The Fix We’re In
Dear Voters:
I'm sending themail early this evening because Dorothy and I are
going to spend the rest of the night completing our challenge against
Mayor Williams's nominating petitions. We shall file the challenge with
the Board of Elections tomorrow, and shall write more about it in
Wednesday's issue. For now, what I can write is that we do not believe
there are two thousand good signatures — signatures untainted by
forgery or other fraud -- out of the ten thousand signatures on the
Mayor's petitions. The Board of Elections and Ethics normally favors
candidates in the challenge and appeal process; its bias is to put
candidates on the ballot if they're within a few signatures of making
it, and if the rules only have to be bent a bit to accomplish it. But
when faced with a blatant crime of this scope and size, and with a
candidate who has fallen hundreds of signatures short of the required
amount, the Board will be most likely to enforce the rules strictly.
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
###############
Trouble with an Unusually Cool Summer Breeze
in Paradise
Mark David Richards, 17th Street Strip, mark@bisconti.com
We live in troubled times in our little DC paradise (banana republic,
some challenge). Crime is still out of control. A pipe bomb explodes and
I watch in wonder as sirens fly by with hazardous materials trucks. I
still want to know what I'm supposed to do if there is a terrorist
attack when I'm walking down the street. We've entered this new security
age — everybody watching everybody. (Time to learn a dance for all the
cameras, I suppose.) No doubt, security is important. And so are civil
liberties. Fire Department Chief Ronnie Few . . . what can I say. Our DC
bureaucracy is as bureaucratic as ever. The federal government is busy
reorganizing its bureaucracies, spending, spending, spending, and
haphazardly jumping into local affairs. 401-Ks have dropped so much in
value one wonders about the future. Housing costs and rents continue to
rise. DC residents can't decide if they want to keep being a federal
colony or try to win some measure of freedom. We seem to be at the
center of some unspecified but precarious storm. And there seems to be a
vacuum of leadership.
And then we have the upcoming election. For Mayor Williams, this has
got to be a migraine time. I would be furious! I don't know what the
people who were supposedly his advocates were doing related to getting
in-person endorsements for his reelection, but it looks pretty bad.
You'd suspect these subordinates weren't on his team at all. I'm not a
vocal critic of Mayor Williams, and I don't see a better mayoral choice
to maneuver DC through the District's power elite feuds. But hundreds
(thousands?) of fraudulent petition signatures -- that requires a decent
explanation. What exactly is happening? Is this ridiculous situation a
symptom of a chain-of-command problem, incompetence, reckless abandon,
sabotage, or what? I heard someone say the mayor is running against
himself. That sounds like the truth.
Despite the sociopolitical storm clouds, DC's actual weather has been
great. Trees are full and flowers in bloom. Gardening time. Someone can
offer a simple smile while passing on the sidewalk and wash all my DC
troubles away. The street life on the 17th Street strip is vibrant, and
there are many smiling faces and silly and interesting people. Moods
seem light, as light gets in DC. The dusk sky is beautiful, a deep
cobalt gray blue. The days are long. This cool summer breeze seems to
temporarily erase trouble in paradise. I'm listening for the
mockingbirds; I don't think they've made it to my neighborhood yet.
###############
Burned-Out Streetlights
Valerie Kenyon Gaffney, VKG0531@aol.com
I submitted this three or more weeks ago to Dr. Gridlock, to no
avail. Then I thought perhaps some reader of themail might have a
suggestion: I travel Rt. 27 (Washington Boulevard) past the Pentagon
daily. For months now, the streetlight at the pedestrian crosswalk just
south of the Arlington Memorial Bridge has been burned out. Within the
past couple of weeks, the light immediately adjacent to it has gone out
as well. There are lights burned out on the bridge too, including one
across the bridge on the approach to Rock Creek Parkway.
When approaching this crosswalk (as well as the one at the Lincoln
Memorial where the sidewalk crosses the entrance ramp to RCP) after dark
it is impossible for a motorist to see if a pedestrian or cyclist is
waiting to cross or is already crossing the boulevard headed for
Arlington National Cemetery, thus allowing you to slow down or stop for
them. The way traffic speeds through there, it's only a matter of time
before an unsuspecting tourist becomes a statistic, unaware that
Washington traffic waits for neither time, nor tide, nor pedestrians,
nor bicyclists. To whom does one complain to get the burned out
streetlights replaced, before someone does get hit?
###############
Williams Administration Recipe for Bad Labor
Relations
Donald Rifenburgh, drifenburgh@yahoo.com
Here for your consideration is the recipe for an unsavory dish that
Mayor Williams' administration has been cooking up for the past two
years, at the expense of labor relations and DC taxpayers. 1: Take one
veteran Department of Human Services employee who is receiving
psychiatric treatment following the deaths of his partner and his
partner's daughter. When the employee requests a temporary modification
of his work assignment to accommodate his medical condition, have him
fired the following day as “an immediate threat to the agency and the
public.” Step 2: Appoint a hearing examiner of your choice to hear the
employee's appeal of his dismissal. When the hearing examiner determines
the dismissal was unjustified and that the employee should be restored
to his position with full back pay and benefits, disregard her
considered decision. Step 3: Ignore the labor contract requiring a
decision in the matter within 45 days. Instead, keep the employee
waiting for 490 days, and then issue a final decision upholding the
dismissal. Do not offer any justification or explanation for firing the
employee. Step 4: When the employee's union submits a formal grievance
under the labor contract and calls for the employee's reinstatement,
waste another opportunity to do the right thing and deny the grievance.
Again, make sure no justification or explanation is offered. Step 5: Try
to avoid an adverse ruling by an independent arbitrator that will expose
your administration's unfair labor practices. Make repeated assertions
to the employee's union that you want to settle the matter.
Step 6: Set aside the ingredients and wait an additional five months
before presenting the employee's union with a settlement proposal. Make
sure the proposal will be unacceptable to the employee and his union by
way of the following: A) Refuse to restore the employee to his previous
job, and instead insist he agree to accept an unspecified position with
an unspecified agency at an unspecified time in the future. B) Insist
that the employee help bear the financial burden incurred through the
malice and ineptitude of your administrators by making him agree to
forfeit an unspecified amount of the back pay he is owed. Step 7: Try to
keep a straight face while you ask for the endorsement of labor unions
and the votes of union members in your upcoming reelection bid. Step 8:
Add generous portions of dissembling, cynicism and bad faith. Stir
thoroughly and sweep under the rug until after the election.
Recipe serves a city of approximately 500,000. Total cost of recipe
— don't worry, the DC taxpayers are footing the bill!
###############
Ronnie Few’s Reference Letter
Ralph Blessing, rblessin88@hotmail.com
According to the July 11 Washington Post, the mayor of
Augusta, Georgia, wrote a glowing letter of reference for Ronnie Few.
However, Mayor William's press secretary, Tony Bullock, indicated that
he saw no need to contact the Georgia mayor before Few was offered the
position of DC Fire Chief. And exactly what planet does Mr. Bullock
reside on? During my many years with the feds and non-profits, I don't
recall one hiring decision ever being made without first following up
with references. But with such a high-profile position as fire chief,
the mayor's office doesn't think it's necessary? Sure, maybe (as Bullock
contends) the Augusta mayor should have been more forthcoming in his
letter, but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to recognize that you
don't take reference letters at face value.
###############
The Mayor’s Race
Michael Bindner, mbindnerdc at aol
In the event the Mayor is thrown off the ballot, which candidates are
left? I can't imagine that the Williams campaign is not examining every
signature turned in by another candidate. (If they aren't, they are
dumber than any of us thought). The District Democratic Party would then
be faced with an open election, and several write in candidates. The
question is, who will people write in. It is likely that the Mayor will
mount such a campaign — although after the current signature fiasco,
the honorable thing to do would be to withdraw from the race. Many
people will likely write in Marion Barry's name — and if he gives any
hint of support for such an effort he would likely win. Kevin Chavous
should be seriously tempted to undertake a write in campaign —
although he would be wise not to unless Barry endorses either his
candidacy or Tony's. If the ego of Jack Evans throws his hat in it could
split the Tony vote. If both he and Kevin had run outright, Jack would
have had a serious chance of winning the primary. If the long time
movers and shakers in DC politics have any sense, they will huddle up
sometime soon and settle on a candidate and support him (or her) in a
united front. Given the collection of current council members, I would
think that the ultimate unity candidate would be John Ray. John, do you
read this list?
I have a question for the Democratic readership. If the election were
held today and no one were on the ballot, who would you write in? (If I
were still a Democrat and still a DC voter, I would likely write in John
Ray). For GOP members of the list, with Tony running as damaged goods,
should Carol run, and will you write her name in? Finally, given the
current institutional problems with the DC Dems (their slavish ties to a
corrupt Williams machine) perhaps the best alternative is to go outside
the traditional parties and look at the Green front-runner — Steve
Donkin (whom I am supporting).
###############
Election Fraud and Where Is Kelvin Robinson?
John Olinger, North Lincoln Park, john.olinger@worldnet.att.net
It says a great deal about the mayor's insecurity that they had to
cook the petitions. For the first time ever, I agree with one of Ed
Barron's posts. I served on a jury during the last week before petitions
were due and almost every morning, I was approached by people asking me
to sign a nominating petition for a candidate. Having been involved in
countless nominating petition drives over the years, I've adopted the
attitude that 1) if I am qualified to sign, and 2) if I do not strongly
disagree with the candidate or position, I will sign the petition. I
generally talk to the petitioner to find out more about the candidate or
the issue. DC Superior Court is a good place because among potential or
actual jurors, there is bound to be a rich stream of registered voters
who reside in the District (say as compared to a Metro stop). Anyway,
amongst all those petitioners, I never once found a petitioner for the
mayor. Raising the question, that if they weren't at the supermarket and
they weren't at the court, where were they? Did anyone on the mail sign
a petition for the mayor? Did anyone on the mail see a petition gatherer
for the mayor? Has anyone seen the mayor?
Now that we know more than we would like to know (now) but should
have known (then) about Chief Few, one wonders why they keep Kelvin
Robinson, the other hire without benefit of due diligence, under wraps?
Just askin'.
###############
Sam Kaiser Case in the Washington
Post
Richard P. Schmitt, seabsct@smart.net
The Sam Kaiser scandal is being swept under the rug either with the
active assistance of the Washington Post or just through
negligent journalism. The Post reported on Mr. Kaiser's guilty
plea on July 10, Page B01. However, nowhere in the article was mention
made of a plea bargain. The fact that there was a plea bargain, as
reported in the Washington Times, July 10, Page B1, is important
for two reasons. The public has a right to know both how the criminal
system is being administered and their government managed. Avoiding a
trial by a plea bargain does not promote either of these ends in the
Kaiser case. The citizens of the District of Columbia have valid reasons
to want a public airing of the facts of the crimes or a guilty plea,
with no bargains, to all the charges. The current city administration
has reasons to avoid a public airing of the facts of the crimes.
A trial would have disclosed which government officials authorized or
allowed Kaiser to have sole check writing authority over a city bank
account. A trial probably would have disclosed if other government
employees have been allowed such illegal rights. A trial may also have
provided an exploration of the hiring practices of the Chief Financial
Officer. It is possible that the Chief Financial Officer's refusal to
utilize the Corporation Counsel's Office and then to hire, without
verifying professional licenses, a “lawyer” to provide the services
may have seen the light of public scrutiny. Trials and criminal
convictions sometimes lead to changes of laws or changes through the
ballot box.
Defenders of the Washington Post may point to a editorial in
the June 30, edition, Page B06, which explores the apparent breakdowns
in the District's hiring and financial systems. However, we should not
have to read the editorials for the complete news. Particularly, where
just the use of two words, “plea bargain,” would have gone a far way
in making the July 10 article accurate and informative. A second reason
that the accuracy of the article is important is a reader would have the
impression that stealing $248,000 and mail fraud only warrants a
three-year sentence. The Washington Times points out that as a
result of the plea agreement, Kaiser does not face ten years of jail as
asked for in the indictment. A seemingly small point, but worth noting
when citizens base their views on the fairness and efficiency of the
judicial system on the sentences white collar or street criminals face.
###############
Jackson Challenges Mayor Williams to Debate on
Contract Corruption
Arthur H. Jackson, Jr., CCADADC2@aol.com
Since taking office in January 1999, Mayor Tony Williams has seen no
fewer than fifty city employees indicted or convicted of corruption in
government. This record is higher than Barry's, Kelly's, and
Washington's administrations all combined together. Political corruption
in our city government will be target of my administration, and I will
announce a major proposal on Saturday, July 20, at the monthly meeting
of the Ward 8 Democrats, to fight corruption in the District government.
As a Candidate for Mayor, I challenged Mayor Williams to three
debates on corruption, housing and the displacement of African
Americans, Latinos, and fixed income Caucasians and on education and
public safety. The voters of DC need and deserve a debate our different
views of DC, and which candidate is the best candidate to deliver
quality services, real affordable housing, and open up the doors of
opportunity to all District of Columbia contractors, vendors and
suppliers, not just those contributors to the Mayor's reelection.
###############
I'd like to make two suggestions for submittals by citizens to
themail, of which I have become an avid reader because of its inclusion
of informative, engaging dialogue about issues our community faces.
First, I believe that an open, informative dialogue requires
contributing writers to be identified by their affiliations when those
affiliations are substantially relevant to their posts. One example: the
published postings of one repeat writer, who works for a city
councilmember, have criticized another elected official from an opposing
political party. Readers of themail wouldn't have automatically known of
the writer's affiliation. By proposing inclusion of
substantially-relevant affiliations, I do not suggest that a post by a
member of one political party, or by a particular employer, merit being
dismissed — or believed — merely because of the affiliation. Rather,
I suggest that inclusion of affiliations helps to place one's public
perspective in context.
Often, I agree with a post that arguably and, perhaps only
coincidentally, articulates what most would expect to be consistent with
a “company line” articulated by the writer's affiliated
organization(s). But only by being well-informed of affiliations can
readers of themail make informed judgments and put many postings in
context. The hard and credible work of activist and themail
co-publisher, Dorothy Brizill, has made that case powerfully. Also, I
would sum up the criteria for what kind of affiliations merit being
included as: does it pass the sniff test?
My second suggestion relates to the tone or approach taken by
writers. It is my belief that people's communication style in general
has taken on a nastier tone in the past fifteen years. While nasty
political communication has been at play for many centuries, I believe
it has turned nastier at lower levels — as in among and between
neighbors. A posting in the July 10th edition of themail lambasted
another writer: “...your high level of vitriol has affected not only
your brain but your vision and hearing too!” It so happens that I
agreed with the substance behind the July 10th posting. But it reminds
me of an E-mail I received recently from a “peace” activist inviting
me to a rally to “eat Bush 4 lunch.” If we are going to preach
reasonableness and openness and compassion in the political process and
in public policy, then we should consistently incorporate such
principles in how we address people as well.
I submit that one is apt to be more effective in articulating one's
viewpoint, especially if one is seeking to address those whose minds
have not yet been made up on a particular issue -- and is also apt to
promote a more healthy society and community — by praising and
criticizing people's positions and actions, rather than bitterly
attacking, or “partisanly” defending an individual person or even
organization. The two most essential ingredients for effective
communication are kindness and honesty. Criticizing an opponent by
mocking his brain, hearing, and vision is not nice. It is not effective.
It is not necessary. It is not informative. It is, ironically, itself
vitriolic. I submit that it is really another example of the “politics
of personal destruction” that the Clintons and liberal Democrats in
particular decried for years. Vitriolic communications is also like a
cancer that eats away at our dignity, and ultimately dampens
participation. themail is too good of a civic tool to be subjected as a
hotbed of praise and denouncement of people — instead of ideas.
###############
Just over the last few weeks, themail and other sources have hosted
criticisms of efforts to change the DC flag, of the Declaration of
Reunification at the British Embassy on July 3, and of the Statehood
Green Party's reception at the Palisades Parade on July 4. Enough with
the infighting, already.
The various groups working for democracy in the District may not
agree on everything, but we have a hell of a lot more in common than we
have with the opponents arrayed against us. Anyone who is going to make
the effort to stand up for DC rights should not be pilloried for being
“ideologically impure” or slightly “off-message.” I applaud
anyone who takes a step to advance democracy for the District, even if I
don't agree with the exact message or solution. Let's have a meaningful
debate on the DC flag changes, but let's make sure that we end up with a
change that promotes the cause. Some things we do may offend a few
people, but asking nicely for our rights hasn't exactly been working.
###############
Prince Hall Masons Versus the Cardoza Shaw
Neighborhood Association
Clyde E. Howard, Jr., ceohoward@hotmail.com
The Cardozo Shaw Neighborhood Association (CSNA) has taken the
position to oppose the addition to a parking lot that the Prince Hall
Masons own. This addition will add nine additional spaces to the current
spaces and will reduce the number of cars parking in the neighborhood by
a like number. However, the rancor that took place in the CSNA meeting
on July 11 had such racial overtones that it appeared that the real
objection was due to the fact that the Prince Hall Masons own some of
the most prime property in the community and that certain individuals
are not able to induce their bourgeois and capitalistic ideas upon the
Masonic organization. Therefore, it is their intent to deny the Masons
the ability to provide a small parking lot for their members who do not
live in the community and must use personal transportation to and from
the Masonic Temple Building. The subway or taxicab places an unfair
burden upon our fixed income members plus many of the cabs do not stop
for fares of a certain color at night and the subway stop running at an
early time that affects attendance at meetings. The cry of affecting
property values by a parking lot is nothing more then a smokescreen that
cannot be proven. The escalating prices of housing in the area do not
support the assumption of declining housing values caused by a parking
lot. This organization presupposes that they have the voice of the
community. They do not since their membership reflects who they really
represent. They are not as diverse as they have pronounced, they are
more myopic in their views and are ignorant of the true character of
this community. Most have only moved into this area on a 1/32nd of time
and have not fought to stabilize this area as so many have in the past.
When an Organization such as the Masons, who have contributed so much
to the community at large, is now being opposed because of a small
matter of an additional nine parking spaces on a current parking lot, an
insignificant matter, beware; the CSNA might develop a home owners
association telling you how to cut your grass.
###############
I was surprised to hear that Ed T. Baron and his roommate collected
fewer than seven signatures per hour for Kathy Patterson. I had no
trouble gathering twenty to twenty-five an hour for Erik Gaull.
###############
Problems with Washington Diplomat Web
Page
Charles Stevenson, anjinsan@his.com
Am I the only person having chronic problems accessing the Washington
Diplomat magazine's web page, at http://www.washdiplomat.com?
This is a great page, supporting as it does a fine paper, and I'd come
to rely on it as a source of good information. But about eight months
ago it started crashing my browser, esp. when I tried to navigate
sub-pages inside the top level page. Several inquiries to the webmaster
produced “We can't find anything wrong” to, more recently, no
response at all to my inquiry.
This is a problem I haven't experienced on any other page in several
years, and it happens almost every time I bring up their page. Does
anyone else have this problem? Feel free to straighten me out off line.
###############
This is to advise that the July 2002 on-line edition has been
uploaded and may be accessed at http://www.intowner.com.
Included are the lead stories, community news items and crime reports,
editorials (including prior months' archived), restaurant reviews (prior
months' also archived), and the text from the ever-popular “Scenes
from the Past” feature. Also included are all current classified ads.
The complete issue (along with prior issues back to April 2001) also is
available in PDF file format by direct access from our home page at no
charge simply by clicking the link provided. Here you will be able to
view the entire issue as it looks in print, including the new ABC Board
actions report, all photos and advertisements. The next issue will
publish on August 9. The complete PDF version will be posted by early
that Friday morning, following which the text of the lead stories,
community news, and selected features will be uploaded shortly
thereafter.
To read this month's lead stories, simply click the link on the home
page to the following headlines: (1) “DC Agency Officer Found to Hold
Unrevealed Full-Time Position at University of Maryland”; (2)
“Dupont to Georgetown Shuttle Bus Garnering Enthusiastic Ridership”;
(3) “Neighborhood Park Set for Summer.”
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS
The DC Public Library faces fewer open hours and reduced services.
The Mayor has placed an embargo on the Library's spending until it comes
up with a plan due July 16 to reduce expenditures by $905,000 in the
remaining 2-1/2 months of the fiscal year. The Library paces its
expenditures so it doesn't exceed its budget (unlike other units of the
DC government). It operates with a very frugal budget, about 7/10 of 1
percent of the total District budget, and reducing its spending by
$905,000 will require sharp cutbacks in hours the branches are open and
a reduction in services to the communities served by the branches. If
you're opposed to this unwarranted and last-minute cutback, E-mail the
mayor - it doesn't have to be a long message and I understand he reads
E-mails.
It's short notice, but the Library Board of Trustees is meeting with
the public on the proposed reductions at 6 p.m. on Monday, July 15, Room
443 at the Martin Luther King, Jr., Library at 9th and G Streets, NW. On
Metro (red, yellow, green lines) use the 9th Street exit at Gallery
Place.
###############
Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs)
Barbara Conn, bconn@cpcug.org
While on the go, do you need an easier way to keep in touch with
colleagues via instant messenger, E-mail, and the Web? Would you like an
alternative to lugging around a heavy laptop when making presentations?
Do you need to develop Web sites for easy viewing on the wide variety of
PDAs now available? If you answered yes to any of these questions, you
won't want to miss this event! Those PDA Guys, Shawn Googins and Ray
Wiley, will be leading a seminar to help new and experienced PalmOS or
Pocket PC PDA users become more productive while on the go. Gather your
questions, friends, and colleagues and bring them to the Saturday, July
20, 1:00 p.m. (check-in: 12:50 p.m.), meeting of the Capital PC User
Group (CPCUG) Entrepreneurs and Consultants Special Interest Group
(SIG).
Meetings are free and are held each month, usually on the third
Saturday, at the Cleveland Park Library (Second Floor Large Meeting
Room) at 3310 Connecticut Avenue, NW, just a block and a half south of
the Cleveland Park Metrorail station and half a block south of the
Cineplex Odeon Uptown movie theater. For more information about the
seminar, the speakers, and CPCUG, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit educational
organization, and to register for the meeting, visit http://www.cpcug.org/user/entrepreneur/702meet.html.
###############
I know you all are aware that DC is going to require all businesses
to have a Master Business License. There will seminars on it all over
the city during the summer, but the one for us in Chevy Chase DC will be
held this coming Tuesday morning, July 16, at 8:00 a.m. to 9:30 a.m., at
the Chevy Chase Community Center, corner of Connecticut and McKinley
Streets in Chevy Chase DC. For more info contact the DCRA at 727-8964
Just thought all of you should know. And from what I understand,
every business in DC will have to have this license — nonprofit,
school, any business. But we will find more out about this on Tuesday.
###############
Ward 2 Dems Endorsement Forum
B. Warren Lane, buddlane@msn.com
The Ward 2 Democrats invite you to an endorsement forum, Sunday, July
21, 3:00-5:00 p.m., St. Thomas Church, 18th and Church Streets, NW.
Registration will begin at 3:00 p.m. and end at 4:30 p.m. Quorum call
will commence at 3:15 p.m. and business will commence when a quorum is
reached. Order of business: adoption of the rules of the day;
nominations from floor for DC Democratic State Committee Reps: speeches
by qualified candidates for Mayor, Congressional Delegate, At-Large City
Councilmember, Shadow Senator, and Shadow Representative.
Voting may commence upon conclusion of nominations for State
Committee Reps and will conclude by 4:30 p.m. All registered Democrats
in Ward 2 are welcome to participate. For more information, call
682-0300.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — RECOMMENDATIONS
Contractor Experiences Sought
Deborah C. Fort, fortdc@earthlink.net
We recently dealt with a crooked contractor and received redress
through the DC Regulatory and Court systems. To broaden the story, I'd
like to hear other themail readers' experiences with contractors, bad
and good, and (if bad) what the homeowners did about them. Please let me
know if I may quote you or your contractor's name in print; if no, I'd
still like to know about what happened, and I will protect your privacy.
###############
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every
Wednesday and Sunday. To subscribe, to change E-mail addresses, or to
switch between HTML and plain text versions of themail, use the
subscription form at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail/subscribe.htm.
To unsubscribe, send an E-mail message to themail@dcwatch.com
with “unsubscribe” in the subject line. Archives of past messages
are available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should also be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com,
and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of
Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to
be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief
paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can
be put into each mailing.