Cars in the City
Dear Car Lovers and Haters:
Cars are one of your most popular topics in themail, but they are
some of your least favorite things. I'm thankful for cars, especially
when I think how much cleaner, quieter, and especially better smelling
cities became when cars replaced horses as the primary means of urban
transportation. Private cars give drivers real personal freedom and
independence, which is why even the most convenient public
transportation system can never replace them. But cars are also terrific
annoyances, particularly when there are more of them then there are
parking spaces, and they are terrible dangers, especially when the only
driving education most drivers get is from the car chases in Bullitt and
The French Connection.
When I was a teenager growing up in the suburbs where I couldn't get
anywhere without a car, I wanted desperately to get to the inner city
where I'd never need a car. Since the primary rule of life is irony, now
that I live in the inner city I find that I need a car in order to get
to the suburbs. We've gone through three decades of urban policy aimed
at making owning a car increasingly inconvenient and expensive, in order
to discourage private cars and encourage mass transportation, trying to
eliminate what Anne Heute, below, calls “the hegemony of the car.”
So far, that policy has succeeded in multiplying the problems of owning
cars, without decreasing car ownership at all. So let's face it:
bicycles and buses are not going to replace cars, and pedestrians and
cars are going to coexist in cities for the foreseeable future. Until
cars are replaced with teleportation, what can we do in Washington to
make city driving safer and parking easier?
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
###############
Evening Rush Hour Gridlock
Bill Starrels, Georgetown, mortgagecorp@hotmail.com
Recently I had to go from Georgetown to the 1500 block of I street,
NW, to deliver some papers at rush hour. Rush hour traffic is bad
enough. What is still unbelievable to me is the number of selfish
drivers who leave their cars parked in clearly marked “No Parking or
Standing 4-6:30 PM” spaces. Only one car can disrupt the flow of
traffic. Any other major American or Canadian city I have lived or
visited in recent memory seems able to tow these violators. If one gets
his or her car towed, the word spreads fast. Short of towing, tickets
(if they are written) have little effect. Booting is worse, because it
leaves the offending car blocking the lane for an indefinite period of
time.
I have heard that DC has bought more tow trucks. Something has to
give. It is unconscionable that this situation goes on day after day. In
Georgetown, in preparation for the late night utility work we have
effectively towed cars. It is not rocket science. It is time something
is done.
###############
My initial response [to the introduction to the last issue of themail]
is not an answer to what [Gary Imhoff] wrote, but a response to what I
think is the enduring problem of this city: how shall we take back our
neighborhoods and all that is so precious in them? I have no great
answers, just a dogged sense that life is where you are, in the few
blocks where you live, come and go every day, and that no government is
in charge of that.
I live on Newton Street, NE, at the bottom of the hill that was once
the best sled-coasting place around here, and we had tons of kids and
adults, before global warming, who used to come on our street and have a
gorgeous time, Barriers to cars would appear, cars would have to
accommodate, and it was a good time for all. I can remember serious
sledders, adults, in the wee hours of the a.m., sliding, going up,
coming down again. Then, something happened, I don't know what. I got
furious at the destruction of a wonderful thing. I want that world back,
even without snow, and all I can think of is, take over your
neighborhood, any way you can. Forget being nice, polite. It is your
turf.
I even had the dream that the short streets here, between Newton and
the Franciscan Monastery, never mind the details, could be turned into
small parks for trees, people, picnic tables, tennis, etc. Cars don’t
need all of those short blocks. The hegemony of the car — it's gotta
go. Getting people unglued from thinking that there are wonderful others
who will do the work, aye, there's the rub.
###############
James Treworgey argues that with 750 deaths per year, running red
lights is a relatively small problem. Unfortunately, counting deaths
doesn't give an accurate estimate of the actual extent of the problem.
How about injuries? How about damage to vehicles? How about traffic
slowdowns caused when everyone is afraid to proceed through green
lights, because of the red light runners coming through the
intersection? How about the general degradation of the city environment
for pedestrians and motorists dodging red light runners? How about the
effect of that kind of general lawlessness on society in general?
When I learned to drive, I almost never saw anyone run a red light
(Connecticut, early 80s). The day I made the first payment on my first
new car, someone ran a red light and did $3000 of damage to it -- and
had I entered the intersection a moment earlier I'd probably have been
killed (Boston, 1990). Flash to DC and Tysons Corner (my home and my
workplace), 2001 — people blatantly run through lights well after
they've turned red. A sign that society's going down the tubes? You
decide.
As far the cost of cameras versus cruises — show me some numbers,
James. And cameras have the benefit of collecting the money from the
violators. I don't care if they are DC residents or not — anything
short of a suspended license is pretty soft, in my opinion.
###############
First, I want to thank Mr. Treworgy for mentioning the Red Means Stop
web site, http://www.redmeansstop.com,
in his reply to my post about red light cameras. But when he cites the
statistic of 750 deaths a year from red light runners, and uses that to
trivialize the problem, he chose to omit out the information that was in
the next sentence on the website: Red light runners also cause 260,000
accidents and $7 billion a year in damage, lost wages, and insurance
costs a year.
Being a pedestrian in Washington is risky business. The District of
Columbia has twice the pedestrian fatality rate as the national average,
from all causes, according to the Department of Transportation.
Pedestrians account for a third of all motor vehicle related deaths in
Washington, DC. It's also just plain scary and difficult to cross a
street when cars are zipping through the red, especially for children,
senior citizens and handicapped people. Red light running is hardly a
“small problem,” as Mr. Treworgy maintains.
###############
Even More on Red Light Cameras
John Wheeler, zippytrash@att.net
In the 11/21 issue of themail, James Treworgy implied that the DC
government is paying $44 million for red light cameras. He states that
based on the total people killed in the U.S. as a result of red light
running, only 1.25 persons per year in the DC are killed. Here's the
full quote from which Mr. Treworgy took his statistic: “In the United
States, over 20 percent of all traffic accidents are caused by drivers
running red lights. Year after year, red light runners kill over 750
people, and result in 260,000 accidents. They cause an estimated 7
billion dollars in property damage, medical bills, lost productivity and
insurance hikes. And unfortunately, red light running is on the
increase.” I think that's a fairly compelling argument for the
cameras. And the DC Government is not paying for the cameras. DC and the
contractor share in the revenue produced by tickets. (I do think that
DC's contract with Lockheed Martin is something to look into.) Mr.
Treworgy's argument that solving homicides is the typical argument made
against police time spent enforcing traffic laws. However, he should be
happy because the red light cameras frees up the police to solve
homicides, or whatever.
###############
Wisconsin Avenue Giant
Patty Hahn, (remove at for real address), cat.zero@starpower.net
Forgive me if there's been a discussion already about this; if so, I
wasn't reading themail at the time. Is it true there's a group trying to
block expansion of our neighborhood Giant at Wisconsin and Newark, and
that the claim is it's an historic property? This must be satire; it
can't be for real.
###############
[In reply to Mark Sutton, themail, November 21] Why do anti-meat
activists feel they have to try to guilt/scare folks into not eating
meat? Do you seriously think that relaying anecdotes about fat turkeys
will persuade Americans to stop eating turkey on Thanksgiving? Good
luck! A lot of us well-rounded (food-wise, not girth-wise) eaters will
continue eating the foods we do, regardless of the electronic, printed
or verbal pressure from non-meat eaters.
I eat turkey, chicken, and beef and I'm proud of it. As well, it's
good to hear of your pride in "eschewing meat, fowl, and fish for
twenty years." I have many friends who do the same as you and are
also proud of it. And do you know why those non-meat-eaters are my
friends? Because they don't tell me I'm wrong or uninformed or a jerk
because I enjoy eating cows, chicken, bison, or even ostrich. Nor do
they tell me that I'm somehow enlightened or fabulously intelligent when
I enjoy a dish of freshly steamed vegetables (broccoli, spinach and
asparagus preferred). Happy Thanksgiving.
[Mr. Chaggaris and Mr. Sutton had a further private exchange about
vegetarianism before agreeing that the subject was really off-topic for
themail — unless, of course, anyone has any suggestions for vegetarian
restaurants that everybody could enjoy. — Gary Imhoff]
###############
[In reply to Nick Keenan's posting on maternity wards] I delivered 9
1/2 years ago at George Washington University; do they no longer handle
obstetrics? What about Columbia Hospital? Sibley? The Hospital Center?
I'm stunned to learn that these don't have maternity wards.
[In response to David Sobelsohn on Restaurant Week] I thought I was
alone in thinking that $20.01 was pretty high for lunch. So, no sir,
you're not alone.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS
Community Forum/Speak Out: Is Your
Neighborhood Prepared for an Emergency?
Sam Jordan, sjordan@communitychange.org
Health Care Now, DC's largest health care consumer advocacy
organization, is convening a community information forum on Wednesday,
November 28, at 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. at Greater Mount Calvary Holy
Church, 610 Rhode Island Avenue, NE (Rhode Island Metro Station). The
forum's keynoter, Dr. Margaret Barron, MD, Chief of Emergency Medicine
at Providence Hospital, will describe the elements of an effective
emergency preparedness system.
This forum is absolutely necessary in light of the continuing anthrax
alert and lingering doubts by many that an effective emergency plan has
been devised or communicated to community groups. Our people need to
know how to protect themselves and their families. The average person is
feeling neglected and ignored. Representatives of DC's hospitals,
Departments of Emergency Management and Emergency Health and Medical
Services will be joined by Fire and Police personnel in providing
answers to questions from community members, many of whom live within
blocks of the Brentwood Postal facility. Complaints that they have
received little communication from city or federal officials have been
numerous. Speakers will include Agnes Chase, Convenor, Health Care Now;
Dr. Margaret Barron, MD, Chief, Emergency Medicine, Providence Hospital;
Robert Malson, President, DC Hospital Association, Chair COG's
Bioterrorism Taskforce; Barbara Childs-Pair, Deputy Director, DC
Emergency Management Administration; Sherry Adams, RN, Executive
Director, DC Office of Emergency Health and Medical Services; Roger
Hooper, East Coast EMS, Director, DC Emergency Medical Rapid Response
Team.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — RECOMMENDATIONS
A Spectacular Opportunity to Recycle
Charlie Wellander, ah52j2e3@mailshell.com
Used eyeglasses are collected by Lions and other volunteers and are
recycled at one of nine Lions Eyeglass Recycling Centers throughout the
world. The used eyeglasses are cleaned, repaired and classified by
prescription. The eyeglasses are then distributed to those in need by
Lions volunteers and other organizations hosting optical missions in
developing countries. Individuals may donate their used eyeglasses
year-round to their local Lions club via collection boxes located at
various community offices and businesses, offices of members of the
American Optometric Association, Goodwill Industries stores and
LensCrafters stores. All types of eyeglasses and sunglasses,
prescription and nonprescription, are acceptable. For more information,
see http://www.lionsclubs.org/English/FRCenters.html.
Local contact info: Lions Eyeglass Recycling Center of Northern
Virginia, 703-241-7004, E-mail lercva@lnetmail.att.net,
Web site: http://www.pwcweb.com/d24alions/recycl.html
(also has an address that glasses may be mailed to).
In fiscal year 2000-01, the Lions Eyeglass Recycling Centers reported
a collection of approximately 5 million pairs of eyeglasses,
distributing to more than 2.5 million people in developing nations.
Recycled eyeglasses are typically distributed outside of the United
States due to legal constraints concerning the dispersal of prescriptive
devices.
[Thanks also to Sara Cormeny, sara@paperlantern.com,
who sent references to the same web sites. — Gary Imhoff]
###############
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every
Wednesday and Sunday. To subscribe, to change E-mail addresses, or to
switch between HTML and plain text versions of themail, use the
subscription form at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail/subscribe.htm.
To unsubscribe, send an E-mail message to themail@dcwatch.com
with “unsubscribe” in the subject line. Archives of past messages
are available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should also be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com,
and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of
Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to
be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief
paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can
be put into each mailing.