Endorsements
Dear Endorsers:
The Washington Post is finally catching up with writers to
themail, and giving Tony Williams a daily beating for his distant and
unfriendly personality. Personality is important — a leader won't know
what people want or think if he shrinks from listening to them — but
in concentrating on personality the Post implies that the only
grounds for dissatisfaction is personal, and that Williams's policies
and management are above complaint. Against all evidence, the Post
still pretends that District agencies and service delivery have been
greatly improved, that the public schools are on an upswing, that public
health care was increased and its cost decreased by closing DC General
Hospital, and that the generally good economy that DC enjoyed for the
past several years resulted from city government policies. We often vote
based on nothing but superstition. We usually believe that an
officeholder lucky enough to serve during a good economy must be a good
politician deserving of reelection, and a politician unlucky enough to
be in office during a recession must deserve replacement. Tony Williams
has been lucky enough to have been CFO and Mayor during good times, and
to have put off the news of returning budget deficits and the prospects
of even further service cuts until they are too late to hurt him at the
polls. He will benefit from that timing and from our search for a Mayor
who is a good-luck talisman, but he will most likely find that the next
four years will be a tough slog through rocky terrain.
Will Williams have learned anything from this election? Will he have
learned to listen to voters? Is he really likely to attend any further
community meetings or block parties the week after the primary is over?
Will he be accessible to and listen to citizens and residents, or will
he instruct his police guards to return to keeping the peons at a
respectful distance? Will his manner of governing or any of his policies
really change? Or, if he wins the primary with a huge majority, will he
learn only that he is invincible, unaccountable, unharmable by any
misdeeds, crimes, or scandals; that he is indeed, as Washington Times
columnist Adrienne Washington calls him, “Teflon Tony?”
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
###############
News from the Campaign
Dorothy Brizill, dorothy@dcwatch.com
The Williams campaign has an uncanny talent for shooting itself in
the foot with its own campaign ads. Several weeks ago, the campaign
published a flyer imploring voters to write in Williams [http://www.dcwatch.com/election2002/williams18.htm].
The photo on the flyer, supposedly showing Williams campaigning with
voters, was actually an old photo from the 1998 campaign, and featured
then campaign aide Marshall Brown. Brown is best remembered for causing
the first embarrassing faux pas of the Williams administration
when his complaint over David Howard's use of the word “niggardly”
led to Williams allowing Howard to be forced out of the administration.
Now Williams is running a television ad that shows eight people praising
Williams's accomplishments. The woman in the ad who says, “I'm going
to write in. . .” Anthony Williams is Ana Raley, the former CEO of
Greater Southeast Hospital who worked with the city to close DC General
Hospital. Raley is now a senior executive with Doctors Community
Healthcare, the Arizona corporation that is making millions on the deal
and that has contributed tens of thousands to Williams's campaign. If
Raley does write in Williams, she'll be committing election fraud; she's
neither a DC resident nor a registered voter in the District.
The Williams campaign has an issues committee that meets weekly, but
the committee hasn't published any issue papers. The chair of the
committee is Peter Rosenstein, who, when asked about it, first denied
that the issues committee existed, then said that he didn't know who the
members of the committee were, and then that he was too busy to prepare
a list of the members. Williams campaign manager Ted Carter promised to
reveal the list of members a week ago, but hasn't delivered.
Perhaps the most interesting campaign flyer of the season is from Al-Malik
Farrakhan, who is running as a Democratic candidate for At-Large
Councilmember. Farakkhan, who makes his twenty-one-year incarceration a
key highlight of his campaign resume, uses a picture of himself in a
striped uniform suggesting a prison suit, with a “wanted” sign hung
around his neck [http://www.dcwatch.com/election2002/farakkhan01.htm].
One thing to watch for after the campaign is over: Stephen Callas is
a current member of the Board of Elections and Ethics whose renomination
Mayor Williams sent to the City Council just before its summer recess.
Sources close to Williams say that he is still furious over the Board's
rejection of his nominating petitions, and that he is considering
whether to withdraw Callas' nomination or to persuade Vincent Orange,
chair of the Government Operations Committee, to bury the nomination in
Committee.
###############
Phil Mendelson in the Primary
Janet W. Brown, janetwbrown@igc.org
Dear Friends in DC, I'm writing to urge you — if you are registered
as a Democrat — to vote for Phil Mendelson in the
council-member-at-large race.
As some of you know, I've worked very hard with a lot of friends over
the last two years on affordable housing issues in DC. Much of that has
been work with the Council — to get a good law and a reasonable
budget. In the process, I have closely observed the Council Members.
Phil Mendelson is one of those who has earned my lasting respect. He is
honest, straightforward, principled. One always knows where he stands.
He works very hard (full-time, with no outside employment, unlike his
opponents) and does his homework. He's accessible, responsive, and
listens to new ideas — quite capable of changing his positions if he
learns new facts. He is courageous and not afraid ever to stand alone
— against the whole Council if need be — and he has left his mark on
many bills. And he volunteered to do the job of redistricting, which
nobody else wanted and which probably cost him some votes. I have not
always agreed with Phil, but I know you will not find a better public
servant. So please vote for him on Tuesday.
###############
At-Large Council Primary
Charles King, King13CT@aol.com
In the Democratic Primary it seems the race has come down to two real
contestants: Phil Mendelson and Dwight Singleton. Though much touted,
Beverly Wilbourn never really materialized as a force on the campaign
trail. Indeed, Marc Fisher of the Washington Post was right in
February when he wrote the following for his weekly on-line “Potomac
Journal” Q & A session: “Wilbourn is the kind of candidate who
can only happen in the District, where political activism is limited to
a small group of people and someone who has no real experience in city
affairs can come along and, with the backing of a few business folks,
pretend to be something she's not. Last time, voters saw right through
her act. Let's hope they're smart enough to do so again.” [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/liveonline/02/metro/fisher/fisher021402.htm]
###############
Negative Campaigning
Barbara Somson, bsomsonuaw@aol.com
It is a political truism that a losing candidate has no where to go
but negative, but the mailing I received on Friday from Erik Gaull
established a new low in campaign literature, based on my fifteen
election seasons in the District. The piece contains lies and
distortions about Kathy Patterson and contains no information about Erik
Gaull, his record, or what he would do if he were on the Council.
Indeed, it does not even ask Ward 3 residents to vote for Erik Gaull; it
asks us to “vote no on Kathy Patterson.” Among the lies and
innuendoes in the brochure is one asserting that Kathy is soft on
handgun control. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Kathy is a
longtime opponent of handguns and, in fact, introduced a resolution in
the Council, timed with her participation in the Million Mom March,
calling for a ban on the manufacture and sale of handguns nationwide.
But the most offensive aspect of Gaull's piece is his use of Kathy's
children to score negative political points. He claims Kathy cut funds
for summer school, "while sending her own children to private
school." Kathy did not cut funds for summer school, and both of her
kids went through Murch Elementary and Deal Jr. High with my kids, then
went to Maret for high school. (In contrast, when the candidates were
asked at the NW Current forum whether they would send their children to
DC public schools, Erik Gaull acknowledged he had none and said, if he
did, he wasn't sure whether he would send them or not!) Kathy has an
outstanding record as a public school advocate, predating her first run
for office and continuing to this day. Public school parents from Ward 3
and from around the city turn to Kathy for help and advocacy in matters
concerning the public schools and she delivers. I've got a daughter at
Wilson HS and I've been a public school activist for over ten years and
I've never seen Erik Gaull show a dime's worth of interest in the public
schools until he began his campaign to unseat Kathy.
Kathy Patterson is running on her record of results, not only for
Ward 3 residents but for District residents throughout the city. Erik
Gaull is running a myopic campaign focused solely on the ward. Now that
he realizes it is not working, he's turned vilely negative. Shame on
him.
###############
The Choice in Ward 3 — Erik Gaull
Lars Hydle, Larshhydle@aol.com
Incumbent Ward 3 Council Member Kathy Patterson enjoys the great
advantages that incumbent DC Council members have over potential
challengers — name recognition, endless Channel 13 telecasts, the
absence of partisan competition, endorsements and contributions from
police officers and firefighters whose budgets he Council committee
controls, an informal code of mutual support among incumbent Council
members that would make the Mafia jealous, and the endorsement of the
city's incumbent newspaper. Earlier this year, according to the Post,
she was seemed to be a shoo-in. But now that Erik Gaull resigned his
position in the Office of the Mayor and entered the race, she faces a
tough challenge, suggesting that dissatisfaction with her performance
may trump her advantages as an incumbent.
The choice comes down to their respective attitudes toward the
voters. Patterson has been lackluster, compared with neighboring Ward
council members, in fulfilling individual constituent requests for
service and in supporting the struggles of groups and neighborhoods with
developers and large institutions. She has shown that she thinks she
knows better than DC and Ward 3 voters, by voting to repeal the term
limits we imposed on Council Members in a 1994 initiative, without
coming back to us for our approval; and to redistrict ward council seats
contrary to legal redistricting principles and the views of her
constituents. She has tried to portray these decisions as tough and
courageous, but they benefited her and her colleagues, not us.
In contrast, Erik Gaull has focused in his campaign on listening to
and working for us -- individuals, groups and neighborhoods. He has said
he would not have repealed term limits without our approval, nor placed
numbers ahead of neighbors when redistricting, and that he would
transfer redistricting from the Council to an impartial commission. I
urge Ward 3 Democrats to break the stranglehold of incumbency by voting
for a Council member who will pay attention to our interests and respect
our views, not just every fourth August, but all four years — Erik
Gaull.
###############
Eric Gaull for Ward 3
Frank J. Haendler, fjhdcme@aol.com
Before voters go to the polls September 10 to vote in the Democratic
primary for Ward 3 City Council, I would like to raise an important
issue. Newspaper endorsements and Kathy Patterson's own written campaign
material do not mention a single, concrete initiative to address any
local issue of significance to Ward 3 residents. When it comes to gut
issues involving the day to day quality of life in our various Ward 3
neighborhoods, issues with long term implications for us and our
families such as development, zoning and traffic, Kathy Patterson is
nowhere to be found. She is evasive, elusive, and in the rare event that
someone finally manages to reach her directly, she says she does not
wish to be involved, that it is too early to address the problem, that
she will take the issue under advisement. If she finally does take a
position, it is usually too tardy and tepid to have any effect.
As a director of the Tenleytown Neighbors Association, one of Ward
3's most active neighborhood groups, I know directly whereof I write. I
want to stress that I am writing solely in my personal capacity. We were
involved in a serious, precedent setting zoning matter that galvanized
our neighborhood — the 3901 Albemarle development issue. Of course, we
turned to our Council representative for advice and help. It was in
vain. All three At Large Council members we approached came to our aid.
Phil Mendelson met with us; gave us advice; wrote a powerful, detailed,
substantive letter, and personally appeared before the DC Zoning
Commission. David Catania met with us, wrote the Commission and
testified. Carol Schwartz received us, listened and wrote a good letter
in support. Patterson finally and far too late, wrote a noncommittal
letter suggesting a traffic study. Eventually, the DC Zoning Commission
unanimously agreed with our position and the integrity of our
neighborhood was saved. Sadly enough, in a recent radio show, WAMU FM's
DC Political Hour, Kathy Patterson grossly misrepresented her conduct,
cliaming she had given us vigorous support, something that is patently
not true.
It is no wonder that I have an Erik Gaull sign in my front yard. Erik
Gaull served as Director of Operational Improvements on the staff of
City Administrator John Koskinen. According to Mayor Williams, he “has
shown great insight into the city's problems and has demonstrated the
leadership and ability to solve them creatively.” Having served as
President of the Palisades Citizens Association, we know Erik Gaull
understands neighborhood problems and concerns. We want and need a Ward
3 representative who is balanced and will work both for the city and for
us, not one who seems to be busy positioning herself for some other
office such as Council Chair or Mayor. Erik Gaull for Ward 3.
###############
Vote for Kathy Patterson on September 10th
Marie Sennett, msennett@rcn.com
On Tuesday, September 10th, voters in the Ward 3 Democratic primary
should reelect Councilmember Kathy Patterson, a skilled and dedicated
legislator who has helped the DC Council become an equal and effective
partner in city government. While challenger Erik Gaull was voting in
New Mexico and claiming the homestead tax exemption in the District,
Kathy Patterson was leading the city out of its severe financial crisis,
before we even had a control board or a chief financial officer. She
helped turn a $722 million deficit into five consecutive budget
surpluses, and has been the Council’s strongest voice for fiscal
responsibility.
Kathy has been an outstanding Chairperson of the Council’s
Judiciary Committee. Her relentless oversight over the police department’s
homicide investigations led Chief Ramsey to re-create a specialized unit
dedicated to homicide cases. She secured pay increases for police
officers, firefighters, and emergency communications workers, and kept
the spotlight on the Fire Department’s lack of adequate reserve
equipment and poor response times during the troubled reign of Chief
Ronnie Few. Kathy is endorsed by DC police officers and DC firefighters,
due to her leadership on public safety. Her record on education is
equally strong. Kathy protected early childhood education and teachers’
aides from cutbacks during the financial crisis, and has increased the
education budget during the city’s recovery. She spearheaded the
legislation authorizing the renovation of Oyster School through a
public-private partnership, and she kept Hearst Elementary and other
successful schools open when the Control Board tried to close them.
Erik Gaull says he wants to work on public safety, and that he wants
to work on public education. Kathy Patterson has worked on public
safety, public education, the city’s finances, and government reform,
with excellent results. She’s the clear choice on September 10th.
###############
Erik Gaull: Raising the Standard for
Representation in Ward 3
Mary Rowse, merowse@aol.com
It is extraordinary that the only DC races discussed exclusively in
separate, lead editorial endorsements in The Washington Post have
been the Ward 3 race and the Mayor's — in that order. The other six DC
races involving fourteen other candidates (excluding shadow seats) have
been dispensed with in two “group” editorials that each appeared at
the bottom of editorial pages on August 30 and 31. It does seem unusual
that the first editorial endorsement to appear on any DC race was the
August 24th Ward 3 one. This is even before the Mayor's race! Was it a
mere coincidence that this editorial followed on the heels of a lengthy,
unprecedented Metro section article on the Ward 3 race indicating that
Erik Gaull was proving to be a “tough challenge” for Kathy
Patterson? No other race in the city other than the Mayor's has merited
such lengthy attention in the Metro section. All others have been
discussed in the District Weekly.
The Post's editorial was unusual in it's fury; slamming Erik
Gaull for being a newcomer to DC politics, but never once mentioning his
eminent qualifications for the Council seat, or any of the issues in
Ward 3 that have many people so unhappy with the incumbent and ready to
vote for a change on Tuesday. Why such special attention to the Ward 3
race on the part of The Post editorial board?
It's been a long time since Ward 3 residents have had an advocate for
their concerns on the council. Our representative doesn't attend
community or Advisory Neighborhood Commission meetings and doesn't
consider it a priority to address the myriad issues that have confronted
every neighborhood in the ward. As a result, other council members are
forced to pick up her slack, such as Ward 4's Adrian Fenty, who obtained
$50,000 in citywide funding for the vacant Avalon Theater. Because of
this critical void in leadership, citizen activist groups have had to
form in nearly every neighborhood in the ward to work on solving
problems of unreasonable development and zoning; traffic; crime; soil
contamination; outdated fire fighting facilities; inadequate ambulance
service; vacant storefronts; poorly equipped and managed schools,
libraries and recreation centers; and even the unnecessary, illegal
splitting of a cohesive neighborhood, in disregard of natural geographic
boundaries during redistricting. We're ready in Ward 3 to elect a
representative who will listen to us and work for us, and not just in an
election season.
###############
Negative Campaigning Two
Ed Johnson, Edward@wdcnet.net
While I can admire Mr. Ross' obvious enthusiasm for his US Senate
campaign, there are many people like Senator Strauss who put in the long
hours and the hard work to promote voting rights and Statehood for all
DC citizens, and we're hardly out there for the glory of it all. We do
it because we know its the right thing, and if writing letters and
researching legislation isn't as glamorous as marching in the streets,
well, it takes some of both to make it all happen.
I'm turned off by negative campaigning. I want to know what my
candidates (and they are mine, not even Congress can take them away!)
plan to do, not what they think is wrong with their opponent. I can tell
that Mr. Ross cares deeply about our rights. But I have to ask, the
first time he meets opposition -- and there is and will continue to be
plenty of that -- will he point fingers and blame others, or just
buckle-up and keep putting in the hard work to keep us on the road to
Statehood?
Next year, and probably a few more after that, I'll be doing my part
to support our Shadow Senators and Representative no matter who they are
— whether it's making the posters or carrying them in a march. On
September 10th though, I'll cast my vote for the candidate with too many
street signs and not the one telling me about it. The first I can
forgive, the second I'd just as soon do without.
###############
This has been one of the more dynamic forums for Senatorial
communication. I appreciate the attention that themail has given to our
Senatorial race. The Senator from the District of Columbia is an
important position because our voting rights are important. To gain our
voting rights requires leadership and persistence. As I have shown
during my campaign, I am dedicated, vocal, and up front about my
successes and actions in the Senate. To gain voting rights, we must
mobilize our own people as a united force through public knowledge and
activities. The days of relying solely on back room and shadow politics
are behind us. We must educate the American people that we do not have a
vote in Congress and enlist their support toward our voting rights.
In my endorsement by the City Paper (the only non-incumbent to
be endorsed), it was noted that: “If he comes close to pestering those
in Congress the way he has LL [Loose Lips], all 100 US Senators will be
fully briefed on the District's disenfranchisement. And they might
finally take action on a voting rights bill just to shut him
up.”" This is the type of dedication and hard work that will be
visible to you. Please vote for me, Pete Ross, Democrat for US Senate.
###############
One For Strauss
Winston Bull, BULWIN@AOL.COM
I met Paul Strauss in 1997 and was quickly impressed with his love
for this city. But his work was not done only in the halls of the Senate
to which he has ludicrously limited access. His work for us all and for
our need for voting rights and Congressional representation comes out of
a sincere interest in-and connection with-the people who make this city
what it is. I have watched him stay up all night listening to a
constituent's issues, working to learn what that person's issues are and
how he can help to make that person's life better. His work as the
incumbent Shadow Senator takes him all over the city, to every ward and
neighborhood.
His work in his law practice, dealing with housing and regulatory
issues, has also brought him closer to his constituents. He has not been
simply taking care of issues related solely to his own neighborhood: he
has been dealing with citywide issues and has established a real
foothold with the very members of congress who are in a position to help
us gain what every other citizen in this country has: Congressional
Representation.
Paul Strauss has held rallies, meetings and forums to raise awareness
of our plight, has taken the message to visiting groups of out-of-state
students, and has admonished President Bush for his lack of support of
this worthy cause. He has not missed an opportunity to push this issue
to the forefront wherever and whenever possible. DC Voting Rights is an
issue that is admittedly swimming upstream against over two hundred
years of constitutional mandate. But the passage of time does not
automatically make a flawed notion right; I am glad to know that there
is someone with experience, strength, and a proven track record of
working to change our disenfranchised status, and I, for one, know which
way I will be casting my vote in the September 10th Democratic
Primaries. Paul Strauss has reinvigorated a strong and just fight: it is
now up to the residents of this great city to send him back to complete
the job that he has begun.
###############
Pete Ross for US Senator
Lars Hydle, Larshhydle@aol.com
The race for US Senator is important to all of us, because our
Senators and Representative are our only elected officials whose
principal duty is to get voting rights for DC residents. The question of
whether incumbent Senator Strauss has violated the Hatch Act by his use
of interns for "unofficial business" has triggered an
investigation by the Office of the Special Counsel. I have heard that
one intern returned home to New Jersey in May when she found that she
was being asked to gather signatures for Strauss's petition rather than
to work on DC voting rights. I hope Strauss cooperates with the
investigation, so that it can be quickly resolved!
Congratulations to Pete Ross for his endorsement by the City Paper,
their only endorsement of a non-incumbent; and for scheduling
meet-and-greets at his home for both Rev. Wilson and Mayor Williams,
illustrating his ability to reach across geographic, racial, and
ideological lines -- the only way to mobilize DC residents to get the
voting rights in Congress that we deserve. For US Senator, remember two
four-letter words — Pete Ross.
###############
Make Your Vote Count
Mark Richards, Dupont East, mark@bisconti.com
Tuesday's weather is projected to be a partly sunny 86 degrees.
That's not bad for a trip to the neighborhood civic space to see friends
and neighbors, to stand in line, and to try out the new voting system.
In the September primary in 2000, 13.5 percent of registered voters —
39,258 people — made an effort and narrowed the field for the November
election.
In the last issue of themail, Gary Imhoff wrote, “Now all of our
elected officials can practically count on incumbency to guarantee job
security. That's sad, and bad for the health of our local democracy,
even if you like all the incumbents.” My view is that if voters are
unsatisfied, they will try to change their elected officials even if
they like them on a personal level. DC has changed the makeup of its
Council significantly before and will do so again. But for now, my mood
favors the incumbents. No protest votes this year. In my book, a
favorable record is the main reason for reelecting an incumbent, even if
people I like are challenging them. I also appreciate experience . . .
DC can't afford too many learning curves. We need to be steady at the
wheel at this uncertain time nationally. I have some issues with most
candidates, but overall, I'm satisfied. For that reason, as a Ward Two
Democrat, I will vote for Eleanor Holmes Norton for Delegate to the US
House of Representatives, Paul Strauss for shadow Senator, Ray Browne
for shadow Representative, Tony Williams for mayor, Linda Cropp for
Chair of the Council, and Phil Mendelson for Council At-Large. I
appreciate their work over the past years, and want them to continue.
And I will continue to clamor for them to do more for DC democracy.
Let's hope for a cool breeze to go with that partly cloudy 86 degree
weather on Tuesday.
###############
Going to the Polls?
Ralston Cox, Strivers' Section Historic District, Dupont
Circle, ralstoncox@earthlink.net
Gee, here it is less than a week before the primary and I don't know
where to go to vote. I was redistricted from Ward One to Ward Two and
— silly me — I assumed that the DC Board of Elections and Ethics
would be able to tell me where I'm supposed to go to vote. I visited the
web site (http://www.dcboee.org) and
find that they think I'm still in Ward One. And calling the office for
an answer? Fuhgeddaboutit.
I wonder how many folks are going to be turned away at the polls
because DCBOEE told 'em to go to the wrong place. Yet another example of
my government not being able to do the simple, basic things right.
Remember, folks, redistricting was completed months ago. Sigh.
###############
How to Teach DC Kids About Voting and Other
Stuff
Susan Ousley, slousley@aol.com
Many schools are voting sites, so DC kids get one of their few
opportunities to view democracy in action on voting days. Teachers use
election days to show their students election booths, hold mock
campaigns and elections, and learn more about the process. Creative
principals display school activities and accomplishments — on these
rare visits of non-parents — and find other ways to build
community/school links.
What lesson will DC kids learn from the November Election 2002?
They've been kicked out for the day.
###############
Another Source for Neighborhood Listings
Lea Adams, newleaseonlife@juno.com
The real estate industry is one source of neighborhood categories Mr.
Gilmore didn't mention. The list of Major Area/Subarea Codes and
Subdivision Boundaries used by DC area Realtors with access to the
Multiple Listing Service (MLS) shows 47 in NW, 11 in SE, two in SW, and
19 in NE. It's interesting to note the significant cause and effect
relationship between residential property sales and the labels given to
our neighborhoods, often by people who have little or no real knowledge
of the places or the people who make their homes in DC. As a relatively
new agent (who, by the way, is a lifelong DC rez as well), I was curious
to know if my pre-incarnation perception was right: that the market
would eventually prevail. In the decades following the 1960s, Georgetown
and Capitol Hill — both comfortably working class communities of
neighbors when I was growing up — were submerged by waves of “what's
in a name”: “Transitional” became “acceptable,” then
“desirable,” then “great,” and finally “hot,” as they were
submerged in gentrification, and speculator investment in the city's
“renaissance.” Nothing changes but change.
###############
Miracles at the DMV Inspection Station
Pete Ross, peteross@prodigy.net
By now, many DC citizens know that I have been campaigning daily at
the DMV Inspection Station on Half Street, SW. The lines have been
horrendous. In the morning, the lines were always at least two hours.
Mayor Williams visited the inspection station on Tuesday, September 4 at
approximately 4:00 p.m. Miracles occurred by the time the inspection
station opened on Wednesday morning. For the first time in a long time,
the inspection station started inspecting cars promptly at 6:00 a.m.
with all of the inspection lanes open, and several DMV personnel were in
the street directing traffic. Wednesday morning was one of the few times
that I observed management personnel on the street managing. The number
of automobiles inspected in the first two hours after opening was
considerably more than what they normally inspect during the first two
hours of opening.
Miraculously, by 7:45 a.m., the line of vehicles on the Half Street
in front of the inspection station had only four cars! This had never
occurred before in the two months that I have been at the inspection
station. I was very pleasantly surprised to observe the complete
transformation that occurred at the inspection station after one mayoral
visit.
Congratulations to Mayor Williams for his courage to meet voters at
the DMV Inspection Station. I know that at least one disgruntled
customer who had a lengthy wait expressed his frustration while the
Mayor was there. I have previously suggested to several council members
to campaign at the DMV Inspection Station, but all of them felt that it
would be to risky to campaign there. PS: The downside is that I have to
find a new location to campaign! I no longer have a captive audience
waiting in line to have their vehicles inspected.
###############
If It Walks Like a Duck, It May Be Photo
Surveillance
William Haskett, gollum@earthlink.net
I should begin by emphasizing that I am not talking about the
so-called red-light use of cameras, but only about the common-or-garden
use of cameras to enforce the District's artificially-low speed limit of
25 mph “unless otherwise posted.” The use of this speed means
simply, of course, that most drivers in the District are most of the
time technically in violation of the regulation on speed. There is a
widespread misapprehension that this system, and its attached procedures
of what is mistakenly called adjudication, is a part of the usual legal
system. It is not, and every assumption elsewhere true of the law is
rendered inapplicable in the actual administration of the system;
including the presumption of innocence, the right to be heard by a judge
or some other legal officer, the right to counsel, the standards of
evidence to be applied, etc.
The only matters admitted to be relevant are the fact of the
photograph itself, and two other possibilities which are also taken as
matters of fact: that the car was stolen from you (and this fact had
been reported to the police before the photograph was taken), or that
you were not driving the car at the time, and the person was not
authorized to drive it by you. Nothing else is admitted, and you cannot
comment unless you deny one or other of these facts, or claim one of
these exceptions. The administrative hearing is, despite appearances,
not a trial: the person who conducts the hearing is not necessarily a
lawyer or a judge, the right to be heard is tightly constrained to a
denial of simple fact, in case of denial of the fact (not covered by the
exceptions already described) the transcript of the procedure is made by
the Hearing Officer, and is the only form of evidence transmitted to
what is called the Traffic Adjudication Appeals Board. The party to all
of this does not know what this last entity is, does not know who its
members are, or by what rules of evidence they conduct themselves, has
no right to be heard by the TAAB in any event, and pays $10.00 for the
privilege of not being heard by it.
Beyond the Traffic Adjudication Appeals Board lies the first step
where the law proper can be said to apply, in that the person charged
has a right to be heard in an actual court. It is only there that we
climb out of the morass of administrative procedure and into the light
of day, where we know that we are charged with a violation of the law,
and the normal procedures and assumptions of legal/civic action take
over. All the rest is prolegomena — a Greek term meaning a form
of words preceding an actual ceremony or ritual. Postscript: It should
be noted that not everything about the TAAB is negative: if it does not
respond to your appeal in two years, the ticket is reported to be
dismissed.
###############
It's funny how most of themail is spent criticizing DC's various
agencies, especially Public Works, for their incompetence. Yet when it
comes to designing intersections and light timings, which is arguably
one of the most complex tasks they face, the red-light camera advocates
steadfastly refuse to consider the possibility that there could anything
wrong other than scofflaw drivers. Let me try this one more time, and I
promise I won't comment again in this round. I am not arguing that red
light cameras are necessarily bad, or necessarily increase the overall
incidence of accidents. I am arguing that there is significant evidence
that they are implemented primarily with a goal of revenue generation,
and not safety. To summarize:
1) There are numerous, documented instances that show a pattern of
installation guided primarily by potential income and not potential to
reduce accidents. (High red-light running intersections versus high
accident intersections). 2) Some intersections are inherently more
dangerous than others, e.g., result in higher number of red-light
violations and/or accidents proportional to the amount of traffic. Why
is this? Are we to believe that bad drivers and scofflaws only use
certain intersections? We should be interested in analyzing an
intersection to determine the causes of the problem, rather than simply
slapping a camera on it. 3) Every counter I've seen to the analysis that
actually highlights problems with these studies is simply dismissed. As
Bill Adler writes in the last issue, “People bury their noses in
studies and simply fail to use their eyes and common sense.” Well,
I'll fundamentally disagree with that statement: you should not believe
your eyes and ears. Anyone with high school science can tell you that.
Scientific observation and analysis is all that matters. Why does
someone telling you that increasing a yellow light timing at a certain
intersection dramatically reduces red light runners make you cringe? Why
is it impossible to believe that there's a scientifically calculable
“right” timing for a yellow light — and maybe it's longer than
they are presently set in some intersections?
My questions are: Why don't you care about what makes certain
intersections unsafe compared to others? Why aren't you interested in
finding out if there is actually something wrong with an intersection
before you simply start enforcement that may reduce certain types of
accidents while potentially increasing others? Doesn't the fact that
rear-end collisions increase after red-light cameras are installed —
even if less than the reduction in overall accidents — tell you that
maybe, just maybe, there's something else wrong with the intersection
other than the drivers? And if that's the case, isn't it possible that
there's a better solution than just a red light camera?
[I'm calling a temporary halt on red-light postings. Please wait a
while before reopening the discussion unless you can add some new
information. — Gary Imhoff]
###############
Groping for a Grip on Urban Profit and Loss
Len Sullivan, lsnarpac@bellatlantic.net
Some communities in DC raise more in revenues than they consume in
services. Others, per force, take more than they give. Add it all up,
and DC residents run up a net loss of over a billion a year. And it's up
to DC's taxpaying businesses to bail them out. Without those businesses,
how many upscale Ward 3 households would it take to pay Anacostia's
bills, or how many Tenleytowns to make Shaw break even? Does it make any
difference? Can we solve DC's financial structural imbalance by
attracting more residents? NARPAC's very approximate answers can be
found in the September update of its web site at http://www.narpac.org/INTHOM.HTM.
Try a new approach to making DC better. Get positively involved.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS
The DC Society of Young Professionals is hosting a Forty Plus Profile
Singles Dinner at Tuscana West on Friday night, September 13, at 7:30
p.m. As is typical with our singles dinners, this event is now sold out
for women. However, we do have space for more men. Women can get on our
wait list by E-mailing events@dcyoungpro.com.
Like all of our prior dinners, this event is expected to sell out for
men as well. As with all of our events, anybody is welcome at this
dinner. The majority of attendees at this event, however, will be at
least forty years old. At this dinner, each participant will be given a
questionnaire in advance. Based on the answers to the questionnaire, we
wills eat you at a table of five men and five women with similar
interests. This event is $60. For more information on this new event, to
purchase tickets, or to be added to our E-mail list to hear of all of
our events, please visit www.dcyoungpro.com,
E-mail events@dcyoungpro.com
(and type “Add 40 Plus List” in the subject header), or call
686-6085.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — HOUSING
House Sitting Opportunity Wanted
Rachel Hines, rhines18@yahoo.com
Professional female seeking long term house sitting opportunity in
Washington, DC, area near Metro. Will take excellent care of your house,
plants, and pets while you are gone. Please E-mail rhines18@yahoo.com.
###############
Efficiency for Rent
Irina Livezeanu, irinal+@pitt.edu
Lovely efficiency in beautifully renovated townhouse (and possible
office as well) available October 1. Located between Adams Morgan and
Woodley Park, close to Metro. It can be rented equipped and
semi-furnished or not; $1050/month. It can be rented for five months or
longer. Call me at 588-8205 if you are interested.
###############
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every
Wednesday and Sunday. To subscribe, to change E-mail addresses, or to
switch between HTML and plain text versions of themail, use the
subscription form at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail/subscribe.htm.
To unsubscribe, send an E-mail message to themail@dcwatch.com
with “unsubscribe” in the subject line. Archives of past messages
are available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should also be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com,
and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of
Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to
be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief
paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can
be put into each mailing.