Logosm.gif (1927 bytes)
navlinks.gif (4688 bytes)
Hruler04.gif (5511 bytes)

Back to Regional Mobility Panel main page

Regional Mobility Panel
Principles for Coordinated Bus Service in the Washington Metropolitan Area
September 26, 1997

Home

Bibliography

Calendar

Columns
Dorothy Brizill
Bonnie Cain
Jim Dougherty
Gary Imhoff
Phil Mendelson
Mark David Richards
Sandra Seegars

DCPSWatch

DCWatch Archives
Council Period 12
Council Period 13
Council Period 14

Election 1998
Election 2000
Election 2002

Elections
Election 2004
Election 2006

Government and People
ANC's
Anacostia Waterfront Corporation
Auditor
Boards and Com
BusRegRefCom
Campaign Finance
Chief Financial Officer
Chief Management Officer
City Council
Congress
Control Board
Corporation Counsel
Courts
DC2000
DC Agenda
Elections and Ethics
Fire Department
FOI Officers
Inspector General
Health
Housing and Community Dev.
Human Services
Legislation
Mayor's Office
Mental Health
Motor Vehicles
Neighborhood Action
National Capital Revitalization Corp.
Planning and Econ. Dev.
Planning, Office of
Police Department
Property Management
Public Advocate
Public Libraries
Public Schools
Public Service Commission
Public Works
Regional Mobility Panel
Sports and Entertainment Com.
Taxi Commission
Telephone Directory
University of DC
Water and Sewer Administration
Youth Rehabilitation Services
Zoning Commission

Issues in DC Politics

Budget issues
DC Flag
DC General, PBC
Gun issues
Health issues
Housing initiatives
Mayor’s mansion
Public Benefit Corporation
Regional Mobility
Reservation 13
Tax Rev Comm
Term limits repeal
Voting rights, statehood
Williams’s Fundraising Scandals

Links

Organizations
Appleseed Center
Cardozo Shaw Neigh.Assoc.
Committee of 100
Fed of Citizens Assocs
League of Women Voters
Parents United
Shaw Coalition

Photos

Search

What Is DCWatch?

themail archives

Attachment 1: Regional Service Plan
Attachment 2: New Regional Bus Subsidy Allocation Formula
Attachment 3: WMATA Service and Financial Commitment/Metrobus Service and Productivity Enhancement Program
Attachment 4: Five-Year Transition Plan
Attachment 5: Regional Financial Agreement

Principles for Coordinated Bus Service in the Washington Metropolitan Area

1. Regional Bus System

The Regional Mobility Panel has defined an integrated regional bus system that is to be planned, funded and operated in a manner similar to the approach that has long existed for the successful Metrorail system. Under the current system, services operated by Metrobus are only nominally regional, as policy decisions on fares and services are largely determined by local jurisdictions.

Under the integrated regional bus system proposed by the Panel, for the first time there will be an ongoing commitment by local jurisdictions to a set of truly regional bus services planned and operated by WMATA in consultation with local jurisdictions. These bus services will be coordinated and integrated with a set of non-regional bus services planned and provided through decisions by local jurisdictions.

II.. Regional Service Plan

In the defined bus system, regional and non-regional bus routes are distinguished to serve properly markets in the Washington metropolitan area. The new regional service plan ensures predictability and stability of the existing bus services and fosters the development of new bus services. This includes criteria that will generally define regional routes and non-regional routes for both the present and the future, while acknowledging the bus services already provided by local jurisdictions.

III. New Regional Bus Subsidy Allocation Formula

A new benefit-based subsidy allocation formula for regional bus routes will be adopted to address inequities and inefficiencies in the existing formula. The revised formula is keyed to the existing and regionally accepted formula for the Metrorail system. It will be updated periodically to remain current and equitable. In addition, efforts will be made to establish an incentive tier to reward actions that result in increased ridership.

IV. WMATA Service and Financial Commitment

WMATA commits to maintain constant average regional bus fares and to maintain bus subsidy levels through aggressive cost controls, and pledges to continue to deliver quality bus service and to advance service improvement strategies under the Service and Productivity Enhancement Program for the five year period FY 1998- 2002.

V. Five-Year Transition Plan

A five-year transition period to the regional and non-regional bus system structure will be adopted, based on staged implementation, which assumes no layoffs of WMATA unionized operating employees. The transition plan will include strategies to improve bus service through coordinated service planning and establishment of service quality standards, to be defined jointly by WMATA and local jurisdictions; fare simplification and integration; comprehensive marketing and customer information services; and market-driven service planning. These strategies are designed to make the region's bus services more 'user friendly' and customer oriented, with the goal of providing incentives to increase ridership.

Vl. Regional Financial Agreement

Local jurisdictions will enter into an interjurisdictional financial agreement with WMATA to participate in the regional bus system in accordance with the regional service plan, new subsidy allocation formula and five-year transition plan.

VII. Long-Term Funding Strategy

The Regional Mobility Panel agrees that there is a need to define the magnitude of the funding requirements for the WMATA bus and rail Capital Improvement Program (CIP), and acknowledges its responsibility to address and resolve the issue. It agrees to reconvene upon receipt of the recommendations of the Transit Funding Subcommittee, and to meet and confer during a six-month period resulting in a final course of action designed to ensure a reliable, predictable and adequate amount of funding for this purpose. The region together will pursue, support and implement necessary actions in the District of Columbia, Maryland, Virginia and the U.S. Congress during the five-year transition period to fully fund the annual needs of the CIP as determined by the Panel.

Back to top of page

Attachment 1: Regional Service Plan

Criteria for Regional and Non-Regional Routes

Based on principles established by the Regional Mobility Panel, criteria were developed that recognize the distinction between regional and non regional bus routes and various service markets. Regional bus routes generally provide transportation between jurisdictions. Regional bus routes also may include bus routes that serve major activity centers, that operate on major arterial streets and carry high volumes of ridership either in one jurisdiction or in multiple jurisdictions.

Existing Metrobus service was evaluated to determine which bus routes met these criteria; bus routes currently operated by local governments were 'grandfathered' into the non- regional category. The following table shows the result of the analysis of Metrobus routes. WMATA will have responsibility for operating regional bus routes. Local jurisdictions will have responsibility for determining how non-regional bus routes will be provided. WMATA intends to compete aggressively to provide service on non-regional bus routes under contract to these local jurisdictions.

The following are the specific criteria used by the Regional Mobility Panel to disaggregrate current Metrobus routes into regional and non-regional categories. This criteria is also to be used for determining appropriate future route assignments for the region.

Interjurisdictional - A route is automatically a regional route if it:

  • crosses a jurisdictional (independent city, county, state) boundary; and

  • penetrates at least two jurisdictions by more than one-half mile in each; and

  • operates "open door" (allows boarding and alighting) over at least a portion of the line in two or more jurisdictions.

If a route does not qualify as regional under the interjurisdictional definition, then it must meet at least two of the following three criteria to be regional:

Arterial streets

  • operates for a considerable distance on an arterial street and a substantial portion (usually a majority) of riders use stops on the arterial street. Routes which operate for a short distance on an arterial incidental to their service areas are not included.

Regional activity center

  • serves one or more regional activity centers. A conservative definition of regional activity centers was used, including only those where there is virtually universal agreement as to their regional character. (Routes which feed Metrorail stations but which do not directly serve any regional activity center were not considered to be regional).

Cost effectiveness

  • Annual boardings per annual platform hour greater than 30 applied consistently in all jurisdictions.

[A table of routes of regional significance and a profile of regional bus services are omitted here.]

Back to top of page

Attachment 2: New Regional Bus Subsidy Allocation Formula

Regional Mobility Panel Findings Regarding Current Formula:

Outdated Information:

  • The current formula relies on outdated information, such as the distribution of 1975 peak period buses to allocate certain costs

Business Planning:

  • The current formula reduces management's ability to implement system cost saving actions because these actions may result in cost increases in some jurisdictions

Artificial Financial Incentives/Disincentives:

  • Under the current formula, jurisdictions that reduce bus service save more than the resulting system savings and jurisdictions that increase bus service pay more than the resulting system cost increases

Cost Shifting:

  • As bus service is reduced in any one jurisdiction, the unit costs for all remaining bus service increases resulting in cost increases in jurisdictions that do not change their service

Goals Associated with a Revised Allocation Procedure:

  • Develop easy-to-understand formula
  • Rely on information that can be periodically updated
  • Develop formula that allows WMATA to make rational business decisions
  • Develop formula that reduces incentives to eliminate service and increases incentives for ridership growth
  • Develop formula that is similar to regionally accepted Metrorail allocation process

Recommended Changes:

  • Allocate Metrobus subsidy regionally
  • Use data that can be periodically updated
  • Allocate subsidy based on benefits received in each jurisdiction
  • Convert to new formula for regional services in FY 1999, with annual transition limits
  • Evaluate carefully the mechanisms to implement a ridership incentive factor

Shown on the next page is the new regional bus subsidy allocation formula as endorsed by the Regional Mobility Panel at its September 9, 1997 meeting.

Back to top of page

Attachment 3: WMATA Service and Financial Commitment/Metrobus Service and Productivity Program

Metrobus Subsidies:

  • No increase in subsidies for regional service or for WMATA-provided non-regional bus service through FY 2002
  • WMATA will strive to provide non-regional services at rates that are competitive with the local market
  • Constraints on subsidies are exclusive of any unfunded federal mandates, reductions in federal operating assistance or mitigating emergency circumstances

Metrobus Passenger Fares:

  • No increase in the average passenger fare through FY 2002
  • Propose and implement fare simplification and integration
  • Local jurisdictions may continue to maintain fare incentives through buydown programs

Regional Customer Service:

  • Maintain baseline level of regional bus service with appropriate changes related to Metrorail openings
  • Develop comprehensive and integrated regional customer service and marketing program
  • Plan new service initiatives targeted toward under served and unserved markets (implementation subject to the availability of funding)

Regional Bus Service Planning:

  • WMATA and local governments jointly establish a coordinated service planning process that addresses:
  • quality standards (such as on-time performance, cleanliness.convenience, etc.) for regional and non-regional bus routes
  • regional and non-regional route service modifications
  • regional and non-regional transit service needs
  • Consistent with these standards:
  • WMATA plans and operates the regional bus routes
  • consultative process with local governments
  • decisions based on need and cost
  • Local governments plan non-regional routes
  • coordinated with regional routes to the extent practical

Go to tables for Attachment 3

Back to top of page

Attachment 4: Five-Year Transition Plan

Five-Year Transition Plan
Schedule of Actions by Fiscal Year

Year One
FY 98 (7/1/97 - 6/30/98)

  • Regional Mobility Panel approves Principles for Coordinated Bus Service in the Washington Metropolitan Area and recommends final report to the WMATA Board for subsequent approval and submission of the final report to Congress
  • Local governments enter into an interjurisdictional financial agreement with WMATA by March 31, 1998
  • WMATA finalizes detailed Five-Year Transition Plan, in coordination with local jurisdictions
  • Service quality standards and guidelines for regional and non-regional bus routes cooperatively developed between WMATA and local jurisdictions
  • Local plans developed for non-regional bus routes, including determinations on use of WMATA as a contract operator for non-regional bus routes
  • New "experimental" regional services examined for possible early implementation

Year Two
FY 99 (7/1/98 - 6/30/99)

  • Conversion to a new subsidy allocation formula with annual transition limits
  • All non-regional bus routes funded separately by being moved into a new and distinct accounting format for subsidy purposes
  • Non-regional bus service plans begin (up to 25% of total non-regional bus routes may be operated by local governments)
  • Fare simplification/integration plan developed by WMATA in cooperation with local jurisdictions
  • Service plan developed by WMATA for under served and unserved markets
  • Comprehensive and integrated regional customer information and marketing program developed by WMATA

Year Three
FY 00 (7/1/99 - 6/30/00)

  • Non-regional plans continued (up to 50% of total non-regional bus routes may be operated by local governments)
  • New service initiatives implemented (as funding permits)
  • New simplified and integrated fare structure implemented
  • Initial review of accomplishments toward cost containment goal and updated review of regional transit service plan
  • Implementation of the comprehensive and integrated regional customer information and marketing program

Year Four
FY 01 (7/1/00 - 6/30/01)

  • Non-regional service plans continued (up to 75% of total non-regional bus routes may be operated by local governments)

Year Five
FY 02 (7/1/01 - 6/30/02)

  • Non-regional service plan complete (up to 100% of total non-regional bus routes may be operated by local governments)
  • Final review of accomplishments toward cost containment goal (end of FY 2002) and updated review of regional transit service plan

Notes:

1. Decisions on operation of non-regional bus routes may occur beyond the five-year time frame if required or desired by local jurisdictions
2. The concept of an incentive factor for the subsidy allocation formula will continue to be refined and pursued during the time frame
3. Updated reviews of the regional transit service plan to occur every two years

Five-Year Transition Plan
Summary of Actions

Bus Service:

  • In FY 1999, regional and non-regional bus routes will be separately budgeted to ensure that neither the regional bus subsidy nor any individual jurisdiction is affected by any change that might occur on non-regional services except for the jurisdiction proposing the change
  • Any jurisdiction assuming operation of Metrobus non-regional routes must agree to maintain service standards
  • Maximum level of redesignated non-regional service that may be operated by local governments is not to exceed 25% per year

Regional Subsidy Allocation

  • New subsidy allocation formula will be implemented in FY 1999, with specified annual transition limits
  • During the transition period (FY 1999-2002) the total subsidy for regional bus service and the average bus fare levels will not increase

Service Planning:

  • Non-regional service planning will be accomplished by local jurisdictions in consultation with WMATA
  • Regional service planning will be conducted by WMATA in consultation with all jurisdictions
  • Regional transit service plan will be re-evaluated every two years, based on market changes and consistent with the final criteria for regional services
  • All bus services in the region will be coordinated by WMATA through a panel of the region's bus/transit managers
  • Regional and non-regional service quality standards will be developed
  • Unserved and under served markets will be identified and service initiatives proposed within funding limits
  • New integrated and comprehensive regional customer service and marketing programs will be developed to promote and enhance bus services

Back to top of page

Attachment 5: Regional Financial Agreement

  • The parties will enter into an Interjurisdictional financial agreement with WMATA to participate in the regional Metrobus system by March 31, 1998. The initial term of the commitment is for five years. They further agree to review the structure and extent of the regional bus system every two years to determine its adequacy. Any adjustments to the regional bus system will be approved by the WMATA Board, subject to funding limits in agreements with local jurisdictions.
  • Subject to appropriation, local jurisdictions commit to funding the costs of operating the regional bus service at specified levels.
  • By May 1 of each year (depending on each jurisdiction's annual budget cycle), local jurisdictions will notify WMATA of their commitment to fund the operating subsidy for regional bus services for the following year.
  • WMATA commits to continuing operation of regional bus service at or above the established levels for regional services for the period FY 98 through FY 02. Thereafter, regional bus service levels are determined by standards established and approved funding levels. All parties agree to maximize efforts designed to increase ridership.
  • WMATA commits to maintaining average bus fares at levels presently in effect for the period FY 98 through FY 02.
  • Agreement is subject to participation by all WMATA member jurisdictions.
  • WMATA's ability to fulfill its commitments is subject to continuation of Federal operating assistance. no new Federal mandates affecting costs or service, and mitigating emergency circumstances.
  • Agreement commits the region to pursue, support and implement necessary actions in the District of Columbia, Maryland, Virginia and the U.S. Congress during the five- year transition period to fully fund the annual needs of the WMATA Capital Improvement Program, as determined by the Panel.

Back to top of page


Send mail with questions or comments to webmaster@dcwatch.com
Web site copyright ©DCWatch (ISSN 1546-4296)