person or family that will appreciate all that these guys have to offer. For more information and to see photos of these two felines go to http://www.mrgeoffreys.com or call their foster parents at 249.0041.

###############

themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every Wednesday and Sunday. To subscribe, to change E-mail addresses, or to switch between HTML and plain text versions of themail, use the subscription form at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail/subscribe.htm. To unsubscribe, send an E-mail message to themail@dcwatch.com with “unsubscribe” in the subject line. Archives of past messages are available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.

All postings should also be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com, and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can be put into each mailing.


Send mail with questions or comments to webmaster@dcwatch.com
Web site copyright ©DCWatch (ISSN 1546-4296)