Deals and More Deals
Dear Wheeler-Dealers:
Today, the first day of the Board of Elections hearing on Mayor
Williams's nominating petitions ran from 10 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Tomorrow,
the hearings will start at 8 a.m., and are expected to run to 8 or 9
p.m. Now, do you think I'm going to write anything witty or profound in
themail tonight? And for those of you who doubt that I ever write
anything witty or profound, do you think I'm even going to write
anything long? Of course not.
On with the show.
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
###############
The Secret Deal on St. Coletta’s
Jim Myers, hilleast@aol.com
Those who claimed in February and March that backroom deals were
short-circuiting the planning process for land around the former DC
General Hospital now have further evidence gained via the Freedom of
Information Act. A March 11 memorandum of understanding on DC General
land being given to St. Coletta of Great Washington, a private vendor of
services, resulted from a February 26 meeting at which the deal was
hammered out. Among those present were Ward 6 Council Member Sharon
Ambrose, City Administrator John Koskinen, DC Senior Deputy Counsel
Charles Barbera, City Planner Andrew Altman, and Sharon Raimo, executive
director of St. Colleta of Greater Washington, a Virginia school for the
developmentally disabled. The memorandum was signed by Koskinen (on
March 12) and Raimo (on March 14).
It would appear that negotiators for the District were in a giveaway
mood — the same spirit of giving that produced funding and a site for
the recent Cadillac Grand Prix, also in our eastern Capitol Hill
neighborhood. Not only does St. Coletta get free land ($1 a year for 99
years). There also appears to be nothing in the memorandum suggesting
what St. Coletta will do in return. Furthermore, there is also an
agreement to give land to St. Coletta's for “a future phase of
development to include a combination of residential housing and retail
uses.” What is this? It would appear that those involved in the
backroom deals owe District and community residents a clear, specific
and full explanation. Why, besides land for their school, was St.
Coletta's being given rights to residential and commercial development
of DC General land when no other proposals for private residential or
commercial development were being entertained? And why wasn't this
granting of rights for residential and commercial development openly
laid on the table in the public discussion on Reservation 13 in February
and March?
Also, a minor detail, it is the recollection of many in the Capitol
Hill community that St. Coletta's Raimo insisted at a May 14, 2002,
meeting of ANC6B that no signed agreement existed between St. Coletta
and DC. Yet the memo of understanding clearly bears what appears to be
her signature.
###############
Still More Less Service by the US Postal
Service
Phil Carney, philnopus@erols.com
The mail box by my building had weekday collections at 3:30 p.m. and
4:30 p.m. Then for months there were posted notices warning us that
there would only be one collection at 4:00 p.m. At 3:40 p.m., after
throwing in letters that I really wanted to get out today, I saw the new
collection time is now 3:00 p.m. No warning, higher prices, less
service.
###############
Race Course Noise
Ed T. Barron, edtb@aoldotcom
There is no way that the race promoters of the Grand Prix Races of
Washington will ever be able to get the noise level at the nearby homes
within acceptable limits. What the race promoters should do, however, is
to install air conditioning and triple glazed windows in every one of
the homes affected by the noise levels. This would provide those
residents with a safe haven while the noise polluting races are going on
in that neighborhood. This would be the only fair response since the
residents had no say in the establishment of that race in DC.
###############
The Check Really Is in the Mail
Vivian Henderson, VHende1886@aol.com
Re: The Check Is in the Mail: welcome to the club, Mr. Penniman, you
have experienced the efficiency of the DC Government. We too sent our
tax check in — “Dumb Us.” After receiving several letters about
nonpayment, my husband went to the tax office. Surprise, the check was
still in the clerk's in-box and had been there for weeks. I have quite a
few of these stories; you should hear my experiences about rats in the
alley. The Mayor claims there is a war on rats; don't believe it.
###############
Target Coming to 1400 Block of Irving
Bill Mosley, billmosley@starpower.net
This fact hasn't been well-publicized, but the lot on the north side
of the 1400 block of Irving — where the old auto shop and post office
used to stand — is slated to become the site of a Target store. Many
people in the Columbia Heights/Mount Pleasant neighborhood might look
forward to a big-box store with a wide range of merchandise within
walking distance. But I question whether such as store is the right fit
for this area. Big-box stores tend not to fit well in dense,
pedestrian-oriented residential communities. They can't survive on
serving their neighborhoods alone; rather, they must attract shoppers
over a wide area. This will mean an increase in traffic in the
neighborhoods. How much parking will Target supply? Will it be
sufficient for their clientele, or will shoppers be parking on
residential streets in Columbia Heights and Mount Pleasant (or circling
our streets looking for parking?) Has Target offered this information to
anyone? Has anyone asked?
Another concern is the impact Target will have on other businesses in
the area, particularly small, owner-run businesses. With a huge store
like Target in their midst, can smaller retail establishments on Mount
Pleasant Street, 14th Street and nearby survive? I also wonder how this
fits in with the overall redevelopment scheme in Columbia Heights, and
fear that Target could drive out potential new businesses that could
serve the community and enliven the street environment. Does anyone else
have similar concerns — or does anyone think a Target in Columbia
Heights would be beneficial?
###############
Denser Development within Walking Distance of
Metro
Richard Layman, Northeast DC, richlaymandc@yahoo.com
The last issue of themail had a post from someone representing the
Friendship Heights Organization for Reasonable Development, which is
concerned about development projects in the Friendship Heights area.
Although I can appreciate the concerns that were raised in the post, if
we don't have denser development of housing around Metro stations, what
was the point of even building the Metro system? Transit-oriented
development makes sense. And if you want a good example of it, pay
attention to development in Arlington County along the Wilson Boulevard
corridor, and now at Pentagon Row in Arlington. Arlington County has the
lowest tax burden in the region and a tremendous utilization of the
subway system because they made conscious planning decisions to promote
denser, mixed use development centered around subway stations.
Housing in the form of apartments by Metro stations will: 1) bring
greater income tax revenues to the District of Columbia, which are
sorely needed due to various restrictions on how the DC Government can
raise revenue; 2) bring more residents into the District able to support
the retail that the City so desperately needs (although in this
particular situation Friendship Heights is well served by retail,
probably the best collection of retail assets in the City in fact; 3)
bring residents likely to rely on public transportation, particularly
the subway system, to get around; thus bringing more residents without
necessarily significantly increasing the number of car trips made in the
immediate neighborhood. Apartment buildings in the center city find as
many as 80 percent of the residents do not own cars.
I am extremely troubled that people seem to believe that DC should
have more residents (and note that in 1950 DC had almost 300,000 more
residents than it does today, which probably means more people can be
accommodated again) and yet every time a transit-oriented development
project is suggested (i.e., Takoma Park, Massachusetts Avenue NE,
Brookland) neighbors seem to come up with reasons about why the
particular project at hand is an “exception” to the general
principles. (Of course, I also got the point from someone in Takoma Park
that transit-oriented mixed-use developments should only be built in
"blighted areas." Tell that to people in Dupont Circle or
Arlington County.) Not everyone relies on a car for everything they do.
But it seems to me like the “sensible development” folks, not just
in Friendship Heights, think that everyone who moves to the City has
five cars. I tell Arlington County officials when they make
presentations about how they have implemented and maintained their
transit-oriented/mixed use planning model that they should retitle the
presentations “How to Kill DC.” It's a shame that our own residents
are helping, perhaps unwittingly, to kill DC as well.
###############
Misplaced Priorities
Ed T. Barron, edtb@aol.com
Somewhere along the line our Champion of Ethics in DC, Mayor Tony
Williams, has taken a few wrong turns. His recent decisions to allow the
District to spend $5.1M for the construction of a race course adjacent
to RFK Stadium followed by his support for elimination of a full summer
school program and reduction of public library hours, clearly shows the
Mayor has lost his way. If this is good management (and it is certainly
not anything approaching leadership), I'll eat my hat.
Too bad that we don't have a decent Democratic challenger for the
primary in September (assuming Williams will be on the primary ballot).
It might have been a real horse race. Unfortunately we are likely to be
facing another four years of reaction and wrong turns by Tony Williams.
###############
The End of the Line
John Whiteside, john at logancircle dot net
When the Mayor filed his brief on the tainted petitions, it was the
end of the line for me. I've long been a defender of the man; I think
his performance has been good more than it's been bad. I think a lot of
the opposition to him over the last few years has been motivated more by
defending turf than by a desire for good government; in particular, I
think the knocks he got on DC General were unfair and that the real
story was people profiting from a broken health care system defending
their paychecks. But no matter — with this latest, he's lost me (and
my vote). I find it really depressing to see him going down this way,
but I think that his willingness to ignore the law and ask that the
rules be changed for his benefit speak to a shocking character defect in
the man, and I don't want to see him continue as mayor of my city. (The
petition process may in fact be a bad one, and that's a worthwhile
discussion — but this is not how we should be entering into it.)
The problem, of course, is who'd be a good alternative, and we find
ourselves a few months before the election with only one other potential
candidate having been discussed — and he's a throwback to all of the
worst dysfunction of DC's past. So now what?
###############
Anthony Williams as an Administrator
William Haskett, gollum@earthlink.net
I know it is fashionable to let the Mayor believe that he is a good
administrator, but it is notorious that he is not one at all. To hire
from elsewhere the expensive heads-of-departments he does, is to
misunderstand the nature of the problem, and the solutions found are
virtually all either top-down without a corresponding change below (at
the operational level of services, for example) or purely cosmetic. It
is better to be answered politely over the phone than to encounter
previous crudities, but does nothing for the actual service pretended to
be rendered. This characterization goes all over the government of DC,
and nullifies a good deal that might otherwise be useful change.
The other aspect of this Mayor's tenure of office is the tendency to
transform what generally might be thought of as neutral performance of
government function, consistent with a general freedom of citizens to go
about their normal activities. It involves interventions of all kinds
and of great variety, exemplified by the recent (actually several
years-old, and dating to 1998) brouhaha over what is referred to as
"licensing" fees. These evidently involve 123 or so forms of
license, to do what otherwise would be considered normal and harmless
activities that people engage in, usually without government taking
notice of it or them. But now these are transformed into activities only
permitted if allowed by license, and for a fee that might be
considerable, and requires a new set of offenses for engaging in that
which is harmless action but not permitted without a license. This forms
yet another link in a chain of administrative permissions and
prohibitions, all having in common the levying of a fee, sometimes
graduated, sometimes not, and involving records that usually will not be
in the possession of the citizen, and only accurately in the files of
the District government by happenstance, and which are very often in
error or out-of-date. This ranges from real-property assessment records,
to motor vehicle offenses and unpaid fines, which are then tied to a
unitary governmental entity that holds itself entitled to deny renewals
and extensions for unpaid sums arising from matters very far from the
immediate questions under consideration.
In short, we move into an administrative world which has something,
but not a lot, to do with the political world of freedoms and
protections-from-harm that government has generally been held to connote
in our tradition. This is "big brother" with technology. It
takes the whole range of human activities as its subject matter, and
levies a fee for breathing. It coerces conformity with its rules by
invoking executive discretion. It operates within the confines of
administrative permissions, and takes by retail what legislation is
supposed to deal with by open discussion and the creation of broad
fields of action for the citizen to do with as he/she likes. It is very
dangerous to freedom because it purports to be protective. It
confiscates citizen discretion in the name of administrative efficiency.
In the process, it subverts the processes of government it claims to
represent.
###############
As a lifelong Democrat, I've always voted for the Democratic
candidate for Mayor, and Tony Williams has been an insult and baggage to
our party. He should be ashamed of his failure to monitor his petitions.
He lost Ward 2 to “No Endorsement,” and I believe Democrats should
throw Norm Neverson and the corrupt DC Democrats out of office.
###############
In the last issue of themail, Bob Levine asked about other
candidates for Mayor. Isn't candidate former Councilmember Douglas E.
Moore, the guy who jumped on a tow truck driver's back and bit him? In
addition, I think that there was a later incident involving an attempt
to ram his car into a girlfriend's basement apartment or something like
that.
I don't think that anything needs to said about wanna be Mayor Kevin
Chavous, other than he oversees the schools and libraries for the City
Council.
###############
Write In David Catania
Sean Snowden, Jr., grosnwden@aol.com
Last year the city was excited over the prospect of David Catania as
Mayor; now we are ashamed at all the Letterman and Chris Rock jokes
about the DC Petitions. Please Democrats and Republicans, write in David
Catania for Mayor.
###############
I am outraged at Mayor Williams for this whole petition fiasco. I'm
not angry just because of his incompetence in actually allowing
fraudulent signatures to be submitted on his behalf, but because of the
arrogance and contempt that he continues to display in blaming everyone
but himself and by challenging the legitimacy of BOEE and the election
laws themselves. It is the last straw in a long string of illegal
errors, frauds, and broken promises to the people of DC.
Larry Seftor wrote that he'd sign a petition to recall Mayor
Williams. With the election so close, a recall isn't really feasible.
However, I'd love to see a petition campaign to collect 10,000 REAL
signatures from 10,000 REAL voters in DC demanding that Tony Williams'
name be OFF the ballot in November. We need to show him that DC
residents will not accept his incompetence anymore. Is anyone else
willing to gather signatures to oppose Mayor Williams? Let's show him
how easy it really is to gather at least 2,000 signatures when people
believe their cause is just. Whether you are a Democrat, Republican, or
Statehood Green (like myself) we can all agree that Mayor Williams
should not run for reelection.
[One footnote: recalls are not allowed by law during the first and
last quarters of electoral terms -- that is, the first and last years of
four-year terms and the first and last six months of two-year terms
(such as for ANC Commissioners). — Gary Imhoff]
###############
So it's the cappuccino and political chatter that's turning all those
self-respecting critters into jitterbugs! Given the proximity of the
memorials to Haines Point, I was worried that it might be something a
bit stronger. Boy, am I relieved!
###############
Brief Summary of House
DC “Voting Representation in Congress” Hearing
Mark David Richards, Dupont East, mark@bisconti.com
The Subcommittee on the District of Columbia of the Committee on
Government Reform of the House of Representatives, http://reform.house.gov/dc/,
chaired by Rep. Constance Morella (R-MD), held a hearing on Friday, July
19, on "Voting Representation in Congress."
Rep. Morella said that, “To me, it seems inevitable — inevitable
— that the citizens of the District of Columbia will one day have
voting representation in Congress. . . . Congressional oversight is no
substitute for voting rights.” She said the hearing would, she hoped,
“assist us in determining where we go from here.” She said that
although she understood there were forceful arguments otherwise, “It
seems obvious that the District of Columbia is not a state, and thus
Congress's legislative power would have no bearing on the District's
voting representation in Congress.” DC Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton
introduced the panel and highlighted the work of Rep. Browne. She
encouraged others to follow his effective methods. There were seven
witnesses and about 55 observers in the audience, including Councilman
Adrian Fenty. Most DC elected officials who were not invited to testify
did not attend.
Mayor Anthony Williams wore a bright red bow tie. No one breached the
topic of campaign petition signatures. That's a self-determination/Home
Rule issue, hopefully not for a Congressional hearing. Mayor Williams
said, “We are here today because the need has arisen and because you
are vested with the power and responsibility to make sure that all
Americans can exercise their rights. Full voting representation in
Congress is a fundamental right held by every citizen of the District of
Columbia.” He said, “There are 572,000 'real people' living within
the 10 square miles known as the District of Columbia.” (DC was 10
square miles until 1846.) He asked Congress to pass the "No
Taxation without Representation Act." Williams supported budgetary
autonomy, and said Congress should make a distinction between the
federal center and the local city of Washington, DC. Council Chairman
Linda Cropp noted that this was the first hearing on this topic in a
long time, and presented a resolution of the Council in support of the
“No Taxation without Representation Act.” She said, “Madame Chair,
for far too long the residents of the District of Columbia have been
invited to the dinner table but have not been allowed to eat. District
residents are hungry for Congressional voting rights, and District
residents are starving for democracy!” She attached a Sense of the
Council resolution developed by the DC Subcommittee on Labor, Voting
Rights and Redistricting, chaired by Councilman Phil Mendelson,
supporting the Bill. She made a case for fiscal autonomy. Rep. Morella
picked up on a line of questioning by Congresswoman Norton and asked,
“What more could be done to raise national awareness of DC's issue?”
After discussion, Chairman Cropp noted that, by budget rider, “We're
forbidden to spend our locally raised tax dollars in support of voting
rights.” Morella curtly said, “You are. Maybe you could demonstrate
this on your own time.”
DC Representative (shadow) Ray Browne supported the Bill. Rep.
Morella flashed the only smile I noticed when he made the point that
decisions in DC should be made by residents like those of “Cleveland
Park not Cleveland, Ohio.” Rep. Browne offered supporting evidence of
elected official support for Senate and House voting rights that he has
collected from cities such as Philadelphia, Boston, Cleveland, Atlanta,
Baltimore, Los Angeles, Illinois, New Orleans, Detroit, San Francisco,
and the state of Alaska. Governor Tony Knowles of Alaska wrote to Rep.
Browne, “In the years before 1959, Alaskans held views that
undoubtedly parallel those of the current residents of the District
concerning the obligations of citizenship and proper representation in
Congress. Like District of Columbia residents, Alaskans paid taxes,
served their country in time of war, and longed for a voice in national
government.” Reps. Morella and Norton both praised Rep. Browne and
Rep. Morella suggested he should be cloned. DC Republican Party Chair
Betsy Werronen said, “[T]he residents of the District of Columbia are
citizens of the United States. We are entitled under the Constitution to
the same rights and responsibilities as all other United States
Citizens. . . . We must have the right to voting representation in
Congress just like all other citizens.” Ms. Werronen said she did not
know why the Republican Party had withdrawn its long-standing support
for DC voting rights in the most recent Party Platform. She said the DC
Republican Party supported a vote in the House as a first step, as a
practical matter, because there was support. When Congresswoman Norton
asked if the DC Republican Party's problem would be solved if DC
acquired two Senators via Constitutional amendment, Werronen said she
would have to speak with the Committee, but asked, “If you want
Senators, would that mean statehood?” She said, “There has never
been a Congressional Committee to review what the next step for DC
should be . . . there are so many different ways to do it. So many
views, and we don't have consensus.” She said they “believe the
arguments for voting rights are compelling enough on their own,”
without consideration of the “no taxation” part of the Bill.
President of the Greater Washington Board of Trade Robert Peck said
the Board of Trade has supported voting rights in the Senate and House
of Representatives for DC since 1917, and in 1972 endorsed the Home Rule
Charter. He said the Board of Trade supports expansion of the Home Rule
Charter, including budgetary and legislative autonomy. He said this is
based on “pragmatic considerations.” He said their members
throughout the region support and promote voting rights for DC in
Congress. Mr. Peck explained the benefits to the region of having
Senators and greater levels of DC autonomy, and made a business case —
DC representatives will add clout to the whole region. He said the
current arrangement violates fundamental principles of business
management. Mr. Peck said he didn't know if “we want to market DC's
disenfranchisement” because that message isn't a positive marketing
point for attracting business. He said that having an improved business
climate was a better marketing point for developing the economy. Rep.
Morella said, “Your groups could be a good conduit.”
Executive Director of DC Appleseed Center Walter Smith, having been
Deputy Corporation Counsel for DC when DC brought suit in Alexander vs.
Daley contending that DC's lack of voting representation is
unconstitutional, said, “[W]e have brought our case to the Congress
because that is precisely what the 2-1 ruling from the court directed us
to do.” He said they court ruled that “it is unjust that we do not
have voting rights, but this is an issue that Congress, not the courts,
should address.” Mr. Smith said, “Congress has the authority by
simple legislation to confer voting rights on District citizens.” To
his testimony he attached a legal memorandum supporting his assertion.
He agreed that Congress could take away legislative rights is confers,
but said he didn't think Congress would take rights away once granted.
Eugene Boyd, analyst, American National Government Congressional
Research Service, reported on a study by the Congressional Research
Service comparing DC to ten national capitals.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS
Boys Town Teach-in
Karen A. Szulgit, kaszulgit@ilsr.org
Stand Up! for Democracy in DC Coalition Invites you to a Teach-In on
The (Girls and) Boys Town Controversy: NIMBYism or Neighborhood
Takeover? Tuesday, July 23rd, 6:30 - 8:30 p.m., basement conference
room, National Council of Negro Women, 633 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,
Green/Yellow Metro Line, Archives/Navy Memorial Stop. Because you
deserve to learn the facts, you can effect change in your community, and
your opinion matters! Is this just another example of DC residents
decrying “Not in MY Backyard” or is the US Congress taking advantage
of Washingtonians? Come join our discussion and decide for yourself!
(Girls and) Boys Town, based in Omaha, Nebraska, targeted the corner
of 14th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, SE, as the only properly zoned
site in DC to build a complex of group homes for 40 troubled youth. A
total of $7.1 million in taxpayer money came to (Girls and) Boys Town
through the DC Appropriations process in 1999 to help expand its
programs here; the city has pledged to pay a $150 per day subsidy for
housing and guidance for each youth remanded by the District of Columbia
Court System. In 2001, officials at the DC Board of Zoning Adjustments (BZA)
approved the construction of four separate homes to house a total of 24
youths on the 1.6 acre lot in southeast. Wilbert "Will" Hill,
Chair, (544-3785) and Ellen Opper-Weiner, Vice-Chair, (547-7131) of the
Southeast Citizens for Smart Development (SCSD) are leading the fight
against (Girls and) Boys Town locating on Capitol Hill and have openly,
publicly, and regularly expressed their dissatisfaction with the
process. Rev. Val J. Peter, executive director of (Girls and) Boys Town,
responded to community opposition with a lawsuit, claiming that SCSD,
Will Hill, Ellen Opper-Weiner, District officials, and the city itself
are in violation of the “Fair Housing Act’s prohibitions against
discrimination on the basis of race and handicap.” The Center for
Individual Rights (CIR), joined by the American Civil Liberties
Union-National Capital Area, is defending the First Amendment Rights of
the members of SCSD. CIR believes that the members of SCSD have acted in
the finest tradition of participatory democracy in speaking out against
the project. In February 2002, residents argued that building permits
granted to (Girls and) Boys Town violated a city law barring the
construction of community-based residential facilities within 500 feet
of existing ones. In May 2002, BZA officials reversed themselves and
stripped the permits for (Girls and) Boys Town. Representative Lee Terry
(R-NE) asked about 40 members of Congress to sign a letter of petition
calling on Rep. Joe Knollenberg (R-MI), chairman of the House’s DC
Appropriations subcommittee, to recognize the “fundamental
injustice” of the DC zoning officials, and to take proper action. For
another side of the story, contact: Sharon Robinson, Public Relations
Consultant, (Girls and) Boys Town, 4801 Sargent Road, NE, 832-7343, fax
832-9807, http://www.girlsandboystown.org/.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — HELP WANTED
Membership Position at National Health
Advocacy/Education Organization
Rene Wallis, rwallis@dcpca.org
The National Association of Community Health Centers (NACHC), based
in Bethesda, Maryland, has retained Slesinger Management Services to
recruit an energetic and creative person to serve as Director of
Membership. This person will oversee the organization's work in
recruiting and retaining members, and will play a lead role in designing
new programs and services that meet members' needs. Community health
centers are nonprofit organizations that offer comprehensive primary and
preventive health care, including medical, dental, social, and mental
health services, in urban and rural areas where access to doctors and
medical facilities has historically been inadequate. These centers serve
predominantly low-income people, including migrant workers, people who
are homeless, and families without private health insurance. Currently,
there are approximately 1,000 community health centers throughout the
country serving 11 million people. NACHC itself has a staff of 59, and a
budget of $14 million.
The ideal candidate for Director of Membership should have at least
five years of progressively responsible, hands-on experience in
membership within a national association. Experience with organizational
memberships (as opposed to lower-cost individual memberships) would be
especially valuable. The complete announcement is posted at http://www.SlesingerManagement.com.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — HOUSING
Apartment Rental Sought
Jon Katz, jon-at-markskatz-dot-com
My friend seeks a 1 or 2 bedroom rental near downtown Silver Spring,
to move in no later than August 6. Complexes of interest include the
Parkside Plaza and Rock Creek Gardens condos. If you know somebody who's
renting in the area (condo or apartment complex) or who has access to
listings, please contact me at the above-listed E-mail address, or at
301-495-4300.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — VOLUNTEERS
Pediatric Care Volunteer Work Day Saturday
Sarah Barnett, sarahbarnett1@starpower.net
If you have a few hours free on Saturday, July 27th, Pediatric
AIDS/HIV Care, Inc., an after school facility serving children from the
District, Maryland and Virginia, located at 450 M Street, NW, needs your
help. We are having a Volunteer Work Day from noon to 3 p.m. Some of the
opportunities on Saturday are giving the five-story stairwell a second
coat of paint and the large sitting room two coats of paint; the
computer room needs your expertise; the Executive Director, Gerri
Graves, always welcomes help researching sources of contributions, help
with writing grants and other administrative tasks.
There are several groups (interns, junior/high school students and
others) who need to put in a certain number of hours of volunteer time.
Pediatric Care (a 501(c)(3) organization) is a wonderful place to
accomplish that on our work days. We always welcome new faces. Gerri
Graves delights in showing newcomers around, explaining what the staff
is accomplishing. The facility is located two blocks from the new
convention center. For more information, please telephone Pediatric Care
at 347-5366.
###############
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every
Wednesday and Sunday. To subscribe, to change E-mail addresses, or to
switch between HTML and plain text versions of themail, use the
subscription form at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail/subscribe.htm.
To unsubscribe, send an E-mail message to themail@dcwatch.com
with “unsubscribe” in the subject line. Archives of past messages
are available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should also be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com,
and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of
Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to
be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief
paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can
be put into each mailing.