Logosm.gif (1927 bytes)
navlinks.gif (4688 bytes)
Hruler04.gif (5511 bytes)

Back to Video Lottery Terminal Initiative of 2004 main page

DCWatch and DC Against Slots
Motion in Opposition to the Motion to Intervene by Ester Baxley on Initiative 68
August 31, 2004

Home

Bibliography

Calendar

Columns
Dorothy Brizill
Bonnie Cain
Jim Dougherty
Gary Imhoff
Phil Mendelson
Mark David Richards
Sandra Seegars

DCPSWatch

DCWatch Archives
Council Period 12
Council Period 13
Council Period 14

Election 1998
Election 2000
Election 2002

Elections
Election 2004
Election 2006

Government and People
ANC's
Anacostia Waterfront Corporation
Auditor
Boards and Com
BusRegRefCom
Campaign Finance
Chief Financial Officer
Chief Management Officer
City Council
Congress
Control Board
Corporation Counsel
Courts
DC2000
DC Agenda
Elections and Ethics
Fire Department
FOI Officers
Inspector General
Health
Housing and Community Dev.
Human Services
Legislation
Mayor's Office
Mental Health
Motor Vehicles
Neighborhood Action
National Capital Revitalization Corp.
Planning and Econ. Dev.
Planning, Office of
Police Department
Property Management
Public Advocate
Public Libraries
Public Schools
Public Service Commission
Public Works
Regional Mobility Panel
Sports and Entertainment Com.
Taxi Commission
Telephone Directory
University of DC
Water and Sewer Administration
Youth Rehabilitation Services
Zoning Commission

Issues in DC Politics

Budget issues
DC Flag
DC General, PBC
Gun issues
Health issues
Housing initiatives
Mayor’s mansion
Public Benefit Corporation
Regional Mobility
Reservation 13
Tax Rev Comm
Term limits repeal
Voting rights, statehood
Williams’s Fundraising Scandals

Links

Organizations
Appleseed Center
Cardozo Shaw Neigh.Assoc.
Committee of 100
Fed of Citizens Assocs
League of Women Voters
Parents United
Shaw Coalition

Photos

Search

What Is DCWatch?

themail archives

No. 04-AA-957

IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR THE D.C. VIDEO LOTTERY TERMINAL INITIATIVE, Petitioner,
v. 
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND ETHICS, Respondent, 
and 
RONALD L. DRAKE,
DOROTHY A. BRIZILL, DCWATCH 
and 
DEAN J. SNYDER, DC AGAINST SLOTS, Intervenors 

On Petition for Review of the District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics

Motion in Opposition to the Motion to Intervene of Ester Baxley, et al. by DCWatch and DC Against Slots

Dorothy Brizill, pro se 
DCWatch 
1327 Girard Street, NW 
Washington, DC 20009 

Carol Colbeth (D.C. Bar No. 439198)
DC Against Slots
208 Franklin Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20901

Back to top of page


LIST OF PARTIES

1. Petitioner Citizens Committee for the District of Columbia Video Lottery Terminal Initiative, represented by:

George W. Jones, Jr.
Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP
1501 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20005

Erik S. Jaffe
Law Office of Erik S. Jaffe, P.C.
5101 34th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20008

John Ray
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
700 12th Street, NW, Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005-4075

2. Respondent District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, represented by:

Kenneth J. McGhie, General Counsel
Alice Miller, Acting General Counsel
Terri Stroud, Staff Attorney
DC Board of Elections and Ethics
441 4th Street, NW, Suite 270
Washington, DC 20001

3. Intervenor Ronald L. Drake, Pro Se
5 P Street, SW
Washington, DC 20024

4. Intervenor DCWatch, Pro Se
Dorothy Brizill
DCWatch
1327 Girard Street, NW
Washington, DC 20009

5. Intervenor DC Against Slots
Reverend Dean L. Snyder
DC Against Slots
333 A Street, NE
Washington, DC 20002

Carol Colbeth (Bar No. 439198)
Attorney of Record
DC Against Slots
208 Franklin Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20901

6. Proposed Intervenor Ester Baxley, et al.
Jeffrey D. Robinson, Esq. (D.C. Bar No. 376037)
Baach Robinson & Lewis PLLC
1201 F Street, NW, Suite 500
Washington, DC 20004-1225

7. Proposed amicus curiae
Arthur B. Spitzer
American Civil Liberties Union of the National Capital Area
1400 20th Street, NW, #119
Washington, DC 20036

Back to top of page


Intervenors DCWatch and DC Against Slots oppose the motion to intervene by Ester Baxley, et al., on four grounds. First, although attorneys for the proposed intervenors were fully aware of the issue and were on notice of the case, they chose to intervene at the last minute and then failed to serve opposing parties properly and in a timely manner. Second, we object to the unrepresentativeness of the class of individuals the motion purports to represent. Third, we object to the attempt by the proposed intervenor to introduce new evidence into the record. Fourth, we object to the form of the declarations attached to the motion to intervene.

Failure to serve parties properly and in a timely manner

The rules of intervention of the DC Court of Appeals state that, "A copy of the motion must be served on all parties" (Rule 15(b)). The certificate of service filed with the Motion to Intervene of Ester Baxley, et al., states that a copy of the motion and its accompanying brief were hand-delivered to the parties on Thursday, August 26, 2004, the date that the motion and brief were filed with the Court. In actuality, service on the parties was accomplished by first-class mail. DCWatch and DC Against Slots received their copies of the motion and brief by mail on Saturday, August 28, 2004. The District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics did not receive its copy of the motion and brief by mail until Monday, August 30, 2004.

This occurrence is especially troubling, since parties have subsequently learned that the attorney for the intervenors issued a press release on Thursday, August 26, and had copies of that press release and its motion and brief hand delivered to at least some media outlets on that day.

In its order dated August 17, 2004, the Court set an expedited briefing schedule and directed all parties to hand serve copies of all pleadings on each other. Moreover, in the August 17, 2004, order, the DC Board of Elections and Ethics and intervenors DCWatch, DC Against Slots, and attorney Ronald Drake were directed to file their briefs no later than August 27, 2004.

It should also be noted that attorneys for the proposed intervenors did not, as a courtesy, inform DCWatch, DC Against Slots, attorney Drake, or the DC Board of Elections and Ethics of their intention to intervene prior to their filing their motion and brief. The proposed intervenor's failure to serve opposing parties in a timely manner prevented us from being able to address the issues they raised. It is reasonable to conclude that the attorney for the proposed intervenors deliberately chose not to serve the opposing parties prior to August 27, 2004, so that we would not be aware of the proposed intervention and would not be able to address any of the issues raised in the proposed brief of the intervenors in our briefs that were due on August 27, 2004.

Opposition to class of individuals

The motion to intervene by Ester Baxley, et al., is filed on behalf of two petition circulators, Bobbie Diggs and Charles Thornton, as well as of sixteen individuals who signed petition sheets for Initiative 68. The motion and the brief present no reason to believe that the two named individuals who circulated petitions while in the employ of Stars and Stripes are representative of the sixty-seven DC resident circulators who circulated petitions on behalf of Stars and Stripes, and whose petitions were stricken by the DC Board of Elections and Ethics. In addition, the motion and the brief present no reason to believe that the sixteen individuals who signed petitions circulated by Stars and Stripes were representative of the DC registered voters who signed those petitions. Indeed, out of the thousands of registered voters who signed petitions circulated by Stars and Stripes, the attorneys have been able to locate only sixteen registered voters who signed those petitions who believe that the petition was fairly and accurately presented to them, and who believe that they are being disenfranchised because petitions attributed to Stars and Stripes were stricken because of widespread and pervasive false circulator affidavits, fraud, forgery, and misrepresentation. That in itself is evidence that the class is not representative.

Opposition to the Introduction of New Evidence

The motion to intervene and the accompanying brief attempt to introduce new evidence and testimony through declarations into the record. With the exception of Bobbie Diggs, none of the proposed intervenors testified or requested to testify at the Board of Elections and Ethics hearing. None was called as a witness by the Citizens Committee for Video Lottery Terminals. The proposed intervenors are attempting to retry the case on the basis of declarations; the parties will have no opportunity to cross examine the individuals who make these declarations or to introduce new evidence themselves to refute them.

Opposition to the Declarations

The declarations attached to the motion to intervene are deficient, in that they are neither sworn affidavits nor are they notarized.

DCWatch and DC Against Slots will not at this time make a substantive reply to the brief of the proposed intervenors; however, should the Court grant the proposed intervenor's motion to intervene or allow them to file an amicus curiae brief, we request that the Court grant us adequate time to reply.

Respectfully submitted,
Dorothy Brizill
DCWatch
1327 Girard Street, NW
Washington, DC 20009

Carol Colbeth (Bar No. 439198)
DC Against Slots
208 Franklin Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20901

Back to top of page


CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Motion in Opposition to the Motion to Intervene of Ester Baxley, et al., by DCWatch and DC Against Slots was hereby delivered by facsimile or by E-mail (by permission of the receivers) this 31st day of August 2004 upon the following:

George W. Jones, Jr.
Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP
1501 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20005

Erik S. Jaffe
Law Office of Erik S. Jaffe, P.C.
5101 34th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20008

John Ray
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
700 12th Street, NW, Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005-4075

Kenneth J. McGhie, General Counsel
Alice Miller, Acting General Counsel
Terri Stroud, Staff Attorney
DC Board of Elections and Ethics
441 4th Street, NW, Suite 270
Washington, DC 20001

Ronald L. Drake, Pro Se
5 P Street, SW
Washington, DC 20024

Jeffrey D. Robinson, Esq. (D.C. Bar No. 376037)
Baach Robinson & Lewis PLLC
1201 F Street, NW, Suite 500
Washington, DC 20004-1225
FAX: 202-466-5738

Arthur B. Spitzer
American Civil Liberties Union of the National Capital Area
1400 20th Street, NW, #119
Washington, DC 20036
FAX: 202-452-1868
ArtSpitzer@aol.com

Dorothy A. Brizill

Back to top of page


Send mail with questions or comments to webmaster@dcwatch.com
Web site copyright ©DCWatch (ISSN 1546-4296)