I can't help wondering why the hottest contests in next week's
primary election are for the unpaid lobbyist “shadow” positions,
while serious challengers avoided running for the top elected positions
— Delegate to Congress, Mayor, Council Chairman. My bias has always
been that in a democracy politics is for amateurs and not professionals
and that, as Senator Fred Thompson said last week when he announced that
he would not seek reelection, holding political office should be an
interruption in a career rather than a career in itself. In DC, Marion
Barry used to be called the “Mayor for Life.” Now all of our elected
officials can practically count on incumbency to guarantee job security.
That's sad, and bad for the health of our local democracy, even if you
like all the incumbents.
GLAA and The Common Denominator post messages below about
their voters' guides. Here are the online voters' guides I've been able
to find: The Common Denominator and the DC League of Women Voters
post transcripts of candidates forums at http://www.thecommondenominator.com/081202_candidatesforums.html.
The League of Women Voter's own voter guide is at http://www.dnet.org/My_State/State_home.dnet/DC.
GLAA's ratings and questionnaire are at http://www.glaa.org/archive/2002/election2002.shtml.
AARP's candidate questionnaire, mentioned in the last issue of themail,
is at http://www.aarp.org/vg2002/dc.
The Washington Post has a links page for its coverage of the
mayoral race at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/metro/dc/elections/mayor/.
The DC Employment Justice Center publishes the "Human Needs
First" voters guide at http://www.dcejc.org/election/index.htm.
And DCWatch provides links to candidates' own web sites and publishes
campaign materials from all candidates at http://www.dcwatch.com/election2002.
Please let me know if I've missed any other online guides.
Does anyone know who the “Bardoe for Mayor” is who has spray
painted his signs on sidewalks? There is a spray painted, stenciled sign
on the corner of Park Road, NW, and Klingle Road, NW, if anyone wants to
The money raised and spent on election campaigns continues to reach
new highs, but candidates seem to be getting very little public exposure
for the money they spend. Only an election or two ago, the very best
financed ward candidates, except for Jack Evans, who was called
“moneybags” as a result, spent well under a hundred thousand dollars
on a campaign, and credible citywide candidates spent little more than
that. Now Tony Williams seems destined to become DC's first multimillion
dollar candidate — he has raised $1,662,372 to date, but has only
$216,940 cash left, with $338,540 in debts. Council Chair Linda Cropp
has no opponent in the primary and no Republican opponent, and Debby
Hanrahan announced her Statehood Party write-in candidacy for Council
Chair just yesterday. Yet Cropp has raised $264,955 for her invisible
campaign, and still has $198,917.58 in the bank, with no debts. At-large
incumbents Phil Mendelson ($154,288 raised, $69,520 cash remaining,
$53,482 in unpaid bills) David Catania ($327,968 raised, $220,618 left)
are not hurting. And Ward councilmember incumbents are well financed:
Jim Graham ($214,351 raised, $127,956 cash on hand), Kathy Patterson
($92,476 raised, $52,022 remaining with a $1,000 debt); and Sharon
Ambrose ($145,276 raised, $66,139 cash left). The only Ward challenger
with similar funding is Ward 3's Erik Gaull ($126,635 raised; $5,790
left; and a $52,000 debt), but Gaull has donated or loaned his own
campaign a good portion of those funds, including all the debt. Since
the money these campaigns have spent seems to be largely wasted, the
major purpose of such large war chests seems to be to convince potential
challengers that their efforts will be futile. (The only laugh among the
latest financial reports at the Office of Campaign Finance came from
Democratic mayoral candidate James Clark, who reported as his total
receipts, “What I need I spend.”)
A revealing footnote to Tony Williams's financial report is how much
of his debt is due to his stubborn persistence in defending his forged
and fraudulent petitions. Williams still owes $45,120 to the law firm of
Holland and Knight, $43,420 to the law firm of Greenstein DeLorme and
Luchs, and the $250,000 fine assessed by the Board of Elections and
Ethics. Williams's total legal bill was $116,124, including $27,584 that
was paid ion August. By contrast, the two teams who challenged the
election fraud, DCWatch and Republican activists Shaun Snyder and Mark
Sibley, spent under $500 between them: $307 to buy three copies of the
petitions, $112 to buy a transcript of the Board's hearing, and $50 for
Support for Phil Mendelson, DC Council
Joan Eisenstodt, firstname.lastname@example.org
Phil Mendelson has been, directly and through his superb staff, the
most responsive Council member since the late John Wilson and Dave
Clarke. From a post on this list, their office learned of frustrations
in our neighborhood with dead trees and missing crosswalks and resulting
danger. They wrote, they called, and they ensured the problems were
handled. We need Phil Mendelson on the Council.
Patterson and Mendelson Didn’t Have to Split
Jenny Chesky, email@example.com
Incumbent At-large Councilmember Mendelson and Ward 3 Councilmember
Patterson have been saying during the current campaign that they had no
choice but to split my Chevy Chase neighborhood between Wards 3 and 4
during last year's decennial ward redistricting. Not so. Patterson
accepted Ward 2 Councilmember Evans' position that he did not want
Glover Park to be transferred to his ward, and that he wanted to
transfer to Ward 3 eastern Palisades and Foxhall, which included some of
his political opponents. She paid more attention to the wishes of her
fellow councilmember than to the passionate opposition of her ward's
Patterson and Mendelson say they had to split Chevy Chase to get Ward
3's population down toward the Ward average. But the District's
redistricting statute, 1-1308(f) plainly says the population can deviate
more than 5% from the average “from the promotion of a rational public
policy, including but not limited to respect for . . . the natural
geography of the District, neighborhood cohesiveness, or the development
of compact and contiguous districts.” In other words, factors such as
the natural boundary, Rock Creek Park, or the cohesiveness of our
long-standing neighborhood, Chevy Chase, are more important than
approximately equal population of the wards. While it is obvious that
redistricting of the council, by the council, and for the council will
always result in gerrymandering to protect incumbents, both Patterson
and Mendelson say they want the Council to continue to redistrict
itself. Patterson even claims, falsely, that all other US state
legislatures have that power — although about a third of them give
greater or lesser authority to an independent commission, as proposed by
Ward 3 challenger Erik Gaull.
Since Patterson and Mendelson redistricted us against our will,
continue to defend what they did, and even insist that the Council
should retain that power in the future, they should be held accountable.
Chevy Chase Democrats should vote for Beverly Wilbourn, at-large, and
where they can, Erik Gaull, Ward 3.
Arthur Jackson Endorses
Rhonda Howell Thurston, rhtrton@msn,net
Candidate for Mayor Arthur H. Jackson, Jr., has announced his support
for Democratic candidates for DC City Council in Wards 5 and 6. Jackson
is supporting Ward 5 native son Harry Thomas, Jr., for his outstanding
service to all the people of Ward Five, not to a select few, and for his
progressive leadership on issues of concern for Democrats: health care,
affordable housing, senior citizens and our youth. And in Ward 6,
Jackson supports Keith Andrew Perry, a bright star on the horizon for
DC. We must work hard to end the policies of Tony Williams to force
African American families out of DC and into Prince Georges County.
Jackson will confirm his choices for endorsement in his final debate
before the primary election at UDC on Thursday, September 5, at 7 p.m.
The Hotly Contested Race for Shadow Senator
Paul Michael Brown, Eastern Market, firstname.lastname@example.org
After reading the charges and counter charges by partisans of the
candidates for shadow senator, I am reminded of Henry Kissinger's
wisecrack about academic politics in which he explained that the battles
are so vigorous because so little is at stake.
[I can already see the battles, not over who should be elected, but
over who originated the quotation about academic politics. Was it
Kissinger, or can you come up with citations predating him? — Gary
While personally collecting 2700 signatures for my petition for the
US Senate ballot, and since then in my campaign, I have enjoyed the
opportunity to meet so many DC citizens and discuss with you the denial
of our right to vote in the Congress, and the role of our elected US
Senator. I have learned that just about everyone agrees that it is an
outrage that we have no vote in Congress, but that few know about the US
Senate position, or can identify its current incumbent. Even though the
Congress has forbidden the DC government from paying the salary and
expenses of its US Senators and Representative, and they are sometimes
called the “shadow delegation,” we DC citizens must take these
positions seriously, and let everyone know that our voting rights in
Congress are important to us. After all, when the original civil rights
leaders took up the cause of voting rights for African Americans back in
the 50s and 60s, they didn't have the right to vote either.
Many DC citizens and organizations have made important contributions
to our struggle for voting rights — Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton,
senior US Senator Florence Pendleton, US Representative Ray Browne; DC
Vote, Stand Up for Democracy, DC RABBLE, and Joe Grano with his attempt
to put an ad in the New York Times. The challenger for the US
Representative position, Susi Baranano, has a good idea, working through
the national associations headquartered in DC to influence their
nationwide membership and, through them, their Senators and Members of
Congress. I would suggest that when our new Convention Center comes on
line next year, it be asked to set aside some space for the voting
rights effort so that we can use every convention that comes there to
raise consciousness about our cause.
Many people and organizations have contributed to the struggle, and
many more will be needed. If elected US Senator, I will raise the
profile of the office, and focus on mobilizing our own resources, but
not for self-promotion; cooperating with others and giving them credit
where credit is due rather than claiming credit for myself for their
achievements and ideas.
Shadow Senator and Representative
Michael Bindner, mbindner at aol dot you know what
First, on Ray Browne. I appreciate his tireless efforts on voting
rights. However, getting voting rights is not the purpose of his job.
His one and only job is to push for statehood for New Columbia. That is
the job the constitutional convention of 1982 created. If he, or any
other candidates, are uncomfortable with advocating for statehood as the
solution, they should not seek one of these offices. In November, this
is a candidate who takes such an uncompromising position, Adam Eidinger
of the DC Statehood Green Party. He deserves the vote of every DC voter
who believes in statehood — and according to a recent poll of DC
residents, that would be 82 percent of them. By that standard, Ray does
not deserve their vote.
Second, on Peter Ross. Peter's main campaign focus seems to be DPW
inspections. Peter, that is not your job. Your job is statehood. If you
wish to seek statehood by improving local governance, you must raise the
awareness of the problem of two New Columbia Constitutions and pressure
the District Council to resolve it. Of course, to do so, you need to
make the case that Paul Strauss has not done his job — advocating for
statehood generally and more specifically doing everything he can for
the District on the Hill, especially at budget time. Paul is a known
quantity in the Senate and in the Democracy movement. In the movement
and on the Hill there is only one question. Peter who? Ray is at least
known (and loved) in the movement, although his focus on voting rights
is not something that many of us agree with. He at least shows up, as
does Adam. Private to Mr. Ross: run for Council again, possibly
at-large, possibly for Chair. That is how Mr. Orange built his base.
Don't challenge our very successful and able Senator. Finally, the DC
Appropriations legislation prohibits federal funding of the DC
delegation. The Council could fund it, though it has not chosen to. The
provision prohibiting local funding was eliminated many years ago. If
Mr. Ross does not understand this, he is not qualified for this office.
Strauss “Behind the Scenes” vs. Ross
“Out in Front”
Catherine Cahill, email@example.com
AS we approach the primary, we all need to consider the effectiveness
of our incumbents and the potential of their respective challengers.
Previous articles have talked about the Shadow Senator’s job as
requiring a lot of “behind the scenes” work (Mark Richards and Lynne
Mersfelder). Should we ask ourselves if perhaps behind the scenes is one
of the operational problems for the District of Columbia? Without full
voting representation, our Shadow Senator is already working with one
hand tied behind his back. Is quiet action really any action at all?
Perhaps we need someone to step up and be recognized. We need someone
willing to be vocal about our District's circumstances, our needs, and
our expectations of equal treatment. Pete Ross, the challenger for the
US Senate is that person with the energy and the drive to do those
My comments presented here in themail are not neutral. I currently
serve as the Treasurer for the Pete Ross 2002 Campaign. Watching his
work for the interests of the Foxhall Community Citizens Association
made it easy to support him and to help with his campaign. Along with
the rest of my neighborhood, I have watched Pete's activism. He
immediately and openly takes our issues to the correct source in DC
government to resolve the problems. Whenever he has met with resistance,
or relative silence, his persistence ultimately wins the day. We can
only believe that the same energy and effectiveness that we’ve
witnessed locally will be carried into the United States Senate. The
visibility of Eleanor Holmes Norton has helped her effectiveness in the
House of Representatives. One of Pete's goals is to be just as visible
on the Senate side of the Congress. Together with our other senator,
Florence Pendleton, he can better support Del. Norton’s
accomplishments in the House and see them through the Senate
Appropriations Subcommittee on the District of Columbia.
Behind the scenes may be an occasional course of action for anyone in
politics, but not a general rule. It is far more likely that Pete Ross
will be out in front with his fellow Senators on behalf of all us in
Washington. For all the tax dollars we spend, the residents of the
District deserve full representation. When the readers of themail go to
the polls on September 10, I sincerely hope that they will give careful
consideration to the kind of action that they want to represent them
before the US Senate for the coming six years. Will it be behind the
scenes? Or out in front?
Paul Strauss and Student Interns
Jason Juffras, firstname.lastname@example.org
The “controversy” over Paul Strauss' use of unpaid student
interns only makes me more likely to vote for him. The young people I
saw working for Strauss at the Ward 2 Democrats endorsement meeting did
not seem coerced or unhappy; their energy was palpable and genuine. More
power to them!
Slander in the DC Shadow Senate Race
Sean Tenner, email@example.com
As an activist in the voting rights movement, I just wanted to note
my distaste for Pete Ross' nasty attacks on our Shadow Senator Paul
Strauss. While it's great that the Shadow Senate race is competitive, it
does our cause a disservice when a challenger makes these personal
attacks. Pete should be talking about one thing: the District's lack of
voting rights/statehood and his differing views and ideas for righting
this wrong. Regardless of who wins, the Shadow Senator will be one of
DC's only voices in the halls of Congress and across the nation.
Throwing mud in this race will only worsen the District's position in
the public's mind.
Ever since I've been involved in the voting rights movement, I've
known Paul to be open, accessible and hardworking. He's been there at
every meeting, event or fundraiser that I've attended for the District's
cause — yet I've never seen Pete Ross. I hope this campaign can get
back on a positive, issue-oriented footing.
Stop the Negative Attacks
Kate Burke, KBurke@cmht.com
Despite his assertions to the contrary, Pete Ross does have more than
three posters on Nebraska Avenue, NW, on the South Side of the street
between Ward Circle and Van Ness Street, and more than three on the
North side between Ward Circle and 42nd Street, NW. The truth is, I
couldn't care less. What bothers me was the hypocrisy of preaching one
thing and doing another. In my DC travels I have not seen more than
three Strauss signs on any one side of the street, but who really cares.
If Strauss apologized for real or imagined slights, good for him. That
takes honesty and character.
Without a salary, paid staff, or budget, Paul Strauss has worked his
tail off for all of us in this city. If you want to vote for someone
else, that's of course your right. But, whatever you think of Mr. Ross,
Strauss deserves better than the string of negative personal attacks
that the Ross campaign has thrown at him. Finally, the whole false
accusation that the Senator's student volunteers somehow violated
federal law by collecting valid voter signatures is ridiculous! Good for
him and his young volunteers. Ross is the one who says he's out of
“the 1960's.” Why would he criticize the active political youth of
today? I only wish the Mayor Williams campaign involved young people,
the same way the Paul Strauss campaign does.
Candidates for the Democratic nomination for the US Senate do not get
much press; therefore political campaign posters are one of the major
ways to get our name out before the public. Over Labor Day weekend,
three volunteers set up signs for me throughout Washington, DC. Erik
Gaull (who is a candidate for the Democratic Nomination for Ward 3
Councilmember) called me and told me that all of my signs from 4000
Massachusetts Avenue to Ward Circle had been torn down. He told me that
the signs were laying on the grass next to the light poles where they
had been installed. I personally went out to examine the carnage and
replaced the signs. These same signs were torn down again last night.
This in itself would not be so disturbing, except the "Pete Ross
for US Senate" posters were torn down on Rhode Island Avenue from
12th Street to the Maryland line, as were my signs on New York Avenue,
14th Street, and 15th Street, NW. Removal of my posters has occurred on
several other major thoroughfares. I find it disturbing that none of the
signs for the other candidates are being vandalized in such a wholesale
manner. As a candidate, we have to expect that some of our signs will be
removed. However, in prior races, I have never experienced such
wholesale removal of my political signs. If anybody has any information
about who is doing this, please call 246-0000 or send me an E-mail.
Mark David Richards, Dupont East, firstname.lastname@example.org
I agree with Patrick Pellerin that Ray Browne deserves reelection. He
has worked tirelessly to produce demonstrable evidence in support for
DC's case in the political arena. He listens to constituents and has
helped to advance DC's most important goal, with title — but without
Mayoral Candidates Forum at UDC
Alverda Muhammad, email@example.com
I read the notice for the City Council and Mayoral Candidates' Fora
to be held at UDC on September 4th and 5th. While the City Council
meeting will be moderated by two local personalities, I am totally
aghast at UDC bringing Amy Goodman of WPFW's "Democracy Now"
from New York City to Washington, DC for a candidates' forum for a local
election. I like Amy Goodman's show. It is probably the best of its kind
in all of radio land. However, we have in DC some very able, local
personalities such as WTOP's Mark Plotkin, WHUT's Kojo Nnambi and WOL's
Joe Madison, to name only three, (there are others), who know the
candidates by face and name and who know the Washington, DC issues, and
who are involved with the persons and issues on a daily basis and have
been for years. If this were a national election, I could understand —
but for a local election, I feel this move is inexcusable and an insult
to the intelligence and ability of the local news community.
Will the Real Tony Williams Please Stand Up
Ed T. Barron, edtb@aoldotcom
Wednesday's issue of the Post notes that there are thirty Anthony
Williamses listed in the District and an assortment of Tony Williamses.
The same goes for William Wilsons. Any one of these namesakes can
declare their write-in candidacy, even as late as three days after the
election, and claim that they are the “real” Anthony (or Tony)
Williams. Who is to say that some namesake of Williams or Wilson might
not lay claim as the Democratic candidate for the general election?
In retrospect it looks like Tony Williams (our current Mayor), in his
zest to hang onto the Democratic Party war chest and run as a write-in
Democrat, may have been hoist on his own petard. He should have run as
an independent and filed the requisite number of valid petition
signatures. He would have avoided the primary mess and been a
legitimate, unbeatable candidate in the general election. It's like
Alice in Wonderland here in DC. Is Carol Schwartz the Cheshire Cat who
will then be our next mayor?
Joan Eisenstodt, firstname.lastname@example.org
Received mine and found it interesting. A teeny tiny pencil was
included with instructions on how to "connect the arrows" and
write in if desired. I hope the pencils on election day are far bigger .
. . anyone with any arthritis or other hand/motion difficulty will have
a problem. It may be an election to BYOP.
Candidate Forum Transcripts Online
Kathy Sinzinger, NewsDC@aol.com
The League of Women Voters of the District of Columbia and The
Common Denominator have teamed up this year to provide online
transcripts of selected candidates forums. Transcripts of the forums,
which have been selected and transcribed by the League, can be read on
the “Election 2002” page of The Common Denominator's Web site
This week's issue of The Common Denominator also contains our
citywide Voters' Guide to the 2002 Primary Election. The guide, without
photographs, also is available on our Web site. There is no charge for
accessing current or archived information on The Common Denominator's
Six Primary Candidates Excel in the Gay and
Lesbian Activists Alliance Ratings
Bob Summersgill, GLAA President, email@example.com
The Gay and Lesbian Activists Alliance of Washington, DC has
announced its ratings for candidates in the September 10 primary
election for DC Council and Mayor. Six candidates earned high ratings,
well above the rest. Incumbent Councilmembers David Catania (R-At Large)
and Sharon Ambrose (D-Ward 6) topped the list with perfect scores of 10
on a scale of -10 to +10. Kathy Patterson (D-Ward 3) was close behind at
9. Councilmembers Jim Graham (D-Ward 1), Phil Mendelson (D-At Large) and
mayoral candidate Steve Donkin (Statehood Green) each earned 7.5.
“David Catania, Sharon Ambrose, Kathy Patterson, Jim Graham and
Phil Mendelson are among our best friends on the DC Council, and their
ratings and questionnaires reflect their commitments to our community
and issues,” said GLAA President Bob Summersgill. “It is also
important to note that four Democrats, a Republican, and a Statehood
Green candidate were all rated very highly,” said Summersgill,
“Incumbents and challengers alike rated very well.” Candidates are
rated on a scale of -10 to +10, based on their answers to GLAA’s
questionnaire and their record on behalf of the gay and lesbian
community. GLAA has rated candidates for office in every DC primary and
general election since 1971. Independent candidates will be rated prior
to the general election. Full questionnaires and rating breakdowns are
online at http://www.glaa.org.
Board of Elections and Voter Lists
Elizabeth McIntire, firstname.lastname@example.org
In response to Dominic Sale's complaint that the BOEE still has not
provided the lists of registered voters within the Single Member
Districts for ANC candidates, they have also not updated their web site
to include listings of ANC candidates , and there are errors in the
information on new Single Member District details. As for petitions,
even with a conscientious effort, count on 30 percent of signatures to
be questionable; people may have moved and not changed their address,
etc. So to get 25 good signatures, you should collect at least forty.
And to be sure, check the voter lists. Up to this year, my experience of
the BOEE has been very positive; they have always impressed me as
efficient and courteous public servants, unlike other DC agencies where
surly service was the norm.
Does anyone know anything about what appears to be new streetlights
being installed on Columbia Road between 14th and 16th Streets? I can't
find out who knows or should know the plan here. These look like
decorative globe-type lights, which I suppose are fine (except for the
fact that the street is lined with low-rise apartments into which
windows they will shine unmercifully, and glass globes will be shot out
or otherwise busted pretty quickly around here for sport), but I am
worried that they might be planning to remove the old ones. The existing
lights are very effective and this street, only recently recovering from
major drug and crime activity, needs lots of light. Additional light,
decorative or not is great, taking out the old lights would be bad.
Also, new sidewalks are being put in — very nice. I happened to be
coming home late enough that night that the drying cement was just the
right texture to rub out all the marks that had been scratched into it.
A thought: if you are spending a few thousand dollars to pour new
cement, why not find some neighborhood kid or homeless guy and pay them
$50.00 or so to keep watch over the drying canvas and "erase"
all the inevitable scratchings throughout the night. Easy enough to do
since you would only pay upon finding a clean smooth and dry sidewalk.
Does anyone know anything about the DC road test for motorcycle
operators? No one at the DMV can tell me what it entails.
As mentioned in someone's post about the DMV, government seems to
operate on stealth. Sneak in a regulation, catch citizens unaware.
Speaking of that, I was out the Saturday night before Labor Day and it
was a beautiful evening. Was driving back home around the Mall and
decided that I would try to go up in the Washington Monument. Although I
know you now have to get tickets beforehand, I thought I might be able
to go up and walk in, as it was pretty quiet and no one was around. I
got there at 9:30 p.m. and the Monument was closed. Went to check the
sign, and it said that the Washington Monument hours are from 7 or 8
a.m. to 4:30 p.m. in the afternoon. What? When did this happen? After
September 11, no doubt. There is no nighttime viewing allowed anymore
during the summer months? What gives? Another way to save taxpayer money
and take away even more quality of life in DC? If they're not going to
open E Street, how about the Washington Monument?
What Do Others Think About “Anthems?”
Wendy Blair, email@example.com
In answer to Mark Richards's question, What do others think about
“Anthems?” in the September 1 issue of themail, two friends and I
found “Anthems,” currently running at the Krieger Theater, preachy.
In fairness, the assignment to come up with a play that expresses the
essence of DC is not a promising one. The acting company is superb —
but we were disappointed that the material did not rise above the
caliber of a good revue. We laughed. We admired the energy of the
actors. Qualities not to be sneezed at — but they do not add up to a
Preserving the Fragile Fabric of Freedom and
Len Sullivan, firstname.lastname@example.org
Citizens of DC are at some risk of turning their democratic
obligations into a cartoon caricature. They must objectively address the
basic issue of who should next govern them, from among the very few
willing to try. They cannot afford to ignore the Council races, or
casually trash the only competent, albeit imperfect, mayor the nation's
capital has had in over twenty years.
It is an important time to distinguish naivety from malice,
individual responsibilities from self-appointed rights, prudence from
histrionics, professionalism from evangelism, reality from sanctimonious
sophistry, the common good from personal quirks. Beware the exaggerated
idiosyncrasies of activists majoring in negativism, misplaced blame,
petty vendettas and peculiar views of democracy. Avoid the racial
demagoguery and buffoonery of candidates and critics with little or no
knowledge of what it takes to run, and how long it takes to change, a
major heterogeneous inner city. No realistic alternative approach to any
of the city's many, mostly self-inflicted, problems is being proffered
(though some are certainly possible).
Be serious, fellow citizens. This isn't a carnival, a revival
meeting, a beauty contest, or a public pillorying. This is not the time
to send spiteful or ambiguous messages by ballot. It is time to vote for
the future of our nation's capital city: don't let it revert to a
Kudos to Mr. Sullivan for Thinking Outside the
Paul Michael Brown, Eastern Market, email@example.com
A few issues back Len Sullivan dissected the flaccid rhetoric of
class/race warfare favored by so many here with his cogent and pithy
essay entitled: “Misplaying the Poverty Card: Who Doesn't Get What?”
In this latest effort, “Down with Affordable Housing?” Mr. Sullivan
once again bucks the conventional wisdom with some tightly written and
didactic prose in which he dares to posit that Mayor Williams has wisely
invested scarce city funds to build more than 10,000 housing units for
low and moderate income citizens (never mind the criticism that has
spewed forth from the Professional Poverty Lobby.) After reading so much
common sense from Mr. Sullivan, I'm considering writing in his name when
I cast my vote for mayor.
I Am A Camera (Apologies to Christopher
Mark Eckenwiler, eck [at] ingot [dot] org
At the risk of beating a well and truly dead horse, I'll offer up a
few comments in reply to James Treworgy's posting in the last issue on
red-light cameras. First, he suggests that his purpose in criticizing
the cameras is merely “to stimulate people to stop taking all the
pro-camera propaganda at face value and think for themselves.” I
commend him for seeking to stimulate thoughtful discussion, but observe
that he seems nevertheless unsatisfied by the thoughtful conclusions
reached by themailers favoring cameras. (If the last issue is any
indication, few are buying what Mr. Treworgy is selling.)
My own experience as a driver in DC is that the timing of yellow
lights is just fine. Having driven all over the District in the past
several years, I can't think of a single intersection where a too-short
yellow signal sandbagged me into running a red. By contrast, I can't
begin to count the times I've seen other drivers -- almost invariably
driving well in excess of the speed limit — blitz inexcusably through
a red light. (I'm also reminded of the occasions when I've stopped at a
stop sign — evidently I am the sole remaining driver on the East Coast
who follows this quaint custom — and had the driver behind me simply
pull out and pass through the intersection on my left instead of
stopping. Ditto for the times I've seen drivers run a red light in
advance of the coming green signal.) The problem is a behavioral one
that, in my view, requires not adjustment by DOT of the signals, but
rather adjustment of the bad behavior by deterrent sanctions, as several
readers observed in the last issue. On the issue of bias, I did read the
Matt Labash piece in the Daily Standard (available at http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/001/078ftoqz.asp)
suggested by Mr. Treworgy and found it axe-grindingly unpersuasive.
(E.g., there are good reasons to question the commission-style
compensation arrangements with the companies deploying cameras, as
Labash does. Alas, this sideshow issue has nothing to do with the
advisability/efficacy of the cameras themselves.) And contrary to Mr.
Treworgy's unfounded accusation, I am hardly a shill for the insurance
industry, least of all because I puckishly satirize the patent
flimsiness of the NMA anti-camera "study" in Fairfax on which
An exercise for the reader: if, as Messrs. Treworgy and Labash would
have us believe, red light cameras increase the incidence of rear-end
collisions, then why is the insurance industry so supportive of the
cameras? (Bonus question: If your answer is “because they get to raise
the premiums of the drivers involved,” explain a) how this makes
economic sense for the industry, and b) why I should care about helping
speeders and tailgaters in DC keep their rates low.)
CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS
DC Preservation League’s Row House Month
Events, September 2002
Kate Farnham, firstname.lastname@example.org
To draw attention to the importance of preserving of Washington's
predominant housing type, the row house, the DC Preservation League is
sponsoring three events in the month of September 2002 with the generous
support of Hines. Reservations for all events may be made by calling the
DC Preservation League at 202-955-5616.
1) Name that Row House, Saturday, September 14, 10:00 a.m. to noon,
Chapel of the Resurrection, Congressional Cemetery 1801 E Street, SE.
$15 DCPL members; $20 nonmembers. This lecture/slide show, followed by a
walking tour of the Capitol Hill East neighborhood, will help
participants identify row house types and histories from Federal to
Victorian, Flat Fronts to Bays. Light refreshments provided. 2) City
Living: Opportunities and Incentives, Wednesday, September 18, 6:30
p.m., Washington Chapter of the American Institute of Architects, 1777
Church Street, NW, admission is free. A panel of experts from the public
and private sectors will discuss the historical growth of row house
neighborhoods, current real estate trends, and the future of residential
development, including the City's economic incentives for homeowners. A
reception will follow the panel discussion. 3) Nuts and Bolts, Bricks
and Mortar, Saturday, September 28, 10 a.m. to noon, departing from the
Southwest corner of 1st Street and Rhode Island Avenue, NW (front of the
Bloomingdale Market, 1836 1st Street, NW). $15 DCPL members; $20
nonmembers. This walking tour among the substantial brick row houses of
Bloomingdale will focus on the rewards and challenges of renovating
older homes and include tips for successful preservation. Light
On September 27 the Subcommittee on Latino Affairs Human Rights and
Property Management will be holding a hearing on vacant school
properties in OPM's inventory, and I am looking for interested
persons/interest groups that would like to testify. These would, but not
be limited to, proposed uses, buildings of historic or community
interest. Please call or E-mail me your name, group (if any) or interest
(like I graduated from there) a phone number and the school you wish to
CLASSIFIEDS — FOR SALE
September 8 (Adams Morgan Day), 10 a.m. to 5 p.m., 1827 Belmont Road,
NW. (Rain date, the following Sunday if necessary.) All proceeds to go
to the Kalorama Citizens Association for the purpose of assisting with a
historic building survey. Contact Ann or Larry Hargrove at 332-6320 for
information or to donate items for the sale. They will arrange pickup if
needed. Donate, help, buy!
Two antique china cabinets, both under $200; a Scan 1950s Hi-Fi
stand/desk ($100); mahogany sideboard with slate top ($!50); 1920s
elegant floor lamp ($150). Contact: email@example.com.
CLASSIFIEDS — DONATIONS WANTED
Need for Used Refrigerator
June Kress, firstname.lastname@example.org
The St. Luke's Shelter, now in its 11th year of operation, has a
desperate need for a used refrigerator. We are a transitional,
community-based homeless shelter that houses up to six men for up to a
six-month period. We know you're out there renovating your kitchens, so
please consider donating your used fridge to a good cause.
CLASSIFIEDS — HOUSING
Anyone Know of an Available Studio/1 Bedroom?
Faye Brown, email@example.com
Interested in Metro-accessible Studio/1BR apartment. Quiet, NS, neat,
responsible, young professional looking to move as soon as possible.
Working at a nonprofit so need a reasonable rent. Fairly handy and
interested in gardening, so would keep your property neat and in great
shape! Please E-mail me at firstname.lastname@example.org or call me at
CLASSIFIEDS — RECOMMENDATIONS
What to See with Only 48 Hours in DC?
Alan Henney, email@example.com
Several foreign exchange students will visit our city for two days
before returning home later this month. What advice or strategy do the
seasoned Washingtonians give the students as to what to see, how much to
see, where to start -- if they only have two days?
Can anybody recommend a safe and affordable place, perhaps a downtown
B&B, for them to stay for a couple nights?
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every
Wednesday and Sunday. To subscribe, to change E-mail addresses, or to
switch between HTML and plain text versions of themail, use the
subscription form at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail/subscribe.htm.
To unsubscribe, send an E-mail message to firstname.lastname@example.org
with “unsubscribe” in the subject line. Archives of past messages
are available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should also be submitted to email@example.com,
and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of
Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to
be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief
paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can
be put into each mailing.