themail.gif (3487 bytes)

October 22, 2000

Top Jobs

Dear Job Applicants:

Reluctantly, grudgingly, complainingly, Mayor Williams has allowed Robert Newman to resign as Director of the Department of Parks and Recreation. Mayor Williams has explained in today's Washington Post that if he actually had to hold government employees accountable for doing their jobs well, or for the accuracy of their resumes, or for following the rules about spending government money, then he would have difficulty attracting good people to fill the top government jobs. Aw, shucks.

We are coming up to the holiday season, when most government bureaucracies do their real dirty work, since they think nobody will be paying any attention. In the days and weeks to come, here are some things to keep your eyes on. What kind of severance package will Newman receive? Will he get another position in the DC government in two or three months? What will Mayor Williams do to fill, not only the position of Director of Parks and Recreation, but the several other key positions that are vacant, some of them for many months: director of the Department of Public Works, director of the Department of Human Services, director of the Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs, the District's Procurement Officer, and so on. Whom will Williams appoint to his four appointed positions on the Board of Education? Will the Williams administration develop a detailed, written plan regarding the future of DC General and the delivery of health services? (Since DC General will run out of money by the end of February at its current rate of spending, the administration can either come up with a real plan or just stand by and see what happens when the hospital goes out of business and the poor and uninsured have no alternative for health care). The Williams Administration is working on a plan to split the Department of Human Services into two separate Departments in the first quarter of this fiscal year, but it has not shared its plan either with the City Council or with the public in general. What is the plan, and when will the public have a chance to comment on it? The Administration has also indicated that it may make the Office of Transportation a separate Department, and take it out of the Department of Public Works. When will the citizens be told about this, and get a chance to comment on it?

Keep your eyes peeled.

Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com

###############

Robert Newman Should Resign
Helen Hagerty, Helenmhag@aol.com

We've heard enough about Mr. Newman and his inability to maintain ball fields, pay rec employees on time, complete playground renovations, and successfully run summer programs. Now we have to read about how he has inappropriately spent almost $200,000! Once again, it's the kids who will ultimately lose while this guy continues to remain as the Director. $200,000 could pay for four new playgrounds. It's time for Mr. Newman to resign.

###############

I’ll Take One From Column B
Ed T. Barron, edtb@aol.com

Given the choice of representation in Congress (column A) and paying no taxes to the Federal Government (column B), I'd opt, in a NY minute, for column B. Sure, I'd like voting rights here in D.C. but not at the expense of electing Marion Barry to Congress and Jesse Jackson to the U.S. Senate. And that's a very likely possibility in this town. If there were some other way that we could get voting rights without having another layer of inept government on top of the one that we have already, then I'd vote for that.

###############

A New Voice on Campus Plans — Take Note
Madelyn Lane, madelynlane@hotmail.com

In the October 19 District Extra section of the Washington Post, Sol S. Shalit, emeritus professor of economics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee School of Business, wrote a satirical account of the September 26 BZA hearing on GWU's controversial 10-year campus plan (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A36902-2000Oct19.html). This should be required reading for all District Officials, particularly Councilmembers who have for years facilitated the unrestrained university expansion that has had a major impact on adjacent communities throughout the city. Professor Shalit's portrayal of the D.C. Board of Zoning Adjustment hearing typifies the constant struggle that our citizens endure at the hands of a mindless bureaucracy that at best is incompetent to protect our fragile neighborhoods from encroachment and at worst indifferent to the plight of these communities. I would even suggest that our Government has been hopelessly corrupted by the powerful forces of the Federal City Council, of which all of our universities are prominent members. More importantly, all residents who are interested in campus plans should refer to the objective analysis presented by Professor Shalit at the September 26 BZA hearing and his follow-up letter to Andrew Altman, Office of Planning (http://www.dcwatch.com/columns/shalit.htm) which debunk the arguments presented by GWU that neither address the concerns raised by the Foggy Bottom community nor present valid arguments for continued growth that benefits the District taxpayer. If ever there was a cogent argument for placing constraints on university growth and expansion, this brilliant professor has outlined it.

Professor Shalit's remedy concludes that “GWU has already achieved all of its rosy expansion objectives by having staked out the territory, and is fully aware that times have changed. Its present Plan is merely an end-run attempt to legitimize the fruit of its aggressive and improper grab and to negotiate the best deal for its future consolidation. Any OP (Office of Planning) recommendation which calls for freezing the status quo (“to stop the damage”) — even with severe constraints — while “providing the University with flexibility” is not a remedy, but a total victory for the University (its protestations notwithstanding). Such a recommendation would not only reward the university for its past transgressions and legitimize them, but would also permanently sentence the community to live with the damage already done, day in and day out, with no hope of ever reclaiming the neighborhood. While the District is trying so hard to preserve and revitalize residential communities, the University is gradually, but systematically, destroying a most desirable and historic residential neighborhood of this city. This is certainly not their intent, but this is the effect. . . . The Plan should be rejected, not tinkered with. Instead, GWU should be asked to submit a new Ten Year Plan containing not just promises of good behavior, but a meaningful roll-back to its strict prescribed boundaries, coupled with a set of gradually decreasing enrollment caps to restore Foggy Bottom and welcome GWU back as a good neighbor.”

One wonders why, with all of the intellectual talent in our city, we do not see more of this type of eloquent thought-provoking analysis contributed by private citizens on behalf of the taxpayer. I believe that if we had more responsible reporting in our mainstream media we could elevate these important issues to the forefront of discussions intended to get at some of the major reasons for loss in past years of our taxpaying population, the decline of stable residential neighborhoods (such as Foggy Bottom) and the impact on the District's fiscal health and well-being. Let us hope that our reform-minded government takes heed and reverses some of the more self-destructive practices of the past. Professor Shalit's arguments appear to be indisputable. Stay tuned.

###############

Fascism in Cardozo-Shaw
Ms. Dorothy Persiflage, daniel@hers.com

Ms. Persiflage is pleased to report that she safely returned to Washington after a week's business trip to a conference at Disney World. She is also pleased to report that, while on the trip, her Significant Other obtained and placed several “Bush-Cheney” signs in the windows of our home — simple, blue-background signs with a rendering of an American flag. Ms. P thought this added a nice counterpoint to all the Gore-Lieberman signs about, and showed a commitment to “diversity” which really counts, that is to say, of opinion. Ms. Persiflage is sad to report, therefore, that her enthusiasm for Mr. Bush's character, and desire to head in the direction of restoring freedom by limiting the role of the Federal Government, is clearly and unfortunately not shared by all. She herself would never use such language, and so will simply quote, in its entirety, an unsigned note which someone placed through her mailbox door opening shortly after the signs went up. This still being a relatively free country, you may draw your own conclusions.

“Hi there! You have a whole hell of a lot of nerve displaying your right-wing poison in a neighborhood like this. But at least now we know who you really are! Fuck you and your racist, homo-phobic, anti-woman, anti-environment 'candidate.'” (Emphases in the original).

A tout ta' — Do

###############

Fascism in Cardozo-Shaw Reply
Karen Ford, kkford@bestweb.net

Dear Do, While I am supporting Gore/Lieberman, I applaud your stand for “diversity” and against your neighborhood's tyranny of the majority. Display your signs proudly, for they are beacons of light in your neighborhood in many ways (and so are you !).

[Miss Persiflage copied her original message to Ms. Ford, who copied her reply to themail; this is why both messages appear in the same issue. — Gary Imhoff]

###############

Most Creative Zoning Solution
Ann Loikow, Cleveland Park, johnl@erols.com

American Tower Corporation, who is building the 756 foot digital TV/telecommunications tower in Tenleytown despite the permit being revoked, is a finalist for the “Most Creative Zoning Solution” award in the “Annual Excellence in Business Awards” of the Tower and Site Development Industry. Although Carlynn Fuller, Acting Director of DCRA, notified American Tower on Oct. 6 (Friday) that the permit would be revoked as of 5 pm Oct. 10 (Tuesday after Columbus Day), they accelerated construction and worked over the weekend to add as much as possible to one side of the tower. When DCRA revoked the permit October 10, they sued the city and the Mayor and Ms. Fuller, individually and in their official capacity. They then went to the court and asked for more time to “secure” the tower, which means that now they are building again (bringing the other three sides up to the height of the section they rushed to build after being notified that the permit was being revoked)! Given the fact that the permit probably shouldn't have been issued in the first place as the Zoning Regulations required them to go the BZA for a special exception and to get the Mayor's waiver of the 1910 Height Act (much less the fact that the DC Environmental Policy Act, among other laws, was ignored), this is truly “creative zoning.” Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!

###############

Trash Problems
Ralph Blessing, rblessin@pd.state.gov

I wish my recent experience with a trash problem had the same positive outcome as that described by Andrew Tarpgaard in the 10/19 edition of themail. For the past two to three months I've made numerous calls to 727-1000, sent E-mail service requests to DPW, and corresponded with the DC Clean City Coordinator about a severe litter problem adjacent to the Takoma Metro station. Despite promises from those who answer the mayor's “all purpose” service line and efforts by the Clean City Coordinator to make sure the request reached the right office, nothing has been done about this eyesore. As Mr. Tarpgaard asked, does it have to take so long to determine who is responsible for providing what should be routine city services? On the other side of the coin, kudos to the National Park Service for its sparkling clean-up of the mall following the Million Family March. Even though its attendance was far less than other recent marches (e.g., Million Mom March) or July 4 events, the amount of trash left behind was the worst I've ever seen. Not just overflowing trash cans, but litter of every imaginable sort scattered across the length and breadth of the mall. But thanks to NPS, you'd never know that the event had even taken place. Out of curiosity, does anyone know if we taxpayers end up footing the bill for such clean-ups, or do event organizers have to provide a deposit or make other arrangements to assure that trash is removed?

###############

Barbed Wire and the AFL-CIO
Katie Mann, kmann@biglizard.net

I was walking past the AFL-CIO building last weekend. They're having some sort of construction, it appears, with the front entrances blocked by plywood and a fence that comes out quite a distance to the sidewalk on the main entrance side of the building. Par for the course these days. What really got my attention though was the strand of barbed wire going across the top of the fence. I haven't noticed this at construction sites before. Is this normal these days? Does the AFL-CIO perceive itself (whether actual or not) to be particularly threatened?

###############

Gertrude Stein Democrats Endorse for School Board
Kurt Vorndran, Kvorn@nteu.org

I am pleased to announce the Gertrude Stein Democratic Club, DC's largest gay/lesbian political organization, has made its endorsements for the Board of Education seats in the upcoming General Election. At a standing room only meeting, the Stein Democrats picked Peggy Cooper Cafritz for President of the DC Board of Education along with candidates in three of the four district seats. Julie Mikuta running for District One (Wards 1 and 2), Tommy Wells, in District Three (Wards 5 and 6) and William Lockridge in District Four (Wards 7 and 8) each received the Club's backing. No endorsement was made in District Two (Wards 3 and 4) where Dwight Singleton and Hugh Allen were the strongest contenders of the six candidates.

The endorsement vote came after appeals from most of the major candidates in the races. The Gertrude Stein Club's endorsement procedures allow for remarks by the candidates and then internal discussion by Club members. A supermajority of 60 percent is required for Club support. Stein previously endorsed Al Gore for President, Eleanor Holmes Norton for Delegate, Harold Brazil, Jack Evans, Adrian Fenty and Sandy Allen for DC Council, and Ray Browne and Florence Pendleton for the Shadow positions.

###############

Martin Thomas for Shadow Rep
Tanya Snyder, tanyacita@yahoo.com

Martin Thomas's bid for the U.S. Shadow Representative position is a natural extension of his activism in support of full democracy for D.C. Rather than stopping short at mere voting representation, which would leave D.C. a colony under the control of the federal government, Martin fights for statehood. This means that Congress would no longer have an automatic review and repeal period for all local D.C. legislation. This means that our annual budget would no longer get put through the wringer in Congress and come out entirely different, chock full of socially conservative riders that obstruct the wishes of the people of D.C.

Martin, a member of the steering committee of the D.C. Statehood Green Party, is the only candidate running who would make the position a meaningful platform from which to advocate for D.C.'s rights. He is one of the Democracy 7, put on trial for standing up to Congress as they debated our local budget. He has written and personally delivered a letter to every last member of the U.S. Congress asking them to support democracy in D.C. He has organized fundraisers, rallies, and high-profile events for statehood. He supported the Twenty Citizens Lawsuit, which sought to end the injustices faced by D.C. citizens. Martin opposes funding for big downtown development projects like the new convention center when the city claims not to be able to fund necessities like D.C. General Hospital and other services for its residents.

As someone who wants to make the city better for its residents and not just big business and real estate interests, I urge everyone to support Martin Thomas for U.S. Shadow Representative on November 7.

###############

Hatch Act Violation
Tom Briggs, briggstf@yahoo.com

Tom Briggs, a Shaw resident and teacher in the DC public school system, has been charged by the Office of the Special Council (OSC) with a violation of the Hatch Act. He was called by Anna Marrone on September 29th and informed that since he was a DC employee, he was subject to the provisions in the Hatch Act. He was told over the phone that his two choices were to either resign his teaching position at Dunbar Senior High School or withdraw his candidacy from the Ward 2 Council race. Briggs received a letter informing him of this same information on October 5th and was given 7 days to respond to OSC.

“The law is ridiculous!” says Briggs. “Teachers in all 50 states can run for public office, but teachers in Washington, DC cannot.” Mr. Briggs is in the middle of teaching his third year in an inner city school. “Deciding between my job and my principles is the hardest decision I have ever had to make,” says Briggs. On October 13th, the OSC filed the formal complaint against Briggs. Briggs has refused to resign his teaching position or withdraw from the council race. “Consider my actions a form of civil disobedience, and I will continue to fight against this unjust federal action,” says Briggs.

Our biggest challenge is to optimize expansion and economic growth without neglecting those citizens most vulnerable to gentrification. All too often, neighborhood revitalization projects have overlooked long-term residents in the development gold rush. In short, we risk losing the soul of the very neighborhoods we seek to improve. As an example, within the shadow of the new billion dollar Convention Center one can find sub-standard housing and homelessness. Throughout Shaw there is a one to three month wait to begin drug rehabilitation programs, and no city-sponsored adult education or GED classes. At Dunbar High School where I teach, we have less than ten networked computers to serve some 900 students. Our task is to manage growth in such a way as to allow citizens of all incomes to enjoy the fruits of prosperity by preparing them to contribute to that prosperity, primarily through job training, education and the encouragement of local businesses. Furthermore, any future large scale development projects must include a mandate for the improvement of local infrastructure, contributions to social programs, and a policy of “DC first” in awarding contracts.

###############

Getting Good Teachers in the Schools
Ed T. Barron, edtb@aol.com

With the shortage of good teachers willing to teach in the city's schools we have to find a better, and different approach to using teachers and hiring them. Roomie taught for a whole lot of years (almost exclusively in private schools) so I can attest that it is a more than full time job. She also was paid a pittance (and with very minimal benefits) compared to the salaries and pensions of long term public school employees. That said, it is essential that a whole new approach be taken that addresses both the amount of work required by teachers and how they are paid. Good teachers should be paid enough to support themselves and their family.

As for getting more good teachers into the system and providing them jobs that won't require a more than full time job, let's make teaching positions available on a part-time basis. Some qualified persons might find it reasonable to teach two classes in the morning during the school year (perhaps mothers with children in school). Other qualified persons (retired military, perhaps) might be willing to teach two classes each afternoon for the school year. If the pay was attractive (even with reduced benefits) this approach might smoke out a whole new cadre of qualified teachers for our schools.

###############

Police and Fire Call Boxes
Paul Williams, Callboxes@aol.com

Lynda Lantz inquired about the fate of the Police and Fire Call boxes in the city; there is an effort underway by the Heritage Tourism Coalition, and I'm the coordinator! We have partnered with the DPW, DC Commission on Arts and Humanities and the Downtown BID and have had over 40 neighborhoods survey their boxes. DPW has included 473 boxes into a contract this winter to begin to restore the boxes (removing lead paint and priming the boxes), and it is our charge have neighborhood organizations “adopt” their boxes; matching artists and historians and determining what it is the neighborhood would like to evoke on/in their boxes to be a true neighborhood icon. The HTC will establish a review panel to begin reviewing proposals in the early spring to ensure a quality product, and dispensing funds to assist in the effort. By the way, the Fire call boxes first appeared in Washington in the 1860s, when they had an elaborate gas light on top, surrounded by red etched glass announcing its purpose and location. Police call boxes were added in the 1890s. To find out if your neighborhood is already participating, or for more information, E-mail me at Callboxes@aol.com.

###############

Red Call Boxes
Aaron Lloyd, wayama@bellatlantic.net

The people/organization leading the charge on saving the call boxes was the DC Heritage Tourism Coalition, in particular Kathy Smith, executive director. You can find them in the phone book, or contact Paul Williams, who was also involved in the campaign. Best of luck to you; I have one right on my corner that I would be willing to help refurbish.

###############

Emergency Call Boxes
Rick Otis, rdotis@yahoo.com

While they are not the organization responsible for the city-wide project to turn the old emergency call boxes into 'works of art,' the Capitol Hill Restoration Society is involved here on Capitol Hill. Contact Nancy Metzger at nm2@bellatlantic.net.

###############

Update on Puerto Rican Lawsuit
Mark Richards, Dupont East, mark@bisconti.com

I recently posted information about a lawsuit in which a US District Court Judge said Congress could grant Puerto Rico the right to vote for President without becoming a state or passing a Constitutional Amendment. Although the majority of Puerto Ricans have not voted in support of statehood, Puerto Ricans are American citizens (whom Congress exempts from paying federal taxes). Here is an update from The U.S. Council for Puerto Rico Statehood (http://www.prstatehood.com/): “The First US Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston recently heard arguments concerning the granting of the vote for President of the United States to the US citizens of Puerto Rico. The Court ruled in favor of the United States and against the Puerto Rican plaintiffs of the lawsuit seeking a vote in November's election. In July, US District Court Judge Jaime Pieras, Jr., ruled that a citizen's right to vote emanates from citizenship as a 'fundamental right' in a democratic society. The US Department of Justice argued both in the July case and before the First US Circuit Court, that states, not individuals, vote for president and vice president through the Electoral College. According to the US Constitution, each state chooses electors to represent them in the Electoral College. These electors actually choose the president. If the residents of Puerto Rico want the right to vote in presidential elections, the island must either become a state of the Union or the US Constitution must be amended. Presently, Puerto Rico is a territory of the United States. Its citizens have statutory US citizenship granted by Congress in 1917.“ I believe that in 1820, the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government had the right to tax DC citizens, even though they didn't have Presidential [at that time] or Congressional representation.

###############

More Walk and Don’t Walk
Rich Mintz, richmintz@richmintz.com

Responding to my friend Ted LeBlond's (hi, Ted) message on pedestrian patterns in Foggy Bottom: I walked through Washington Circle twice a day, from upper New Hampshire Avenue to Foggy Bottom Metro and back, for over a year (1994-95). I ignored the light on the south side almost every time, and there's a reason: the officially sanctioned pedestrian pathway is counterintuitive for pedestrian “through traffic” walking between New Hampshire (on the north) and the station. Coming from the north, the authorized path I recall is: walk southwesterly down New Hampshire; cross the north circle roadway to the plaza in a southerly direction (at about 1 o'clock); walk into the plaza and counterclockwise around the statue roughly 150 degrees (to about 8 o'clock), to the crossing point enforced by a break in the fencing; cross the south circle roadway from the plaza in a southwesterly direction along the New Hampshire axis (this is the problem); when you reach the other side, twirl sharp left roughly 135 degrees, walk east to 23rd, then turn right to the station.

It's impossible to overemphasize how annoying the zigzag on the south side of the circle feels to a pedestrian who has to walk those extra paces day after day, especially since he just had to walk in a circle around Washington's statue rather than crossing the plaza in a straight line. Day after day I stood there waiting for the light thinking “Why don't they put a $^@&! crosswalk at the NW corner of 23rd and South Washington Circle, and cut a hole in that $&#@% fence?” (Sure, it sounds petty now, but it is from just such inconveniences that confirmed violators are made.) Pedestrians, like floodwaters, will find the shortest path, and the shortest path for pedestrians crossing South Washington Circle from the plaza is southeasterly through traffic, from the legal crossing point at the 8 o'clock position on the plaza, to the NW corner of 23rd and South Washington Circle — and vice versa on the northbound trip. This movement is discouraged (as I recall) by iron fencing along the southern arc of the circle plaza, but that never stopped me. It's especially treacherous for southbound pedestrians, who have their back to oncoming traffic, but northbound pedestrians have their own version of hell — they often try walking counterclockwise across the complicated lanes on the east side of the circle, which seems shorter but is far more dangerous due to the traffic coming off K Street on the northeast side. I'm amazed I wasn't killed.

By the way, same kind of problem in Dupont Circle, where pedestrians approaching from the east on P Street (where I lived a year ago) feel compelled to cross diagonally through traffic to the Mass Avenue plaza entrance, but at least there are traffic islands.

###############

Over $10,000 Per Student?
Helen Hagerty, Helenmhag@aol.com

I appreciate the comments of Anthony Watts regarding the candidates for School Board in District 1. I'd like to correct this number of $10,000 per student. We often see this figure kicked around and it is inaccurate. DC does not spend over $10,000 per student. It is actually less than half. If we took the overall DCPS budget, including the Special Education private placement tuitions, and divide it by the number of students, we would come up with roughly $10,000. With the Weighted Student Formula budget, schools receive about $4,200 per student. Schools will receive more for Special Ed students. Compared to other states, DC actually spends less per student.

###############

CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS

Trash Force Joins Klingle Valley Cleanup
Paul Nahay, pnahay@sprynet.com

Trash Force's next outing will be this coming Saturday, October 21, meeting at 10:45 am in Klingle Valley, Washington, DC. We'll be joining the Klingle Valley Park Association's cleanup (http://www.klinglevalley.org) of the closed portion of Klingle Road that they are valiantly fighting to SAVE, NOT PAVE. Refreshments will be served. Info at http://pnahay.home.sprynet.com/tforce.htm#Oct21, directions at http://www.klinglevalley.org/directions.html. Please let me know if you're planning to attend (and also if your plans change), and don't forget to bring lots of plastic bags (at least a dozen) and gloves, if you want them!

###############

Advocacy for Children
Susie Cambria, scambria@dckids.org

The Advocacy Initiative to meet Human Needs is sponsoring free training — yes, you can be a budget advocate! November 30 from 11:30 am - 1:30 pm at Western Presbyterian Church, 2401 Virginia Avenue, NW (limited parking available; near Foggy Bottom Metro stop). RSVP by November 20 to DC Action for Children, 234-9404, dcaction@dckids.org. This free introductory session, over a brown bag lunch, will review what budget advocacy means, the role non-profits play in the city's budget, the budget process, and more. Beverages and dessert will be provided.

The Advocacy Initiative to meet Human Needs' training series, “Everyone's an Advocate,” is designed to increase the skill and comfort levels of all budget advocates, new and old alike. Individuals may select one, more or all of the sessions to attend — the goal is a trained and confident advocacy community. January 2001, harnessing the power of the media; February 2001, what is in the Mayor's FY 2002 budget proposal?; March 2001, advocacy day: putting human needs first. For more information about “Everyone's an Advocate,” contact Patty Mullahy Fugere at the Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless, 872-1494.

###############

CLASSIFIEDS — HOUSING

For Rent on Capitol Hill
Ann Bond, ortacb@gwumc.edu

Efficiency one block from Eastern Market, available November 1. Month to month; $700/mo. plus utilities. Call 544-7272.

###############

CLASSIFIEDS — RECOMMENDATIONS

Breakfast in Alexandria
David Sobelsohn, dsobelso@capaccess.org

I'll be taking two out-of-town guests to breakfast (around 9:30 a.m.) on a weekday in Alexandria, probably southern or southwestern Alexandria, between the Wilson Bridge and I-395 (on their way south). Any breakfast suggestions along that route?

###############

Election Night Hangouts?
Dru Sefton, drusefton@hotmail.com

So here we all are, in our nation's capital, with Election Day quickly approaching. This is my first election in town, and I was wondering: where are the good hangouts to watch the votes come in? I don't mean GOP and Dem headquarters, bah. I mean the bars, coffee shops, etc., where people gather to celebrate the grandeur of Democracy in a jovial, bipartisan atmosphere. Or something like that. As always, any and all suggestions greatly appreciated.

###############

themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every Wednesday and Sunday. To subscribe, to change E-mail addresses, or to switch between HTML and plain text versions of themail, use the subscription form at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail/subscribe.htm. To unsubscribe, send an E-mail message to themail@dcwatch.com with “unsubscribe” in the subject line. Archives of past messages are available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.

All postings should also be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com, and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can be put into each mailing.


Send mail with questions or comments to webmaster@dcwatch.com
Web site copyright ©DCWatch (ISSN 1546-4296)