Mom and Doc
Dear Washingtonians:
This is one of those short summer issues of themail, but I’m not
going to take advantage of it by writing a long introduction. You may
want to take advantage of July and August, however, by sending us
something about your neighborhood or your block. Please let the rest of
the town know the local news that we haven’t yet heard.
Jeff Norman and Ben Slade, below, write about their encounters with
petition circulators who were gathering signatures for the slots casino
initiative. A couple dozen other people have already written us about
their experiences and what they observed. If you had an experience with
or information about circulators who weren’t DC residents or who
seriously misrepresented the initiative, please help us challenge the
initiative before the Board of Elections and Ethics by sending us the
details at slots@dcwatch.com. If
you want to get involved in the campaign against the slots initiative,
please E-mail us, also at slots@dcwatch.com.
For the first few days of the petition gathering process, most of the
circulators were using the story that the petition was for more money
for schools and health care, or that it was for an entertainment
complex; many of them denied that it was about gambling or slots at all.
By the last few days of the process, many circulators in upper northwest
and in Dupont Circle were calling out, “Sign the petition against
slots.” Today, the out-of-town companies that ran the petition
circulation process for the gambling promoters were busy checking out of
their hotels to get out of paying the homeless men and women they had
hired as “circulators,” to sign the petitions that had been gathered
by their non-DC crews.
Even if gambling is your favorite vice, even if get your greatest
enjoyment in life from losing your money, these aren’t the kind of
people with whom you want to place a bet. Nelson Algren wrote some very
good books and essays, but perhaps his best-remembered quote will always
be life advice from A Walk on the Wild Side: “Never eat at a
place called Mom's. Never play cards with a man called Doc. Never go to
bed with a woman whose troubles are greater than your own.” Well,
everybody involved in the slots initiative is named Doc. You don’t
want to ante up in any game they’re dealing.
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
###############
OK, I don’t believe in prohibition of alcohol, drugs, prostitution,
tobacco, gambling — fill in your favorite vice here — either. I even
won my basketball pool, too! And let’s let the people vote on the
slots issue; fine. But promoting a vice that, let’s face it, would
spread gambling addiction among those who are vulnerable among us is not
my idea of a public good. It should be a no-brainer to vote this baby
down if and when it comes to a vote this fall.
###############
There was a woman sitting in front of the Safeway at Connecticut
Avenue and McKinley Street, NW, on July 5, gathering signatures to get
the slot machine referendum on the ballot. She was telling people that
they should sign the petition so they could vote against slot machines
coming into the District. She said that the city council was getting
ready to approve slot machines; and the only way that we could stop them
was to put this pro-slot machine referendum on the ballot and then vote
against it.
It should go without saying that this pitch is grossly misleading.
First of all, there is no evidence that any member of the city council
supports bringing slot machines to the District; and at least some
councilmembers have already declared against it. The people collecting
signatures must realize that a substantial number of DC citizens oppose
slot machines; and the only way that the collectors can get citizens to
sign is by tricking them into thinking that signing the petition will
help stop slot machines.
The backers of this ill-advised proposal seem to think that if they
can get enough signatures to get it on the ballot by fair means or foul,
they can then mount a huge TV advertising campaign to overcome all
opposition and win the referendum. Regardless of how you may feel about
gambling, this proposal is very unfair to DC in that DC would get only
25 percent of the revenues whereas other cities or states get as much as
60 percent. If this proposal does get on the ballot, we all need to be
ready to fight hard to defeat it this fall.
###############
I was on the DC subway yesterday when a 20-something kid approached
me about signing a petition for a “video entertainment center”
downtown. He didn’t have any documentation for the petition, saying he
had “run out of copies.” When I asked him for more details,
specifically was this a commercial or government thing, and why was a
petition necessary, he mentioned that some people were opposed to the
entertainment center because there would be a few video gambling
machines there. Only then did I realize what was going on, i.e., this
kid was getting paid to collect signatures by the commercial gambling
interests (see the Washington Post article, “DC Slots Goal Met,
Backers Say,” http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A31377-2004Jul6.html).
No, I didn’t get his name.
When I voiced my opinion that legalized gambling in the District
would essentially be an unfair tax on poor people, he responded that
using the same logic, liquor should be banned. Which is actually a good
point. Maybe gambling should be allowed only if liquor stores and
gambling enterprises are zoned out of poorer neighborhoods?
###############
Free DC and the “B.A.D. Day” Seven
Karen Szulgit, thirdpartygirl@juno.com
Thank you to all who attended our pretrial rally on Tuesday, July 6,
outside of DC Superior Court. We had a crowd of at least 51 (die-hard)
DC democracy advocates who came out to show their support. Even though
the weather was great (hazy, hot, humid, and sunny), our turnout was
probably affected by having a rally so early in the morning immediately
following a three-day weekend. (Oh, well.) This trial is moving fast! In
the “old” days, it used to take two full days to pick a jury, but
this time it took us a mere two hours! The government and the defense
have already delivered their opening statements. The government’s
first witness (Lucas James Hatzis, staff assistant for House Speaker
Dennis Hastert [R-IL]) has already testified and been cross-examined by
the defense. On Wednesday morning, Anthony Reed (a senior staffer for
Hastert) will testify and be cross-examined by the defense. The Court
has already ruled that the defense will not be permitted to call US
Senator Paul Strauss (D-DC) and Julia Hudson (chief of staff for our
nonvoting Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton [D-DC]) to testify because
neither was present at the time of the mass arrest.
Because the government was aware of a news story they heard on NPR
about the trial, they asked the Court to impose a “gag order” on the
defendants — shutting down all contact with the media! Believe it, or
not, the Court granted this “gag order” for ten minutes. Since the
government couldn’t come up with any case law to support a permanent
“gag order,” it wasn’t reinstated. Judge Craig Iscoe has already
granted the government’s motion in limine to forbid the defendants
from even mentioning our “political motivations, political beliefs,
and political causes, etc.” in Court. The government and the Court are
looking for every little opportunity to shut down the "B.A.D. Day
Seven" and their vocal demands for equal democratic rights for
residents of the District of Columbia — the last colony. And truth be
told, there just aren’t enough people sitting in the audience to send
a message to the judge and jury. Must I beg? (Okay, I will.) Let’s
pack the courtroom, people! Please can’t you all just take an hour —
or fifteen minutes — out of your busy work days and come show some
solidarity for your colleagues in the movement that are facing a maximum
six months jail sentence and a $100 fine? (Other fines, such as $250
towards the violent crimes unit, can also be imposed by the Court.) But
maybe it’s true what “they” say. We, the people of Washington, DC,
truly don’t care enough about democracy.
###############
Field of Schemes Cites the No DC Taxes for
Baseball Campaign
Ed Delaney, profeddel@yahoo.com
[From http://www.fieldofschemes.com:]
“Man, a measly 974 days into the Montreal Expos relocation saga, and
already some people are getting cranky. After MLB president Bob DuPuy
revealed last week that a decision likely won’t be forthcoming after
next week’s All-Star Game, as had been previously promised, a
spokesperson for DC Mayor Anthony Williams has lashed out at MLB for
foot-dragging.
?‘We need Major League Baseball to make a decision,’ said Tony
Bullock, Williams’ communications director. ‘We’ve been waiting a
while. We’re hopeful, but every time they get ready to make a
decision, they push it back. . . . There’s a tremendous demand for
downtown property in Washington. These sites just aren’t going to sit
here endlessly, waiting for Major League Baseball. . . . They got the
message pretty loud and clear from the mayor that we wanted a decision
by the All-Star Game.’”
“USA Today reported last week that DC and Northern Virginia
are the likely finalists, though each locale’s stadium plan faces
legislative hurdles. DC-area stadium-tax opponents have begun to
organize as well, under the banner of the NO DC Taxes for Baseball!
Campaign, which notes: ‘The DC area is the largest metro area without
a team and one of the wealthiest in the nation. Major League Baseball
should be begging to come here rather than making outrageous demands.’
But where would Bud Selig be without making outrageous demands?”
###############
BitTorrent and Michael Moore
Glenn Melcher, glworld@erols.com
[Re: Phil Shapiro, themail, July 4:] You, like tens of thousands,
have been duped. Perhaps you should do a little more fact checking when
posting a story which encourages people to violate the copyright laws.
BitTorrent certainly is revolutionary software — but it is simply
untrue that Michael Moore approved the use of BitTorrent for
distribution of Fahrenheit 9/11. This was a fake story first placed on
Denounce.com (“Recognized around the world as the best source for
completely fictional news and information”). It is a joke (and I would
argue a very bad one). Check out the disclaimer at http://www.denounce.com/archives/000055.html.
Also, see the Reuters’ article, http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5342052/,
which makes clear that the film file download is illegal and that Moore’s
legal counsel is exploring legal action. Erosion of intellectual
property rights through the Internet is a very serious problem and
neither you nor the readers of the mail should be encouraging such
illegal activity.
###############
In regard to the question about the sex lives of politicians, L.E.
Adams concluded by saying: “Let’s not confuse public interest, which
is our business, with prurient interest, which is nobody’s dirty
business but theirs.”
Ah, but it does become the taxpayer-citizen’s business when the
politician uses the influence of his or her office to get a public job
for the love interest, as seems to have been in the case in the Brazil
incident.
###############
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every
Wednesday and Sunday. To subscribe, to change E-mail addresses, or to
switch between HTML and plain text versions of themail, use the
subscription form at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail/subscribe.htm.
To unsubscribe, send an E-mail message to themail@dcwatch.com
with “unsubscribe” in the subject line. Archives of past messages
are available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should also be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com,
and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of
Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to
be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief
paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can
be put into each mailing.