The Nonpolitical Season
Dear Voters:
It certainly doesn't look like there will be much of a choice at the
polls this year. We're only seven months and a week or two away from the
primary election, and there are no serious announced primary candidates
to challenge any of the following elected officials, all of whom are
running for reelection: Mayor Anthony Williams; Delegate Eleanor Holmes
Norton; Council Chairman Linda Cropp; At-Large Councilmembers David
Catania and Phil Mendelson; Councilmembers Graham (Ward 1), Patterson
(Ward 3), Orange (Ward 5), and Ambrose (Ward 6); Board of Education
Chair Peggy Cooper Cafritz; and Board of Education members Tommy Wells
(District 3) and William Lockridge (District 4).
Is this a sign that DC voters are happy and satisfied, or that we are
discouraged and hopeless? I don't think that the lack of candidates can
be blamed on the federal government, though undoubtedly some will blame
it on Congress. But which alternate explanation makes more sense: the
perceived failure of home rule; the taint on serving in the District
government continuing from the Barry years; the stagnation imposed by
one-party rule; campaign financing from the business community which
goes exclusively to incumbents; or a political culture in which
everybody is reelected, if not for life, at least for the normal length
of a full career? Or do you have another explanation?
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
###############
Springlike Plans
Carol Bessette, Certified Master Tour Guide, Jcbessette@aol.com
Overlooked sights? This is a subject dear to my heart as a DC tour
guide. I will be giving a presentation on this subject at the Pohick
Regional Library in Fairfax County on June 20, 2002. You mentioned two
good ones: 1) the Botanical Gardens: newly renovated, bright, sparkling,
and colorful. For a brief period of time you can forget the forest of
Jersey barriers and sewer pipe “defenses” surrounding our government
buildings. 2) The National Zoo, not just for the pandas, but for the new
babies — a baby elephant, a baby tiger, and a baby giraffe. Go and
watch young families bring their toddlers for their first zoo
experience; it is fun to watch.
Other thoughts (and remember that what you consider to be well-known
may not be familiar to other people. As a tour guide working with local
groups, I have learned that these places are not known, or visited, by
many in our area.) 1) Lincoln Park. Check out a copy of James M. Goode's
Outdoor Sculpture of Washington, DC at your local library, and
read the history of the events and people involved in the two
thought-provoking statues (the Emancipation Monument and the statue of
Mary McLeod Bethune). 2) National Building Museum. One of the most
magnificent legacies of the Civil War in Washington. Look closely at the
frieze that encompasses the building. Try to start out by taking one of
the excellent building tours offered by the docent staff, and then
immerse yourself in their exhibits. Lunch and a wonderful museum shop on
the site. You can easily spend a full day there. 3) Hillwood Museum and
Gardens. A gem of the city, with its elegant home, and fabulous
(literally) collection of Imperial Russian and French decorative art,
which translates into items like Faberge eggs, the nuptial crown worn by
the last Czarina, and the like. Tour the gardens, which are beautiful
year-round. 4) The Washington National Cathedral. Yes, most of us have
been there, perhaps for a “macro” view. Go and sit and watch the
light on the columns change as the sunlight changes. Go and pick one
item on which to concentrate and follow that item throughout the
building -- examples: the wrought iron or the needlework. Visit the
Bishop's Garden. 5) Fort Stevens. Stand where Lincoln stood (and came
under fire) during the only direct attack on Washington during the Civil
War. Try to imagine the scene at the time. Consider how the 19th Century
Army engineers (who took advantage of the terrain for their fort system)
never imagined we'd be using the same promontories for television
towers. 6) Fort Ward (yes, it is Virginia, but as a tour guide, I know
that tourism in Washington is a regional issue.) Visit for the best
introduction to the complex Civil War fort system that guarded the
nation's capital the last time it came under attack. 7) National
Cryptologic Museum at Fort Meade. Not just for the technically inclined.
Its depiction of code-making and code-breaking throughout history has
particular meaning in light of recent headlines. (Note: it has reopened
since 9/11, but only during the week. It plans to eventually reopen on
Saturdays.) 8) The Navy Museum at the Navy Yard. One of the best museums
in the area for young people. Lots of hands-on displays, and plenty for
the older folk. Highly recommended. Call first because of security
restrictions. 9) The National Museum of Health and Medicine at Walter
Reed Army Medical Center. Ditto on all counts, including calling. Also
highly recommended. 10) Newseum (yes, Virginia again.) Visit it quickly;
it will close in early March. However, Freedom Park and the Berlin Wall
exhibit (outside) will remain open to the public. Both are excellent,
especially the Berlin Wall display. See how one side (which faced West
Berlin) was covered in graffiti, but the side which faced back into East
Berlin was untouched by spray paint. See the East German guard house, at
one time a truly menacing sight.
Other lesser-known DC museums worthy of a visit, or a repeat visit:
1) The Mary McLeod Bethune Council House National Historic Site, 2) the
Sewall-Belmont House, 3) Woodrow Wilson House, 4) the Textile Museum, 5)
Anderson House, 6) the Octagon, 7) the Department of Interior Museum (I
would call first). And this list is just a start!
###############
Doing Good and Doing Well — Interactive
Applications Group
Phil Shapiro, pshapiro@his.com
Back in 1995 I met two college grads volunteering their time at the
Capital Children's Museum. In passing they told me they were starting
their own web-design company, Interactive Applications Group (iapps),
whose focus is to help national nonprofit organizations and foundations
establish a strong web presence. True to their word, their company has
flourished and encountered a string of successes. I'm so proud of what
these fellows have been able to accomplish. If you visit the web site of
the Meyer Foundation (one of the largest foundations in the DC area) or
countless other entities working to better the human condition, you'll
find iapps as the site designer. http://www.meyerfoundation.org/,
http://www.iapps.com. The icing on
the cake? Last month the company's internal intranet won an award as one
of the top ten intranets in the world. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20011125.html.
Can one person change the world? You bet! Can a small group of
dedicated web designer have a strongly positive impact on the nonprofit
and foundation world, helping community builders extend their work even
further? Even more so. Based here in DC. We're proud of 'em. (Note: I
have no financial connections to the company. Just a bystander observing
the company's growth.)
###############
Hey Bill, Can Your Mother Cross This
Intersection?
Ed T. Barron, edtb@aol.com
In this week's District Section of the Post there is a piece
in the Dr. Gridlock section about the intersection of 25th and K
Streets, NW. Bill Rice notes that the walk signal is on for 27 seconds
to allow pedestrians to safely cross the 115 foot intersection. Let me
show you the math. To safely cross this intersection in 27 seconds one
must walk at a pace of 5 feet per second. That equates to 2.9 miles per
hour. Now that does not sound fast, but I can assure you that it is
quite fast for older folks.
I walk a 2.7 mile course daily at a pace of 3.6 miles per hour, and
that is a very brisk walk. I wonder if Bill Rice would like his mom to
cross at that intersection the way it is currently set up. There are
also complaints about drivers ignoring pedestrians crossing there and
ignoring the red light. Seems to me that there are two solutions that
should be implemented at this crossing: Add ten more seconds to the
crossing light, and put some cops down there to ticket those who ignore
the law. That would be both pedestrian and DC Treasury friendly.
###############
David Catania, Our Next Mayor, Our Best Choice
Arthur H. Jackson, Jr., ccadadc@aol.com
A bipartisan coalition of DC residents tired of ethics violations,
corruption, and government incompetence and insensitivity to the needs
of the people of this city are calling for the drafting of David Catania
for Mayor of Washington, DC
We believe David Catania makes sense for DC more now than ever. We
need a leader not afraid to tell corrupt DC officials we will not
tolerate misuse of the public trust. From East of the River to Capitol
Hill to the proposed towers in Ward 3, Tony Williams has violated the
public trust and faces his own ethics questions.
Democrats serving on the Democratic State Committee are expected to
announce a drive to encourage David Catania to seek the Democratic
nomination for mayor. However, the group has committed to supporting
Councilman Catania if Councilmember Kevin Chavous decides not to run. We
urge all DC residents tired of this shameful administration to call
David Catania's office and tell him we need him as Mayor now.
###############
Presidential Champions for the District of
Columbia
Mark David Richards, Dupont East, mark@bisconti.com
As George W. Bush prepares to make his State of the Union address on
Tuesday night, I wondered what I’d like to hear him say about the
District of Columbia. Since President George Washington established
Washington City, Presidents have played an important role in advocating
for or against the permanent residents of DC. Washington spent most of
the 1790s preparing for the arrival of federal officials from
Philadelphia in 1800. General Washington died eleven days after
President Adams announced DC was ready for the 131 federal government
officials to join the 14,093 residents of the areas of the District of
Columbia. On December 14, 1799, Adams expressed the national sentiment
toward the General: “For his fellow-citizens, if their prayers could
have been answered, he would have been immortal.” In 1828, President’s
Andrew Jackson urged Congress to allow DC residents to elect a nonvoting
Delegate to that body “with the same privileges that are allowed to
other territories of the United States.” President Martin Van Buren
asked Congress to give “liberal and even generous attention to the
interests o the District and a thorough and careful revision of its
local government.” President William Henry Harrison championed DC in
his Inaugural address on March 4, 1841. He said, “The people of the
District of Columbia are not the subjects of the people of the States,
but free American citizens. . . . [T]he legislation of Congress should
be adapted to their peculiar position and wants and be conformable with
their deliberate opinions of their own interests.”
In his 1843 message to Congress, President Tyler urged a parental
relationship: “The seat of government of our associated republics
cannot but be regarded as worthy of your parental care.” President
James Knox Polk, told Congress, “I shall be ever disposed to show a
proper regard for their [the people of this District] wishes and within
constitutional limits shall at all times cheerfully cooperate with you
for the advancement of their welfare.” In 1921, President Taft
expressed a new sentiment in expressing his strong opposition to giving
DC citizens the franchise and local self-government: “The truth is
this is a city governed by a popular body, to wit, the Congress of the
United States, selected from the people of the United States who own
Washington.” In 1952, President Harry Truman expressed an opinion more
typical of Presidents: “I strongly believe that the citizens of the
District of Columbia are entitled to self-government . . . the right and
the responsibility of free men. The denial of self-government does not
befit the National Capital of the world’s largest and most powerful
democracy. . . . [T]he structure of the District government has become
so complicated, confused, and obsolete that a thorough reorganization
cannot be further delayed.” President Eisenhower and Kennedy both
asked Congress to grant DC Home Rule. The Senate was favorable, but
powerful members of the House of Representatives opposed DC Home Rule,
and President Johnson was a strong champion for DC. In this third State
of the Union address in 1966, he said, “I urge the House of
Representatives to complete action on three programs already passed by
the Senate — the Teacher Corps, rent assistance, and home rule for the
District of Columbia.” President Nixon in 1969 said, “The District’s
citizens should not be expected to pay taxes for a government which they
have no part in choosing — or to bear the full burdens of citizenship
without the full rights of citizens.” In 1981, President Jimmy Carter
said that DC had gained a greater degree of Home Rule than under the
previous administration, he said, “Yet, despite the close cooperation
between my Administration and that of Mayor Barry, we have not yet seen
the necessary number of states ratify the Constitutional Amendment
granting full voting representation in the Congress to the citizens of
this city. It is my hope that this inequity will be rectified. The
country and the people who inhabit Washington deserve.” Time to get
approval for the amendment ran out under President Reagan. President
Clinton endorsed DC statehood and worked with Congress on the 1997
revitalization plan, but he wasn’t a champion for DC in his State of
the Union addresses. Will President George W. Bush mention DC on
Tuesday?
###############
Health Care Now!, Washington, DC's, largest health care consumer
advocacy organization, warns that the public interest may be unprotected
in the wake of the announcement by CareFirst, the region's Blue
Cross/Blue Shield holding company, that it will convert to for-profit
status. CareFirst, like other Blue Cross/Blue Shield plans, has enjoyed
tax exemptions and other taxpayer supported financial benefits since its
creation in the late 30's. The public bestowed special status on the
"Blues," as they are called, in return for coverage of the
most underserved and difficult to insure populations. As nonprofit
“insurers of last resort,” the Blues became trusted institutions
synonymous with affordable, accessible health insurance.
Conversion requires an accurate estimate of the value accrued to
CareFirst as a result of its multi-year special tax status. Upon
conversion, that value is to be recaptured by the public in the form of
a special fund devoted to charitable purposes to continue the Blue
Cross/Blue Shield mission of public service. In addition, a conversion's
impact on the insurance market and delivery of health care services must
be examined closely, since conversions are often accompanied by the loss
of insurance coverage among certain population groups. With
approximately 3.1 million subscribers in Maryland, the District and
Delaware, making it the premier health care insurer in the area,
CareFirst alerted the District's Insurance Commissioner on Friday,
January 11, that it seeks to convert from nonprofit to for-profit status
as part of its plan to be acquired by Wellpoint, a California-based
corporation. In response, Health Care Now! referred to the dismal record
that the Mayor's office and the DC Council have established in
monitoring the $500 million contract of the DC Healthcare Alliance,
successors to the DC General Hospital system, as proof that the close
attention such a conversion needs from public officials may not be
readily available.
If the Mayor and the DC Council cannot account for the millions of
dollars paid to the DC Healthcare Alliance, how can we expect them to
guard the public's interest when a multi-billion dollar Wellpoint is
calling the shots? At Health Care Now!, we feel justified in sounding a
general alarm and warning the public that the conversion of CareFirst
can have a disastrous impact on the delivery of health care services in
the District without immediate due diligence from the DC Council and the
Mayor's office. Because of Health Care NOW's concerns regarding proposed
conversion, it has joined with other organizations in a coalition called
CareFirst Watch. The coalition has taken several steps that would
require DC regulators to assure that the conversion is in the public
interest, and that full value is paid for CareFirst if a conversion is
to be approved. For more information, contact Sam Jordan, 339-9341.
###############
Killing the Goose that Could Lay Golden Eggs
for Its Feathers
Len Sullivan, lsnarpac@bellatlantic.net
I am constantly amazed at the ability of single-issue activists to
defeat their own purposes with counterproductive histrionics. The future
of the inefficient, outmoded, ill-located DC General Hospital site is a
case in point. The accusation repeatedly voiced at the Armory kickoff
meeting on Jan 23rd that the DC government is insensitive to the needs
of the poor is absurd. Well over half of DC's budget goes to low income
residents. Improving the health and welfare of the poor is an expensive
business that requires additional city revenues, efficiently spent. One
good way to raise revenues is to increase the amount of land available
for DC to develop, and put it to revenue-productive use. The highly
desirable 67-acre river front parcel of federally-owned land on which DC
General squats is capable of generating tax revenues of $200-$400M per
year if turned over to DC and devoted to high density mixed
commercial/residential use. It would also be a significant step towards
greater DC revenues from its limited tax base.
A good share of any increased revenues should probably go towards
improving public health care. But the city needs several smaller sites
centrally located in poor neighborhoods to efficiently provide much
needed clinical medical services. The oversized DC General site, backed
up against the river, is not readily accessible to many who most need
its services. However, DC owns as many as 300 acres of surplus land
scattered around the city, mostly in poor neighborhoods but protected by
other possessive activist groups. The DC Public School System is hanging
on to, and planning the modernization of, enough school facilities for
100,000 students. But current enrollment has dropped to 66,000 and is
preordained to drop close to 50,000 by a) the decline in city birth
rates already realized over the past five years, and b) the migration to
charter schools. Productive use of surplus DCPS properties could pay for
a lot of its skyrocketing school system costs and make available
properly situated public health clinic sites as well. Creative planning
could develop much-needed synergism between improving health and
improving education for the city's underprivileged kids, and its
underprivileged adults as well. It's high time to replace negative
emotionalism with constructive rationalism on this key issue.
###############
The Crazies Versus Giant
Ed T. Barron, edtb@aol.com
In a scenario reminiscent of the Spring Valley/AU Park battle against
American University's Law School, A minority of self proclaimed
activists who resist change in Cleveland Park are fighting expansion
plans by the Giant supermarket on Wisconsin Avenue and Newark Street,
NW. Giant has two options at this point. They can continue to fight and
probably win in the courts (as did American University), or they can
just sit tight and let the will of the majority of the people win out
some time later. There is a third unlikely, but possible, option. Right
now the Giant store is a profit making venture for Giant. With the
additional space they have acquired being unusable, it may be less, or
even unprofitable. The store could close under that unlikely scenario.
As is my bent when posting on problems, I offer the crazies that
oppose change and the latest Giant proposal for their store in Cleveland
Park a suggestion. Stop fighting and negotiate. Since this is a war that
the Cleveland Park Citizens' Association will lose, they should
negotiate now and gain something of value. Why not get Giant to make
part of their expansion into a fitness/wellness center that would be
open to the nearby residents in the area surrounding the proposed
expanded Giant. This fitness center could occupy some of the space from
the former G.C. Murphy store and open onto Wisconsin Avenue. Giant could
also make some architectural changes to the side of the building that
faces onto Wisconsin Avenue much like American University did on
Massachusetts Avenue. This would be a major benefit to the neighborhood
and result in a Giant that better serves the needs of that community.
Change, like other stuff, happens and is inevitable. When you are
green you are growing, when you are ripe you rot.
###############
Regarding Tad DiBiase's tale of woe about camping out for a child's
space at Oyster School: I sympathize. We had the same problem with Pre-K
at Lafayette Elementary School in the late 1980s. Some parents suggested
a lottery, but others complained that would negate the effort made by
those who chose to camp out. People could just waltz into an 8 a.m.
lottery, the argument went, and have the same chance as someone who
otherwise would have chosen to brave the elements. I headed a Home &
School Association Committee that recommended a 6 a.m. lottery, which at
least would make parents make the effort to get up early. That was
rejected by the then-principal. I don't recall whether DC school
policies were cited as the reason, but I think one rationale was that
space in a public school shouldn't be subjected to a game of chance --
first-come, first-served was deemed fairer. But one question: our
registration back then was in April, when at least the weather was
warmer. Why does this one have to be in January?
###############
Camping Out at Oyster
Rick Cohen, rcohen5@att.net
The system of camping out at Oyster is, as one of your correspondents
noted, ludicrous and unfair. It not only discriminates against people
who have to work on weekends (many of whom might be lower income than
the organized coterie of Mt. Pleasant families that seem to dominate the
Oyster assault), but also against single-parent households who have to
take care of their kids instead of time-sharing spots in the Oyster
line. It also discriminates against families who aren't "in the
know" as much as others, which last year meant that some families
with better knowledge than others were camped out much earlier than
anyone might have imagined necessary. Plenty of people showed up late,
so to speak, and discovered that they should have been freezing their
butts off several evenings earlier. People who say that spending time in
line demonstrates dedication to bilingual education for their kids
simply ignore all the factors that make many other bilingually dedicated
people miss the opportunity for Oyster. Sure, more money for bilingual
schools or even bilingual classrooms would be great and is ultimately
necessary, but it doesn't answer the question for families who are
disadvantaged by the DCPS Darwinist system for getting out-of-boundary
admission to the Oyster School.
###############
One Reason Some Cab Drivers Oppose Meters
Paul Michael Brown, pmb@his.com
Hopped into a cab at the Old Ebbitt Grille last Friday night, with $8
tucked into my shirt pocket for the two zone trip to my hip Capitol Hill
condo. ($6.90 for the fare, plus $1.10 for tip.) During the ride, I
asked the driver his position on meters. Like others before him, he
opposed them. But he gave a reason I hadn't heard before: “Most
drivers won't admit this, but they like zones because it's so easy to
hide trips.” He went to explain a scam endemic to all businesses that
deal strictly in cash: skimming. The driver purposely fails to record
some of his trips on the handwritten log. Instead he pockets the cash
and the tax man is none the wiser.
To my mind, the practice of skimming by cabbies is good for the those
of us who use taxis because it encourages more people to become drivers
by increasing their take home pay, and that results in an increased
availability of cabs. In simple terms, under the zone system the
government is indirectly subsidizing the taxi system. As a result, in
the District cabs are relatively cheap and plentiful. To my mind, this
is another reason to eschew meters.
###############
Victoria McKernan wrote, “Why is the only choice for taxis between
a bad zone map or potentially abusive meters? Hello — what have all
you computer nerds out there been doing all this time...?” Glad you
asked. With zones, cabbies gamble on traffic; with meters, it is the
riders who gamble. One party gets a fair deal ride-by-ride, and the
other makes it up in volume. Both schemes leave room for cheats.
Computer nerds like to build brokers that bring disparate parties
together, and yet let each party play the game its own way, irrespective
of the other's arrangements. Is that clear? Here's how it might work
with Washington's taxis.
Riders will sign up with a Taxi Mediation Organization (TMO); they'll
join a "zones plan," a "metered" plan, or any other
gimmicky plan the TMO may offer. The indigent can apply their e-benefit
to whichever plan gets them the farthest. Meanwhile, the TMOs will
contract, mainly non-exclusively, with individual cabbies on a mutually
agreeable basis, perhaps zones or salary or meters (and, if meters, then
meters of what exactly?). Everybody — rider and cabbie — can choose
for himself or herself how much bad-traffic risk to accept and how much
to leave to the TMO. Oh, how fine a taxi system administered by computer
nerds would be. Want a cab? Just point your cab fob at the sky. Want a
discount? While the ride away listening to ads on the TMO's
loudspeakers. Green? Let the TMO taxi you to Metro and pick you up again
at the other end of the tube (at exactly the right time). Rich? Pay your
TMO extra each month for OnStar concierge service or XM Satellite Radio
in any cab you ride. Economy-minded and adventuresome? Ride at a
discount every Wednesday through Friday and 3 a.m. to 8 a.m. Sundays if
you endure a “free gift” random ride to somewhere chosen by the TMO
on Tuesday.
Month by month, some TMOs might gamble poorly and go bust, others
might rake it in and gradually lose customers: the properly-regulated
free market would save everyone from a fate dictated by bureaucrats and
special interests.
###############
“Incrementalism” and Thurgood Marshall's
Strategy for Overturning Segregation
David Sobelsohn, dsobelso@capacces.org
I recommend that everyone read Richard Kluger's great book Simple
Justice for themselves, something George LaRoche apparently has not
done. Since we're going far afield from the specific issue of DC
self-government, I will refrain from further elaboration.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS
What’s on the horizon for FY 2003? Briefing on the important budget
issues facing the District in FY 2003. Hear from policy makers and
fiscal experts on the issues that will impact the FY 2003 budget.
Wednesday, February 6, noon - 2:00 p.m., 1616 P Street, NW, 7th floor
conference room. There is limited parking on the street and in the
parking garage; closest Metro stop is Dupont Circle. Panelists: Tommy
Wells, Member, DC Board of Education, speaking about special education
funding and spending issues; Ratio Blitzstein, Budget Director, Council
of the District of Columbia, speaking from the Council perspective about
what the Council anticipates; Ed Lazere, Executive Director, DC Fiscal
Policy Institute (presenting an independent, analytical perspective on
the current fiscal conditions); Rick Hayes, Special Assistant, Office of
the Chief Financial Officer, speaking on the revenue side of the budget,
including the tobacco settlement; Theodore Carter, Senior Advisor,
Office of the Chief Financial Officer (invited), speaking about Medicaid
spending across government agencies. The agenda is introductions, panel
presentations, Q & A.
RSVP by February 4 to DC Action for Children, dcaction@dckids.org,
234-9404, 234-9108 fax. This briefing is sponsored by DC Action for
Children, DC Fiscal Policy Institute, Fair Budget Coalition, and
Washington Council of Agencies.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — DONATIONS WANTED
The Fighting 54th Food and Clothing Drive
Needs Your Help Now
Arthur H. Jackson, Jr., ccadadc@aol.com
The Fighting 54th Public Service Organization is opening it's first
community center in ward 8 next month, and needs donations of clothing,
canned goods, office furniture, computers, and volunteers to help
maintain the office and assist in picking up clothing and can good. If
you can help contact Kenny Baker, 610-3094.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — HELP WANTED
Job Opening at ZPG
Tim Cline, tim@zpg.org
ZPG Campus Outreach Coordinator (2002), reports to National Field
Director. ZPG's Campus Outreach Program is the resource for students and
faculty concerned with population growth. We are working to raise
awareness and take action on population issues on campuses across the
country. Campus Outreach staff travel to college campuses to give
presentations, conduct issue workshops, and train activists. We keep
students and faculty informed and involved through electronic updates,
action alerts, a Campus Activist Newsletter, and our website.
Responsibilities: the Campus Outreach Coordinators will work as a part
of a team to develop and maintain ZPG's Campus Outreach Program. S/he
will: travel regularly to campuses, conferences, and outreach events
concurrent with semester schedules; publicly represent and advocate the
positions of ZPG; keep abreast of current issues; compose content for
newsletters, electronic updates and the website; maintain correspondence
with members of the program; and assist with other activities of the
Field and Outreach Department as assigned. The Coordinators will work
together to devise techniques and materials to be used in training
student and faculty to increase awareness and action on population and
related issues.
Qualifications: qualified applicants should be enthusiastic and
dedicated to the mission of ZPG. Ability to work under pressure, in a
team, and a good sense of humor are important. This position will
involve extensive travel in the US. Applicants should also possess good
communication skills, particularly writing and public speaking.
Knowledge of Microsoft Word (Office), FileMaker Pro, Power Point,
Internet applications (browser, E-mail etc.) and Spanish a plus. $25,000
- $28,000 depending on experience. Generous health, leave, and
retirement benefits included. Equal Opportunity Employment. Send cover
letter expressing your interest in position, resume, two writing samples
(3-5 pages), three reference names, title and phone numbers (not written
references) to: Campus Coordinator Opening: C/o ZPG 1400 16th Street,
NW, Suite 320, Washington, DC 20036.
###############
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every
Wednesday and Sunday. To subscribe, to change E-mail addresses, or to
switch between HTML and plain text versions of themail, use the
subscription form at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail/subscribe.htm.
To unsubscribe, send an E-mail message to themail@dcwatch.com
with “unsubscribe” in the subject line. Archives of past messages
are available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should also be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com,
and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of
Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to
be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief
paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can
be put into each mailing.