themail.gif (3487 bytes)

October 27, 2004

Cheaply Bought

Dear Watchers:

The mayor’s press conference was interesting today; watch it on Channel 16 if you get a chance. Basically, the mayor announced that he had bought off the opposition of a group of ministers to the baseball stadium giveaway, and he paraded the ministers to testify that they were happy with the payoffs they had received. As long as we get a part of the loot for our pet projects, the ministers said, we’ll happily abandon any principled objection that we may have had against fleecing the taxpayers.

The mayor announced that he and Jack Evans had devised a scheme to create a new TIF financing district around the site of the new stadium, and that the new property taxes that would be created by all the massive, rapid development that would take place in this district would be placed in a TIF fund instead of in the general fund, and that that fund would be used to pay for everything imaginable under the sun that the ministers would want, from bats and balls for Little League baseball teams, to housing and health care and hospitals and helicopters, to streets paved with gold. Because the money would be in a special fund instead of the general fund, it would be just like free money, not costing the taxpayers anything. Although the scheme had just been dreamed up in the past few days, and nobody had any facts or details or specifics about anything, the mayor promised that the TIF fund would be worth $440 million within ten years, and that he would find a way to front load it so that the money would start flowing to the ministers’ projects almost immediately. And the gullible crew gathered at the press conference pledged to abandon their opposition to the ballpark giveaway on the basis of an inflated, if not complete empty, promise. When asked why he believed he would really benefit from this scheme, one minister replied that he was a man of faith, and that as a man of faith he always believed the best would happen. The mayor beamed his approval at the answer.

Attention, swindlers and confidence men: I have a list of easy marks for you. These guys will fall for any con, no matter how lame. They can be taken. E-mail me for their names and contact information.

Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com

###############

Playing Ball?
Dorothy Brizill, Dorothy@dcwatch.com

On Thursday, October 28, the city council’s Finance and Economic Development Committees will hold a joint public hearing on Mayor Williams’s baseball stadium proposal (Bill 15-1028, the Ballpark Omnibus Financing and Revenue Act of 2004). The legislation will be marked up by the Committees on November 3. In order to hold the vote before January, when the terms of the three lame duck councilmembers who support the stadium deal (Allen, Brazil, and Chavous) will expire, Council Chairman Linda Cropp has scheduled the first vote on the bill by the entire council for November 9, and the second and final council vote will take place in December.

DCWatch has published or linked to nearly all the public documents that are available on the baseball deal; they can be accessed from http://www.dcwatch.com/govern/sports.htm. The most recent additions include the PowerPoint presentation on the stadium created by the Williams administration and used by it at the ANC6D and Southwest Neighborhood Assembly meeting on October 25; the moving testimony by Daynna Dixon given at that meeting; financial analyses by the DC Fiscal Policy Institute and the Cato Institute released on October 26 and 27; and the letter from ninety economists and the E-mail rationalization of the deal by Jack Evans mentioned in the previous issue of themail. Within the next few days, we shall post much of the testimony that will be given at tomorrow’s hearing.

###############

Baseball Stadium and MCI Center
Richard Wolf, richwolf1@verizon.net

This is to try to set the record set on several “facts” in the Evans E-mail [http://www.dcwatch.com/govern/sports041021.htm]. The MCI Center did not stimulate “4 billion dollars” of development — where does that figure come from? Most of the development in the 7th Street corridor was set up by three major actions by government: a) PADC, which for forty years spent hundreds of millions of dollars of tax money buying and reselling property along Pennsylvania Avenue between the Treasury and the US Court House. Much of that money was spent of acquisition and development on the north side of the Avenue stretching up to C and D streets. b) The establishment by the Zoning Commission of a downtown residential district in those areas of newest residential development — that implemented on a zoning basis the plans of PADC for a residential core of at least 5,000 residents — now called Penn Quarter. c) Historic preservation along the 7th Street corridor, which created the requisite “urban character.” And, finally, MCI Center with at least $100 million dollars in tax incentives, enlargement of a Metro stop, and the continuing tax deals for Mr. Pollin that have never been assessed by the city’s economic development authority. So much for the MCI Center and its purported great economic engine.

As to the “great development” incentives of a stadium for the Anacostia River front and South Capitol Street, the facts are against Mr. Evans. As one engaged in planning in the Capitol Hill area for forty years, and as a student of development on the Hill as well as a member of the Solid Waste Transfer Facility Site Selection Advisory Panel, which studied the area in question very thoroughly and issued its report in November 2000, the area of the proposed stadium has been under intense development for years. To wit, the huge one million square foot Florida Rock development, which has already gotten zoning approval and is located just across South Capitol Street, SE, from the stadium site. Also, going east from the stadium site on the grounds of the Navy Yard are approved plans for the DOT building and the soon to be approved plans of Forest City — hundreds of millions of dollars of development. M Street, SE, from South Capitol Street to 11th Street, SE, is already built out with office buildings, the Capper-Carrollsburg mixed income project, and the new Marine Barracks. New Jersey Avenue, SE, has both apartments and a hotel approved between M Street, SE, and the freeway. South Capitol Street between the Capitol and the bridge is under an intense planning effort with developers just waiting to see what the plan looks like -- what zoning will be proposed and public space improvements made.

In short. the only thing a new stadium will be is a huge dead weight for half the year; it will use space otherwise destined for retail/commercial/residential. The public money spent on this project is a huge waste of many times what was spent on MCI. But who’s interested in the facts?

###############

Priority or Profit
Kenneth Lyons, President, AFGE Local 3721, kendu256@aol.com

As the union president for the hard working Emergency Medical Services providers of Washington, DC (AFGE Local 3721), I am writing concerning the mayor’s proposed finance deal for building a baseball stadium. It seems clear to me and the citizenry that there is plenty of money for a sports entertainment stadium but no commitment for emergency health care in the District of Columbia! He has found a way to creatively finance this stadium on the backs of the people of this city, but cannot commit to the health and well-being of these same people. The mayor seems to have set up an innovative financial package to the District; showing great dedication to this idea, while ignoring the basic necessity and obligations of a responsible government — emergency health care!

It was a priority of Mayor Williams and his administration to shut down the city’s only public hospital, DC General , taking away a valuable resource to the residents of southeast Washington. Furthermore, he closed the only trauma center serving SE, SW and NE Washington, which accommodated 60 percent of the major trauma in this city. Now, with the continuing exodus of trained paramedics to our surrounding jurisdictions, and with our EMS advanced and basic services in critical condition, where does he focus his attention? A baseball stadium!

The pre-hospital EMS work force functions and serves this city as a vital component of the public safety network. Most perceive that we are a uniform service sharing in the same benefits, pay and promotional system as our peer firefighters in the DC Fire and EMS Department. I am here to say we do not! To date fewer than a dozen civilian paramedics and emergency medical technicians have retired from this agency, while thousands of firefighters have retired enjoying a and well deserved pension. Our EMS workers do not have a pension to retire to. They depend on a formula of special security and a defined contribution plan to survive on, after breaking their backs and placing their health and life on the line while serving this city! This is woefully inadequate! As the City Administrator Robert Bobb said under oath during a hearing of the Judiciary Committee earlier this summer, “the current retirement system for the District’s employees is inadequate!” We have lost over 240 paramedics over the last twelve years, with more expected to leave before the end of this year. After spending thousands of dollars to train and nurture these paramedics, we are consistently losing them to systems that understand and value them as equal public safety employees. When will the alarm be heard?

Contrary to the Fire/EMS Chief Adrian Thompson and Mayor Williams assertions that things are fine with our paramedics, emergency medical technicians and the delivery of pre-hospital care, they are not! Everyday paramedic units are being downgraded to basic life support ambulances due to staffing shortages which are paramedics, this places the critically ill patients of the District of Columbia in jeopardy. Response times are up, out of service times are up, and the number of recommended units are far below all the consultant’s reports by eight to ten additional units for the last eight years. If the Mayor places a value on your life, he knows what the proper remedy is. Give us our retirement (with time served as EMS providers of this agency), and pay parity and benefits, so that we can stop hemorrhaging our good personnel to the other jurisdictions. As important as building this stadium is to the economy of this city; it is more important to take care of the emergency health care needs of its citizens! As easy as it was to find the creative financing of $440,000,000.00, it should be as easy to remedy and find the financing for top quality health care and a commitment to recruiting and retaining your dedicated EMS workforce.

###############

Adventurous Virginians
Gabe Goldberg gabe@gabegold.com

In “Why Major League Baseball Won’t Work in DC,” [themail, October 24] Ed T. Barron reported that, “folks from Virginia and Maryland are not folks who frequently come to the District.”

C’mon, get real. Some VA folk travel downtown, some don’t. I’m often downtown several times in a week. I and friends of mine do things like volunteer at DC museums, attend meetings, take classes, sightsee, eat, do business. We’ve just bought a house; an issue in our "location, location, location" equation was continued ease of getting downtown. I’ve no interest in baseball; my only concern about it is when a baseball game will cause traffic jams. But all-inclusive generalizations about Virginians not coming to the District are silly. Ed shouldn’t assume that everyone in VA is DC-phobic just because his friends are.

###############

Stadium Economics
Ralph Blessing, rblessin88@hotmail.com

The letter Gary quoted opposing a DC baseball stadium [http://www.dcwatch.com/govern/sports041021.htm] states: “Most studies find that new sports stadiums … sometimes have a modest negative effect on local economies. The reason appears to be that sports stadiums do not increase overall entertainment spending but merely shift it from other entertainment venues to the stadium.” This claim overlooks the likelihood that much/most of the “shift” will be from Virginia or Maryland venues, thus a net gain for DC. Moreover, if I go to a sporting event, more often than not it’s splurge spending; it’s seldom a question of going to the game in lieu of other entertainment as I would otherwise just stay home.

###############

A Horrible Idea
Henry Townsend, henry.townsend@verizon.net

[An open letter to Councilmember Jack Evans]. I am a neighbor and a longtime supporter of you. That said: your push to subsidize a bunch of millionaires (the players) and centi-millionaires (the owners) is the worst DC public policy measure since the Barry days. See my name as a signatory among the ninety economists who are against the stadium.

###############

Fannie Mae Pays DC Property Taxes
Edward Cowan, Friendship Heights, edcowan1114@yahoo.com

A post in the October 24 issue concerned with the DC Fiscal Policy Institute and property taxes stated erroneously that Fannie Mae escapes paying those taxes on its campus and building on Wisconsin Avenue. Fannie Mae does pay DC real estate taxes, according to a public affairs officer, Janice Smith, with whom I checked. (The adequacy of its assessment and liability may be another issue.) Pursuant to a Congressional statutory exemption, Fannie Mae pays no corporate income tax on its net earnings to the District or other states. I would repeal that exemption.

[At today’s press conference, Mayor Williams and Councilmember Jack Evans both said they would encourage Fannie Mae to “voluntarily” pay the $28 thousand maximum annual corporate tribute to Major League Baseball. Since Fannie Mae president Fred Raines is also a partner in the politicians’ favored team ownership group, the billionaire boys baseball club, I am certain that he wouldn’t hesitate to have the corporation pay a few thousand a year for a deal that would net him millions in personal profit. — Gary Imhoff]

###############

Laura Slover for Board of Education
Edward Cowan, Friendship Heights, edcowan1114@yahoo.com

I commend to voters in Wards 3 and 4 the candidacy of Laura McGiffert Slover for the District 2 seat on the DC Board of Education. I heard Laura Slover speak at a candidates’ forum. She made a strong and favorable impression on me, more so than any of the other candidates, including the incumbent. She struck me as well focused, alert, high in energy, succinct and articulate in her expression, informed about the issues and -- as she said herself -- someone who understands how to work collaboratively and build a consensus. She seems to know a lot about education and school problems.

Laura Slover is 36 years old. She has a BA from Harvard and two master’s degrees in education, one in secondary education curriculum and instruction from Colorado (Boulder) and one from Georgetown, in public policy. She has classroom experience as an English teacher. Laura has been tutor and mentor to a DC boy, now in 10th grade, since 1998. The incumbent in the District 2 seat, Dwight Singleton, has been on the Board for six years and has little to show for it. He and I spoke after the meeting. I was unimpressed. On Election Day, I hope you will vote for Laura McGiffert Slover for the Board of Education.

###############

Victor Reinoso for Board of Education
Joe Sternlieb, joesternlieb-at-comcast.net

I agree with Mike Spevak that there are three excellent candidates running for the District II school board race and the incumbent Dwight Singleton -- the school board’s weakest member -- is not one of them. As the father of two DCPS elementary school students, I share his fear that Allen, Slover, and Reinoso will split the vote and leave Singleton with a plurality. I participated in the EdAction interviews of all the candidates this summer. Although I was very impressed with both Hugh Allen and Laura Slover, the rest of the group and I decided that Victor Reinoso would make the strongest board member. Now that the election is only a few days away, I’ll share my personal political observations for what they are worth.

In order to beat Singleton, a candidate has to cut directly into his base while attracting significant support in Ward 3. Victor is the only major challenger who both lives in Ward 4 (where he is running hard at Singleton’s base) and is competing in Ward 3. He has been endorsed by the very popular and well-organized Adrian Fenty. Team Fenty is out in force for Victor and Ward 4 voters are responding. Victor has also been endorsed by the Washington Post and a large number of Ward 3 voters. While all three challengers would make great school board members, Victor Reinoso is the only one who is working for, and likely to get, equal support on both sides of the park. If you are looking for a candidate with real appeal to voters across the diversity of Wards 3 and 4 and the qualifications and commitment to be a great school board member, I highly recommend Victor Reinoso. For more information you can go to http://votevictor2004.com.

###############

Keenan Keller for Board of Education
Chuck Thies, chuckthies@aol.com

For reasons that have nothing to do with students, teachers and parents, there continues to be bizarre politics at play in the District One (Wards 1 and 2) Board of Education race. Hopefully, qualifications and integrity will matter to voters, not political alliances built of ulterior motives.

If that’s the case, the choice in District One is clear: Keenan Keller. But don’t take my word for it, the Washington Post makes the case: “We endorse Keenan Keller, a parent, senior congressional staffer and local school activist who has made valuable contributions to the DC public school system at the elementary school and superintendent levels.”

###############

No Answers to the Problem
Ed Dixon, Georgetown Reservoir, jedxn@erols.com

I assume that since Mr. Gorlick [themail, October 24] has redirected my attention to “the answer to the problem” of the growing disparity in the city’s ranks, he agrees that a problem exists but feels that DCFPI’s analysis is not “the answer to the problem.” I agree that developers are happily trying to move people on so they can flip properties for profit. Similar tricks were used in the 40’s and 50’s to scare people out of their homes using race instead of taxes as the ploy. But, the rhetorical question that seems to being posed is “why should the middle class take a hit for the poor?” Though I too wish the city valued the middle class more, I do not see the middle class’ responsibility to the poor as any less pressing. And as to the DCFPI’s answer to the problem, the assertion that the institute acts as a front to serve the profiteers amongst us comes across as dubious at best. A similar retort could be made regarding the Peter Craig lawsuit. Craig’s work provides political cover for all those tax attorneys visiting the Wilson Building and Judiciary Square to keep their clients’ residential and commercial properties (e.g. parking corporations) off the roles or held at levels that reflect the political bribery and extortion used to get them.

DCFPI testimony speaks to the contrary of Mr. Gorlick’s assertion. The DCFPI has testified for closing corporate tax loopholes. The DCFPI has had a conservative stance on letting the Tax Parity Act loose on the city. The DCFPI has held a conservative stance on providing taxpayer subsidies to the baseball stadium cabal. Further the DCFPI has criticized the use of tax increment financing to help corporate henchmen to redirect the tax system to pay off luxury projects. Mr. Gorlick’s closing sentiment that "a powerful force in the displacement of the District’s middle class by the wealthy and commercial interests" exists, is true but DCFPI is not that force. Just imagine being able to redirect all your taxes into renovating your home (as the Gallery Place luxury condos, the Spy Museum and the Mandarin Oriental Hotel have been allowed through public financing). Then imagine the gall it would take to publicly propose such a venture while everyone else pays for the police and roads. Does anyone recall the $20 million property tax relief that the supposedly bankrupt Doctors Community Healthcare Corporation got shortly after the Arizona corporation handed out campaign money in the Wilson Building? Everyday these schemes are being concocted amongst us and not being put to a stop. One needn’t wonder why the city seems dysfunctional at times. Many very wealthy ventures are getting by with a free ride. Until residents focus their anger on the real culprits and charlatans looting the city, little will change.

###############

Orientalism
Will Grant, wsgrant@his.com

In reference to Pete Ross’ E-mail in themail on October 24 (“DC’s Chinagate”), I do hope Mr. Ross realizes that no one these days refers to travel to “the Orient.” One travels to Asia, or even to Southeast Asia in the case of Bangkok, but not “the Orient.” It’s a phrase loaded with mystical images of inscrutable men sitting around sipping tea and pondering the universe, referring to a Jerusalem-centered model of the universe (where things “to the east of Jerusalem” lie in “the Orient” and things to the west in “the Occident”). The phrase is archaic, and is considered offensive by most Asians, and should not be encouraged. The Mayor, for all his faults, went to Asia and Southeast Asia, much as Mr. Ross evidently does on a regular basis even if he apparently learns little from theses visits, and not to “the Orient.”

[Western, especially American, academics have scorned the word “Orient” ever since Edward Said stigmatized it, but is there any real evidence that Asians themselves are offended by it? I ask especially because of last month’s National Annenberg Election survey that found that, contrary to the repeated claims of anti-Redskin activists, only 9 percent of American Indians felt the name of the suburban Maryland football team was offensive, while 90 percent didn’t object (http://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/naes/2004_03_redskins_09-24_pr.pdf). In this case, is the preference just academic fashion or based on actual perceived offense? I’d appreciate any polls or equivalent evidence of public opinion among Asians. — Gary Imhoff]

###############

CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS

Stephen Bright on the Death Penalty, October 28
Joe Libertelli, JLibertelli@Udc.edu

Please come hear Stephen Bright, Director, Southern Center for Human Rights (http://www.schr.org), a leading death penalty opponent, speak on current legal and political issues. Lunch will follow his talk. There is no charge for this event. Please feel free to forward. Thursday, October 28, noon to 1:30 p.m., UDC David A. Clarke School of Law, 4200 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Building 38, 2nd Floor. Red Line Van Ness/UDC Metro. RSVP: Joe Libertelli, JLibertelli@Udc.edu, 274-7338.

###############

District II School Board Candidates Forum
Ralph Blessing, rblessin88@hotmail.com

The Shepherd Park Citizens Association will sponsor a forum for District II (Wards 3 and 4) school board candidates on Thursday, October 28, 7:00-8:30 p.m., at Shepherd Elementary School, 7800 14th Street, NW (enter at the corner of 14th and Jonquil). Submit questions in advance to Dwayne Toliver, SPCA President, at dtoliver@nixonpeabody.com, or Barry Hudson at blehudson@msn.com.

###############

Ross Elementary School Salsa Night, October 29
Dawn Dickerson, ddd668 at aol.com

The Ross Elementary School PTCA is hosting a salsa night at the Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1530 P Street, NW, on Friday, October 29, 7-10 p.m. Tickets are $25 (admits 2 adults, children free). Tickets will be available at the door. Salsa lessons provided by Jesse L. Golphin, Jr., formerly of the Latin Jazz Alley. Come experience an evening of fun, food, and salsa dancing for all!

###############

Andrea Mitchell on the Election, November 9
Lois Kirkpatrick, lois.kirkpatrick@fairfaxcounty.gov

The Fairfax County Public Library invites you to a live presentation by NBC News correspondent Andrea Mitchell, who will discuss the outcome of the 2004 presidential election on Tuesday, November 9 at 7:30 p.m. At the Alden Theater of the McLean Community Center. The event is free; tickets will be available on a first-come, first-served basis starting an hour before the event begins. For details go to http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/library.

###############

Donald Davis in Two Very Special Performances, November 12-13
Brad Hills, bradhills@washingtonstorytellers.org

Washington Storytellers Theater Season 04-05 presents legendary storyteller Donald Davis in From Black and White to Living Color on Friday, November 12, and Laundry and Other Fresh Tales on Saturday, November 13, at The City Museum of Washington, DC, 801 K Street, at 8:00 p.m. each night. Ticket price $15 (senior, student, and group rates available). Purchase at the door or in advance by calling 301-891-1129 or on-line at www.washingtonstorytellers.org. Street or garage parking nearby (check web site for details). Metro Red line (Chinatown), Green/Yellow line (Mt. Vernon or Chinatown), and Blue/Orange (Metro Center).

Washington Storytellers Theater kicks off its 15th Anniversary Season with two very special performances by one of America’s premier and best-loved storytellers, Donald Davis. Friday night will feature a collection of stories commemorating the historic 50th Anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education. Saturday night’s performance will showcase stories brand-new to the DC audience, but filled with Donald’s unique brand of homespun humor and charm.

###############

Earned Income Tax Credit Campaign, November 18
Susie Cambria, scambria@dckids.org

You’re invited to the DC EITC Campaign 2004-2005 kickoff. Join the DC EITC Campaign as we get ready for tax season with an EITC fair for service providers, civic associations, government agencies, and businesses. Thursday, November 18, 11:00 a.m.-1:00 p.m., Martin Luther King, Jr., Memorial Library, 901 G Street, NW, Room A-5 (lower level). Free parking is available at the library in the garage under the library.

Get free outreach materials, including flyers, posters, and important information about free tax preparation, the Earned Income Tax Credit, Child Tax Credit, and Child/Dependent Care Credit. Get answers to your questions about the valuable tax credits and free tax assistance for working families. Sign up for a half-day orientation for staff of community-based organization, nonprofits, and businesses with clients that are eligible for these credits. Refreshments will be provided! RSVP to DC Fiscal Policy Institute, 408-1080, pierre@dcfpi.org.

###############

themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every Wednesday and Sunday. To subscribe, to change E-mail addresses, or to switch between HTML and plain text versions of themail, use the subscription form at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail/subscribe.htm. To unsubscribe, send an E-mail message to themail@dcwatch.com with “unsubscribe” in the subject line. Archives of past messages are available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.

All postings should also be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com, and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can be put into each mailing.


Send mail with questions or comments to webmaster@dcwatch.com
Web site copyright ©DCWatch (ISSN 1546-4296)