When Lightning Strikes
Dear Targets:
I've written before (nearly three years ago, on November 28, 1999)
about the wonderful Spanish Mediterranean Sunday brunch at Gabriel. It's
certainly no secret; the restaurant is very popular and Sunday brunch is
usually fully booked. Today, Dorothy and I had a celebratory meal there
in a mostly empty room. The waiter said that the restaurant had had over
a hundred reservation cancellations for the two seatings. If a Dupont
Circle restaurant that is very far from any easily accessible highway is
undergoing a severe cut in business because of fears of a single sniper
who chooses suburban sites near highways, it is certain that restaurants
and other businesses throughout the region are suffering a major
setback, at least comparable to and maybe worse than that after
September 11, 2001.
We are inflicting a tremendous wound on our region and on ourselves
by reacting to the sniper attacks with a crippling fear that keeps us in
our homes and away from our normal daily business. The odds of being
shot by the sniper are tremendously low — certainly lower than being
in an automobile accident driving to a shop or restaurant. But the
unpredictability and randomness of the shootings makes us insecure. Most
people in DC can usually ignore the danger of being murdered. As long as
we refrain from buying or selling drugs, which provides the motive for
the majority of murders here, we are usually in danger only from our
family or close friends. The sniper makes us afraid of strangers, and
unseen strangers at that. But hiding from the sniper by staying away
from public spaces makes no more sense than staying indoors forever for
fear of being hit by lightning.
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
###############
Vote Yes for an Elected District Attorney
Mark David Richards, Dupont East, mark@bisconti.com
The Council of the District of Columbia unanimously passed a
resolution on July 2 to place Advisory Referendum A on the ballot this
November 5 http://www.dcboee.org/htmldocs/Advisory_Referendum_A_2.htm
to determine if DC voters support or oppose amending the DC Home Rule
Charter to establish an Office of the District Attorney for DC. Since DC
home rule, prosecutorial authority has been shared by a US Attorney
appointed by the US President http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/dc/
and Corporation Counsel appointed by the DC Mayor http://occ.dc.gov/main.shtm.
The proposed District Attorney for DC would become DC's single, unified,
Chief Legal Officer for defending and protecting DC residents and the
public interest on issues ranging from enforcement of human and civil
rights laws to environmental and consumer protection. The office would
be responsible for prosecuting violations of DC law and for all civil
actions by and against the municipal government. DC is the only area in
the US where the President appoints the person who is supposed to
enforce their local laws. DC citizens would benefit by having control
their judicial system and having a prosecutor who is accountable only to
them and their priorities. One office responsible for prosecuting all
crimes in DC would be more efficient.
Councilmember Catania said that establishing this office is one of
the most important things we can do right now to improve the quality of
DC government. This is something that is achievable in the near term.
Since elected, Councilmember David Catania (R) has championed this
effort, which would become the first major expansion of Home Rule since
1973. He says, "The US Attorneys, by virtue of their federal
appointment, are structurally more inclined to prosecute federal rather
than local laws. This system has greatly ignored certain crimes, such as
government fraud, abuse, and corruption, and has led to lax enforcement
of many laws." http://www.dccouncil.washington.dc.us/CATANIA/news/20020702da.htm.
Council Chairman Linda W. Cropp (D) told that Washington Post (1-25-02),
“As we look as a city at strengthening our foundation, improving
government and service delivery, we can't do it with only two legs of a
three-legged stool.” Councilmember Jack Evans told the Post,
“This is a fundamental principle of democracy, to control your own
judiciary.”
Some have raised concerns about the cost of having a
locally-controlled judicial system. Councilmember Catania estimates that
the maximum cost of this measure would be $60 million annually. Sam
Smith, who has supported such a measure for several decades, says that
many of the abuses DC suffered over the past years could have been
stopped by a locally elected prosecutor attentive to DC voters. Citizens
for DC Justice (www.cdcj.org,
496-1292, 1050 17th Street NW) is leading the effort to encourage
citizens to vote YES for Referendum A. Contact CDCJ if you would like a
yard sign or can volunteer to pass out fliers. Stand Up for Democracy in
DC, Get the Vote, Democracy First, DC Appleseed, DC Democracy Fund,
Let's Free DC, and many others support the measure. To endorse
Referendum A as a group or an individual, fill out this form http://www.cdcj.org/endorsement.pdf
and fax it to 462-9878.
###############
AOBA Gets Multimillion
Dollar Council Gift
Debby Hanrahan, Statehood Candidate for Council Chair, debosly@aol.com
In late July, the DC Council, thanks to legislation introduced by
David Catania, handed the members of the Apartment and Office Building
Association of Metropolitan Washington (AOBA) a multimillion dollar
gift. The legislation, approved without a public hearing, exempted the
city's downtown property owners from having to pay ground water
discharge fees to the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (WASA).
This recent example of the Council's succumbing to business giveaways
has not yet been reported in the press. Through a combination of
resistance to having flutter meters installed on its members' property
and court action, AOBA had been able to block WASA from collecting
ground water fees from its members for eight years. As AOBA bragged on
its web site earlier this year in a summary of its accomplishments for
its members in 2001: "AOBA continues its opposition to attempts by
the Water and Sewer Authority (WASA) to require metering of and billing
for ground water discharges into the city's sewer system. . . . Our
organized and methodical resistance to this ill-conceived program has
forestalled its implementation for over eight years now, effectively
saving AOBA members millions of dollars in the process."
But, thanks to the Council in an election year, AOBA -- one of the
city's most influential business groups -- is now legal and no longer a
scofflaw. It and its members have been rewarded by the Council for their
recalcitrance, their skilled and ever-present lobbying on this and a
number of other issues, and their campaign contributions. WASA in the
past has fought AOBA in court to try to get AOBA's members to pay up.
WASA clearly did not support the Catania legislation, but is now making
no public statement about the AOBA exemption -- apparently because it
does not want to pick a fight with the Council over this. Two WASA
representatives told me in late summer (before I began raising this
issue at political forums) that WASA didn't want the legislation, didn't
ask for it, and heard that it had passed only after the fact. WASA
representatives also told me that this legislation not only lets AOBA
members off the hook, but exempts other entities that had each been
paying thousands of dollars annually in ground water discharge fees --
such as the federal government, Metro, the World Bank, George Washington
University and other private universities, the Convention Center
Authority, et al.
Curiously, only AOBA had been refusing to pay these fees and only
AOBA appears to have been actively lobbying the Council on this issue
(as evidenced by past statements going back a few years on AOBA's web
site). This legislation was a favor for AOBA, pure and simple. Ground
water discharge fees are (or were) paid by those downtown businesses,
apartment buildings and institutions that have deep basements that
capture ground water, which is then sent to WASA's Blue Plains treatment
plant where it is processed and discharged into the river. It is this
treatment that costs money, and somebody has to pay for it. Meters
(flutter meters) were installed in non-AOBA buildings downtown in order
to determine that building's billing for ground water. I don't want to
speak for AOBA, but one of their objections was apparently that they
shouldn't have to pay for an antiquated downtown sewer system (which has
just one combined sewer for ground water plus sewage, rather than also
having a second and separate sewer for ground water and rain water, as
newer areas of the city have). So it is complicated (as two Council
members told me). But while the mechanics of it may be complicated, what
isn't complicated is that a powerful downtown business lobby has gotten
its way at the expense of ordinary rate payers. Somebody has to pay for
the Council's largesse. And who is that somebody? I have been following
this issue for some time. Months before this legislation passed, a WASA
spokesperson told me that AOBA members' total annual ground water
discharge fees were anywhere from $3 million to $10 million. (WASA had
no precise figure, because AOBA members were blocking it from installing
the flutter meters needed to monitor this process.) AOBA members'
refusal to pay the fees translated into a 1 percent increase on
residential water bills, I was told. In other words, we residential rate
payers were paying for AOBA's deadbeat activities. One Council member
advocate for this legislation recently told me the measure — despite
exempting all “improved properties” downtown, including AOBA
members' properties — won't cost residential rate payers anything.
Somehow, I don't believe it.
This legislation also has environmental ramifications because, by
eliminating all the ground water discharge fees, a major incentive not
to create ground water (for example, by deep digging) is eliminated. And
our efforts to capture the sewer water overflow will be undermined,
according to a local environmentalist involved in efforts to seek
federal funds to contain raw sewage. The legislation could undermine
those efforts to get federal funds, this environmentalist said. Stay
tuned. I hope to have additional developments.
###############
District Cable: Bad and Getting Worse
Jon Desenberg, Jondes@hotmail.com
How bad does District Cable reception have to get before we can get a
refund for our monthly payment? The snowy picture is now interrupted
several times an hour with a complete interruption in service. A call to
the company leads to a recording informing the customer of “Service
Problems in 20002, 20003, 20009, etc.” Whole zip codes with no service
or a picture worse than rabbit ears, and we're paying for it! Does the
company's management still read themail?
###############
Things That Worked
John Whiteside, johnwhiteside at earthlink dot net
Fair's fair. I complain when things don't work. So when they do work,
I will spread the news as loudly. Through the city web site, I reported
two broken walk signals near Logan Circle. Today I discovered that the
first has been fixed; I'll keep an eye on the second. In the past
nothing ever happened when these things got reported, so this is
progress. More surprisingly, I submitted a request for a public trash
can on my block. We have a major litter problem, and I really think some
of it is because there is nowhere for blocks to throw trash — you
can't do the right thing if there are no trash cans. Lo and behold, a
trash barrel has appeared on the corner. Hopefully this will help with
the litter. I hope I'm not naive about this.
And, I used DMV's online registration system. Hey, it worked. It's
been a little over a week, and today I received my new card and window
sticker. I like the new sticker system. The tag stickers are a pain in
the butt, and I think someone tried to peel off my current one (it's
half gone). Plus, when someone steals a tag, it should be slightly more
obvious now, since the tag won't match the sticker. For those who think
this change is nuts, I'll mention that New York has been using window
stickers instead of tag stickers for a very long time — at least back
to 1985, when I first registered a car there.
###############
Renewing DC Tags on Leased Vehicles
Matt Brosius, matt.brosius@oecd.org
I have been leasing cars for many years now, as do increasing numbers
of people. Each year when tag renewal time comes, instead of sending the
renewal to the leasee who has to pay for the tags, the DC government
either sends no renewal, or sends it to the leasor, usually too late for
passing on to the leasee, which results in the leasee often not
receiving renewal notices before expiration. The DC government is
unrepentant about this practice, but it has come to my attention that in
other states the government is able to send the renewal notice to the
leasee. Why can't DC? The government would get their renewal payments
sooner and the car leasees would not get tickets for expired tags, and
would be much happier customers. This is just another one of those
aggravating things the DC government does which gets citizens upset.
Can't the city council do something about this?
###############
Residential Parking Is Broken
James Treworgy, jamie@trewtech.com
The current residential parking system is broken and I don't see how
the short-term solutions being proposed are of any value. From Denise
Wiktor's E-mail: “According to the former PSA Lieutenant for Mt.
Pleasant, there are about 300 cars registered out of state that belong
to folks who live in Mt. Pleasant. There is now the ROSA task force
working evenings geared toward targeting those cars and getting them
registered in DC.” I don't see any way that this will increase the
amount of parking available in Mount Pleasant. I think it's wonderful
that the city will receive an additional $19,500 per year in
registration fees from these 300 cars, but the cars, with DC plates,
will still be in Mt. Pleasant after they're registered.
“It is a simple process to get your block zoned RPP. The problems
folks have run into is blocks where there are a large number of
out-of-state cars and apartment buildings. Both of those can be dealt
with, the first one administratively with DDOT, and the second we have
helped with.” I live on an unzoned block of 19th Street, NW. Sure, we
have some out of state cars. But zoning only covers daytime hours. There
is plenty of parking during daytime hours. At night, when it's a
free-for-all everywhere, you can't park on my street or anywhere else
for that matter, zoned or unzoned. What difference will zoning make when
I get home from work at 7:30 and there's no parking anywhere in the
neighborhood already? And what difference will it make at other times,
when there's always plenty of parking already? The only result of zoning
my street would be that a few people finally register their cars in DC
(and possibly park on other streets where the owners actually live, but
since it's a net sum zero game other cars will be displaced to my street
anyway) and my out-of-town and across-town visitors get ticketed. No
thanks.
The bottom line is that the current zoning system serves little to no
purpose, and inconveniences out-of-town and out-of-zone visitors. None
of the solutions or task forces here will reduce the number of cars in
my neighborhood: not registering them in DC, not zoning my street. So,
since we're stuck with the fact that there are too many cars and not
enough space at night, at the very least can we get rid of this
ridiculous zoning system that makes me get a ticket every time I visit
my friend in Glover Park during the day, when there's lots of parking
available? P.S. There's a dusty Kia Sportage with California plates
that's been parked for six months at 19th and Lamont. How about using
the law requiring you to move your car every 72 hours to get rid of this
guy, rather than making me zone my street?
###############
Parking cars in a city is surely a challenge, but so is safely
crossing the street or riding a bicycle. According to the 2000 census,
37 percent of District households do not own cars. At the hearing on
parking policy held by Councilmember Carol Schwartz, she proclaimed that
parking is a struggle “for all.” For those who own cars, she must
mean. While existing parking could and should be better managed, let’s
not forget about giving fair attention to the residents who rely on
walking, bicycling, and riding the bus and Metrorail. There are few
places in the suburbs where you can get along without a car. In the
District, foregoing the cost and hassle of car ownership is a viable
option because many neighborhoods offer reliable transit service, new
bicycle lanes, and shops and businesses within easy walking distance.
The city needs to give sufficient attention to making streets and
sidewalks safer and more inviting places for all residents and visitors
— car owners and non-car owners alike.
We should manage parking better, but we don’t necessarily need to
pour huge public subsidies into municipal parking garages. Increasing
supply without addressing demand will only create more demand -- meaning
more traffic, air pollution, and a continuing shortage of parking.
Through fairer parking pricing and investing in alternatives like
requiring apartment and office buildings to provide transit passes,
shared parking, ZipCar or FlexCar spaces, and convenient and secure
bicycle parking, we can manage demand. Residential parking can be better
managed by charging graduated prices for each permit per household. With
a more managed supply of permits, we can also enable non-car owning
households to sell their permits to car-owning neighbors. It's usually
most efficient and equitable to allocate scarce and costly resources by
charging prices that reflect those limitations. Managing demand, rather
than throwing money (that we don’t have) at parking supply can make
our city streets better places for truly all — including the more than
one-third of our households that do not own a single car.
###############
Time to Remove Primary Campaign Signs
Toni Ritzenberg, taritzdc@aol.com
The Department of Public Works and many of the losing campaigns have
done a wonderful job of removing most of the signs in Ward III. But,
alas, there are signs remaining, some too high to be gotten down without
a “super” ladder. If you are the culprit, how about spending a few
hours and taking them down. I know that losing can be hard, but there is
always tomorrow.
###############
In addition to co-introducing legislation to rescind the tax on
interest earned from non-DC municipal bonds, I'm looking at options for
rescinding it before it takes effect, when the Budget Support Act comes
up for second and final reading and vote on November 7. The revised
budget itself, with totals for revenue and spending, has already been
sent to Congress, but the policy underpinnings included in the Budget
Support Act require a second vote and, hence, a chance to substitute an
alternative revenue source. (The $6.6 million estimated from interest on
bonds can't be replaced with budget cuts because we can't change the
bottom line numbers at this point). While none of the alternatives is
attractive, except perhaps an even higher tax on cigarettes, I think it
may be more legitimate to raise the rate of an existing tax as an
alternative to instituting a wholly new tax given that residents based
investment decisions on the tax-free status of bonds. Anyone who wants
to weigh in with a preferred revenue alternative, let me know.
###############
Gertrude Stein Club Meeting in Public Space
Kurt Vorndran, kvorn@nteu.org
Some question was raised in this forum as to our Club's meeting site.
The DC government has a long-standing practice of allowing community,
nonprofit, and civic organizations to use meeting rooms in public
buildings. No one has ever suggested to us that political groups should
be excluded from this practice. However, our organization would certain
follow whatever decision the government makes. Similarly, if the DC OCF
told us that meeting in a commercial space was an unreported in-kind
contribution from that business, we would comply as well.
At that endorsement meeting, members of the Gertrude Stein Democratic
Club, DC's largest gay and lesbian political organization, endorsed
At-Large Councilmember Phil Mendelson (D) for re-election, but came to
no consensus as to an endorsement for the second At-large DC Council
seat on the ballot this year. While I am confident Councilmember
Mendelson will win overwhelming support from gay and lesbian voters,
clearly we have a diversity of opinion in the gay and lesbian community
as to what we will do with our second vote. Candidates other than
Mendelson, the Democratic nominee, include incumbent Councilmember David
Catania (R), Statehood Green Party nominee Michele A. Tingling-Clemmons,
and independent Eugene Dewitt Kinlow.
Stein Club rules allow for the Club to have a voice in all elected
offices in the District and suburban Maryland. A supermajority of 60
percent is required to insure consensus from the Club. Proponents of all
viewpoints made articulate statements in support of their position at
the meeting. We heard some state their affection for Catania as a member
of the gay community, others for Eugene D. Kinlow for his stands on the
issues and work with gay leaders and others still for no endorsement, to
respect the diversity of opinion in the gay community. In the end, it
was the later viewpoint that prevailed.
###############
Preventative Arrests
Ed Dixon, jedxn@erols.com
Though “preventative arrest is a tactic more commonly used by
despots, tyrants, dictators and others who cling to power by brute
force,” countries such as Great Britain and India, renowned
democracies, use it constitutionally. Another step, as DC becomes one of
the great democracies of the world. Preventative arrest as a tactic of
the state becomes unmanageable when the numbers arriving to protest
outnumbers the space police have to keep them or at least away from the
television cameras. Maybe next year RFK will become the processing
center.
###############
My Humble Response: World Bank II
Tom Berry, tom@berrybefst.com
First I'd like to thank George Ripley and Vicki Kratz for opening my
eyes and mind to the fact that there is cohesion and unity in the World
Bank protests. Maybe I should get in the trenches and see what is going
on, but I'm afraid that, for personal reasons, I'm going to have to
decline Mr. Ripley's invitation to do just that. As for David
Pansegrouw's not buying the line that the police have every right to
peacefully disassemble large groups before the situation gets nasty, I'd
just like to ask: If you were forewarned that a mob was going to burn
your house on Saturday would you alert the police or wait until the
torches were thrown? (After rereading that sentence I cynically realize
that the police wouldn't do a damn thing until the firemen had finished
cleaning up. But the question remains valid.)
Ms. Kratz raises another interesting side to this issue that has no
easy answers, but there is a side that protesters seem to ignore. Ms.
Kratz says, “Developing countries can't afford to devote resources to
the huge AIDS epidemic they're battling because so much of their money
is tied up in debt. They're forced to pay back the money they borrowed
from the World Bank, rather than pour that money into health care.”
Let's assume, for argument's sake, that these countries and the World
Bank sign agreements regarding their loans. These agreements surely have
payment terms and that is what they are “forced” to honor, like all
of us when we borrow money. Maybe if these countries would recognize the
serious problems that the protesters are aware of, they'd shift the
allocation of much of these borrowed funds from corrupt pockets and
their pork projects to the people the leadership is supposedly
governing. AIDS is truly a valid concern for all humanity, but there are
some countries that are obviously not doing enough to combat this vile
disease. Gosh, even Pres. Mbeki of South Africa, a non-third world
country no less, refuses to acknowledge an epidemic. Perhaps if the
protesters directed their energy towards the leadership of these
countries, rather than their financial benefactors, there would be more
positive results in this battle. But travel to these countries could be
prohibitive for many protesters, not to mention the great number that
would be incarcerated for more than a few hours because of their
honorable actions. So, protest on in DC, folks, it keeps forums like
this active and the city vibrant. I'm off to ask my banker to forgive my
loans.
###############
I posted the wrong web page for the DC Statehood Green Party in the
last issue of themail. The correct address is http://www.dcstatehoodgreen.org.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS
DCPCA Annual Meeting, October 23
Rene Wallis, rwallis@dcpca.org
Come learn and meet others who share the vision of DC's low income
community living long and health lives. The District of Columbia Primary
Care Association annual meeting will be next Wednesday, October 23 from
1:00 to 5:00, followed by a Health Reform Campaign Forum from 6:00 to
8:00. It will be at Children's National Medical Center. All the vital
information is available on the DCPCA web site, http://www.dcpca.org,
or just request more info from dcpca@dcpca.org.
This is going to be a great meeting! You will get the chance to ask
questions throughout the day. Connie Garner, from Senator Ted Kennedy's
Office, is going to give a federal overview of what to expect nationally
on health care reform for the vulnerable. She's a dynamic speaker! Sandy
Allen, City Council Chair, Human Services will talk about her vision for
health care. Sandy is committed to the vulnerable. James Buford, new
Director at DOH, will talk about his vision for health reform. He's the
man who will make it happen! Two incredible new reports will be
released: who are the medically vulnerable and the primary care safety
net that serves them. A savvy, sophisticated and compelling panel has
been assembled to give their thoughts on health reform and where it
needs to go in the future. Hear from some of the folks who do the work:
Bob Malson, CEO, DC Hospital Association; Vince Keane, ED, Unity
Healthcare; Maria Gomez, ED, Mary's Center; Kim Bell, Covering Kids, DC
Action for Children; Marty Kneisly, Director, DC Mental Health
Department; Jennifer Campbell, Senior Director, DC Healthcare Alliance.
After all this, you'll be so well educated you will be able to really
evaluate DC's elected official's grasp of health care issues, so stay
and hear: Catania, Mendelson, Orange, Mayor Williams, Carol Schwartz,
and other candidates for city office discuss what leadership they would
provide in health reform efforts.
###############
DC Historian Sets the P. Charles L'Enfant
Record Straight, October 24
Mark David Richards, Dupont East, mark@bisconti.com
Historian Kenneth R. Bowling, author of the landmark work, The
Creation of Washington, DC, will discuss his new book, Peter
Charles L'Enfant: Vision, Honor, and Male Friendship in the Early
American Republic on Thursday, October 24, at 7 p.m. in Room 105 of
the National Archives. Call 208-7345 for information and reservations. http://www.archives.gov/about_us/calendar_of_events/sep_oct_2002.html.
This is an excellent and concise book that sets the historic record
about P. Charles L'Enfant straight. For example, did you think L'Enfant
was dismissed by George Washington due to his conflict with the DC
commissioners? Bowling shows that L'Enfant resigned.
Bowling shows how after L'Enfant died in poverty on June 14, 1825, he
was further disrespected with an apparent tug-of-war over, of all
things, his name. Bowling reports that he was buried in the unmarked
slave portion of the William Dudley Digges family graveyard on their
Green Hill plantation in northern Prince Georges County. L'Enfant's
estate — comprised three gold and silver watches, three compasses,
survey instruments, and books — was valued at 45 dollars. In 1909,
when boosters were focused on creating an architecturally proud national
capital, Congress moved L'Enfant to his current resting place in
Arlington Cemetery. President William Howard Taft and British Ambassador
James Bryce called him Peter Charles L'Enfant in a book they authored in
1913. But his name was effectively changed to Pierre after French
Ambassador Jules Jusserand, a historian, published the first biography
of “Pierre” Charles L'Enfant in 1921. Bowling concludes, “For a
century biographers and historians have followed Jusserand and called
the planner of Washington, DC, 'Pierre' Charles L'Enfant. It is time to
recognize Peter Charles L'Enfant's full contribution to the early
Republic and claim him as an American, just as we do Robert Morris,
Alexander Hamilton, and the millions of other immigrants who followed in
their footsteps.”
###############
Sears Houses Lecture, October 24
Mary Rowse, merowse@aol.com
Rosemary Thornton, author of the recently published book: The
Houses that Sears Built, will present a slide lecture on Sears
Houses, at the Chevy Chase Community Center, 5601 Connecticut Avenue,
NW, on Thursday, October 24, at 7:30 p.m. Thornton will discuss the
history of these unique houses (approximately 75,000 exist today) and
her Sears discoveries in the midwest, where she lives. Slides of Sears
houses in Washington, DC, will also be shown. Thornton's book will be
available for sale.
On Tuesday, November 12, at 7:30 p.m., also at the Chevy Chase
Community Center, local author Michael Dolan will discuss The
American Porch, the title of his new book that examines the history
and design of porches. Dolan's lecture will include slides of porches
and houses in the Washington area.
These lectures are free and sponsored by Historic Washington
Architecture, a newly formed nonprofit dedicated to researching our
citywide architectural heritage and presenting educational programs
about it to area residents. For more information, please contact: Mary
Rowse, at: MERowse@aol.com or at
362-9279.
###############
Chime Presents Hispanic Music Program, October
26
Dorothy Marschak, chime-dc@aol.com
You’ll all have a wonderful time, for sure
If you join Diana Saez on her musical tour
Of Latin America through song and play
At Petworth Library next Saturday.
This program is right for the whole family
You can try instruments, and learn songs and their history.
Diana directs Coral Cantigas and the IMF-World Bank chorus
And CHIME is delighted she will be performing for us.
This program is the fifth of CHIME’s 22 presentations this year in
the series “Music Around the World in Your Neighborhood,” scheduled
at 11 branch DC public libraries. For a complete schedule of these
programs and information about CHIME (Community Help In Music
Education), visit our web site http://www.chime-dc.org,
E-mail info@chime-dc.org or call
232-2731.
###############
Cleveland Park Citizens Association Mayoral
Candidates Forum, November 2
Ann Loikow, johnl@erols.com
The Cleveland Park Citizens Association will hold a mayoral
candidates forum on Saturday, November 2, 10:45 a.m., at the Cleveland
Park Library, Connecticut Avenue and Macomb Street , NW. Anthony
Williams (Democrat), Carol Schwartz (Republican), and Steve Donkin (DC
Statehood Green Party) are invited to attend. It should be a lively and
informative debate. We look forward to seeing you there. For more
information contact, George Idelson (362-4279) or Ann Loikow (363-6658).
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — HOUSING
Fully furnished room available. $900 per month. Area: North Cleveland
Park; near Tenley Metro stop on red line; available November 1 or
flexible; E-mail Donald.Lewis@starpower.net or call 362-9494. Nonsmokers
looking for mature professional, clean, responsible to share home, some
cleaning; part-time or commuter housemate ideal. Includes utilities;
shared phone line is extra. Short or long term rental. Rate reduction
for part-time/ commuter housemate.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — HELP WANTED
Part-time Secretarial Help Wanted
Sid Booth, SidBooth1@aol.com
Temple Micah, a synagogue located on Wisconsin Avenue between Fulton
and Garfield Streets, NW, is seeking a part-time (15 hours per week)
administrative assistant. Computer knowledge, Word Perfect or Word, a
must. Please fax resume to 342-9179 or E-mail to office@templemicah.org.
###############
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every
Wednesday and Sunday. To subscribe, to change E-mail addresses, or to
switch between HTML and plain text versions of themail, use the
subscription form at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail/subscribe.htm.
To unsubscribe, send an E-mail message to themail@dcwatch.com
with “unsubscribe” in the subject line. Archives of past messages
are available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should also be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com,
and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of
Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to
be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief
paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can
be put into each mailing.