Logosm.gif (1927 bytes)
navlinks.gif (4688 bytes)
Hruler04.gif (5511 bytes)

Back to Office of Tax and Revenue scandal main pageBack to Office of the Chief Financial Officer main page

Deborah K. Nichols, DC Auditor
Testimony
Committee of the Whole and Committee on Finance and Revenue joint public oversight roundtable on the operations of the Office of Tax and Revenue

November 15, 2007

Home

Bibliography

Calendar

Columns
Dorothy Brizill
Bonnie Cain
Jim Dougherty
Gary Imhoff
Phil Mendelson
Mark David Richards
Sandra Seegars

DCPSWatch

DCWatch Archives
Council Period 12
Council Period 13
Council Period 14

Election 1998
Election 2000
Election 2002

Elections
Election 2004
Election 2006

Government and People
ANC's
Anacostia Waterfront Corporation
Auditor
Boards and Com
BusRegRefCom
Campaign Finance
Chief Financial Officer
Chief Management Officer
City Council
Congress
Control Board
Corporation Counsel
Courts
DC2000
DC Agenda
Elections and Ethics
Fire Department
FOI Officers
Inspector General
Health
Housing and Community Dev.
Human Services
Legislation
Mayor's Office
Mental Health
Motor Vehicles
Neighborhood Action
National Capital Revitalization Corp.
Planning and Econ. Dev.
Planning, Office of
Police Department
Property Management
Public Advocate
Public Libraries
Public Schools
Public Service Commission
Public Works
Regional Mobility Panel
Sports and Entertainment Com.
Taxi Commission
Telephone Directory
University of DC
Water and Sewer Administration
Youth Rehabilitation Services
Zoning Commission

Issues in DC Politics

Budget issues
DC Flag
DC General, PBC
Gun issues
Health issues
Housing initiatives
Mayor’s mansion
Public Benefit Corporation
Regional Mobility
Reservation 13
Tax Rev Comm
Term limits repeal
Voting rights, statehood
Williams’s Fundraising Scandals

Links

Organizations
Appleseed Center
Cardozo Shaw Neigh.Assoc.
Committee of 100
Fed of Citizens Assocs
League of Women Voters
Parents United
Shaw Coalition

Photos

Search

What Is DCWatch?

themail archives

TESTIMONY OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AUDITOR DEBORAH K. NICHOLS

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
CHAIRMAN VINCENT C. GRAY
COMMITTEE ON FINANCE AND REVENUE
COUNCILMEMBER JACK EVANS, CHAIR

JOINT PUBLIC OVERSIGHT ROUNDTABLE ON THE OPERATIONS OF THE OFFICE OF TAX AND REVENUE

November 15, 2007 - 1:00 PM

CHAIRMAN GRAY, COUNCILMEMBER EVANS, AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AND COMMITTEE ON FINANCE AND REVENUE:

Thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today to summarize the major findings and recommendations contained in District of Columbia Auditor reports on the operations of the Office of Tax and Revenue. I am Deborah K. Nichols, District of Columbia Auditor.

Summary of Relevant D.C. Auditor Reports Issued on the Office of Tax and Revenue

Over the past several years the Office of the District of Columbia Auditor has conducted several examinations of the operations of the Office of Tax and Revenue. In my testimony today, I will briefly summarize a few of these reports. I will begin with our reports entitled, "Comparative Analysis of Actual Cash Collections to Revised Revenue Estimates" in which we repeatedly noted the anomaly in real property tax refunds as follows:

1. In our July 16, 2004 report entitled, "Comparative Analysis of Actual Cash Collections to Revised Revenue Estimates Through the 1s` Quarter of Fiscal Year 2004", at Page 5, we stated:

The Auditor notes that real property tax refunds through the 15t quarter totaled $5.7 million and were $1.1 million, or 25.2% higher than the CFO's $4.5 million estimate. By comparison, refunds through the 151 quarter of FY 2004 were $2.54 million, or 81.2%, higher than refunds through the 15C quarter of FY2003.

...The increase in refunds through the 1'C quarter of FY 2004 may have contributed, in part, to the overall decrease in collections in the real property tax category. ORA [Office of Research and Analysis] representatives could not explain why collections were so low in the 15` quarter of FY 2004. They did indicate that collections of real property tax in the 15C quarter historically represent late payments of the previous year's real property tax and are not a true indicator of collections for the current fiscal years.

2. In our July 30, 2004 report entitled, "Comparative Analysis of Actual Cash Collections to Revised Revenue Estimates Through the 2°d Quarter of Fiscal Year 2004", at Page 5, we stated:

Collections of real property tax [were] lower than the estimate, in part, because of: (1) an increase in real property tax refunds; and (2) administrative issues pertaining to the Board of Real Property Assessments and Appeals (BRPAA). Through the 2nd quarter, real property tax refunds totaled $11.9 million against an estimate of $7.3 million. Refunds exceeded the estimate by $4.7 million, or 63%. When compared with the same period in fiscal year 2003, refunds through the 2nd quarter were up by 116%.

District officials should closely monitor this revenue source in the 3rd and 4th quarters of the fiscal year.

3. In our September 7, 2004 report entitled, "Comparative Analysis of Actual Cash Collections to Revised Revenue Estimates Through the 3rd Quarter of Fiscal Year 2004", at Page 6, we stated:

The Auditor notes that real property tax refunds through the 3rd quarter totaled $21.3 million. These refunds were $10.9 million, or 105.7%, higher than the $10.3 million estimate. By comparison, refunds through the 3rd quarter of FY 2004 were $12.8 million, or 149%, higher than refunds through the 3rd quarter of FY 2003.

Despite the fact that real property collections were above the estimate through the 3rd quarter, ORA officials should monitor this revenue source closely.

4. In our August 17, 2006 report entitled, "Comparative Analysis of Actual Cash Collections to Revised Revenue Estimates Through the 1st Quarter of Fiscal Year 2006", at Page 6, we stated:

The Auditor notes that real property tax refunds through the 1st quarter totaled $6.6 million and were $808,000, or 13.8%, higher than the CFO's $5.8 million estimate. Also, refunds through the 1st quarter of FY 2006 were $408,000, or 6.5%, higher than refunds through the 1st quarter of FY 2005. Because real property tax collections are presented net of refunds, and refunds through the 1st quarter of FY 2006 were slightly higher than estimated, the slight increase in refunds may also have contributed to the decrease in collections in the real property tax category.

The Office of the District of Columbia Auditor also issued the following additional reports that contain findings and recommendations on the operations of the Office of Tax and Revenue:

1. November 19, 2001 report entitled, "Homestead Tax Deduction Program Deficiencies May Have Caused the District to Lose As Much As $44.7 Million During Fiscal Years 1998 Through 2000.

2. September 30, 2004 report entitled, "Analysis of the Office of the Chief Financial Officer's Exceptions Account for Fiscal Years 2003 and 2004, as of June 2004." The Exceptions Account was created primarily as a holding account for the deposit of sales and use tax return payments with problems. The Auditor reviewed deposits made to the Exceptions Account and found that during fiscal years 2002 and the 1st quarter of 2003, OTR officials did not always reconcile deposits timely. OTR's failure to do so delayed the transfer of dedicated tax revenues owed to the Washington Convention Center Authority.

3. August 25, 2006 report entitled, Auditor's Examination of the Escrow Account Established by Accenture and the Office of Tax and Revenue (OTR) in Connection with Contract Number DCFRA #99-C-004", also known as the Integrated Tax System contract. The Auditor's examination of the ITS contract retainage escrow account revealed several internal control weaknesses, operational inefficiencies, and issues of non-compliance.

4. August 28, 2006 report entitled, "Auditor's Performance Review of the Integrated Tax System's Processes Related to the Timeliness of Tax Refunds and Deposits of Tax Payments." This examination revealed several weaknesses in internal controls and instances of noncompliance with applicable District guidelines. These conditions resulted in inefficient ITS usage, presented opportunities for financial improprieties and, in some instances, facilitated the system's generation of inaccurate and unreliable information.

5. Soon to be released report entitled, "Auditor's Examination of Contract Cost and Administration for the Integrated Tax System," in which we report on significant weaknesses in internal controls and numerous deficiencies in the ITS contract management and administration process.

The recently disclosed theft of District real property tax revenue is a travesty. More importantly, it soundly and inescapably brings to our attention the very high risk of loss and harm posed to our taxpayer funds by internal control, management accountability, and accounting inadequacies and deficiencies that are ignored or poorly addressed. These problems continue to exist within the District's tax collection and financial management accountability systems.

Chairman Gray, Councilmember Evans, members of the Committee, thank you again for the opportunity to appear before you today. I am prepared to respond to any questions that you may have at this time.

Back to top of page


Send mail with questions or comments to webmaster@dcwatch.com
Web site copyright ©DCWatch (ISSN 1546-4296)